Subcutaneous insulin therapy - end of the road after 80 years?

Subcutaneous (SC) insulin therapy has been a mainstay of pharmacological diabetes management from the moment insulin was successfully developed as treatment. Insulin formulations have become more refined and less allergenic over time, and ancillary technologies such as injection devices and glucose measurement tools have evolved to the extent of permitting closed-loop therapy. However, investigations have continued exploring alternative routes of administration with the ultimate goal of implantable islet replacements, whether cell- or "silicon"-based. Progress on these lines of research, however, has been slow to present patients with viable options: alternative delivery routes have failed to deliver insulin reliably and with commercially viable efficiency, while beta cell transplantation continues to struggle with tissue availability and in vivo viability. In the meantime, SC insulin formulations have advanced for rapid- and long-acting formulations, to better meet typical insulin requirements across the day. Thus, SC insulin will likely remain a key technology for the foreseeable future in order to address the needs of an ever larger number of insulin-dependent patients with diabetes.

Shift from surrogate end point to outcome trials: implications for cardiovascular safety assessment in development programs for antidiabetic drugs.

We assessed the effect of extending the range of cardiovascular (CV) end points to include hospitalization for unstable angina and hospitalization for coronary revascularization (Extended Major Adverse Cardiac Event criteria (MACE)) in addition to the standard ones, namely, CV-related death, nonfatal stroke, and nonfatal myocardial infarction (Core MACE). The trials selected for the analysis had a duration/follow-up period of ≥1 year and involved more than 1,000 subjects. Annual event rates (AERs) for Core MACE in patients with type 2 diabetes were estimated, and the duration of an event-driven CV outcome trial necessary to exclude ≥80% risk increase was modeled. All the studies revealed hazard ratios ≤1.0 for Core MACE end points whereas in 21% of the studies, the hazard ratio for hospitalization for unstable angina or coronary revascularization (Extended MACE) was >1 and was therefore discordant with Core MACE. The AERs for Core MACE ranged from 0.5% (recent clinical programs) to 6% (epidemiological studies); these low rates observed in recent programs would have the effect of increasing the duration required for a CV outcome trial. The addition of Extended MACE end points to the primary composite outcome in antidiabetic clinical trials is unlikely to obscure CV-related risk and may improve the feasibility of CV outcome trials.

Glycemic control with preprandial versus basal insulin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus poorly controlled by oral antidiabetes agents.

OBJECTIVE: This study was designed to compare glycemic control (glycated hemoglobin [A1C] level) with either once-daily basal insulin (BI) (insulin glargine) or preprandial insulin (PPI) (Exubera) [insulin human (recombinant DNA origin)] inhalation powder, Pfizer Inc., New York, NY) in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) poorly controlled on at least two oral antidiabetes agents (OADs). METHODS: This was a 26-week, open-label, parallel-group, randomized study where 257 patients (mean A1C 8.6%) on OAD treatment for > or = 3 months were treated with either BI (n = 122) or PPI (n = 135). Based on self-monitored blood glucose levels, PPI dose was adjusted before each major meal, whereas BI dose was titrated in the morning or before bedtime. Prestudy OADs were continued, but doses could be modified. RESULTS: At 26 weeks, change from baseline in A1C was greater with PPI (-1.7 vs. -1.4%, P = 0.0389). Numerically, more patients achieved A1C <6.5% (28% vs. 19%) and A1C <7.0% (63% vs. 55%) with PPI compared with BI. PPI had lower postmeal glucose increments, but higher prebreakfast glucose and weight gain (1.1kg), than BI. Mild or moderate hypoglycemic events were more frequent with PPI (6.2 vs. 2.9 events/months), but nocturnal hypoglycemic events were less frequent (22% vs. 30%). CONCLUSIONS: PPI improved postprandial glucose and A1C levels significantly more than BI. More patients achieved A1C targets with PPI, at the expense of more hypoglycemia and body weight gain. These results illustrate the potential benefits and detriments of prandial insulin supplementation in patients with T2DM poorly controlled on OADs alone.

The effect of the availability of inhaled insulin on glycaemic control in patients with Type 2 diabetes failing on oral therapy: the evaluation of Exubera as a therapeutic option on insulin initiation and improvement in glycaemic control in clinical practice (EXPERIENCE) trial.

