NIH consensus development statement on management of hepatitis B.

OBJECTIVE: To provide health care providers, patients, and the general public with a responsible assessment of currently available data on the management of hepatitis B. PARTICIPANTS: A non-DHHS, nonadvocate 12-member panel representing the fields of hepatology and liver transplantation, gastroenterology, public health and epidemiology, infectious diseases, pathology, oncology, family practice, internal medicine, and a public representative. In addition, 22 experts from pertinent fields presented data to the panel and conference audience. EVIDENCE: Presentations by experts and a systematic review of the literature prepared by the Minnesota Evidence-based Practice Center, through the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Scientific evidence was given precedence over anecdotal experience. CONFERENCE PROCESS: The panel drafted its statement based on scientific evidence presented in open forum and on published scientific literature. The draft statement was presented on the final day of the conference and circulated to the audience for comment. The panel released a revised statement later that day at http://consensus.nih.gov. This statement is an independent report of the panel and is not a policy statement of the NIH or the Federal Government. CONCLUSIONS: The most important predictors of cirrhosis or hepatocellular carcinoma in persons who have chronic HBV are persistently elevated HBV DNA and ALT levels in blood. Other risk factors include HBV genotype C infection, male sex, older age, family history of hepatocellular carcinoma, and co-infection with HCV or HIV. The major goals of anti-HBV therapy are to prevent the development of progressive disease, specifically cirrhosis and liver failure, as well as hepatocellular carcinoma development and subsequent death. To date, no RCTs of anti-HBV therapies have demonstrated a beneficial impact on overall mortality, liver-specific mortality, or development of hepatocellular carcinoma. Most published reports of hepatitis therapy use changes in short-term virologic, biochemical, and histologic parameters to infer likelihood of long-term benefit. Approved therapies are associated with improvements in intermediate biomarkers, including HBV DNA, HBeAg loss or seroconversion, decreases in ALT levels, and improvement in liver histology (Table). Although various monitoring practices have been recommended, no clear evidence exists for an optimal approach. The most important research needs include representative prospective cohort studies to define the natural history of the disease and large RCTs of monotherapy and combined therapies, including placebo-controlled trials, that measure the effects on clinical health outcomes. Table. Criteria Useful in Determining for Whom Therapy is Indicated: Patients for whom therapy is indicated: Patients who have acute liver failure, cirrhosis and clinical complications, cirrhosis or advanced fibrosis and HBV DNA in serum, or reactivation of chronic HBV after chemotherapy or immunosuppression; Infants born to women who are HBsAg-positive (immunoglobulin and vaccination). Patients for whom therapy may be indicated: Patients in the immune-active phase who do not have advanced fibrosis or cirrhosis. Patients for whom immediate therapy is not routinely indicated: Patients with chronic hepatitis B in the immune-tolerant phase (with high levels of serum HBV DNA but normal serum ALT levels or little activity on liver biopsy); Patients in the inactive carrier or low replicative phase (with low levels of or no detectable HBV DNA in serum and normal serum ALT levels); Patients who have latent HBV infection (HBV DNA without HBsAg). We recommend routine screening for hepatitis B of newly arrived immigrants to the United States from countries where the HBV prevalence rate is greater than 2%. Screening will facilitate the provision of medical and public health services for infected patients and their families and provide public health data on the burden of disease in immigrant populations. The screening test should not be used to prohibit immigration.

Hepatitis C: a brief clinical overview.

Hepatitis C has emerged as an important public health problem that has affected 3.9 million Americans and 170 million people worldwide and is currently the most common indication for orthotopic liver transplantation. The disease, characterized by asymptomatic onset, is often discovered incidentally through blood tests obtained during routine physical examination or before blood donation. Spontaneous recovery occurs in about 20% of patients. Among those who remain chronically infected, an equal percentage progress to cirrhosis within 20 yr, have stable nonprogressive disease, or progress more slowly over 40 to 60 yr. At present, combination therapy with interferon plus ribavirin is the treatment of choice for hepatitis C-infected patients identified as appropriate candidates for therapy. Unfortunately, sustained response rates are only modest, with a lesser response among African Americans, and treatment is associated with a number of side effects. Research studies attempting to improve the response to current therapy, to identify alternative treatments or treatment strategies, and to develop an effective vaccine are ongoing and will hopefully provide us with the ability to better understand and manage hepatitis C.

