A retrospective analysis of early and late outcome of biodegradable stent placement in the management of refractory anastomotic colorectal strictures.

BACKGROUND: Benign colorectal strictures are treated conventionally by endoscopic dilation. Experience using SEMS for benign colonic strictures is limited, and outcomes to date have been disappointing. Refractory colorectal strictures remain challenging to be treated with surgery. Polydioxanone-based stent are biodegradable (BD) stent CE approved for esophageal strictures. This study was designed to investigate retrospectively the safety and the efficacy of these stents for the management of strictures refractory to multiple sessions of dilation. METHODS: Patients with postsurgical benign strictures located within 20 cm from anal verge, refractory to mechanical or pneumatic dilation (at least 3 sessions) were included in this analysis. Clinical success was defined as the absence of occlusive symptoms and the ability to pass through the stricture with a regular size colonoscope. All patients were predilated before stent placement. Stents were released under fluoroscopic control. All patients were under stool softeners for 3 months. Follow-up was scheduled with endoscopic and fluoroscopic controls within 90 days from stent deployment and afterwards by telephone interview and/or ambulatory consultation. RESULTS: Eleven patients (7 males, mean age 62.3 ± 8.5 years) were included. Technical success was achieved in all the patients. Stent migration was observed in four patients within the first 2 weeks after stent placement. Stent migration was followed by recurrence of stricture and obstructive symptoms in all the cases. Among the seven patients who completed the process of stent biodegradation, five of them had complete resolution of the stricture and relief of symptoms. Two of 11 patients required surgical treatment during the follow-up period (mean 19.8 (range 42-15) months). The overall success rate of the BD stent was 45 %. CONCLUSIONS: This retrospective analysis of a limited number of patients demonstrated that nondedicated esophageal BD stents are associated with high risk of migration and clinical success in less than 50 % of patients. Dedicated stents with large diameter and antimigration findings could potentially improve the outcome of patients with refractory benign colorectal strictures.

Safety of cold polypectomy for <10mm polyps at colonoscopy: a prospective multicenter study.

BACKGROUND: Cold polypectomy techniques (without electrocautery) by means of biopsy forceps or snare are widely adopted for the removal of subcentimetric polyps. However, few data are available on the safety of this approach. The aim of this study was to assess the safety of cold polypectomy for subcentimetric polyps, as well as the rate of advanced neoplasia in these lesions. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In a prospective multicenter trial, consecutive patients with at least one < 10-mm polyp at colonoscopy were prospectively included. All of the < 10-mm polyps detected within the study period were removed by cold polypectomy. The rates of immediate or delayed bleeding and other complications were assessed at 7 and 30 days after cold polypectomy by telephone calls. The rate of advanced histology was also assessed. Predictive variables of postpolypectomy bleeding or advanced neoplasia were identified by multivariate analysis. RESULTS: A total of 1015 < 10-mm polyps in 823 patients (15.5 % on antiplatelet agents) were removed. Of these, 822 (81 %) were ≤ 5 mm and 193 (19 %) were 6 - 9 mm. Immediate postpolypectomy bleeding occurred in 18 patients, corresponding to a per-patient and per-polyp bleeding rate of 2.2 % (95 % confidence interval [CI] 1.2 % - 3.2 %) and 1.8 % (95 %CI 1 % - 2.6 %), respectively. Therapy with antiplatelet agents (odds ratio [OR] 4; 95 %CI 1.5 - 10.6) and larger polyp size (OR 2; 95 %CI 1.1 - 6.9) were independent predictors of bleeding. Bleeding was successfully treated by endoscopic hemostasis in all cases and required no further medical intervention. Advanced neoplasia prevalence in polyps ≤ 5 mm was as high as 8.7 %. CONCLUSIONS: The results from this study showed the high safety of a cold polypectomy approach for subcentimetric polyps. This was due to the low rate of postpolypectomy bleeding and to the high efficacy of endoscopic hemostasis in its treatment. The high rate of advanced neoplasia in polyps ≤ 5 mm should prompt some caution on the management of these lesions following detection at computed tomography colonography or colon capsule endoscopy.

Balanced Propofol Sedation in Patients Undergoing EUS-FNA: A Pilot Study to Assess Feasibility and Safety.

Introduction and aims. Balanced propofol sedation (BPS) administered by gastroenterologists has gained popularity in endoscopic procedures. Few studies exist about the safety of this approach during endosonography with fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA). We assessed the safety of BPS in EUS-FNA. Materials and methods. 112 consecutive patients, referred to our unit to perform EUS-FNA, from February 2008 to December 2009, were sedated with BPS. A second gastroenterologist administered the drugs and monitorized the patient. Results. All the 112 patients (62 males, mean age 58.35) completed the examination. The mean dose of midazolam and propofol was, respectively, of 2.1 mg (range 1-4 mg) and 350 mg (range 180-400). All patients received oxygen with a mean flux of 4 liter/minute (range 2-6 liters/minute). The mean recovery time after procedure was 25 minutes (range 18-45 minutes). No major complications related to sedation were registered during all procedures. The oxygen saturation of all patients never reduced to less than 85%. Blood systolic pressure during and after the procedure never reduced to less than 100 mmHg. Conclusions. In our experience BPS administered by non-anaesthesiologists provided safe and successful sedation in patients undergoing EUS-FNA.