AIM: To examine the impact of inhaled human insulin (Exubera, EXU) on patient or physician willingness to adopt insulin after oral glucose-lowering agent failure. METHODS: During a randomized controlled trial in primary, secondary and tertiary care in Europe and North America, 739 patients using >or= 2 oral glucose-lowering agents with glycated haemoglobin (HbA(1c)) >or= 8.0% were assigned to two treatment groups: Group 1 (standard care with the option of EXU) or Group 2 (standard care only). Standard care included adjusting oral therapy (optimizing current regimen or adding/omitting agents) and/or initiating subcutaneous (s.c.) insulin. The primary endpoint was difference in HbA(1c) between randomized groups at 26 weeks. Secondary outcomes included differences in the rate of uptake of insulin therapy, proportion achieving satisfactory glycaemic control, treatment satisfaction and safety outcomes. RESULTS: At baseline, insulin was initiated by more [odds ratio 6.0; 95% confidence interval (CI) 4.2 to 8.8; P < 0.0001] patients in Group 1 (86.2%; 76.7% EXU plus 9.5% s.c.) than Group 2 (50.7%; s.c. insulin only). At 26 weeks, mean (sd) changes in HbA(1c) from baseline were -2.0% (1.2%) and -1.7% (1.3%) in Groups 1 and 2, respectively, a difference of -0.2% (95% CI: -0.1% to -0.4%; P = 0.004). In Group 1, 45% of patients achieved an HbA(1c)

Improved glycaemic control with the use of self-prepared mixtures of insulin lispro and insulin lispro protamine suspension in patients with types 1 and 2 diabetes.

A total of 166 patients (102 type 1, 64 type 2) were randomised to insulin lispro (LP) combined with insulin lispro protamine suspension (NPL), an intermediate-acting formulation of LP, or to regular human insulin (HR) combined with human NPH insulin (NPH) in this open-label, parallel study. Insulin doses were similar at endpoint. Blood glucose (BG) measurements (before and two hours after meals, bedtime, 3 a.m.)(mmol/l) were lower with LP/NPL two hours after breakfast (8.84 +/- 0.32 vs 10.29 +/- 0.41, p < 0.001), before lunch (6.21 +/- 0.20 vs 7.10 +/- 0.31, p = 0.016), two hours after the evening meal (10.18 +/- 0.36 vs 7.86 +/- 0.28, p < 0.0.001), and at bedtime (7.85 +/- 0.28 vs 9.43 +/- 0.40, p = 001). HbA1c was lower for LP/NPL at endpoint (7.54 +/- 0.11% vs 7.92 +/- 0.10%, p = 0.019). There was no difference in hypoglycaemia or insulin antibody levels. LP/NPL resulted in better glycaemic control than HR/NPH without increasing the risk of hypoglycaemia.

A comparative study of insulin lispro and human regular insulin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and secondary failure of oral hypoglycemic agents.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effects of insulin lispro (LP) and human regular insulin (HR) when given twice daily with NPH insulin on glycemic control (HbA1c), daily blood glucose profiles and rates of hypoglycemia in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus after failure to respond to sulfonylurea drugs. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A 5.5-month randomized, open-label, parallel study of 148 patients receiving either LP (n = 70) or HR (n = 78). Eight-point blood glucose profiles and HbA1c measurements were collected at baseline, 1.5, 3.5 and 5.5 months. RESULTS: Two-hour post-breakfast and 2-hour post-supper blood glucose levels (means [and standard errors]) were significantly lower for LP than for HR at the end point (9.5 [0.4] mmol/L v. 10.9 [0.4] mmol/L and 8.4 [0.4] mmol/L v. 9.7 [0.4] mmol/L, respectively, p = 0.02 in both cases). HbA1c improved from 10.5% (0.2%) (LP) and 10.3% (0.2%) (HR) to 8.0% (0.1%). Hypoglycemia rates were similar during the day; however, there was an overnight trend to reduced rates with LP (0.08 [0.03] episodes/30 d v. 0.16 [0.04] episodes/30 d, p = 0.057). Quality-of life assessment showed significant improvement (p < 0.05) in the diabetes-related worry scale for LP subjects whereas HR subjects slightly worsened. CONCLUSIONS: With traditional twice-daily insulin administration algorithms, LP improves 2-hour postprandial glucose levels, quality of life and overnight hypoglycemia rates while delivering an equivalent level of glycemic control (HbA1c) compared with HR to insulin-naïve patients with type 2 diabetes who require insulin.

