Reproductive Rights and Women's Mental Health.

Reproductive rights, including access to comprehensive reproductive health care, are essential to the well-being of women and society. The Dobbs decision of the US Supreme Court has greatly exacerbated the confusion, the stress, and the loss of services. Psychiatrists need to know and communicate the strong scientific evidence of the advantages of sex education, contraception, abortion, and bodily autonomy and to help patients process their feelings and make informed decisions about their own care.

Abortion: Perspectives from an APA Past-President.

The United States Supreme Court's decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization, eliminating the national right to abortion, poses challenges to psychiatrists and patients. Abortion laws now vary widely from state to state and are constantly changing and being challenged. The laws affect both patients and health care professionals; some prohibit not only the performance of abortion but efforts to inform and assist patients seeking abortion. Patients may become pregnant during and/or because of episodes of clinical depression, mania, or psychosis, and recognize that their current circumstances will not allow them to become adequate parents. Some laws allowing abortion to protect a woman's life or health explicitly exclude mental health risks; many prohibit transfer of a patient to a permissive venue. Psychiatrists working with patients contemplating abortion can convey the scientific evidence that abortion does not cause mental illness and help them identify and work through their own beliefs, values, and likely responses to the decision. Psychiatrists will also have to decide whether medical ethics or state laws will govern their own professional behavior.

Reproductive Rights and Women's Mental Health: Essential Information for the Obstetrician-Gynecologist.

Reproductive health care is crucial to women's well-being and that of their families. State and federal laws restricting access to contraception and abortion in the United States are proliferating. Often the given rationales for these laws state or imply that access to contraception and abortion promote promiscuity, and/or that abortion is medically dangerous and causes a variety of adverse obstetric, medical, and psychological sequelae. These rationales lack scientific foundation. This article provides the evidence for the safety of abortion, for both women and girls, and encourages readers to advocate against restrictions.

Update on Reproductive Rights and Women's Mental Health.

Reproductive rights are essential to the recognition/treatment of women as full-fledged human beings/citizens. Barriers to reproductive rights pose a grave danger to women's well-being. This article explores the origins of these barriers, their nature, and their impact on mental health. The most controversial relationship is between induced abortion and mental health. Barriers, misinformation, and coercion affecting contraceptive, abortion, and pregnancy care are an ongoing danger to women's mental health and the well-being of their families. Mental health professionals are best qualified, and have an obligation, to know the facts, apply them, and provide accurate information to protect women's health.

Reproductive Rights and Women's Mental Health.

Reproductive rights are essential to the recognition/treatment of women as full-fledged human beings/citizens. Barriers to reproductive rights pose a grave danger to women's well-being. This article explores the origins of these barriers, their nature, and their impact on mental health. The most controversial relationship is between induced abortion and mental health. Barriers, misinformation, and coercion affecting contraceptive, abortion, and pregnancy care are an ongoing danger to women's mental health and the well-being of their families. Mental health professionals are best qualified, and have an obligation, to know the facts, apply them, and provide accurate information to protect women's health.

Recovery from depression.

Full recovery from depression, as contrasted with symptom improvement, is a relatively new concept and therapeutic goal. It is an important goal, because the failure to achieve this goal leaves many patients with less productive and fulfilling lives, it leaves some children with lasting deficits, and it deprives families and societies of loved ones' and employees' care and investment. As a new therapeutic concept, recovery from depression is not as easy to define as it might seem; many or most patients were not euthymic before an episode of depression or have had some level of depression throughout their lives. There is no measurable definition of euthymia. In addition to definitional difficulties, we need to study and address other barriers to the achievement of recovery from depression. All the barriers to the diagnosis and treatment of depression are barriers against recovery: negative social and professional attitudes, comorbidity, lack of access to demonstrably efficacious professional and social services, and inability to match patients with the antidepressants most likely to help them. Efforts to address many of these knowledge and attitude gaps are already underway. Long-term studies are needed, both observational and experimental. Most published studies encompass only weeks or at best months of follow-up, but recovery must be sustained to be meaningful. As noted previously, there has been little or no attention to the developmental impact of depression. The restoration of premorbid function is not sufficient when depression has hindered a patient's ability to form satisfying relationships and choose and perform satisfying work. We need to learn how to remediate patients whose history of depression has stifled their talents and aspirations. Studying these issues will not be easy, but millions of individuals with depression, and their physicians, will profit by it; it will be well worth the effort.

Psychiatric aspects of induced abortion.

