Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Ann Vasc Surg ; 78: 233-238, 2022 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34455050

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The Canadian Cardiovascular Society 2016 guidelines recommend pre-operative measurement of brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) to risk-stratify patients for a 30-day composite outcome of death, myocardial infarction, or asymptomatic myocardial injury after noncardiac surgery (MINS). Whether this practice affects outcomes is unclear. The aim of this study was to examine the clinical utility of brain natriuretic peptide and myocardial injury after noncardiac surgery. METHODS: Analysis of a prospectively maintained database identified all elective open vascular surgery cases at an academic teaching hospital from January 2015 to December 2018. Pre-operative BNP values were available from June 2018 onward after becoming institutionally mandated. Co-morbidities were also collected to stratify patients using the Revised Cardiac Risk Index. The composite outcome of 30-day mortality, myocardial infarction, or MINS was determined. RESULTS: Prior to BNP becoming an institutionally required test, data was available from 1176 open cases. The 30-day mortality was 1.3% (15/1176) and post-operative myocardial infarction rate was 2.3% (27/1176). BNP measurements were collected in 91 consecutive patients. Ten patients (11%) experienced the composite outcome of mortality, myocardial infarction, or MINS. Elevated BNP was associated with increased odds of the composite outcome (P = 0.04), but not with mortality or myocardial infarction. Revised Cardiac Risk Index score was not predictive of outcomes. The majority of patients who qualified for the composite outcome experienced only an asymptomatic troponin rise (80%). Two patients met the universal definition of myocardial infarction, one of whom died. No other deaths occurred within 30 days. Detection of MINS did not result in any significant changes to patient management. CONCLUSIONS: Elevated BNP correlates with increased MINS. An asymptomatic troponin rise is the most commonly observed event, with unclear clinical implications. BNP may over-estimate surgical risk. Further studies on the long-term outcomes of patients with elevated BNP and MINS are required before widely adopting this strategy in vascular surgery patients.


Subject(s)
Heart Injuries/etiology , Myocardial Infarction/etiology , Natriuretic Peptide, Brain/blood , Vascular Diseases/surgery , Vascular Surgical Procedures/adverse effects , Aged , Biomarkers/blood , Female , Heart Injuries/blood , Heart Injuries/diagnosis , Heart Injuries/mortality , Humans , Male , Myocardial Infarction/blood , Myocardial Infarction/diagnosis , Myocardial Infarction/mortality , Predictive Value of Tests , Retrospective Studies , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , Troponin/blood , Vascular Diseases/blood , Vascular Diseases/diagnosis , Vascular Diseases/mortality , Vascular Surgical Procedures/mortality
2.
Intensive Crit Care Nurs ; 45: 31-36, 2018 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29295760

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to describe the contents of a patient diary and its significance for persons cared for in an ICU. RESEARCH METHODOLOGY: An empirical study with a qualitative design. Eight telephone interviews and one face-to-face interview were conducted with nine persons previously been treated in an ICU and been given a patient diary. In addition, the person would have read his/her diary. The data have been analysed with qualitative content analysis. FINDINGS: The study identified one overarching theme; Gaining understanding, and four categories; The diary is written for me, Creating memories from the time of care, Who writes in the diary and, The ability to return to the diary. The diary meant that participants gained an understanding of their time in the ICU while they were critically ill and the diary was important to be able to return to. CONCLUSION: What formerly critically ill patients appreciate most about the diary is that the diary is personally written, which makes them feel confirmed and valuable as a person. Guidelines for how and when a diary should be written and used would likely encourage critical care nurses and relatives to write in it.


Subject(s)
Critical Illness/psychology , Medical Records/standards , Adult , Aged , Critical Illness/nursing , Family/psychology , Female , Humans , Intensive Care Units/organization & administration , Male , Middle Aged , Qualitative Research
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...