Self-development groups reduce medical school stress: a controlled intervention study.

BACKGROUND: High stress levels and mental health problems are common among medical students and there is a lack of studies on group interventions that aim to reduce such distress during medical school. METHODS: A full class of students (n = 129) participated in group sessions during their third year of medical school in Bergen, Norway. The subsequent third-year class (n = 152) acted as control group, in order to create a quasi-experimental design. Two types of group intervention sessions were offered to the first class. One option was self-development groups led by trained group psychotherapists. Alternatively, students could choose discussion groups that focused on themes of special relevance to doctors, led by experienced general practitioners. The intervention comprised of 12 weekly group sessions each lasting 90 minutes. Data were gathered before the intervention (T1), and three months post intervention (T2). Distress was measured using the Perceived Medical School Stress (PMSS) and Symptom Check List-5 (SCL-5) assessments. RESULTS: The intervention group showed a significant reduction in PMSS over the observation period. The subsequent year control group stayed on the same PMSS levels over the similar period. The intervention was a significant predictor of PMSS reduction in a multiple regression analysis adjusted for age and sex, beta = -1.93 (-3.47 to -0.38), P = 0.02. When we analysed the effects of self-development and discussion groups with the control group as reference, self-development group was the only significant predictor of PMSS reduction, beta = -2.18 (-4.03 to -0.33), P = 0.02. There was no interaction with gender in our analysis. This implicates no significant difference between men and women concerning the effect of the self-development group. There was no reduction in general mental distress (SCL-5) over this period. CONCLUSION: A three-month follow-up showed that the intervention had a positive effect on perceived medical school stress among the students, and further analyses showed this was due to participation in self-development groups.

Frequency and characteristics of recurrent major depressed patients with unimpaired executive functions.

Major depression is associated with impairment of cognitive functions, and especially higher-order cognitive processes referred to as executive functions (EF). Whether this is a general finding is unclear. Patients without EF impairment may have different treatment needs than patients with EF impairment, and will probably have a better everyday functioning. Thus, it is important to identify the prevalence and characteristics of depressed patients without EF impairment. Forty-three patients with recurrent major depressive disorder (19-51 years) and 50 healthy controls were included in the study. The subjects were assessed with neuropsychological tests selected to measure central areas of EF, and screened on clinical and demographic variables. Within the depressed group, a total of 56% were defined as EF unimpaired. These patients were characterised by higher intellectual abilities and fewer depression episodes than the subgroup of patients with EF impairment. The subgroups were similar in age at debut of illness, severity of depression, general psychopathology and global level of functioning. In conclusion, about half of patients with recurrent major depression have normal EF. Since cognitive impairment and depressive symptomatology seem to be distinct dimensions, a neuropsychological investigation could help to ensure optimal treatment in patients with recurrent major depression.

Early visual information processing in schizophrenia compared to recurrent depression.

Patients with schizophrenia have repeatedly shown deficits in early visual processing using backward masking (VBM) tasks. Whether this represents a specific dysfunction in schizophrenia is an unsolved question. Patients with recurrent unipolar depression represent an interesting comparison group to examine the question of specificity, but have never previously been assessed on VBM. In addition to comparing VBM performance in patients with schizophrenia and patients with depression, we wanted to examine the relations between VBM and clinical symptoms. Fifty-one patients with schizophrenia were compared to 49 patients with recurrent unipolar depression and 47 healthy controls. All subjects were administered a two-digit identification task in a no-masking and four masking conditions. Patients with schizophrenia performed significantly worse than normal controls on four of the five conditions. No significant difference was found between depression patients and normal controls. The effect of masking stimuli had no differential effects on the three groups. VBM correlated strongly with positive symptoms in the schizophrenia group.

Brain activation measured with fMRI during a mental arithmetic task in schizophrenia and major depression.

