[Use of antidepressants in unipolar depression in the elderly]. / L'utilisation des antidépresseurs dans l'épisode dépressif caractérisé unipolaire du sujet âgé.

OBJECTIVE: To study the ageing-related pharmacological modifications about major depressive episodes in the elderly and their impact on the efficiency and tolerability of antidepressants. METHODS: Research through Pubmed and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, using the following keywords "antidepressant" ; "treatment"; "late life depression"; "elderly"; up until July 2021. RESULTS: Antidepressants were found to be more efficient than a placebo in the elderly's response to and remission from major depressive episodes. Some depressive episode subtypes seem to be less responsive to antidepressants, such as depressive episodes of vascular origin, for which treating cardiovascular risk factors by statins, angiotensin receptor blockers or calcium channel blockers seems relevant. Two other depressive episode subtypes were highlighted : post-stroke depressive episodes and those induced by major neurocognitive disorders. Antidepressants showed an efficient response in the first case but not in the second. Even though antidepressants are known to stimulate cognitive performances in animals, as yet there is not sufficient evidence to prove they indeed improve cognitive functions, or reduce the risk of developing a neurocognitive disorder, or decelerate the cognitive decline in major neurocognitive disorders in humans. Ageing creates pharmacodynamical changes that increase older people's vulnerability to the side effects of antidepressants. Moreover, age-related pharmacokinetic modifications can also change every step in a drug's transformation process in the body, which leads to a high probability of having adverse effects. Since most antidepressants are eliminated using the P450 cytochrome system, their dosage must be adapted to changes of the P450 system. Somatic comorbidities can, in themselves, influence the pharmacokinetics of antidepressants. Many antidepressants interact with the P450 cytochrome and the P-GP protein, which puts them at a high risk of drug interactions. There is no proven efficiency difference between antidepressant classes. Some antidepressant adverse effects can be of particular importance in the elderly, like the risk of bleeding, cardiovascular episodes, hyponatremia, falling and fractures, anticholinergic effects, extrapyramidal syndrome, epilepsy, liver disease and death. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors have an indication as the first line of treatment, avoiding paroxetine and fluoxetine. Serotonin and norepinephrine re-uptake inhibitors are relevant if the patient presents psychomotor retardation or pain, while keeping in mind to check blood pressure. Tricyclics and monoamine oxidase inhibitors should be avoided because of their anticholinergic effects. Bupropion can be prescribed if the patient has extreme fatigue. Mirtazapine is useful when the patient presents sleep or appetite disturbance. Several molecules can be used in the case of drug-resistant depression, such as associating aripiprazole with small-dosage antidepressants, or electroconvulsive therapy, or repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS). Ketamine and psychostimulants seem to have antidepressant effects, but complementary studies are needed to conclude. CONCLUSIONS: Unipolar major depressive episodes in the elderly are frequent and their medicinal treatment has specific features. Knowing the specificities of antidepressant use in the elderly allows to optimize its efficiency and to limit the risk of inappropriate prescription leading to harmful adverse effects.

Psychotropics and COVID-19: An analysis of safety and prophylaxis.

The use of psychotropics during the COVID-19 pandemic has raised two questions, in order of importance: first, what changes should be made to pharmacological treatments prescribed to mental health patients? Secondly, are there any positive side effects of these substances against SARS-CoV-2? Our aim was to analyze usage safety of psychotropics during COVID-19; therefore, herein, we have studied: (i) the risk of symptomatic complications of COVID-19 associated with the use of these drugs, notably central nervous system activity depression, QTc interval enlargement and infectious and thromboembolic complications; (ii) the risk of mistaking the iatrogenic impact of psychotropics with COVID-19 symptoms, causing diagnostic error. Moreover, we provided a summary of the different information available today for these risks, categorized by mental health disorder, for the following: schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, anxiety disorder, ADHD, sleep disorders and suicidal risk. The matter of psychoactive substance use during the pandemic is also analyzed in this paper, and guideline websites and publications for psychotropic treatments in the context of COVID-19 are referenced during the text, so that changes on those guidelines and eventual interaction between psychotropics and COVID-19 treatment medication can be reported and studied. Finally, we also provide a literature review of the latest known antiviral properties of psychotropics against SARS-CoV-2 as complementary information.

[Informations on psychotropics and their adaptations for patients suffering from mental disorders in France during the SARS-CoV-2 epidemic]. / Informations relatives aux psychotropes et à leurs adaptations éventuelles pour les patients souffrant de troubles psychiques en France pendant l'épidémie à SARS-CoV-2.

