Nonpharmacological nursing interventions for behavioural and psychological symptoms of dementia in acute and subacute settings: A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Behavioural and psychological symptoms of dementia are a group of non-cognitive symptoms such as agitation, physical aggression, depression, sexual disinhibition and psychosis. Therapeutic approaches vary because of the multifactorial and complex symptomology. The researchers of this study aimed to systematically review the nonpharmacological interventions for BPSD used by nurses in acute and subacute hospital settings. DESIGN: The PRISMA guidelines guided this systematic review. The review was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42020184015). METHOD: The databases Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) complete, Medline complete, Excerpta Medica (Embase®) and PsycINFO published by the American Psychological Association (APA) were searched for studies published in English to October 2021. Quality appraisal was performed independently by three reviewers using the Critical Appraisal Skills Program tools. Data were synthesized using a narrative approach. RESULTS: Two studies were identified that focused on interventions used by nurses; findings were positive for the use of nonpharmacological interventions to manage BPSD. CONCLUSION: Current evidence suggests that nonpharmacological interventions are the best practices to manage BPSD. However, limited, and low-quality evidence suggests that further investigation is required to understand the factors contributing to the lack of use of nonpharmacological interventions by nurses in acute and subacute hospital settings.

Evaluating the efficacy of a digital App to enhance patient-centred nursing handover: A simulation study.

AIM: The study aim was to evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of a digital App developed to enhance patient communication with nurses during bedside nursing handover at shift change. METHODS: Six nurses and 11 patient actors/volunteers participated in 12 simulated nursing handovers across six simulation workshops. Over half the patients were aged 70+ years (55%); majority were female (82%). Handover video recordings were analysed using a structured observation tool and a revised Four Habits Coding Scheme to assess nurses' handover communication skills. Patient and nurse feedback was also sought. The STROBE checklist (Data S1) guided preparation of the study. RESULTS: For all simulated handovers (n = 12): Nurses greeted the patient at commencement; nurses made eye contact with the patient; patients were given opportunity to ask questions; and all patient questions were answered. Nurses explained the handover process for less than half the handovers (42%). Familiarity with the patient's history was evident in every handover. Communication behaviours identified in most handovers included: good nonverbal behaviour; allowing time for the patient to absorb information; giving clear explanations; involving the patient in decisions; and exploring acceptability of the care plan. Patient and nurse feedback on the App included: The App was easy to navigate, features were well-liked, with some improvements suggested. CONCLUSION: Patients and nurses provided positive feedback for the App during hospital stay and at handover. The App has the potential to enhance existing handover processes and increase safety of hospital care by using technology to educate and empower patients/carers to be active partners in communication with nurses during change-of-shift handover. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: The App empowers and enables patients/carers to actively participate in nursing handover and allows patients to communicate concerns and provide information to their nursing team, facilitating a new approach. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: Patients and carers were involved in the research from the original co-design workshops that guided the development of the handover App. The research aims and outcome measures were informed by the experiences and preferences of patients/carers. Two patient representatives were involved in writing and submission of the grant application for the study to evaluate the efficacy of the App and were listed as co-authors on this paper. Patient volunteers were involved in the current study to pilot test the handover App. Patient volunteers were recruited through a consumer representative and volunteer registry at the health service. They participated in simulated nursing handovers with two nurses to assess the feasibility and acceptability of the handover App and then provided feedback and suggestions for improvement.

The patient experience of a medical emergency team review: A convergent mixed-methods study.