Endoscopic flexible treatment of Zenker's diverticulum: a modification of the needle-knife technique.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIM: Endoscopic treatment of Zenker's diverticulum has been successfully reported over the last 10 years using different approaches. The hook-knife is a new device originally developed for endoscopic submucosal dissection procedures. This study aimed to investigate the safety and efficacy of endoscopic myotomy performed with the hook-knife. PATIENTS AND METHOD: From July 2005, 32 consecutive patients (23-male, mean age 74.8 years) with dysphagia secondary to the presence of Zenker's diverticulum were prospectively enrolled. Myotomy was performed using a straight-end transparent hood to the tip of the scope and the hook-knife for the incision of the bridge between the Zenker's diverticulum and the esophagus. Clinical outcome was evaluated assigning a dysphagia symptom score from 0 (symptoms absent) to 4 (inability to swallow saliva). RESULTS: General anesthesia was used in 4 patients, deep sedation with propofol in 23 patients, while midazolam was used in 5 patients. The mean procedural time was 28 minutes. Complications occurred in 2 patients (6.25 %). At 1 month follow-up, the mean dysphagia score was significantly improved from 2.9 to 0.6 ( P < 0.001) with 87.5 % of patients free of symptoms and 4 patients with dysphagia that was persistent but milder than before the treatment. Three of these 4 patients underwent a successful second endoscopic treatment with complete relief of dysphagia; one was not re-treated because of advanced age (92 years). During the follow-up period (23.87 +/- 9.6 months), 2 patients developed dysphagia recurrence. The overall success rate was 90.6 %. CONCLUSIONS: Diverticulectomy with a flexible scope and the hook-knife may represent a safe and effective alternative treatment for patients with Zenker's diverticulum.

Endoscopic mucosal resection for large and giant sessile and flat colorectal polyps: a single-center experience with long-term follow-up.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: This study examines efficacy, outcome, and complications of endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) for large (> or = 20 mm) and giant (> or = 40 mm) sessile and flat colorectal polyps. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All EMRs carried out at our institution over a 9-year period, for large and giant sessile and flat colorectal polyps with an intensive and regular follow-up were evaluated. The rate of en bloc and piecemeal resection, complications, and recurrence were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 148 polyps were resected in 148 patients. There were 113 large polyps (76.3 %) with a mean size of 25 +/- 4.7 mm (range 20 - 39 mm) and 35 giant polyps (23.7 %) with a mean size of 48.8 +/- 12.5 mm (range 40 - 100 mm). The most frequent location was the rectum, occurring in 43.2 %. All lesions were removed in a single session. En bloc resection was performed in 65 cases (43.9 %) and piecemeal in 83 (56.1 %). Procedural bleeding occurred in 13 EMRs (8.8 %), and one case of early and one case of delayed bleeding also occurred. There were two cases of postpolypectomy syndrome and one case of perforation. Malignancy (intramucosal and invasive cancer) was mostly present in polyps with sessile shape ( P = 0.0013). Follow-up colonoscopy was performed in 142 patients for a mean of 29.8 months. Recurrence was observed in 6/142 (4.2 %) patients and was found more in patients with giant polyps ( P = 0.014). CONCLUSIONS: In our experience EMR is a simple and safe procedure for removing large and giant sessile and flat colorectal polyps, and is associated with a very low risk of complication and local recurrence.

Optical coherence tomography in inflammatory bowel disease: prospective evaluation of 35 patients.

PURPOSE: Optical coherence tomography is a technique using infrared light in tissues of the gastrointestinal tract and human colon affected by inflammatory diseases. We evaluated whether there are specific patterns of optical coherence tomography for inflammatory bowel disease and compared the technique performance to the histology. METHODS: Optical coherence tomography was performed in 35 patients (18 men; 31 ulcerative colitis, 4 Crohn's disease). The images were obtained from affected and normal colon at endoscopy. Two biopsies of the sites visualized were taken. Two endoscopists scored the images, and two pathologists, blind to the endoscopy and optical coherence tomography, performed the histologic evaluation. RESULTS: Three optical coherence tomography patterns were identified: 1) mucosal backscattering alteration, 2) delimited dark areas, and 3) layered colonic wall. Compared with the histology, mucosal backscattering alteration was the most effective in recognizing the disease in patients (P = 0.007 in colon segments affected, and P < 0.001 in normal segments). The sensitivity and specificity have been 100 and 78 percent, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The in vivo optical coherence tomography correctly detected inflammatory bowel disease features in affected and apparently normal colon, and allowed to discriminate patterns for active ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease.