A real-world analysis of factors associated with high healthcare resource utilization and costs in patients with myasthenia gravis receiving second-line treatment.

Despite current treatments, patients with myasthenia gravis (MG) experience unpredictable and inadequately controlled symptoms, lending to variability in the clinical and economic burden of disease. However, limited data are available on MG healthcare costs, and specifically, no data on patients initiating second-line therapy. Using claims data from the IBM® MarketScan® database, we assessed patient characteristics, healthcare resource utilization, and costs among MG patients initiating second-line therapy, and identified potential factors associated with high healthcare costs over a two-year follow-up period. We identified 1498 patients, of whom 49% and 31% received chronic steroids and non-steroidal immunosuppressants (NSISTs) as their second-line therapy, respectively. During follow-up, 49% experienced ≥1 MG exacerbation. Among all patients, mean all-cause total healthcare cost was $106,821 per patient during follow-up, with $88,040 and $18,780 attributed to medical and pharmacy costs, respectively. In a multivariable analysis, variables significantly associated with high cost included use of high-dose steroids, chronic intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg, ≥6 cycles), and 1 and ≥ 4 (but not 2-3) MG exacerbations in the first year after second-line therapy initiation. Any number of exacerbations were associated with high cost in a univariable analysis. A stratified cost analysis showed that patients with >1 exacerbation, ≥1 treatment switch, and high-dose steroid use in this first year experienced $198,487, $114,037, and $79,752 mean MG-related total healthcare spend during follow-up, respectively. These data suggest that patients receiving chronic IVIg or NSISTs for MG experience significant economic burden. Disease characteristics including exacerbation and treatment history may be an indicator of future high costs.

Physician-Reported Perspectives on Myasthenia Gravis in the United States: A Real-World Survey.

INTRODUCTION: Myasthenia gravis (MG) is a rare, debilitating, chronic disorder caused by the production of pathogenic immunoglobulin G autoantibodies against the neuromuscular junction. A lack of real-world studies in rare diseases reflects a relatively limited understanding of the significant unmet needs and burden of disease for patients. We aimed to provide comprehensive real-world insights into the management and burden of MG from treating physicians in the United States (US). METHODS: Data were collected using the Adelphi Real World MG Disease Specific Programme™, a point-in-time survey of physicians and their patients with MG, in the US between March and July 2020. Physician-reported clinical data, including demographics, comorbidities, symptoms, disease history, treatments, and healthcare resource utilization, were collected. RESULTS: In total, 456 patient record forms were completed by 78 physicians based in the US. At time of survey completion, patient mean age was 54.5 years. Mean time from symptom onset to diagnosis was 9.0 months (n = 357). Ocular symptoms were reported in 71.7% of patients. General fatigue affected 47.1% of patients and over half of those reported the severity as moderate or severe (59.5%, n = 128). Acetylcholinesterase inhibitors and/or steroids were the most frequently prescribed first-line treatment type among patients receiving treatment at time of survey completion and with moderate-to-severe symptoms (77.9%, n = 159/204). High-dose steroids (n = 14) and intravenous immunoglobulin (n = 13) were the most prescribed acute treatments among those receiving an acute treatment at time of survey completion (n = 36), with symptom exacerbations or myasthenic crises being the most common reasons for acute treatment. On average, 2.5 healthcare professionals were involved in patient management and 5.0 consultations were made per patient over the last 12 months. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicated that, despite treatment, there is a proportion of patients with MG in the US who had a significant need for improved disease management.

Improving Patient-Centered Communication about Sudden Unexpected Death in Epilepsy through Computerized Clinical Decision Support.

BACKGROUND: Sudden unexpected death in epilepsy (SUDEP) is a rare but fatal risk that patients, parents, and professional societies clearly recommend discussing with patients and families. However, this conversation does not routinely happen. OBJECTIVES: This pilot study aimed to demonstrate whether computerized decision support could increase patient communication about SUDEP. METHODS: A prospective before-and-after study of the effect of computerized decision support on delivery of SUDEP counseling. The intervention was a screening, alerting, education, and follow-up SUDEP module for an existing computerized decision support system (the Child Health Improvement through Computer Automation [CHICA]) in five urban pediatric primary care clinics. Families of children with epilepsy were contacted by telephone before and after implementation to assess if the clinician discussed SUDEP at their respective encounters. RESULTS: The CHICA-SUDEP module screened 7,154 children age 0 to 21 years for seizures over 7 months; 108 (1.5%) reported epilepsy. We interviewed 101 families after primary care encounters (75 before and 26 after implementation) over 9 months. After starting CHICA-SUDEP, the number of caregivers who reported discussing SUDEP with their child's clinician more than doubled from 21% (16/75) to 46% (12/26; p = 0.03), and when the parent recalled who brought up the topic, 80% of the time it was the clinician. The differences between timing and sampling methodologies of before and after intervention cohorts could have led to potential sampling and recall bias. CONCLUSION: Clinician-family discussions about SUDEP significantly increased in pediatric primary care clinics after introducing a systematic, computerized screening and decision support module. These tools demonstrate potential for increasing patient-centered education about SUDEP, as well as incorporating other guideline-recommended algorithms into primary and subspecialty cares. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov, NCT03502759.