AIMS: The aim of this study was to explore clinician-patient engagement during, and patient experience of, medical emergency team (MET) reviews. DESIGN: This study involved a convergent mixed-methods design. METHODS: This three-phase study was conducted at two hospitals of one Australian health service. Reviews by the MET were observed for clinician-patient engagement behaviours; medical records were audited to confirm patient demographics and clinical characteristics; and patients who received a MET review were interviewed. Quantitative data were analysed using descriptive statistics, and thematic analysis of qualitative interview data was conducted. RESULTS: In total, 26 MET reviews were observed for 22 patients (median age = 81.5 years and 68.2% females). Between 8 and 13 clinicians and other staff members were present during each review, with a total of 209 clinicians present during the 26 reviews. Clinicians were not observed to speak directly or indirectly to the patient about their care in 38.5% (n = 10/26) of the MET reviews, and 58.3% (n = 56/96) of interventions were performed without explanation. Four themes were identified from the interviews: An unexpected event; A lack of understanding; In good hands, and What happens next? CONCLUSION: Clinician-patient engagement was infrequent during and after MET reviews. Patients experienced surprise from the sudden arrival of clinicians in their room and had poor levels of understanding about the review. However, most patients felt supported and safe. MET reviews are frequent safety-critical events, and this study identified the patient experience of these events. Clinicians should be aware that patients expressed they were surprised and shocked by the review and that an explanation of what was being done by the clinical team was rarely offered. These findings can be used to inform strategies to improve their patient-engagement behaviours and patient-centred care.

Patient and family complaints concerning nursing and midwifery care: applying a taxonomy to classify and analyse consumer complaints.

Objective To evaluate complaints from patients, their families, and caregivers concerning nursing and midwifery care using the Healthcare Complaints Analysis Tool. Methods A prospective cross-sectional study with data coded against the domains and categories outlined in the Healthcare Complaints Analysis Tool. Complaints were received between June and December 2020 to nursing and midwifery services of a health service in Melbourne, Australia. Data were extracted, and complaints de-identified. The content was analysed using the Healthcare Complaints Analysis Tool, including three main domains and seven problem categories. Results A total of 69 written complaints were received: 45% were from patients, 49% from family members, and 6% from friends. Coding of complaints against the taxonomy in the Healthcare Complaints Analysis Tool resulted in 214 complaint categories. Almost half (49.5%) of the complaints pertained to the Relationship domain (including aspects of Patients' Respect and Rights, Communication, and Listening), 34.6% to the Clinical domain and 15.9% to Management. The severity of the incidents described in the complaints were: 32.6% low severity, 51.6% medium severity, and 15.8% high severity. Despite having been categorised by the health service as relating to nursing or midwifery, 38% included other healthcare professionals, and 13% of the complainants (n = 9) did not refer to nurses or midwives at all. Conclusions Assessing consumer complaints with a validated taxonomy may offer ways to target areas of care and service provision that need improvement and highlight other areas performing well. Ongoing data collection and analysis may also inform training and information needs at the individual or service management level.

Labouring Together: Women's experiences of "Getting the care that I want and need" in maternity care.

OBJECTIVE: Poor interprofessional collaboration and lack of decision-making with women have been identified as being detrimental to the quality, safety, and experience of maternity care. The aim of the Labouring Together study was to explore childbearing women's preferences for and experiences of collaboration and control over decision-making in maternity care. DESIGN: A sequential, mixed-method, multi-site case study approach was used to explore the perceptions and experiences of childbearing women regarding collaboration and decision-making. Women's preferred role for decision-making compared to the actual experiences, and the influences upon their preferences and experiences of collaboration were explored using semi-structured interviews. An inductive approach was used for qualitative analysis of interviews, and cross-case analyses were conducted using replication logic. SETTING: Postnatal wards of 1 private and 3 public maternity services in both metropolitan and regional Victoria, Australia. PARTICIPANTS: Postnatal women, over the age of 18 years (n=182). FINDINGS: Half (48.3%) of the participants indicated a preference for a shared decision-making role and 35% preferred an active role. Only 16.7% participants indicated a preference for a passive role, however 24.4% of women reported experiencing a passive decision-making role during their maternity care. Statistically significant differences were also identified between preferences for and experiences of decision-making among women who chose the private obstetrician model of maternity care compared to the public maternity care system. Negative impacts upon women's autonomy over decision-making included: poor access to midwifery models of care; poor access to relational continuity of care; poor understanding of the rights of the woman; inadequate information for women about the risks and benefits of all proposed interventions; and a bureaucratic style of decision-making based upon a dominant discourse of risk avoidance that could ultimately veto the woman's choice. KEY CONCLUSIONS: Despite evidence of the benefits for women of having autonomy over decision-making in their own care, fundamental barriers were identified that hindered women's participation in collaboration in maternity care. Shared decision-making with childbearing women is not routine practice in maternity care in Victoria, Australia. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Relational continuity of care is imperative to promote the autonomy of childbearing women and an environment conducive to women's active engagement in maternity care and participation in shared decision-making.

