Dipeptidyl-peptidase-IV inhibition augments postprandial lipid mobilization and oxidation in type 2 diabetic patients.

CONTEXT: Dipeptidyl-peptidase-IV (DPP-4) inhibition increases endogenous GLP-1 activity, resulting in improved glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. The metabolic response may be explained in part by extrapancreatic mechanisms. OBJECTIVE: We tested the hypothesis that DPP-4 inhibition with vildagliptin elicits changes in adipose tissue and skeletal muscle metabolism. DESIGN AND SETTING: We conducted a randomized, double-blind, crossover study at an academic clinical research center. PATIENTS: Twenty patients with type 2 diabetes, body mass index between 28 and 40 kg/m(2), participated. INTERVENTION: INTERVENTION included 7 d treatment with the selective DPP-4 inhibitor vildagliptin or placebo and a standardized test meal on d 7. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Venous DPP-4 activity, catecholamines, free fatty acids, glycerol, glucose, (pro)insulin, dialysate glucose, lactate, pyruvate, glycerol were measured. RESULTS: Fasting and postprandial venous insulin, glucose, glycerol, triglycerides, and free fatty acid concentrations were not different with vildagliptin and with placebo. Vildagliptin augmented the postprandial increase in plasma norepinephrine. Furthermore, vildagliptin increased dialysate glycerol and lactate concentrations in adipose tissue while suppressing dialysate lactate and pyruvate concentration in skeletal muscle. The respiratory quotient increased with meal ingestion but was consistently lower with vildagliptin. CONCLUSIONS: Our study is the first to suggest that DPP-4 inhibition augments postprandial lipid mobilization and oxidation. The response may be explained by sympathetic activation rather than a direct effect on metabolic status.

Influence of sibutramine treatment on sympathetic vasomotor tone in obese subjects.

BACKGROUND: Sibutramine, a serotonin and norepinephrine transporter blocker, is used as adjunctive obesity treatment. Studies in healthy subjects suggested that sibutramine might have opposing effects on peripheral and central sympathetic activity; an increase in blood pressure has been claimed. Direct measurements of muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA) in sibutramine-treated patients have not been conducted. METHODS AND RESULTS: Twenty nondiabetic obese men and women completed the study (mean body mass index, 35 +/- 3 kg/m2; mean age, 42 +/- 8 years). They were treated for 5 days with 15 mg sibutramine per day or matching placebo in a randomized, double-blind, crossover fashion. At the end of each intervention, heart rate, blood pressure, and MSNA were recorded. Patients underwent cold pressor testing and phenylephrine and nitroprusside infusions. RESULTS: The mean blood pressure (systolic/diastolic) was 118 +/- 13 mm Hg/70 +/- 9 mm Hg with placebo and 120 +/- 13 mm Hg/69 +/- 8 mm Hg with sibutramine (P = .29). The mean resting MSNA was 28 +/- 14 bursts/min with placebo and 12 +/- 10 bursts/min with sibutramine (P < .0001). Sibutramine attenuated the rise in blood pressure (25 +/- 9 mm Hg/9 +/- 9 mm Hg versus 31 +/- 12 mm Hg/14 +/- 9 mm Hg, P < .01) and MSNA (0.3 +/- 0.5 arbitrary units/min versus 1.0 +/- 1.1 arbitrary units/min, P = .01) in response to cold pressor testing. Baroreflex heart rate control was similar with sibutramine and with placebo. The sympathetic baroreflex was shifted such that at a given blood pressure, MSNA was substantially decreased (top, 44 +/- 1.23 bursts/min versus 58 +/- 2.99 bursts/min [P < .001]; center point, 65 +/- 0.32 mm Hg versus 67 +/- 0.81 mm Hg [P < .05]). CONCLUSIONS: Sibutramine treatment profoundly and selectively reduces sympathetic nerve traffic at rest and attenuates the responsiveness to sympathetic stimuli. Our data support the idea that sibutramine's peripheral sympathomimetic effect is counteracted by a central sympatholytic mechanism.