The direct cost of seizure events in severe childhood-onset epilepsies: A retrospective claims-based analysis.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to assess the direct cost of medically treated seizure events in severe childhood-onset epilepsies. Lennox-Gastaut syndrome (LGS), Dravet syndrome (DS), and tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC) are representative conditions associated with frequent intractable seizures. METHODS: Commercial and Medicaid insurance claims from 2010 to 2015 were queried to identify patients with possible LGS, possible DS, or TSC, having ≥2 years of continuous insurance from the date of first epilepsy/seizure diagnosis or antiepileptic drug (AED) fill (index date). Utilization and cost data in patients with and without seizure events requiring acute treatment were evaluated for two years postindex. Medically treated seizure events resulting in minor, moderate, severe, and no injury were included. Average costs were normalized to 2017 dollars at 3% per annum and reported for each cohort, by insurance type and degree of injury. RESULTS: Among 9754 patients, 55.4-58.8% of LGS, 47.7-55.8% of DS, and 13.7-28.0% of TSC cohorts had ≥1 medically treated seizure event, depending on insurance type. Events during two-year postindex averaged 2.8-3.3 in LGS, 3.1-3.3 in DS, and 1.9-2.2 in TSC; cost per event averaged $8147-$14,759 in LGS, $4637-$8751 in DS, and $5335-$9672 in TSC. In patients with events, average all-cause costs per-patient-per-year (PPPY) were $71,512-$84,939 in LGS; $31,278-$43,758 in DS; and $42,997-$48,330 in TSC. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with intractable seizures having at least one medically treated seizure event incur substantial all-cause costs. Our results can be used to inform cost effectiveness and budget impact models to estimate the value of existing and future treatments for these and similar conditions.

Burden of illness in patients with possible Lennox-Gastaut syndrome: A retrospective claims-based study.

OBJECTIVE: Lennox-Gastaut syndrome (LGS) is a severe and treatment-resistant epilepsy syndrome characterized by multiple subtypes of intractable seizures, moderate to severe cognitive impairment, and slow spike-wave complexes on electroencephalographic (EEG) recordings. Lennox-Gastaut syndrome is also associated with increased risk for injury, reduced quality of life, long-term disability, and early mortality. By evaluating private and public US medical insurance claims, we quantified healthcare utilization and direct costs in patients with possible LGS. METHODS: Commercial and Medicaid insurance claims (Truven Health Analytics) from October 2010 to September 2015 were queried to identify patients with intractable epilepsy, intellectual disability, ≥1 prescription for selected antiepileptic drugs (AEDs), and ≥2 years of continuous enrollment. To identify patients with LGS in the absence of a specific International Classification of Diseases ICD-9 diagnosis code, current or prior rufinamide use was selected as a disease indicator of LGS per previously published methodology. Characteristics significantly predictive of rufinamide use were identified with multivariate regression by comparing groups with and without LGS, then assessed in non-rufinamide users fulfilling all other inclusion criteria. Controls without epilepsy, seizures, or prescriptions for selected AEDs were matched to patients with possible LGS by age, gender, US region, and dates of insurance coverage. Average healthcare utilization and costs per patient per year (PPPY) were evaluated for a 2-year postindex period and compared between the cohort with LGS and controls by insurance type. Costs were normalized to 2017 dollars at 3% per annum. RESULTS: In the study, 6019 patients with possible LGS (53% male, mean age of 13 years, in both insurance groups) were identified: 2270 with commercial insurance and 3749 with Medicaid. The cohort with LGS used >8 times more services and >7 times more drugs than controls (all p < 0.001) in both insurance groups. The biggest contributors to service use PPPY were outpatient physician visits and home health services in the commercial-insured cohort with LGS and other outpatient visits and home health services in the Medicaid-insured cohort with LGS. Average total costs PPPY (services + drugs) were significantly higher for the cohort with LGS vs. controls: $65,026 (SD $34,324) vs. $2442 (SD $10,670) for commercial-insured and $63,930 (SD $45,761) vs. $3849 (SD $13849) for Medicaid-insured patients. The biggest cost contributors PPPY were inpatient care in the commercial-insured cohort with LGS and home health services in the Medicaid-insured cohort with LGS. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with possible LGS have significantly higher healthcare utilization and costs than patients without epilepsy or seizures. Our results suggest that direct costs associated with LGS are substantial and highlight the need for new and effective treatments.