Uterine effects of raloxifene in comparison with continuous-combined hormone replacement therapy in postmenopausal women.

OBJECTIVE: We sought to compare the uterine effects of raloxifene with those of continuous-combined hormone replacement therapy. STUDY DESIGN: This randomized, double-blind 24-month study involved 136 postmenopausal women who received raloxifene 150 mg/d or conjugated equine estrogens 0.625 mg/d with medroxyprogesterone acetate 2.5 mg/d. After baseline evaluations, endometrial biopsy specimens were obtained, and endometrial thickness was measured annually by means of transvaginal ultrasonography. Statistical analyses were performed with an intention-to-treat approach. RESULTS: In the raloxifene group at the end point of the study 94.4% of biopsy specimens showed normal benign postmenopausal endometrium and 5.6% were classified as benign stimulatory endometrium. In the continuous-combined hormone replacement therapy group at the end point of the study 78.7% of biopsy specimens showed normal benign postmenopausal endometrium, 19. 1% were classified as benign stimulatory endometrium, and 2.1% showed benign abnormal postmenopausal endometrium. Mean endometrial thickness was unchanged from baseline with raloxifene and was increased significantly by 0.5 mm at 12 months with continuous-combined hormone replacement therapy. CONCLUSION: Raloxifene 150 mg/d did not increase endometrial thickness or cause endometrial proliferation in healthy postmenopausal women.

Effectiveness of human ultralente versus NPH insulin in providing basal insulin replacement for an insulin lispro multiple daily injection regimen. A double-blind randomized prospective trial. The Canadian Lispro Study Group.

OBJECTIVE: To compare human ultralente (UL) insulin with human NPH insulin as basal insulin replacement in patients who use insulin lispro before meals. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: There were 178 patients with type 1 diabetes who were randomized to receive either human NPH or UL insulin once daily at bedtime in a 1-year double-blind clinical study. Eight-point blood glucose profiles were collected once monthly in the first 4 months, then every 2 months for the remainder of the study. Patients were also asked to perform premeal blood glucose measurements every day throughout the study. If before-supper blood glucose levels consistently exceeded 8 mmol/l despite optimal postprandial control with the lunch dose of insulin lispro, a second dose of basal insulin before breakfast was administered. RESULTS: For the group as a whole, insulin doses before meals and basal insulin doses were similar at baseline. At study's end, meal doses remained the same (30 +/- 1 U/day for UL., 29 +/- 1 U/day for NPH), while basal requirements were somewhat higher for the UL group than the NPH group: 30 +/- 1 U/day vs. 26 +/- 1 U/day, respectively (P < 0.05). The rates of severe hypoglycemia were similar for patients on NPH (0.05 +/- 0.03 per patient every 30 days) and for UL (0.07 +/- 0.04 per patient every 30 days) insulin. There was no significant difference for glycemic control between the NPH and UL groups overall (HbAlc at the end of the study: 7.6 +/- 0.1 vs. 7.7 +/- 0.1%, respectively), and by study's end a similar number of patients in the NPH and the UL groups needed to be switched to twice daily basal insulin (21 and 24%, respectively). Patients requiring twice-daily injections of basal insulin had a longer duration of diabetes (17.8 +/- 1.5 vs. 14.0 +/- 0.8 years, P < 0.05) and a highest baseline HbAlc (8.6 +/- 0.1 vs. 8.0 +/- 0.1%, P < 0.002) and were significantly older (38 +/- 2 vs. 34 +/- 1 years, P < 0.007). Patients who were switched to twice-daily NPH insulin had lower HbAlc levels at study's end compared with those switched to twice-daily UL insulin (7.7 +/- 0.2 vs. 8.2 +/- 0.3%), but this difference was not statistically significant. Distribution of hypoglycemia across the day was also similar in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: UL or NPH insulin, when used as the basal insulin for multiple injection regimens, results in similar glycemic control in patients using insulin lispro before meals. However, in patients who require a second injection of basal insulin, NPH insulin appears to provide lower prebreakfast and prelunch glucose levels compared with UL insulin.

