DKA cases over the last three years: has anything changed?

BACKGROUND: Diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) has been related mainly to type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM). However, it is not solely related to T1DM. The purpose of this study was to assess the prevalence of DKA among type 1 and type 2 patients with diabetes mellitus, who were hospitalized in our Clinic due to DKA, as well as to determine the etiology beyond DKA. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A cohort of 109 patients with DKA, 17-86 years of age, who were hospitalized in the Department of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism of our hospital between 2015 and 2017, were included in the study. RESULTS: Among the 109 patients, 50 (45.9%) had mild DKA, 48 (44.1%) had moderate DKA, whereas 11 patients (10%) had severe DKA. Sixty-five patients (60%) developed DKA as the first manifestation of T1DM, 30 patients (27%) developed DKA in the context of type 2 diabetes (T2DM), mainly due to the co-existence of serious infections, 11 patients (10%) had T1DM, but had omitted their insulin dosages, and 3 patients (3%) developed DKA due to unknown reasons. CONCLUSIONS: Most patients with DKA presented with mild and moderate DKA and only a minority presented with the severe form of the disease. The etiology of DKA was mainly T1DM and less frequent uncontrolled T2DM, usually due to the co-existence of severe infections, while only in a tiny minority, the causes remained unidentifiable.

Monitoring of patients with type 2 diabetes and nephropathy in a specialized diabetic nephropathy clinic seems to be beneficial.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcome of DM2 patients with nephropathy when they are under surveillance of a joined clinic run by endocrinologists & nephrologists. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A cohort of 106 patients with DM2, 42-83 years of age, and eGFR < 60 ml/min/m2 were included. Age, sex, duration of diabetes, duration of attending our clinic, smoking habits, BMI, data regarding ischemic heart disease and induction of hemodialysis, urine albumin excretion (UAE) levels, eGFR (MDRD equation) and values of various biochemical parameters were recorded too. Follow-up period ranged from one to 25 years. Paired samples t-test and non-parametrical Kruskal-Wallis test were used for the analyses of the data. RESULTS: Fifty percent of patients had no further progression, 25.9% improvement, while 24.1% had worsening of the UAE levels. During the follow-up in the joined clinic, there was a smaller than the expected from the medical literature decrease in median eGFR, i.e. 2,3 ml/min/m2 and a statistically significant improvement in glycosylated hemoglobin levels from 8.0% to 7.4% (p = 0.016). Time in years of follow-up in the joined clinic of our hospital appeared to be the most significant factor in the improvement or stabilization against deterioration of the UAE levels (p = 0.018). CONCLUSIONS: Close follow-up of DM2 patients with eGFR < 60 ml/min/m2 has resulted in a minor annual eGFR decrease. Monitoring of these patients in a specialized diabetic nephropathy clinic is beneficial for this group of patients for delaying the occurrence of end-stage renal disease.