The 2019-20 coronavirus pandemic (SARS-CoV-2; severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2) has dramatic consequences on populations in terms of morbidity and mortality and in social terms, the general confinement of almost half of the world's population being a situation unprecedented in history, which is difficult today to measure the impact at the individual and collective levels. More specifically, it affects people with various risk factors, which are more frequent in patients suffering from psychiatric disorders. Psychiatrists need to know: (i) how to identify, the risks associated with the prescription of psychotropic drugs and which can prove to be counterproductive in their association with COVID-19 (coronavirus disease 2019), (ii) how to assess in terms of benefit/risk ratio, the implication of any hasty and brutal modification on psychotropic drugs that can induce confusion for a differential diagnosis with the evolution of COVID-19. We carried out a review of the literature aimed at assessing the specific benefit/risk ratio of psychotropic treatments in patients suffering from COVID-19. Clinically, symptoms suggestive of COVID-19 (fever, cough, dyspnea, digestive signs) can be caused by various psychotropic drugs and require vigilance to avoid false negatives and false positives. In infected patients, psychotropic drugs should be used with caution, especially in the elderly, considering the pulmonary risk. Lithium and Clozapine, which are the reference drugs in bipolar disorder and resistant schizophrenia, warrant specific attention. For these two treatments the possibility of a reduction in the dosage - in case of minimal infectious signs and in a situation, which does not allow rapid control - should ideally be considered taking into account the clinical response (even biological; plasma concentrations) observed in the face of previous dose reductions. Tobacco is well identified for its effects as an inducer of CYP1A2 enzyme. In a COVID+ patient, the consequences of an abrupt cessation of smoking, particularly related with the appearance of respiratory symptoms (cough, dyspnea), must therefore be anticipated for patients receiving psychotropics metabolized by CYP1A2. Plasma concentrations of these drugs are expected to decrease and can be related to an increase risk of relapse. The symptomatic treatments used in COVID-19 have frequent interactions with the most used psychotropics. If there is no curative treatment for infection to SARS-CoV-2, the interactions of the various molecules currently tested with several classes of psychotropic drugs (antidepressants, antipsychotics) are important to consider because of the risk of changes in cardiac conduction. Specific knowledge on COVID-19 remains poor today, but we must recommend rigor in this context in the use of psychotropic drugs, to avoid adding, in patients suffering from psychiatric disorders, potentially vulnerable in the epidemic context, an iatrogenic risk or loss of efficiency.

High-dose transdermal nicotine in Parkinson's disease patients: a randomized, open-label, blinded-endpoint evaluation phase 2 study.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Studies of the effects of nicotine on motor symptoms in Parkinson's disease (PD) brought out discordant results. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of high doses of transdermal nicotine on motor symptoms in PD. METHODS: Forty PD patients were randomly assigned to a treated and untreated arm in an open-label study. Treated patients received increasing doses of nicotine to reach 90 mg/day by 11 weeks. This dosage was maintained for 28 weeks (W39) and then reduced over 6 weeks. Final evaluation was performed 6 weeks after washout. The main outcome measure was the OFF-DOPA Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) motor score measured on video recordings by raters blinded to the medication status of the patients. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in OFF-DOPA UPDRS motor scores between the nicotine-treated and non-treated groups, neither at W39 (19.4 ± 9.3 vs. 21.5 ± 14.2) nor considering W39 differences from baseline (-1.5 ± 12.1 vs. +0.9 ± 12.1). The 39-item Parkinson's disease questionnaire scores decreased in nicotine-treated patients and increased in non-treated patients, but the difference was not significant. Overall tolerability was acceptable, and 12/20 treated patients reached the maximal dosage. CONCLUSIONS: High doses of transdermal nicotine were tolerated, but our study failed to demonstrate significant improvement in UPDRS motor scores. Improvement in unblinded secondary outcomes (UPDRS-II, UPDRS-IV, doses of l-DOPA equivalents) suggest a possible benefit for patients treated with nicotine, which should be confirmed in larger double blind, placebo-controlled studies.

Do lipids and apolipoproteins predict coronary heart disease under statin and fibrate therapy in the primary prevention setting in community-dwelling elderly subjects? The 3C Study.

PURPOSE: To evaluate associations of standard lipids and apolipoproteins with incident coronary heart disease (CHD) in older adults according to lipid-lowering treatment (LLT) in the primary prevention setting. METHODS: Within the 3C Study of men and women aged ≥ 65 years, standard lipids, apolipoproteins A-1 and B100 and hs-CRP were measured in baseline blood samples from 199 participants who developed a first CHD event over 4 years of follow-up and from 1081 subjects randomly selected from the initial cohort (case cohort study). Standardized hazard ratios (HRs) were estimated by the Cox proportional hazard model. RESULTS: In the random sample, 75.3% were free of LLT (non-users), 11.5% received statins and 13.4% fibrates. Among the non-users, all lipid parameters were significantly associated with future CHD (n = 145) after adjustment for age, gender, study center and educational level, and their HRs were comparable. For instance, the HR for LDL-cholesterol was 1.38 (95% CI: 1.13-1.69). These associations also existed and were stronger among statin users (n = 27 CHD), as shown by an HR for LDL-cholesterol of 2.20 (95% CI: 1.27-3.81). Additional adjustment for traditional risk factors and hs-CRP marginally modified HR estimates in those receiving or not receiving statins. Among fibrate users (n = 27 CHD), significant associations were observed for triglycerides only (1.68; 95% CI = 1.04-2.72) in fully adjusted analyses. CONCLUSION: In older adults, standard lipids and apolipoproteins are stronger predictors of CHD in those receiving statins than in those who are not in the primary prevention setting. Under fibrate treatment, only triglycerides were independent predictors of CHD.