Effect of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion with lispro on hepatic responsiveness to glucagon in type 1 diabetes.

OBJECTIVE: People with type 1 diabetes frequently develop a blunted counterregulatory hormone response to hypoglycemia coupled with a decreased hepatic response to glucagon, and consequently, they have an increased risk of severe hypoglycemia. We have evaluated the effect of insulin lispro (Humalog) versus regular human insulin (Humulin R) on the hepatic glucose production (HGP) response to glucagon in type 1 diabetic patients on intensive insulin therapy with continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Ten subjects on CSII were treated for 3 months with lispro and 3 months with regular insulin in a double-blind randomized crossover study After 3 months of treatment with each insulin, hepatic sensitivity to glucagon was measured in each subject. The test consisted of a 4-h simultaneous infusion of somatostatin (450 microg/h) to suppress endogenous glucagon, regular insulin (0.15 mU x kg(-1) x min(-1)), glucose at a variable rate to maintain plasma glucose near 5 mmol/l, and D-[6,6-2H2]glucose to measure HGP During the last 2 h, glucagon was infused at 1.5 ng x kg(-1) x min(-1). Eight nondiabetic people served as control subjects. RESULTS: During the glucagon infusion period, free plasma insulin levels in the diabetic subjects were 71.7+/-1.6 vs. 74.8+/-0.5 pmol/l after lispro and regular insulin treatment, with plasma glucagon levels of 88.3+/-1.8 and 83.7+/-1.5 ng/l for insulin:glucagon ratios of 2.8 and 3.0. respectively (NS). However, plasma glucose increased to 9.2+/-1.1 mmo/l after lispro insulin compared with 7.1+/-0.9 mmol/l after regular insulin (P < 0.01), and the rise in HGP was 5.7 +/-2.8 micromol x kg(-1) x min(-1) after lispro insulin versus 3.1+/-2.9 micromol x kg(-1) x min(-1) after regular insulin treatment (P=0.02). In the control subjects, HGP increased by 10.7+/-4.2 micromol x kg(-1) x min(-1) under glucagon infusion. CONCLUSIONS: Insulin lispro treatment by CSII was associated with a heightened response in HGP to glucagon compared with regular human insulin. This suggests that insulin lispro increases the sensitivity of the liver to glucagon and could potentially decrease the risk of severe hypoglycemia.

Counterregulatory hormone responses after long-term continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion with lispro insulin.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the long-term use of insulin lispro (LP) affects the counterregulatory hormone response to hypoglycemia. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Ten patients (age range 26-51 years; ratio of men to women 9:1; BMI 24.9 +/- 0.48; mean HbA1c 7.84 +/- 0.25%) with IDDM, treated with continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII; Disetronic H-TRON V100) were studied using a double-blind, crossover design. Patients were randomized to LP or human regular insulin (HR) for 3 months and then crossed over to the other insulin for an additional 3 months. All meal boluses were given 0-5 min before breakfast, lunch, and dinner. Counterregulatory hormone responses to a stepped hypoglycemic clamp (consecutive glucose levels in mmol/l: 4.2; 3.5; 2.8, each for 1 h) were evaluated at the end of each treatment period. RESULTS: HbA1c was significantly lower with LP versus HR (7.47 +/- 0.28% vs. 7.9 +/- 0.26%, P = 0.04). The incidence of hypoglycemia per 30 days (capillary blood glucose < 3.0 mmol/l and/or symptoms) during the last month of the study was significantly lower with LP versus HR (8.7 +/- 2.9 vs. 11.8 +/- 2.9, P = 0.03). The total daily insulin dosage was not different in the two treatment periods. There was no episode of severe hypoglycemia or diabetic ketoacidosis. The peak growth hormone, cortisol, glucagon, and epinephrine responses during the same period of hypoglycemia were not different for each treatment period. CONCLUSIONS: The use of LP in CSII results in improved glycemic control and a decrease in the frequency of hypoglycemia without adversely affecting counterregulatory hormone response to hypoglycemia.

