Current standard of care for distal femur fractures in Germany and Switzerland.

BACKGROUND: Distal femur fractures occur with an incidence of 4.5/100,000 and show a prevalence of 0.4%. Causes include low-impact trauma in older patients and high-impact trauma in younger patients without pre-existing medical conditions. The aim of this study was to perform a comprehensive evaluation of trauma mechanisms, trauma-promoting factors, comorbidities, medication history and type of surgical care to provide an overview of the causes of injury and the most appropriate therapeutic approach. METHODS: In this multicenter cohort study a retrospective analysis of 229 patients who sustained a distal femur fracture between January 2011 and December 2020 was performed. Individual fracture patterns, fracture predisposing factors, concomitant disease profiles, medication history, treatment strategy and associated complications were analyzed. RESULTS: 229 patients were included in the retrospective analysis. A total of 113-type 33 A, 50-type 33 B and 66-type 33 C fractures were diagnosed, of whom 92% received a lateral locking plate osteosynthesis. There was a complication in 14.4% of all cases, of which 6.1% were attributable to infection. Significant risk factors for developing a complication were an increased BMI (29.9 ± 8.5 kg/m2; p = 0.04), fracture displacement of over half a shaft width (p < 0.001) and AOC fractures (p < 0,016), specifically C2 fractures (p < 0,008). CONCLUSION: In this multicenter retrospective cohort study, lateral locking plate osteosynthesis was the method of choice and was selected in over 90% of cases, regardless of the fracture classification and risk factors. A complication rate of 14.4% emphasizes the necessary analysis of patient- and care-specific risk factors and a resulting adjustment of the therapy strategy. An increased BMI (29.9 ± 8.5 kg/m2; p = 0.04), fracture displacement of over half a shaft width (p < 0.001) and AOC fractures (p < 0,016), specifically C2 fractures (p < 0,008) increase the risk of developing a complication and should prompt an early switch to a treatment strategy that provides more stability.

Diagnostic value of open incisional biopsies in suspected, difficult-to-diagnose periprosthetic hip joint infection prior to revision surgery.

INTRODUCTION: Prior to revision of total hip arthroplasty (THA), low-grade chronic periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is often difficult to diagnose. We aimed to determine the diagnostic accuracy of open incisional tissue biopsy for the prediction of PJI prior to THA revision in cases with culture-negative or dry tap joint aspirates. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective single-center study includes 32 consecutive THA revision cases with high clinical suspicion of low-grade chronic PJI of the hip with culture-negative or dry tap joint aspirates and without systemic signs of infection. Open incisional biopsy (OIB) was performed prior to revision surgery. Periprosthetic tissue samples were analyzed by microbiology and histopathology for PJI. During definitive revision arthroplasty, identical diagnostics were repeated. Results from both procedures were compared and sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of OIB for the final diagnosis were calculated. RESULTS: Average age at revision was 69.3 ± 13.5 years. The sensitivity of the OIB procedure was 80% (microbiology), 69% (histology) and 82% for combined analyses (microbiology and histology). Specificity of OIB was 80% (microbiology), 94% (histology) and 60% for combined analyses. CONCLUSIONS: Open tissue biopsy performed in cases with culture-negative or inconclusive synovial fluid aspirates prior to revision of THA has limited diagnostic accuracy for the prediction of PJI. The procedure does not reliably close the diagnostic gap in a substantial number of cases. In this difficult patient population, risk of an open procedure may outweigh benefits and alternative less invasive methods should be considered for the preoperative diagnosis of PJI.

Implementation of a multidisciplinary infections conference improves the treatment of spondylodiscitis.