High-density lipoproteins from human alcoholics exhibit impaired reverse cholesterol transport function.

We have previously shown that chronic alcohol consumption leads to inhibition of sialylation of apolipoprotein E (apo E) that results in its impaired binding to high-density lipoprotein (HDL) molecule. Because apo E plays a major role in reverse cholesterol transport (RCT), we speculated that ethanol-mediated formation of HDL molecules without apo E may affect the RCT process. Therefore, we have investigated whether the RCT function of HDL is affected in chronic alcoholics with or without liver disease compared with nondrinkers. HDL was isolated from fasting plasma of normal subjects, n = 9 (nondrinkers), chronic alcoholics, n = 8 (ALC), and chronic alcoholics with liver disease, n = 6 (ALD). A portion of HDL sample from each subject was evaluated for its cholesterol efflux capacity from [3H]cholesterol oleate preloaded mouse macrophages. The remaining portion of each HDL sample was labeled with [3H]cholesterol oleate and evaluated for its ability to deliver cholesterol to the liver using HepG2 cells in culture. Cholesterol efflux capacity of HDLs was decreased by 83% (P < .0002) in alcoholics without liver disease and by 84% (P < .0006) in alcoholics with liver disease compared with the HDLs from nondrinkers. The capacities of HDLs to deliver cholesterol to the liver were decreased by 54% (P < .005) in alcoholics without liver disease and by 64% (P < .005) in alcoholics with liver disease compared with the HDLs from nondrinkers. The fact that further complications by liver disease in alcoholic subjects did not significantly exacerbate the extent of impairment in RCT function of HDL suggest that alcohol per se is responsible for its deleterious effects on RCT. Significantly, plasma HDL apo E concentration relative to that of apo A1 (apo E/apo A1 ratio) was also decreased by 31% to 32% (P < .0005) in alcoholics without or with liver disease compared with nondrinkers. It is therefore concluded that chronic alcohol consumption adversely affects the RCT function of HDL by altering its association with apo E due to ethanol-induced desialylation of apo E.

The natural history of chronic hepatitis C infection.

Hepatitis C is among the most common causes of chronic liver disease affecting approximately 1% of the world's population. End-stage hepatitis C virus (HCV)-related chronic liver disease is the leading indication for orthotopic liver transplantation worldwide. Despite these facts, many questions regarding the natural history of HCV infection remain unanswered. Is progression to end-stage liver disease inevitable? Over what time period does it occur? If progression is not inevitable, can we identify those persons destined to have end-stage liver disease and possibly prevent or slow progression?

New hepatitis A vaccines and their role in prevention.

The hepatitis A virus (HAV) accounts for 20 to 25% of clinically apparent hepatitis cases worldwide. It generally causes mild to moderately severe acute illness. The serological prevalence of this virus is high in underdeveloped countries where poor sanitary conditions facilitate the spread of the virus. The Sentinel Counties studies of the Centers for Disease Control in the US have identified a number of factors associated with the acquisition of HAV, including household members, homosexual men, children and caretakers in day-care facilities who come into contact with individuals who are incubating or in the early phases of HAV infection. Poor sanitary conditions, international travel and intravenous drug use promote the transmission of the virus. However, in 40% of cases, no risk factor can be identified. Immune globulin (IG), once used exclusively for the prevention of HAV infection, acts by provoking passive-active immunity. It prevents clinical disease but permits subclinical disease to develop. Unfortunately, IG provides protection for only 3 to 6 months, necessitating repeat inoculation for exposure extending over 180 days. More recently, a number of live-attenuated and formalin-inactivated HAV vaccines have been developed and studied. The vaccines are well tolerated and highly immunogenic, with only mild local adverse reactions. The suggested dose and schedule is 720 ELISA units of inactivated vaccine injected intramuscularly at 0, 1 and 6 months. A single intramuscular dose of 1440 ELISA units followed 6 to 12 months later by a further injection has also been approved by the FDA and is available in several European countries. 90% of vaccines achieve protective levels of anti-HAV after the first injection. Routine use of the HAV vaccine for pre-exposure prophylaxis is expected to replace IG in healthy adults travelling to endemic areas, children in day-care centres, military personnel, homosexual men, healthcare workers and residents in institutions for the mentally disabled.