Stability of insulin lispro in insulin infusion systems.

OBJECTIVE: To test stability of insulin lispro in two insulin infusion systems over 48 h. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We used reverse-phase and size-exclusion high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) to determine the purity, potency, and degree of polymerization of U100 insulin lispro (Humalog) after 24- and 48-h pump cycles conducted at 37 degrees C in five Disetronic H-TRON V100 and five MiniMed 504 pumps. Pumps were set to deliver a basal rate of 0.5 U/h and 6-U boluses at t = 0, 4, 8, 24, 24.5, 28.5, 32.5, and 48 h during each cycle. The effluent was collected into 1-ml vials, pooled at 24 or 48 h, and stored at 4 degrees C until assay. After each 48-h run period of insulin delivery, assays for potency, polymer, and purity were performed on the pooled samples from each individual cycle. m-cresol content and the pooled reservoir content were assayed in the 48-h pooled samples. RESULTS: Insulin lispro retained full HPLC potency (delta < or = 4%) at 48 h, with no degradation of insulin lispro to des-amidoinsulin forms (24 or 48 h). No increase in pumped insulin polymer concentration was observed following 24 h of pump flow. Nonsignificant increases of < or =0.09% (Disetronic) and < or =0.15% (MiniMed) from initial concentrations of 0.18% (polymer divided by total insulin) were detected in three of five pump cycles at 48 h when compared with 37 degrees C paired controls. Nonsignificant decreases (<5 and 10%, Disetronic and MiniMed, respectively) of m-cresol content occurred in both systems following 48 h storage in each device, but sterility was not compromised by this decrease (initial m-cresol concentration, 3.15 mg/ml). Pump performance was without mechanical or electrical fault throughout the study Basal and bolus insulin delivery was evaluated three times daily and remained as expected. Occlusion of catheters by insulin precipitation did not occur, and no change in pH was observed following delivery. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that insulin lispro is suitable for prolonged infusion in these two medical devices when syringes and catheters are replaced at 48-h intervals.

Insulin lispro in CSII: results of a double-blind crossover study.

Insulin lispro is a human insulin analog that dissociates more rapidly than human regular insulin after subcutaneous injection, resulting in higher insulin levels at an earlier point in time and a shorter duration of action. The aim of the study was to evaluate if this pharmacokinetic difference would translate into better postprandial and overall control in 30 IDDM patients (age, 35.1 +/- 1.5 years; male-female ratio, 17:13; BMI, 24.8 +/- 0.5 kg/m2; HbA1c, 8.03 +/- 0.13% at baseline) treated with continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII; Disetronic H-TRON V100) in a double-blind crossover clinical study. Patients were randomized to insulin lispro or human regular insulin for 3 months before crossing over to the other insulin for another 3 months. All meal boluses were given immediately before breakfast, lunch, and supper. An eight-point blood glucose profile was measured once weekly, and HbA1c levels were measured monthly. At the end of the 3-month treatment period, HbA1c levels were significantly lower with insulin lispro, compared with human regular insulin: 7.66 +/- 0.13 vs. 8.00 +/- 0.16% (P = 0.0041). While preprandial, bedtime, and 2:00 A.M. values for blood glucose were not significantly different, 1-h postprandial blood glucose was significantly improved after breakfast, lunch, and dinner with insulin lispro, compared with human regular insulin: 8.35 vs. 9.79 mmol/l (P = 0.006), 7.58 vs. 8.74 mmol/l (P = 0.049), and 7.85 vs. 9.01 mmol/l (P = 0.03). The incidence of hypoglycemia per 30 days (blood glucose levels, <3.0 mmol/l) was 8.4 +/- 1.3 before randomization, decreasing to 6.0 +/- 0.9 for insulin lispro and to 7.6 +/- 1.3 for regular insulin during the last month of the study. Two patients in each group reported insulin precipitation. We conclude that insulin lispro improves glycemic control in CSII without increasing the risk of hypoglycemia.