Establishing a multidisciplinary approach regarding the treatment of spondylodiscitis and analyzing its effect compared to a single discipline approach. 361 patients diagnosed with spondylodiscitis were included in this retrospective pre-post intervention study. The treatment strategy was either established by a single discipline approach (n = 149, year 2003-2011) or by a weekly multidisciplinary infections conference (n = 212, year 2013-2018) consisting of at least an orthopedic surgeon, medical microbiologist, infectious disease specialist and pathologist. Recorded data included the surgical and antibiotic strategy, complications leading to operative revision, recovered microorganisms, as well as the total length of hospital and intensive care unit stay. Compared to a single discipline approach, performing the multidisciplinary infections conference led to significant changes in anti-infective and surgical treatment strategies. Patients discussed in the conference showed significantly reduced days of total antibiotic treatment (66 ± 31 vs 104 ± 31, p < 0.001). Moreover, one stage procedures and open transpedicular screw placement were more frequently performed following multidisciplinary discussions, while there were less involved spinal segments in terms of internal fixation as well as an increased use of intervertebral cages instead of autologous bone graft (p < 0.001). Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis were the most frequently recovered organisms in both patient groups. No significant difference was found comparing inpatient complications between the two groups or the total in-hospital stay. Implementation of a weekly infections conference is an effective approach to introduce multidisciplinarity into spondylodiscitis management. These conferences significantly altered the treatment plan compared to a single discipline approach. Therefore, we highly recommend the implementation to optimize treatment modalities for patients.

High prevalence and undertreatment of osteoporosis in elderly patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty.

We detected a high prevalence of low bone mineral density assessed by DXA in 268 elderly patients with end-stage osteoarthritis scheduled for total hip arthroplasty (18% osteoporosis, 41% osteopenia). Therefore, and due to the identified concomitant undertreatment, routine DXA measurements should be considered in elderly patients prior to surgery. INTRODUCTION: Bone quality represents a decisive factor for osseointegration, durability, and complications of an implanted prosthesis. Although the risk of osteoporosis increases with age and the assessment of bone mineral density (BMD) prior to total hip arthroplasty (THA) is recommended in elderly patients, a systematic, unbiased analysis of such patients is not available in the literature. METHODS: In this retrospective study, we examined 268 elderly patients (age ≥70 years) who underwent dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) within 3 months prior to primary THA. Demographics, medical history, radiographic OA grade, and stem fixation method (i.e., cemented or cementless) were obtained. RESULTS: In total, 153 (57%) cemented and 115 (43%) cementless stem fixations during THA were performed. Forty-nine patients (18%) were diagnosed with osteoporosis (T-score ≤-2.5), 110 patients (41%) with osteopenia (T-score ≤-1.0), and 109 patients (41%) with normal BMD (T-score >-1.0). Importantly, 36/49 patients (73%) with osteoporosis were not diagnosed before, resulting in a relevant undertreatment. Female sex and low body mass index (BMI) were the main factors negatively influencing the bone mineral density (BMD). CONCLUSIONS: Due to a high incidence of undiagnosed and untreated osteoporosis in elderly patients with potential effects on the success of osseointegration as well as other clinical outcomes, DXA measurements should be included in the clinical routine for these patients prior to THA.

[Prevalence, comorbidity and interdisciplinary treatment of rheumatoid arthritis - Insurance data on outpatient and inpatient care in Baden-Württemberg]. / Prävalenz, Komorbidität und interdisziplinäre Versorgung der Rheumatoiden Arthritis ­ Versicherungsdaten zur ambulanten und stationären Versorgung in Baden-Württemberg.

BACKGROUND: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) has an increased number of comorbidities compared with the general population. OBJECTIVE: Study aim was to collect epidemiological data on prevalence, incidence and comorbidities of RA as well as utilization of outpatient and inpatient care services. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In an age and gender-adjusted case control study, a total of 3.4 million patients insured by the AOK Baden-Württemberg were analysed with respect to visits to physicians, prevalence, incidence and comorbidities of RA. The study was based on out- and inpatient diagnoses from 2013. RESULTS: The RA prevalence was 0.64% (n = 26,919), the incidence was 0.04%. Patients with RA have significant more comorbidities in almost all diagnosis groups, especially in musculoskeletal and cardiovascular diseases, compared to a control group (n = 181,209). 22.8% of RA patients had not contacted an internist rheumatologist, orthopedist or orthopedic surgeon. Biological disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) were almost exclusively prescribed by internist rheumatologists, while conventional DMARDs were equally prescribed by general practitioners and rheumatologists. Of the RA patients 32.6% were hospitalized at least once a year and were nearly twice as frequently inpatient as the control group. CONCLUSION: RA patients need more in- and outpatient healthcare services and suffer significantly more often from comorbidities. The general practitioner is the most frequently visited physician. Other consulted physicians are rheumatologists, ophthalmologists, orthopedists/orthopedic surgeons and internists not specialized in rheumatology. The study highlights the need to create consensus treatment algorithms and maintain a close interdisciplinary and intersectoral cooperation and communication.

