Bottlenose dolphin temporary threshold shift following exposure to 10-ms impulses centered at 8 kHza).

Studies of marine mammal temporary threshold shift (TTS) from impulsive sources have typically produced small TTS magnitudes, likely due to much of the energy in tested sources lying below the subjects' range of best hearing. In this study of dolphin TTS, 10-ms impulses centered at 8 kHz were used with the goal of inducing larger magnitudes of TTS and assessing the time course of hearing recovery. Most impulses had sound pressure levels of 175-180 dB re 1 µPa, while inter-pulse interval (IPI) and total number of impulses were varied. Dolphin TTS increased with increasing cumulative sound exposure level (SEL) and there was no apparent effect of IPI for exposures with equal SEL. The lowest TTS onset was 184 dB re 1 µPa2s, although early exposures with 20-s IPI and cumulative SEL of 182-183 dB re 1 µPa2s produced respective TTS of 35 and 16 dB in two dolphins. Continued testing with higher SELs up to 191 dB re 1 µPa2s in one of those dolphins, however, failed to result in TTS greater than 14 dB. Recovery rates were similar to those from other studies with non-impulsive sources and depended on the magnitude of the initial TTS.

Input compensation of dolphin and sea lion auditory brainstem responses using frequency-modulated up-chirps.

Frequency-modulated "chirp" stimuli that offset cochlear dispersion (i.e., input compensation) have shown promise for increasing auditory brainstem response (ABR) amplitudes relative to traditional sound stimuli. To enhance ABR methods with marine mammal species known or suspected to have low ABR signal-to-noise ratios, the present study examined the effects of broadband chirp sweep rate and level on ABR amplitude in bottlenose dolphins and California sea lions. "Optimal" chirps were designed based on previous estimates of cochlear traveling wave speeds (using high-pass subtractive masking methods) in these species. Optimal chirps increased ABR peak amplitudes by compensating for cochlear dispersion; however, chirps with similar (or higher) frequency-modulation rates produced comparable results. The optimal chirps generally increased ABR amplitudes relative to noisebursts as threshold was approached, although this was more obvious when sound pressure level was used to equate stimulus levels (as opposed to total energy). Chirps provided progressively less ABR amplitude gain (relative to noisebursts) as stimulus level increased and produced smaller ABRs at the highest levels tested in dolphins. Although it was previously hypothesized that chirps would provide larger gains in sea lions than dolphins-due to the lower traveling wave speed in the former-no such pattern was observed.

Effects of echo phase on bottlenose dolphin jittered-echo detection.

The ability of bottlenose dolphins to detect changes in echo phase was investigated using a jittered-echo paradigm. The dolphins' task was to produce a conditioned vocalization when phantom echoes with fixed echo delay and phase changed to those with delay and/or phase alternated ("jittered") on successive presentations. Conditions included: jittered delay plus constant phase shifts, ±45° and 0°-180° jittered phase shifts, alternating delay and phase shifts, and random echo-to-echo phase shifts. Results showed clear sensitivity to echo fine structure, revealed as discrimination performance reductions when jittering echo fine structures were similar, but envelopes were different, high performance with identical envelopes but different fine structure, and combinations of echo delay and phase jitter where their effects cancelled. Disruption of consistent echo fine structure via random phase shifts dramatically increased jitter detection thresholds. Sensitivity to echo fine structure in the present study was similar to the cross correlation function between jittering echoes and is consistent with the performance of a hypothetical coherent receiver; however, a coherent receiver is not necessary to obtain the present results, only that the auditory system is sensitive to echo fine structure.

Dolphin conditioned hearing attenuation in response to repetitive tones with increasing level.

All species of toothed whales studied to date can learn to reduce their hearing sensitivity when warned of an impending intense sound; however, the specific conditions under which animals will employ this technique are not well understood. The present study was focused on determining whether dolphins would reduce their hearing sensitivity in response to an intense tone presented at a fixed rate but increasing level, without an otherwise explicit warning. Auditory brainstem responses (ABRs) to intermittent, 57-kHz tone bursts were continuously measured in two bottlenose dolphins as they were exposed to a series of 2-s, 40-kHz tones at fixed time intervals of 20, 25, or 29 s and at sound pressure levels (SPLs) increasing from 120 to 160 dB re 1 µPa. Results from one dolphin showed consistent ABR attenuation preceding intense tones when the SPL exceeded ∼140-150 dB re 1 µPa and the tone interval was 20 s. ABR attenuation with 25- or 29-s intense tone intervals was inconsistent. The second dolphin showed similar, but more subtle, effects. The results show dolphins can learn the timing of repetitive noise and may reduce their hearing sensitivity if the SPL is high enough, presumably to "self-mitigate" the noise effects.

Output compensation of auditory brainstem responses in dolphins and sea lions.

Cochlear dispersion causes increasing delays between neural responses from high-frequency regions in the cochlear base and lower-frequency regions toward the apex. For broadband stimuli, this can lead to neural responses that are out-of-phase, decreasing the amplitude of farfield neural response measurements. In the present study, cochlear traveling-wave speed and effects of dispersion on farfield auditory brainstem responses (ABRs) were investigated by first deriving narrowband ABRs in bottlenose dolphins and California sea lions using the high-pass subtractive masking technique. Derived-band ABRs were then temporally aligned and summed to obtain the "stacked ABR" as a means of compensating for the effects of cochlear dispersion. For derived-band responses between 8 and 32 kHz, cochlear traveling-wave speeds were similar for sea lions and dolphins [∼2-8 octaves (oct)/ms for dolphins; ∼3.5-11 oct/ms for sea lions]; above 32 kHz, traveling-wave speed for dolphins increased up to ∼30 oct/ms. Stacked ABRs were larger than unmasked, broadband ABRs in both species. The amplitude enhancement was smaller in dolphins than in sea lions, and enhancement in both species appears to be less than reported in humans. Results suggest that compensating for cochlear dispersion will provide greater benefit for ABR measurements in species with better low-frequency hearing.