Final results of the Canadian phase I dose escalation trial of gemcitabine and cisplatin for advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

When given at doses of > or = 1,250 mg2 weekly x 3 with a 1-week break, single-agent gemcitabine induces responses in more than 20% of previously untreated patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This study was undertaken to determine the maximum tolerated doses for a 4-week cycle of gemcitabine and cisplatin given in combination weekly x 3 with a 1-week rest. Patients younger than 75 years were eligible if they had stage III/IV NSCLC, life expectancy > or = 12 weeks, hemoglobin > or = 10 g/dL, absolute granulocyte count > or = 2 x 10(9)/L, platelets > or = 100 x 10(9)/L, hepatic enzymes < or = 3 times the upper limit of normal, and serum creatinine < or = 130 mumol/L. The starting doses for gemcitabine and cisplatin were 1,000 mg/m2 and 25 mg/m2 per week x 3, respectively. At dose level 2 cisplatin was increased to 30 mg/m2/week x 3. Thereafter only the gemcitabine was increased, by 250 mg/m2/wk at each dose level, to a maximum of 2,250 mg/m2/wk at dose level 7. The median nadir granulocyte and platelet counts decreased with each dose level, but dose-limiting toxicity in two or more patients was not encountered in the first treatment cycle, even at dose level 7. Cumulative bone marrow toxicity was seen at all dose levels, and this resulted in frequent dose reductions or omissions. Dose delivery was well maintained over time only at dose level 1. Grade 3-4 nonhematologic toxicity was infrequent and rarely dose limiting. An assessment of all toxicities seen during the treatment cycles was undertaken using continual reassessment methodology. This model suggested that dose level 4 (cisplatin 30 mg/m2/wk and gemcitabine 1,500 mg/m2/wk) would be the maximum dose at which grade 4 toxicity would be expected in up to 33% of patients at any time over four treatment cycles. Of 47 patients evaluable for response, partial remission was seen in 14, with an overall response rate of 30% (confidence interval, 17% to 43%). The median duration of response was 16 weeks and the median survival time was 24 weeks (range, 3.5 to 64+ weeks). A phase II trial is planned in which dose level 4 will be evaluated in a larger cohort of patients with NSCLC.

Phase I dose-escalation trial of gemcitabine and cisplatin for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: usefulness of mathematic modeling to determine maximum-tolerable dose.

PURPOSE: This study was undertaken to determine the maximum-tolerated doses of gemcitabine and cisplatin, each given weekly for 3 weeks with a 1-week rest. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients less than 75 years of age were eligible if they had stage III/IV non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), life expectancy > or = 12 weeks, hemoglobin level > or = 10 g/dL, granulocyte count > or = 2 x 10(9)/L, platelet count > or = 100 x 10(9)/L, hepatic enzymes < or = three times the upper limit of normal, and creatinine concentration < or = 130 mumoles/L. The starting doses for gemcitabine and cisplatin were 1,000 mg/m2 and 25 mg/m2 per week for 3 weeks. At dose level 2, cisplatin was increased to 30 mg/m2/wk for 3 weeks, and thereafter only gemcitabine was increased by 250 mg/m2/wk at each dose level to a maximum of 2,250 mg/m2/wk. RESULTS: There were 33 men and 17 women, with a median age of 62 years. Pathology included adenocarcinoma in 35 patients, squamous in eight, large cell in six, and mixed histology in one. Sixteen patients had stage III and 34 had stage IV tumors. The median nadir granulocyte and platelet counts decreased with each dose level, but cycle 1 dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) in > or = two patients was not encountered in cycle 1, even at the highest dose level. Cumulative marrow toxicity was seen at all levels, which resulted in frequent dose reductions or omissions. A mathematic model of all toxicities over time suggested that dose level 4 (cisplatin 30 mg/m2/wk and gemcitabine 1,500 mg/m2/wk) would be the maximum dose at which grade 4 toxicity would be expected in < or = 33% of patients over four cycles. Of 47 assessable patients, 14 achieved a partial response (30%; confidence interval, 17% to 43%). The median duration was 16 weeks and the median survival time was 24 weeks (range, 3.5-64+). CONCLUSION: Weekly gemcitabine and cisplatin are active against NSCLC, and the recommended phase II doses are 30 and 1,500 mg/m2/wk for 3 weeks, respectively.