Determinants of metastatic rate and survival in patients with Zollinger-Ellison syndrome: a prospective long-term study.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: It is unclear whether tumor location, size, or the presence of multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN-1) alters metastatic rate and survival in patients with pancreatic endocrine tumors. The purpose of this study was to determine the prognostic factors of survival and metastatic rate in patients with Zollinger-Ellison syndrome (ZES). METHODS: Data were analyzed from 185 consecutive patients with ZES who were followed up prospectively. RESULTS: Liver metastases were present in 24% of patients and correlated with the size of the primary tumor. Duodenal tumors were smaller than pancreatic tumors. Liver metastases occurred more often (P < 0.00001) with pancreatic than duodenal tumors, whereas the metastatic rate to lymph nodes was not different. Survival of patients with liver but not lymph node metastases was shortened. In patients with sporadic ZES, liver metastases were more common during the initial evaluation and survival was decreased compared with patients with MEN-1; however, during follow-up, an equal percentage of patients with and without MEN-1 developed liver metastases. CONCLUSIONS: Survival was primarily determined by the presence of liver metastases. The frequency of liver metastases depends on the size and location of the primary tumor and on the presence of MEN-1 at the initial presentation. Metastases to the lymph nodes do not depend on these factors. A benign and malignant form of ZES exists.

Helicobacter pylori infection. A reversible cause of hypergastrinemia and hyperchlorhydria which may mimic Zollinger-Ellison syndrome.

The present report describes two patients with fasting hypergastrinemia, gastric acid hypersecretion, and Helicobacter pylori gastritis. Provocative testing for Zollinger-Ellison syndrome was negative and imaging studies did not demonstrate an intra-abdominal mass. Following eradication of the Helicobacter pylori infection, the fasting hypergastrinemia resolved in both patients and in one patient the gastric acid hypersecretion also resolved. The implications of this case on the differential diagnosis of Zollinger-Ellison syndrome are discussed.

Esophageal function and occurrence of Barrett's esophagus in Zollinger-Ellison syndrome.

Manifestations of esophageal disease are present in up to 60% of patients with Zollinger-Ellison syndrome (ZES), although esophageal function has been studied in only a few patients and the prevalence of Barrett's mucosa is unknown in these patients. It is unclear whether the high prevalence of esophageal disease is related to gastric acid hypersecretion alone or to abnormalities of esophageal motility or lower esophageal sphincter (LES) function in addition. To address these issues in the present study esophageal function was evaluated prospectively in 92 consecutive patients with ZES (66 with active disease, 26 disease-free after curative resection) seen during a 1-year period after controlling acid hypersecretion. In the patients with active disease the mean basal acid output (BAO) was 33 +/- 3.0 mEq/h, the maximal acid output (MAO) was 56 +/- 4.0 mEg/h, fasting serum gastrin was 8,736 +/- 4,813 pg/ml and duration of disease prior to study was 12.5 +/- 2.0 years. At the time of manometry, gastric acid secretion was controlled in all patients and no patient had evidence of gastroesophageal reflux disease at upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Esophageal manometry revealed normal motility in 85% of patients. Eleven percent had low LES pressures, and only 1% of patients had an elevated LES pressure. The frequency of Barrett's mucosa (3%) was similar to that found in the general population but much less than that reported in patients with idiopathic GERD. No correlation was noted between LES pressures or manometric abnormalities and the fasting serum gastrin, BAO, MAO or the presence or absence of multiple endocrine neoplasia type I or previous vagotomy. Esophageal manometric results and LES pressure were similar in disease-free patients and those with active ZES. In conclusion, these results suggest that hypergastrinemia or other disease-specific abnormalities are not contributing to the high incidence of esophageal disease in patients with ZES because esophageal function in patients with ZES is similar to normals. Specifically, motility disorders in patients with ZES occur in similar frequency to normals, and LES pressure is normal in most patients. Despite the high levels of acid secretion and prominence of symptoms, the occurrence of Barrett's mucosa was uncommon (3%) raising the possibility of additional protective mechanisms in patients with ZES.