Association between antiepileptic drug dose and long-term response in patients with refractory epilepsy.

Seizures in patients with medically refractory epilepsy remain a substantial clinical challenge, not least because of the dearth of evidence-based guidelines as to which antiepileptic drug (AED) regimens are the most effective, and what doses of these drugs to employ. We sought to determine whether there were regions in the dosage range of commonly used AEDs that were associated with superior efficacy in patients with refractory epilepsy. We retrospectively analyzed treatment records from 164 institutionalized, developmentally disabled patients with refractory epilepsy, averaging 17years of followup per patient. We determined the change in seizure frequency in within-patient comparisons during treatment with the most commonly used combinations of 12 AEDs, and then analyzed the response to treatment by quartile of the dose range for monotherapy with carbamazepine (CBZ), lamotrigine (LTG), valproate (VPA), or phenytoin (PHT), and the combination LTG/VPA. We found that of the 26 most frequently used AED regimens, only LTG/VPA yielded superior efficacy, similar to an earlier study. For the monotherapies, patients who were treated in the lowest quartile of the dose range had significantly better long-term reduction in seizure frequency compared to those treated in the 2nd and 3rd quartiles of the dose range. Patients with paired exposures to CBZ in both the lowest quartile and a higher quartile of dose range experienced an increase in seizure frequency at higher doses, while patients treated with LTG/VPA showed improved response with escalation of LTG dosage. We conclude that in this population of patients with refractory epilepsy, LTG/VPA was the most effective AED combination. The best response to AEDs used in monotherapy was observed at low dosage. This suggests that routine exposure to maximally tolerated AED doses may not be necessary to identify those patients with drug-resistant seizures who will have a beneficial response to therapy. Rather, responders to a given AED regimen may be identified with exposure to low AED doses, with careful evaluation of the response to subsequent titration to identify non-responders or those with exacerbation of seizure frequency at higher doses.

Randomized double-blind comparison of cognitive and EEG effects of lacosamide and carbamazepine.

Differential effectiveness of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) is more commonly determined by tolerability than efficacy. Cognitive effects of AEDs can adversely affect tolerability and quality of life. This study evaluated cognitive and EEG effects of lacosamide (LCM) compared with carbamazepine immediate-release (CBZ-IR). A randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, two-period crossover, fixed-dose study in healthy subjects compared neuropsychological and EEG effects of LCM (150mg, b.i.d.) and CBZ-IR (200mg, t.i.d.). Testing was conducted at screening, predrug baseline, the end of each treatment period (3-week titration; 3-week maintenance), and the end of each washout period (4weeks after treatment). A composite Z-score was derived for the primary outcome variable (computerized cognitive tests and traditional neuropsychological measures) and separately for the EEG measures. Other variables included individual computer, neuropsychological, and EEG scores and adverse events (AEs). Subjects included 60 healthy adults (57% female; mean age: 34.4years [SD: 10.5]); 44 completed both treatments; 41 were per protocol subjects. Carbamazepine immediate-release had worse scores compared with LCM for the primary composite neuropsychological outcome (mean difference=0.33 [SD: 1.36], p=0.011) and for the composite EEG score (mean difference=0.92 [SD: 1.77], p=0.003). Secondary analyses across the individual variables revealed that CBZ-IR was statistically worse than LCM on 36% (4/11) of the neuropsychological tests (computerized and noncomputerized) and 0% of the four EEG measures; none favored CBZ-IR. Drug-related AEs occurred more with CBZ-IR (49%) than LCM (22%). Lacosamide had fewer untoward neuropsychological and EEG effects and fewer AEs and AE-related discontinuations than CBZ-IR in healthy subjects. Lacosamide exhibits a favorable cognitive profile.

Multidisciplinary assessment and diagnosis of conversion disorder in a patient with foreign accent syndrome.

Multiple reports have described patients with disordered articulation and prosody, often following acute aphasia, dysarthria, or apraxia of speech, which results in the perception by listeners of a foreign-like accent. These features led to the term foreign accent syndrome (FAS), a speech disorder with perceptual features that suggest an indistinct, non-native speaking accent. Also correctly known as psuedoforeign accent, the speech does not typically match a specific foreign accent, but is rather a constellation of speech features that result in the perception of a foreign accent by listeners. The primary etiologies of FAS are cerebrovascular accidents or traumatic brain injuries which affect cortical and subcortical regions critical to expressive speech and language production. Far fewer cases of FAS associated with psychiatric conditions have been reported. We will present the clinical history, neurological examination, neuropsychological assessment, cognitive-behavioral and biofeedback assessments, and motor speech examination of a patient with FAS without a known vascular, traumatic, or infectious precipitant. Repeated multidisciplinary examinations of this patient provided convergent evidence in support of FAS secondary to conversion disorder. We discuss these findings and their implications for evaluation and treatment of rare neurological and psychiatric conditions.