Phase I trial of gemcitabine and cisplatin in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a preliminary report.

A phase I trial was performed to investigate the tolerability and efficacy of the novel nucleoside analogue gemcitabine in combination with cisplatin in the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Both cisplatin and gemcitabine were administered as 30 min infusions weekly x 3 with a week of rest. There was one dose escalation of cisplatin from 25 mg/m2 (dose level 1) to 30 mg/m2 (in subsequent dose levels 2-5), such that the mean dose intensity for the weekly x 3 q 4 week cycle was 22.5 mg/m2/week which is close to that achieved with 100 mg/m2 bolus monthly. Gemcitabine was initiated at 1000 mg/m2 (dose levels 1 and 2) then escalated by 250 mg/m2/week to 1750 mg/m2 (dose level 5). Of 32 chemotherapy-naive patients entered (22 males, 10 females; median age 61 years, range 29-74 years), 11 had localized tumours (2 stage IIIa, 9 IIIb) and 21 had stage IV tumours with haematogenous metastases and a poor prognosis. Twenty-one patients had adenocarcinoma, 4 squamous cell carcinoma, 6 large cell undifferentiated tumors, and one had mixed squamous and adenocarcinoma. Dose-limiting toxicity was not seen in more than one patient in cycle 1 at any dose level. Grade 4 granulocytopenia and thrombocytopenia occurred more frequently with repeated dosing, necessitating dose reductions except at the lowest dose level (cisplatin 25 mg/m2, gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2). Non-haematological toxicity was mild and rapidly reversible. Cisplatin administration led to a higher frequency of nausea and vomiting than that seen with gemcitabine alone, but this was easily controlled with antiemetics. In the 28 patients evaluable, to date responses have been seen at most dose levels, with an overall response rate 35.7%. This phase I trial is ongoing and further dose escalation is intended to determine the MTD of gemcitabine.

Glucose turnover after a mixed meal in dogs: glucoregulation without change in arterial glycemia.

Because the dog can respond to a mixed-meal challenge with little or no change in plasma glucose concentration, we used kinetic techniques to quantify the magnitude and duration of changes in glucoregulation. Glucose turnover was measured using [3-3H]glucose and [U-14C]glucose over two 19-h periods in healthy dogs, first during a fast (n = 6) and then throughout the postprandial state (n = 6) after a single mixed meal. Mean arterial glycemia remained constant in the fasted state (7.5 +/- 0.2 mM) and in the fed state (7.6 +/- 0.3 mM). Glucose appearance (Ra), however, increased slowly after the meal from 38 +/- 2 mg/min to a maximum of 79 +/- 8 mg/min after 6 h and stayed elevated until 12 h (P < 0.001). In parallel, glucose disappearance (Rd) rose from 35 +/- 3 to 83 +/- 7 mg/min, closely matching the corresponding Ra. Glucose recycling rose from 25 +/- 8% at baseline to a maximum of 53 +/- 15% (P < 0.05) at 14 h in fed dogs, whereas levels for fasted dogs stayed between 19 +/- 7% at 0 h and 27 +/- 12% at 6 h. Insulin levels rose significantly 30 min after the meal from 67 +/- 7 pM to a peak of 208 +/- 54 pM at 6 h but remained elevated for 12 h. We conclude that 1) the dog was able to maintain postprandial glucoregulation by very precise matching of Ra and Rd such as to maintain glycemia constant.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Selective bilateral blood sampling from the inferior petrosal sinus in Cushing's disease: effects of corticotropin-releasing factor and thyrotropin-releasing hormone on pituitary secretion.

We sought to enhance the sensitivity of selective bilateral blood sampling to determine adrenocorticotropin (ACTH) and prolactin levels in the inferior petrosal sinus (IPS) by administering two stimulatory agents--corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) and thyrotropin-releasing hormone (TRH). We then determined the ACTH and prolactin levels in the IPS of 10 patients with Cushing's disease. After peripheral administration of both CRF and TRH, ACTH levels were significantly higher on the tumor side in all patients. The prolactin level was significantly higher on the tumor side when CRF or TRH was used to stimulate pituitary secretion. Postsurgical immunohistochemistry studies revealed production of both ACTH and prolactin in tumor cells, explaining the abnormal secretion pattern of the pituitary adenoma. The use of CRF and TRH may therefore improve the reliability of selective blood sampling and tests from the IPS in those cases of Cushing's disease for which noninvasive methods have otherwise failed to clarify the diagnosis.