OBJECTIVE: The authors used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to investigate brain activation in patients with schizophrenia and major depression while they performed two tasks-a vigilance task and a mental arithmetic task-that differed in cognitive complexity. METHOD: In the vigilance task, the participants had to press a response button whenever a specific number was seen on a screen inside the MR scanner. In the mental arithmetic task, the participants had to add two consecutive numbers and press the response button whenever the sum was 10. fMRI was performed with a 1.5-T MR scanner. Twelve patients with recurrent nonpsychotic unipolar major depression, 12 patients with schizophrenia, and 12 healthy comparison subjects were included in the study. RESULTS: Performance data showed that the patients were impaired relative to the comparison subjects and showed no difference in performance between the patient groups. The patients with schizophrenia, but not those with major depression, had less activation in prefrontal brain regions, relative to the comparison participants. However, subtracting brain activation during the vigilance task from activation during the mental arithmetic task showed that the schizophrenia patients had activation in parietal areas. CONCLUSIONS: A double dissociation of parietal and frontal lobe activation was found for the schizophrenia patients and the depression patients. The greater parietal lobe activation in the patients with schizophrenia may reflect a compensatory strategy for the failure to recruit cognitive processes that involve frontal lobe areas when solving a mental arithmetic task.

Impairment across executive functions in recurrent major depression.

Depression is associated with impairment of cognitive functions, and especially executive functions (EFs). Despite the fact that most depressed patients experience recurrence of episodes, the pattern and the severity of executive impairment have not been well characterized in this group of depressed patients. We asked if and to what extent these patients were impaired on a range of neuropsychological tests measuring EFs, and also when confounding factors were adjusted for. Forty-five patients (aged 19-51 years) with moderate to severe (Hamilton score >18) recurrent major depressive disorder (DSM-IV) were compared to 50 healthy controls matched on age, education, gender and intellectual abilities. The subjects were administered a set of neuropsychological tests that assesses sub-components of EFs. The depressed patients were impaired compared to the control group on all selected tests, with a severity of impairment within -1 standard deviation from the control group mean. The group difference was statistically significant for eight of the 10 EFs that were assessed. These were measures of verbal fluency, inhibition, working memory, set-maintenance and set-shifting. The group difference was still significant for all sub-components except for set-shifting (Wisconsin Card Sorting Test) and planning (Tower of London), when additional medication and retarded psychomotor speed was adjusted for. In conclusion, the depressed subjects were mildly impaired across a wide range of EFs. This may have a negative impact on everyday functioning for this group of patients.

Attentional and executive dysfunctions in schizophrenia and depression: evidence from dichotic listening performance.

BACKGROUND: We compared performance on a dichotic listening (DL) task between schizophrenic, depressed, and healthy control subjects. A variant of the traditional DL paradigm was used in which the subjects were required to focus attention either on the left (forced-left condition) or right (forced-right condition) ear stimulus. METHODS: The subjects were 51 patients with a DSM-IV diagnosis of schizophrenia, 49 patients with recurrent unipolar major depression, and 49 healthy control subjects. They were tested with a consonant-vowel syllables dichotic listening task under three attentional instructions. RESULTS: There was a significant overall right ear advantage during the nonforced condition, which increased dramatically during the forced-right condition and was eliminated during the forced-left condition. The depressed patients showed no signs of impairments compared with the healthy control group. Thus, they showed a right ear advantage during the nonforced and forced-right conditions, which was shifted to a left ear advantage during the forced left condition. The schizophrenic patients, however, were impaired on the forced-left condition compared with the healthy control and depressed subjects. CONCLUSIONS: The results are discussed in terms of separating attentional and inhibitory executive impairments in schizophrenia and depression, taking into consideration illness duration and information-processing demands.

Sensitivity and specificity of memory dysfunction in schizophrenia: a comparison with major depression.

Fifty-three schizophrenic subjects were compared to 50 patients with major depression and 50 normal controls on measures of working memory, declarative memory and malingering. The schizophrenic group scored 1-2 SDs below controls on all measures, while depressive patients exposed only lesser deficits in working memory and free recall. The memory deficit of the schizophrenic subjects was disproportionately greater than their intellectual decline. Differences between clinical groups could not be explained by differences in IQ, clinical symptom load or demographic characteristics. This indicates that impaired memory is a particular sensitive symptom of schizophrenia and that the impairment is specific to the illness. Working memory failure was prominent in both clinical groups. The schizophrenic subjects displayed primarily an acquisition failure, while the depressed group showed retrieval difficulties.