Zollinger-Ellison syndrome can be the initial endocrine manifestation in patients with multiple endocrine neoplasia-type I.

PURPOSE: To determine whether patients with multiple endocrine neoplasia type I (MEN-I) can initially present with Zollinger-Ellison syndrome (ZES), and to learn whether ZES exhibits any distinguishing features when it occurs as a first manifestation of MEN-I. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Sixty patients who had been referred to a clinical research center with ZES were examined by cohort analysis. Twenty-eight had MEN-I and 32 did not. In patients with MEN-I, we analyzed the temporal relationships between the clinical and biochemical manifestations of ZES and the other endocrinopathies associated with the neoplasia. To determine whether patients who had ZES as a first manifestation of MEN-I (n = 8) had any distinguishing clinical characteristics, we compared them to a cohort of patients with established sporadic ZES (n = 32) matched for age, sex, and time since the onset of symptoms consistent with ZES. RESULTS: Of the 28 patients with ZES and MEN-I, 11 initially presented with ZES and hyperparathyroidism (HP) and 1 with evidence only for pituitary disease. Eight patients (29%) presented with features of ZES and developed clinical and biochemical evidence for HP later, while the same number developed these 2 endocrinopathies in the opposite order. In whichever order ZES and HP occurred, the time from the diagnosis of the first to the diagnosis of the second was similar. It ranged from 9 to 177 months in patients who presented with ZES first, and from 12 to 264 months in patients who presented with HP first. At the time of initial diagnosis, the patients who presented with ZES as a manifestation of MEN-I had no distinguishing ZES-related symptoms, biochemical assays, or tumor imaging results compared to the cohort of patients who had the syndrome sporadically. CONCLUSION: Patients with MEN-I can initially present with a symptomatic pancreatic endocrine tumor syndrome without any other disease manifestations. In patients with ZES and MEN-I, up to one third may present with ZES without evidence of any other endocrinopathy. Consequently, patients with presumed sporadic ZES should undergo continual biochemical screening for other endocrinopathies characteristic of MEN-I and, in the future, genetic studies for the MEN-I gene.

Use of omeprazole in Zollinger-Ellison syndrome: a prospective nine-year study of efficacy and safety.

H+, K(+)-ATPase inhibitors such as omeprazole are the antisecretory agents of choice for the management of gastric acid hypersecretory states, including the Zollinger-Ellison syndrome. However, long-term follow-up data on the overall efficacy and safety of these agents in large numbers of patients are lacking. In the current study we examined the long-term efficacy and safety of omeprazole in 116 patients with Zollinger-Ellison syndrome treated with oral omeprazole at a single centre for up to 114 months (mean +/- S.E.M. = 38 +/- 3 months). The initial omeprazole maintenance dose was established according to the acute upward dose titration method in 89/116 patients (77%). Gastric acid output was effectively controlled using 60 mg of omeprazole once daily in 41/89 patients (46%) and 22/89 patients (25%) required twice daily omeprazole therapy. The mean ranitidine equivalent dose for patients who required 60 mg omeprazole once daily (2.5 +/- 0.2 g/day) was significantly lower than the mean ranitidine equivalent dose for patients who required more than 60 mg omeprazole once daily (4.3 +/- 0.3 g/day). Long-term omeprazole maintenance therapy was discontinued in 36/116 patients (31%) but in no cases was discontinuation due either to drug-induced side-effects or uncontrolled gastric acid output. Fasting serum gastrin levels were significantly elevated above pre-treatment levels at only one time point during follow-up and were likely due to tumour growth rather than a drug effect. The final long-term omeprazole maintenance doses were lower than the initial doses but correlated closely with the pre-omeprazole basal acid output (r = 0.41, P < 0.001) and ranitidine equivalent dose requirements (r = 0.49, P < 0.001). We conclude that omeprazole effectively and safely controls gastric acid hypersecretion in all patients with Zollinger-Ellison syndrome for up to nine years without evidence by tachyphylaxis.