The prediction of change: normative neuropsychological trajectories.

While the application of normative standards is vital to the practice of clinical neuropsychology, data regarding normative change remains scarce despite the frequency of serial assessments. Based on 285 normal individuals, we provide co-normed baseline data with demographic adjustments and test-retest standardized regression based (SRB) models for three time points for several measures. These models delineate normal, expected change across time, and yield standardized z-scores that are comparable across tests. Using a new approach, performance on any previous trial was accounted for in the subsequent models of change, yielding serial normative formulas that model change trajectories rather than simple change from point to point. These equations provide indices of deviation from expected baseline and change for use in clinical or research settings.

Neurocognitive correlates of response to treatment in late-life depression.

UNLABELLED: Depression is often associated with neurocognitive deficits in older adults, particularly in the domains of information processing speed, episodic memory, and executive functions. Greater neurocognitive dysfunction while depressed is associated with a less effective treatment response; however, questions remain about the specific variables that characterize patients showing low treatment response and persistent cognitive deficiencies. OBJECTIVES: The authors examined neurocognitive variables that differentiated patients who showed robust versus weak responses to antidepressant therapy. PARTICIPANTS: The baseline sample included 110 women and 67 men, with a mean age of 69.1 years (SD = 6.9) and mean education of 14 years (SD = 3.3). DESIGN: Patients enrolled in a treatment study completed both a structured diagnostic assessment for depression and neuropsychological testing at study entry and 1-year follow-up. MEASUREMENTS: Clinicians rated patient depression using the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale. Neuropsychological assessments consisted of prose recall and percent retention (Wechsler Memory Scale -III Logical Memory), word-list recall, attention and visuomotor processing speed (Trail Making A, Symbol Digit Modalities Test), and mental flexibility (Trail Making B). INTERVENTIONS: Patients underwent treatment for depression following the guidelines of the Duke Somatic Treatment Algorithm for Geriatric Depression approach. RESULTS: Individuals who demonstrated the greatest improvement in mood symptoms at follow-up exhibited better prose recall and faster processing speed at baseline than individuals who demonstrated weaker treatment responses. These differences remained after controlling for depression severity at both time-points. CONCLUSION: The current results suggest that better pretreatment cognitive function, particularly in verbal memory, is associated with a greater treatment response in late-life depression.

Responses to false physiological feedback in individuals with panic attacks and elevated anxiety sensitivity.

Participants with elevated anxiety sensitivity and a history of panic attacks were compared to a low anxiety comparison group with respect to physiological and subjective reactivity to false heart-rate feedback and reactivity to a priming procedure. Whereas accurate heart-rate feedback elicited minimal responses, participants across groups showed significant physiological and subjective responses to false feedback. High risk and low risk participants did not differ in heart-rate responses to false feedback, though panic attack frequency did predict physiological and subjective reactions to false feedback in the high risk group. Self-reported nonspecific anxiety was significantly higher in high risk female participants than in low risk female participants, while males did not different in general subjective anxiety. However, high risk participants reported more panic-specific symptoms during the false feedback task than low risk participants, regardless of the sex of the participant. Therefore, although the experimental paradigm appeared to trigger nonspecific anxiety in high risk female participants, panic attack symptoms in reaction to the task were specific to risk group, not sex, and consistent with hypotheses. Surprisingly, the priming procedure did not influence physiological or subjective responses to false feedback in either group. These results raise additional questions regarding the process and impact of interception in individuals with panic attacks, and suggest that false perception of internal changes may contribute to risk for panic disorder when exposed to believable cues.

Young children's beliefs about the stability of traits: protective optimism?

Prior research has demonstrated individual differences in children's beliefs about the stability of traits, but this focus on individuals may have masked important developmental differences. In a series of four studies, younger children (5-6 years old, Ns = 53, 32, 16, and 16, respectively) were more optimistic in their beliefs about traits than were older children (7-10 years old, Ns = 60, 32, 16, and 16, respectively) and adults (Ns = 130, 100, 48, and 48, respectively). Younger children were more likely to believe that negative traits would change in an extreme positive direction over time (Study 1) and that they could control the expression of a trait (Study 3). This was true not only for psychological traits, but also for biological traits such as missing a finger and having poor eyesight. Young children also optimistically believed that extreme positive traits would be retained over development (Study 2). Study 4 extended these findings to groups, and showed that young children believed that a majority of people can have above average future outcomes. All age groups made clear distinctions between the malleability of biological and psychological traits, believing negative biological traits to be less malleable than negative psychological traits and less subject to a person's control. Hybrid traits (such as intelligence and body weight) fell midway between these two with respect to malleability. The sources of young children's optimism and implications of this optimism for age differences in the incidence of depression are discussed.