[Selective blood sampling from the sinus petrosus inferior: a comparison of CRF and TRH stimulation]. / Selektive Blutentnahme aus dem Sinus petrosus inferior: Vergleich von CRF- und TRH-Stimulation.

In 10 patients with hypophyseal Cushing microadenomas, selective bilateral sampling from the inferior petrosal sinuses was performed and the effect of stimulation by iv TRH and CRF was compared. On the side of the microadenoma. ACTH concentration rose from 650 +/- 242 pg/ml to 2712 +/- 843 pg/ml following injection of CRF and 2025 +/- 242 pg/ml after TRH. Contralateral values were 165 +/- 79 pg/ml, 490 +/- 200 pg/ml and 165 +/- 72 pg/ml respectively. Prolactin concentration on the side of the adenoma was 98 +/- 49 ng/ml before stimulation, 236 +/- 62 ng/ml after CRF and 747 +/- 168 ng/ml after TRH. Contralateral concentration was 22 +/- 10 ng/ml, 64 +/- 19 ng/ml respectively. Sampling localised all adenomas correctly, whereas contrast-enhanced MRT diagnosed only four adenomas.

The effect of a time delay on the characteristics of the canine glucoregulatory system.

In order to elucidate the effect of a relative time delay on glucose regulation, we performed experiments with differently timed infusions of insulin and glucose in a canine model. When portal insulin infusion (0.03 U/kg over 5 minutes) preceded portal glucose infusion (0.05 g/kg over 5 minutes) by 1 minute, glycemia increased to a maximum value of 104 +/- 4 mg/dL at 6 minutes, whereas insulinemia peaked at 3 minutes at a level of 130 +/- 4 microU/mL (baseline, 21 +/- 7 microU/mL). C-peptide levels increased from 200 +/- 50 to 270 +/- 30 pmol/L. Glycemia then decreased to a minimum level of 61 +/- 4 mg/dL, significantly lower (P less than .02) than the corresponding values in control experiments when insulin was infused alone. With a reversed timing sequence of infusions with glucose infusion preceding insulin infusion by 1 minute, glycemia increased similarly, but decreased to a minimum level of only 84 +/- 4 mg/dL, which was significantly higher (P less than .01) than in the above experiment. Insulinemia peaked similarly at 126 +/- 7 microU/mL, and C-peptide increased from 210 +/- 50 to 280 +/- 50 pmol/L. These experiments demonstrated an unexpected effect: adding glucose to an insulin infusion almost doubled the biological activity of the exogenous insulin as measured by its hypoglycemic action. They also indicated that small perturbations of glycemia and insulinemia in the portal circulation have a profound effect on metabolism, and that even short relative time delays in elevating either insulinemia or glycemia can cause significantly different metabolic outcomes.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

[Computer-assisted diabetes therapy--a challenge for modern medicine]. / Rechnergestützte Diabetestherapie--eine Herausforderung der modernen Medizin.

By the use of computers in the therapy of diabetes new diagnostic and therapeutic possibilities are brought about. The computers open the possibility for a comprehensive data seizing, evaluation of the stored material and possibilities of various abilities for demonstration. Moreover, it becomes possible to regulate the therapy more subtly with the help of self-adapting programs and in its consequence to render it more effective than the own management of therapy is able to do it. This manifests itself significantly in badly or only moderately stabilised diabetics. In very well educated and trained diabetics even the superiority of the management of the computer becomes visible. Here this can no more be shown in the improvement of the stabilisation of diabetes which can no more be improved without risks for the patient. In these patients it is the reduction of the frequency of hyperglycaemia, by means of which can be shown that the stabilisation of diabetes in diabetics who were well stabilised already before can still be improved by the computer therapy. In addition to this the computer seems to cause further positive effects on the learning behaviour of the diabetics.