The offset auditory brainstem response in bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus): Evidence for multiple underlying processes.

The auditory brainstem response (ABR) to stimulus onset has been extensively used to investigate dolphin hearing. The mechanisms underlying this onset response have been thoroughly studied in mammals. In contrast, the ABR evoked by sound offset has received relatively little attention. To build upon previous observations of the dolphin offset ABR, a series of experiments was conducted to (1) determine the cochlear places responsible for response generation and (2) examine differences in response morphologies when using toneburst versus noiseburst stimuli. Measurements were conducted with seven bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) using tonebursts and spectrally "pink" broadband noisebursts, with highpass noise used to limit the cochlear regions involved in response generation. Results for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired dolphins suggest that the offset ABR contains contributions from at least two distinct responses. One type of response (across place) might arise from the activation of neural units that are shifted basally relative to stimulus frequency and shares commonalities with the onset ABR. A second type of response (within place) appears to represent a "true" offset response from afferent centers further up the ascending auditory pathway from the auditory nerve, and likely results from synchronous activity beginning at or above the cochlear nucleus.

Role of the temporal window in dolphin auditory brainstem response onset.

Auditory brainstem responses (ABRs) to linear-enveloped, broadband noisebursts were measured in six bottlenose dolphins to examine relationships between sound onset envelope properties and the ABR peak amplitude. Two stimulus manipulations were utilized: (1) stimulus onset envelope pressure rate-of-change was held constant while plateau pressure and risetime were varied and (2) plateau duration was varied while plateau pressure and risetime were held constant. When the stimulus onset envelope pressure rate-of-change was held constant, ABR amplitudes increased with risetime and were fit well with an exponential growth model. The model best-fit time constants for ABR peaks P1 and N5 were 55 and 64 µs, respectively, meaning ABRs reached 99% of their maximal amplitudes for risetimes of 275-320 µs. When plateau pressure and risetime were constant, ABR amplitudes increased linearly with stimulus sound exposure level up to durations of ∼250 µs. The results highlight the relationship between ABR amplitude and the integral of some quantity related to the stimulus pressure envelope over the first ∼250 µs following stimulus onset-a time interval consistent with prior estimates of the dolphin auditory temporal window, also known as the "critical interval" in hearing.

Spectral cues and temporal integration during cylinder echo discrimination by bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus).

Three bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) participated in simulated cylinder wall thickness discrimination tasks utilizing electronic "phantom" echoes. The first experiment resulted in psychometric functions (percent correct vs wall thickness difference) similar to those produced by a dolphin performing the task with physical cylinders. In the second experiment, a wide range of cylinder echoes was simulated, with the time separation between echo highlights covering a range from <30 to >300 µs. Dolphin performance and a model of the dolphin auditory periphery suggest that the dolphins used high-frequency, spectral-profiles of the echoes for discrimination and that the utility of spectral cues degraded when the time separation between echo highlights approached and exceeded the dolphin's temporal integration time of ∼264 µs.

Dolphin echo-delay resolution measured with a jittered-echo paradigm.

Biosonar echo delay resolution was investigated in four bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) using a "jittered" echo paradigm, where dolphins discriminated between electronic echoes with fixed delay and those whose delay alternated (jittered) on successive presentations. The dolphins performed an echo-change detection task and produced a conditioned acoustic response when detecting a change from non-jittering echoes to jittering echoes. Jitter delay values ranged from 0 to 20 µs. A passive listening task was also conducted, where dolphins listened to simulated echoes and produced a conditioned acoustic response when signals changed from non-jittering to jittering. Results of the biosonar task showed a mean jitter delay threshold of 1.3 µs and secondary peaks in error functions suggestive of the click autocorrelation function. When echoes were jittered in polarity and delay, error functions shifted by approximately 5 µs and all dolphins discriminated echoes that jittered only in polarity. Results were qualitatively similar to those from big brown bats (Eptesicus fuscus) and indicate that the dolphin biosonar range estimator is sensitive to echo phase information. Results of the passive listening task suggested that the dolphins could not passively detect changes in timing and polarity of simulated echoes.

Effects of dolphin hearing bandwidth on biosonar click emissions.

Differences in odontocete biosonar emissions have been reported for animals with hearing loss compared to those with normal hearing. For example, some animals with high-frequency hearing loss have been observed to lower the dominant frequencies of biosonar signals to better match a reduced audible frequency range. However, these observations have been limited to only a few individuals and there has been no systematic effort to examine how animals with varying degrees of hearing loss might alter biosonar click properties. In the present study, relationships between age, biosonar click emissions, auditory evoked potentials (AEPs), and hearing bandwidth were studied in 16 bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) of various ages and hearing capabilities. Underwater hearing thresholds were estimated by measuring steady-state AEPs to sinusoidal amplitude modulated tones at frequencies from 23 to 152 kHz. Input-output functions were generated at each tested frequency and used to calculate frequency-specific thresholds and the upper-frequency limit of hearing for each subject. Click emissions were measured during a biosonar aspect change detection task using a physical target. Relationships between hearing capabilities and the acoustic parameters of biosonar signals are described here and compared to previous experiments with fewer subjects.