[Quality Assurance in Sociomedical Evaluation by Peer Review: A Pilot Project of the German Statutory Pension Insurance]. / Qualitätssicherung in der Sozialmedizinischen Begutachtung durch Peer Review - ein Pilotprojekt der Deutschen Rentenversicherung.

BACKGROUND: The sociomedical evaluation by the German Pension Insurance serves the purpose of determining entitlement to disability pensions. A quality assurance concept for the sociomedical evaluation was developed, which is based on a peer Review process. Peer review is an established process of external quality assurance in health care. The review is based on a hierarchically constructed manual that was evaluated in this pilot project. METHODS: The database consists of 260 medical reports for disability pension of 12 pension insurance agencies. 771 reviews from 19 peers were included in the evaluation of the inter-rater reliability. Kendall's coefficient of concordance W for more than 2 raters is used as primary measure of inter-rater reliability. RESULTS: Reliability appeared to be heterogeneous. Kendalls W varies for the particular criteria from 0.09 to 0.88 and reached for primary criterion reproducibility a value of 0.37. CONCLUSION: The reliability of the manual seemed acceptable in the context of existing research data and is in line with existing peer review research outcomes. Nevertheless, the concordance is limited and requires optimisation. Starting points for improvement can be seen in a systematic training and regular user meetings of the peers involved.

[Outpatient rehabilitation in Germany. Interim results and prospects for further development]. / Ambulante Rehabilitation in Deutschland. Eine Zwischenbilanz und Perspektiven der Weiterentwicklung.

The offer and development of outpatient medical rehabilitation in Germany represents a substantial component of rehabilitative care. In consideration of demographic change and the increase of chronic illnesses, outpatient rehabilitation facilities, on account of their flexibility, can close care gaps for those who find stationary rehabilitation less attractive or not possible for other reasons. With the implementation of the "Sozialgesetzbuch" (SGB) V and SGB VI as well as the introduction of the SGB IX regarding the rehabilitation principle "outpatient before inpatient," outpatient rehabilitation was social juridically established. Today outpatient rehabilitation means an equal setting, which can substitute inpatient rehabilitation, thus, shortening inpatient rehabilitation or it can follow inpatient rehabilitation. In 2008, outpatient services constituted 11% of all rehabilitation services. Illnesses of the muscle system, skeletal system, and connective tissue system, which are the most frequent rehabilitation indications in Germany, are treated in an outpatient setting in 17% of cases. The outpatient rehabilitation process is characterized by the close proximity to a patient's residence and job, flexibility, and individual participation. These characteristics enable the implementation of innovative possibilities, e.g., stepwise occupational reintegration into the rehabilitation process in order to optimize rehabilitation outcome.

Heme-dependent catalase activity of lactobacilli.

The heme-dependent catalase in Lactobacillus pentosus, L. sake, L. delbrueckii and Enterococcus faecalis was studied. The catalase was formed by cells grown aerobically in the presence of hematin or for lactobacilli when grown without added hematin, after incubation of buffered cells in the presence of hematin. The kinetics of the production of catalase revealed maximum activity for L. pentosus and E. faecalis at late stationary and late logarithmic growth phase, respectively. The physiological role of catalase was studied with L. sake. The presence of hematin allows higher growth yields, since it protects the cells against hydrogen peroxide formed endogenously up to concentrations of 4.6 mmol/l.