Approximately one third of the women in the United States have an abortion during their lives. In the year 2008, 1.21 million abortions were performed in the United States (Jones and Koolstra, Perspect Sex Reprod Health 43:41-50, 2011). The psychiatric outcomes of abortion are scientifically well established (Adler et al., Science 248:41-43, 1990). Despite assertions to the contrary, there is no evidence that abortion causes psychiatric problems (Dagg, Am J Psychiatry 148:578-585, 1991). Those studies that report psychiatric sequelae suffer from severe methodological defects (Lagakos, N Engl J Med 354:1667-1669, 2006). Methodologically sound studies have demonstrated that there is a very low incidence of frank psychiatric illness after an abortion; women experience a wide variety of feelings over time, including, for some, transient sadness and grieving. However, the circumstances that lead a woman to terminate a pregnancy, including previous and/or ongoing psychiatric illness, are independently stressful and increase the likelihood of psychiatric illness over the already high baseline incidence and prevalence of mood and anxiety disorders among women of childbearing age. For optimal psychological outcomes, women, including adolescents, need to make autonomous and supported decisions about problem pregnancies. Clinicians can help patients facing these decisions and those who are working through feelings about having had abortions in the past.

Induced abortion and adolescent mental health.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Induced abortion is widely believed - by the public, healthcare professionals, and policy-makers - to lead to adverse mental health sequelae. This belief is false, as it applies both to adult women and adolescents. However, it has been used to rationalize, and been quoted in, restrictive and intrusive legislation in several states and in proposed federal legislation. It is essential for gynecologists to have accurate information, as clinicians, for their patients, and, as key experts, for policy makers. RECENT FINDINGS: New articles concluding that there are adverse psychological outcomes from induced abortion continue to be published. The methodological flaws in these articles are so serious as to invalidate those conclusions. Several recent scholarly analyses detail these flaws. Methodologically sound studies and reviews continue to demonstrate that psychosocial problems play a role in unwanted conception and the decision to abort unwanted pregnancies but are not the result of abortion. SUMMARY: Clinicians may have to reassure patients making decisions about their pregnancies that abortion does not cause psychiatric illness. They can do so on the basis of recent analyses substantiating that finding.

The management of depression during pregnancy: a report from the American Psychiatric Association and the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.

OBJECTIVE: To address the maternal and neonatal risks of both depression and antidepressant exposure and develop algorithms for periconceptional and antenatal management. METHOD: Representatives from the American Psychiatric Association, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists and a consulting developmental pediatrician collaborated to review English language articles on fetal and neonatal outcomes associated with depression and antidepressant treatment during childbearing. Articles were obtained from Medline searches and bibliographies. Search keywords included pregnancy, pregnancy complications, pregnancy outcomes, depressive disorder, depressive disorder/dt, abnormalities/drug-induced/epidemiology, abnormalities/drug-induced/et. Iterative draft manuscripts were reviewed until consensus was achieved. RESULTS: Both depressive symptoms and antidepressant exposure are associated with fetal growth changes and shorter gestations, but the majority of studies that evaluated antidepressant risks were unable to control for the possible effects of a depressive disorder. Short-term neonatal irritability and neurobehavioral changes are also linked with maternal depression and antidepressant treatment. Several studies report fetal malformations in association with first trimester antidepressant exposure but there is no specific pattern of defects for individual medications or class of agents. The association between paroxetine and cardiac defects is more often found in studies that included all malformations rather than clinically significant malformations. Late gestational use of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor antidepressants is associated with transitory neonatal signs and a low risk for persistent pulmonary hypertension in the newborn. Psychotherapy alone is an appropriate treatment for some pregnant women; however, others prefer pharmacotherapy or may require pharmacological treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Antidepressant use in pregnancy is well studied, but available research has not yet adequately controlled for other factors that may influence birth outcomes including maternal illness or problematic health behaviors that can adversely affect pregnancy.

Is there an "abortion trauma syndrome"? Critiquing the evidence.

The objective of this review is to identify and illustrate methodological issues in studies used to support claims that induced abortion results in an "abortion trauma syndrome" or a psychiatric disorder. After identifying key methodological issues to consider when evaluating such research, we illustrate these issues by critically examining recent empirical studies that are widely cited in legislative and judicial testimony in support of the existence of adverse psychiatric sequelae of induced abortion. Recent studies that have been used to assert a causal connection between abortion and subsequent mental disorders are marked by methodological problems that include, but not limited to: poor sample and comparison group selection; inadequate conceptualization and control of relevant variables; poor quality and lack of clinical significance of outcome measures; inappropriateness of statistical analyses; and errors of interpretation, including misattribution of causal effects. By way of contrast, we review some recent major studies that avoid these methodological errors. The most consistent predictor of mental disorders after abortion remains preexisting disorders, which, in turn, are strongly associated with exposure to sexual abuse and intimate violence. Educating researchers, clinicians, and policymakers how to appropriately assess the methodological quality of research about abortion outcomes is crucial. Further, methodologically sound research is needed to evaluate not only psychological outcomes of abortion, but also the impact of existing legislation and the effects of social attitudes and behaviors on women who have abortions.