Integration of Inpatient and Residential Care In-Reach Service Model and Hospital Resource Utilization: A Retrospective Audit.

OBJECTIVE: In parts of Australia, Residential In-Reach (RIR) services have been implemented to treat residential aged care (RAC) residents for acute conditions in their place of residence to avoid preventable hospital presentation. Our service was initiated in 2009 and restructured in 2014. We compared acute healthcare resource utilization (RIR activity and emergency hospital presentations) by RAC residents under 2 RIR models of care. DESIGN: Acute RAC RIR service model of care was changed from existing nurse/emergency physician-led service to nurse/geriatrician-led service and incorporate inpatient liaison nurse consultant into the team. SETTING: RAC episodes and hospital presentations from a single tertiary referral hospital and its associated RAC RIR service. METHODS: Retrospective audit comparing RIR activity, hospital presentations, and associated costs from 2 12-month periods, prior to and postimplementation. Data were expressed as a proportion of the total number of RAC beds in the hospital RIR catchment. RESULTS: After implementation of the new model of care, RIR episodes of care increased from 589 to 985 (15.3 vs 24.7 episodes/100 RAC beds, P < .001). Emergency department (ED) presentations fell from 1616 to 1478 (41.9 vs 37.2 presentations/100 RAC beds, P < .001). There were fewer unplanned ED presentations by RIR patients (2.4% vs 0.8%, = 0.03) and fewer 28-day ED re-presentations (16.8% vs 13.7%, P = .01) under the new model of care. ED cost [$AUD 30,830 vs $28,030/100 RAC beds ($USD 21,344 vs $19,407), P < .001] and inpatient admission costs [$145,607 vs $117,531/100 RAC beds ($USD 100,814 vs $81,380), P < .001] were each lower in the second period. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: In the 12 months following implementation of the new model of care, an increase in RIR activity, and a decrease in ED presentations was observed. Further research is necessary to validate these retrospective findings and better evaluate clinical outcomes and consumer satisfaction of the service.

Feasibility and impact of a post-discharge geriatric evaluation and management service for patients from residential care: the Residential Care Intervention Program in the Elderly (RECIPE).

BACKGROUND: Geriatric evaluation and management has become standard care for community dwelling older adults following an acute admission to hospital. It is unclear whether this approach is beneficial for the frailest older adults living in permanent residential care. This study was undertaken to evaluate (1) the feasibility and consumer satisfaction with a geriatrician-led supported discharge service for older adults living in residential care facilities (RCF) and (2) its impact on the uptake of Advanced Care Planning (ACP) and acute health care service utilisation. METHODS: In 2002-4 a randomised controlled trial was conducted in Melbourne, Australia comparing the geriatrician-led outreach service to usual care for RCF residents. Patients were recruited during their acute hospital stay and followed up at the RCF for six months. The intervention group received a post-discharge home visit within 96 hours, at which a comprehensive geriatric assessment was performed and a care plan developed. Participants and their families were also offered further meetings to discuss ACPs and document Advanced Directives (AD). Additional reviews were made available for assessment and management of intercurrent illness within the RCF. Consumer satisfaction was surveyed using a postal questionnaire. RESULTS: The study included 116 participants (57 intervention and 59 controls) with comparable baseline characteristics. The service was well received by consumers demonstrated by higher satisfaction with care in the intervention group compared to controls (95% versus 58%, p = 0.006).AD were completed by 67% of participants/proxy decision makers in the intervention group compared to 13% of RCF residents prior to service commencement. At six months there was a significant reduction in outpatient visits (intervention 21 (37%) versus controls 45 (76%), (p < 0.001), but no difference in readmissions rates (39% intervention versus 34% control, p = 0.6). There was a trend towards reduced hospital bed-day utilisation (intervention 271 versus controls 372 days). CONCLUSION: It is feasible to provide a supported discharge service that includes geriatrician assessment and care planning within a RCF. By expanding the service there is the potential for acute health care cost savings by decreasing the demand for outpatient consultation and further reducing acute care bed-days.

Epicardial cardiac basal annuloplasty: Preliminary findings on extra-cardiac mitral valve repair.

BACKGROUND: Correction of functional mitral regurgitation in ischaemic heart disease, with a better risk:benefit ratio is an unmet need. A new methodology of external approach of correcting the annulus (BACE: basal annuloplasty of the cardia externally) to repair and stabilise the mitral valve without entering the heart was used in this prospective study. This study was conducted to assess the efficacy and safety of the concept BACE device in patients with moderate functional mitral valve regurgitation as a result of symptomatic coronary artery disease and heart failure. METHODS: The study involved a group of patients who had complex cardiac surgery between January 2000 and December 2001 at the University of Melbourne Campus Hospitals, Melbourne, Australia. Twelve patients with ischaemic heart disease, congestive heart failure, and moderate functional mitral regurgitation (MR) (minimum 2+) underwent the BACE procedure along with coronary artery bypass grafting and/or left ventricular reconstruction. RESULTS: No peri-operative complications or deaths related to surgical procedures occurred in the study group. There were no clinically significant problems related to the BACE implantation procedure. Mean MR grade was significantly improved in BACE Group from baseline to post BACE implant (2.8 pre- and 0.3 post-surgery; P<0.05). Mean left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was significantly improved (P<0.05) and maintained at 6, 12, and 18 months post BACE implant compared to pre-operative baseline, with a mean improvement of 20% (24% at baseline to 44% at 18 months post-operatively) (P<0.05). In addition to that the patients also had a significant improvement (P<0.05) in mean New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional status from pre-operative baseline to 6 and 18 months post procedure with BACE. CONCLUSIONS: External stabilisation of the cardiac base with BACE was associated with significant improvement in mitral valve function with no significant intra-operative or post-operative problems in patients with moderate functional MR. These findings support further study of BACE in functional MR.