An evaluation of human recombinant alpha interferon in patients with metastatic gastrinoma.

BACKGROUND: Metastatic gastrinoma is becoming increasingly recognized in patients with Zollinger-Ellison Syndrome. The mean 5-year survival of these patients is < 20%. Chemotherapeutic regimens are of limited benefit. The aim of this study was to evaluate the use of interferon in these patients because a preliminary report suggested it might be effective. METHODS: The efficacy and toxicity of interferon was assessed in 13 consecutive Zollinger-Ellison syndrome patients with liver metastases. Patients were treated with human recombinant alpha interferon (5 million IU, subcutaneously [SC]) daily and followed up at 3-month intervals with multiple imaging studies. At each follow-up, toxicity of therapy was assessed and fasting serum gastrin concentrations were obtained. RESULTS: No patient showed a reduction in tumor size at any follow-up. One patient died after 2 months. At 6 months, six patients (46%) had stable tumor size in the liver, although new bone metastases developed in one patient. Three patients showed stable disease for up to 21 months. Changes in serum gastrin correlated with tumor response at 6 months. All patients developed some side effects of therapy. Thirty-one percent required dose reduction, and one patient (8%) had to have interferon therapy interrupted briefly. CONCLUSIONS: These results fail to define a therapeutic role for interferon in the treatment of metastatic gastrinoma.

Prospective study of the need for long-term antisecretory therapy in patients with Zollinger-Ellison syndrome following successful curative gastrinoma resection.

A long-term cure is now possible in more than 30% of selected patients with Zollinger-Ellison syndrome who undergo gastrinoma resection. The need, however, for continued gastric acid antisecretory therapy in these patients remains controversial. The current study was designed to determine whether post-operative antisecretory therapy is needed in patients who have undergone successful gastrinoma resection and, if so, to attempt to define criteria with which to identify patients who require therapy. Twenty-eight consecutive patients who had previously undergone curative gastrinoma resection were prospectively studied. When antisecretory therapy was discontinued, 43% (12/28) of these patients developed gastro-oesophageal reflux, diarrhoea, acid-peptic symptoms or endoscopic evidence of acid-peptic disease within 2 weeks and were deemed to have failed a trial of antisecretory drug withdrawal. The remaining 57% (16/28) of patients who successfully discontinued antisecretory therapy were followed for a mean time of 31 months after withdrawal of therapy. Analysis of acid output studies pre-operatively, as well as at the time of drug withdrawal, demonstrated that patients who were unable to discontinue antisecretory therapy exhibited higher pre-operative maximal acid output values and higher basal acid output values at the time of attempted drug withdrawal than patients who were able to discontinue therapy. Despite these findings, there was significant overlap in acid output values between groups so that it was not possible to define specific acid output criteria for successful drug withdrawal. Pre-operative clinical characteristics, such as the presence or absence of gastro-esophageal reflux or acid-peptic disease, or post-operative laboratory values, such as the fasting serum gastrin level, did not correlate with the ability to discontinue antisecretory therapy. We conclude that following successful curative gastrinoma resection, 40% of patients still require antisecretory therapy and that both symptom evaluation as well as upper endoscopy should be used to guide attempted drug withdrawal. Although patients who are not able to discontinue therapy have significantly higher acid output measurements than those who are able to discontinue therapy, neither acid output criteria nor any other laboratory or clinical characteristics are able to predict the need for continued antisecretory therapy in these patients.