Surgical radiofrequency ablation of both atria for atrial fibrillation: results of a multicenter trial.

BACKGROUND: The Cox maze procedure has shown to be effective in treating atrial fibrillation. Radiofrequency ablation, with a similar objective, has been used as an adjunct to conventional cardiac surgery for the treatment of atrial fibrillation in more than 20 centers in Australia and New Zealand since March 2000. This is a report of those results. METHODS: One hundred thirty-two patients in 20 centers underwent radiofrequency ablation as an adjunct to conventional cardiac surgery, with a standardized lesion set created with a flexible, 7-electrode, temperature-controlled probe (Cobra; EPTechnologies, San Jose, Calif). All data were entered into a central registry, with regular follow-up prompted by the registry cocoordinator. Each radiofrequency scar was made with standard parameters requiring 2 minutes of tissue coagulation at 80 degrees C to 85 degrees C. Patients undergoing mitral procedures had radiofrequency ablation performed in the left atrium endocardially. Patients undergoing aortic valve replacement or coronary artery bypass surgery underwent epicardial radiofrequency ablation of the left atrium. Epicardial radiofrequency ablation lesions on the right atrium were common to both groups of patients. Preoperatively, 75% of the patients had chronic atrial fibrillation, 21% had paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, and 4% had flutter. Surgical procedures performed included mitral valve procedure in 60%, coronary artery bypass grafting in 14%, aortic valve replacement in 7%, and coronary artery bypass grafting plus aortic valve replacement in 4%. RESULTS: There were no major complications related to the use of radiofrequency ablation. There were no soft tissue or cardiac perforations. Ten patients were defibrillated into sinus rhythm within 3 months postoperatively. The freedom from atrial fibrillation was 84% at 3 months, 90% at 6 months, and 100% at 12 months. All patients at 12 and 18 months' follow-up were in sinus rhythm. There were no thromboembolic complications. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical radiofrequency ablation can be performed safely as an adjunct to conventional cardiac surgery. A standardized lesion set created by using similar temperature settings can be adopted in multiple centers and might be effective in treating atrial fibrillation. Data collection through a central registry has helped in monitoring the effectiveness of this new technique in a scattered population.

The mid-term outcome of geometric endoventricular repair for the patients with ischemic left ventricular dysfunction.

OBJECTIVE: Recent studies have suggested that increased left ventricular (LV) size is a risk factor for perioperative mortality in patients with low ejection fraction (EF) undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG). We previously presented a new method of LV reconstruction, called geometric endoventricular repair (GER) as representing a physiologically effective repair. The aim of this study is to assess whether GER confers benefits compared to patients undergoing CABG alone. METHODS: Between July 1996 and July 2001, 110 patients with a low EF of less than 35% documented by radionuclide ventriculogram (RNVG) underwent CABG in Austin Hospital, Australia, and were divided into two groups. Group I consisted of 52 patients undergoing isolated CABG. Group II comprised 58 patients undergoing CABG and GER. We compared the two groups in terms of EF, NYHA class, incidence of recurrent heart failure, and mortality. RESULTS: Preoperative EF was 27.7+/-6.1% in group I and 27.4+/-5.7% in group II, respectively (NS), with significant improvement in both groups (33.8+/-13.0% in group I, 35.1+/-13.3% in group II). NYHA class was also significantly improved postoperatively (from 3.3 to 1.8 in group I, and 3.6 to 1.7 in group II). There were 15 patients (28.8%) hospitalized for heart failure in group I, postoperatively, compared to seven patients (10.9%) in group II (p=0.026). Cardiac event-free survival rate at 28 months (mean follow-up) was also significantly higher in group II (88.9% in group II vs. 70.6% in group I, p=0.05). The actuarial survival rate at 31 months (mean follow-up) was 88.2% in group I and 95.3% in group II, respectively (NS). CONCLUSIONS: LV reconstruction along with CABG for ischemic ventricular dysfunction may provide symptomatic and cardiac event free survival benefits, compared to CABG alone.

Post harvest wound infection and patient's perception: comparative study between radial artery and saphenous vein harvest sites.

INTRODUCTION: Despite renewed clinical interest in radial artery grafts (RA) for coronary artery bypass grafting, there is a paucity of controlled prospective data on its efficacy. We report on the rate of harvest related complications from a randomized radial artery study. METHODS: Two hundred eighty nine patients were divided into two groups. Group 1 received RA grafts (n=154 patients) and Group 2 (n=135 patients) received saphenous vein grafts (SVG). Postoperative wound problems were assessed using a questionnaire. Postoperative harvest site infections were also carefully documented. RESULTS: In group 1, 6 of 154 (3.9%) patients had harvest site wound infections. Five of them improved by antibiotic therapy alone. In group 2, 24 of 135 (17.8%) patients had harvest site wound infections (p=0.001 vs. group 1). Fifteen of these patients needed redressing due to discharge from the wound. One hundred forty-nine patients (96.7%) in group 1 answered that their hand function was normal on the questionnaire. Concerns and discomfort about the arm scars in the group 1 were of a similar value of 5.2% (8/154), respectively. In group 2, the incidence of those about the leg were 7.4% (10/135) and 11.9% (16/135), respectively. Although there was no significant difference in concerns about the scar, discomfort was significantly higher in group 2 compared with group 1 (p=0.0139). CONCLUSIONS: RA harvest is associated with fewer wound infections and scar discomfort than SVG harvest. Radial artery harvest is almost acceptable in terms of a patient's perception. However, there are still patients who have some symptoms in the forearm after RA harvest. Long-term follow-up is necessary for patient's hand function.