Recognizing and responding to clinical deterioration in adult patients in isolation precautions for infection control: a retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Patient isolation is widely used as a strategy for prevention and control of infection but may have unintended consequences for patients. Early recognition and response to acute deterioration is an essential component of safe, quality patient care and has not been explored for patients in isolation. OBJECTIVE: The primary aims of this study were to (i) describe the timing, frequency and nature of clinical deterioration during hospital admission for patients with isolation precautions for infection control and (ii) compare the characteristics of patients who did and did not deteriorate during their initial period of isolation precautions for infection control. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study was conducted across three sites of a large Australian health service. The study sample were adult patients (≥18 years) admitted into isolation precautions within 24 h of admission from 1 July 2019 to 31 December 2019. RESULTS: There were 634 patients who fulfilled the study inclusion criteria. One in eight patients experienced at least one episode of clinical deterioration during their time in isolation with most episodes of deterioration occurring within the first 2 days of admission. Timely Medical Emergency Team calls occurred in almost half the episodes of deterioration; however, the same proportion (47.2%) of deterioration episodes resulted in no Medical Emergency Team activation (afferent limb failure). In the 24 h preceding each episode of clinical deterioration (n = 180), 81.6% (n = 147) of episodes were preceded by vital signs fulfilling pre-Medical Emergency Team criteria. Patients who deteriorated during isolation for infection control were older (median age 74.0 vs 71.0 years, P = 0.042); more likely to live in a residential care facility (21.0% vs 7.2%, P = 0.006); had a longer initial period of isolation (4.0 vs 2.9 days, P = < 000.1) and hospital length-of-stay (median 4.9 vs 3.2 days, P = < 0.001) and were more likely to die in hospital (12.3% vs 4.3%, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Patients in isolation precautions experienced high Medical Emergency Team afferent limb failure and most fulfilled pre-Medical Emergency Team criteria in the 24 h preceding episodes of deterioration. Timely recognition and response to clinical deterioration continue to be essential in providing safe, quality patient care regardless of the hospital-care environment.

Australian and Danish nurses' and midwives' wellbeing during COVID-19: A comparison study.

Background: Most investigations of nurses' and midwives' psychological wellbeing during the COVID-19 pandemic have been conducted in a single setting. Aim: To assess and compare the psychological wellbeing of nurses and midwives in Australia and Denmark during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: Nurses and midwives employed at four metropolitan health services in Australia and one in Denmark completed an anonymous online survey, which assessed depression, anxiety, and stress symptoms (The Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale - 21 Items (DASS-21)), and sociodemographic and employment factors. Findings: Completed surveys were received from 3001 nurses and midwives (1611 Australian and 1390 Danish). Overall, approximately one in seven of the nurses and midwives surveyed reported moderate to extremely severe levels of depression (n = 399, 13.5%), anxiety (n = 381, 12.9%) and stress (n = 394, 13.4%). Australian nurses' and midwives' scores on all DASS-21 subscales were significantly higher (representing higher levels of depression, anxiety and stress) than the scores for the Danish nurses and midwives. Fewer years of clinical experience, living in Australia and being employed on a part-time basis were significantly associated with higher levels of psychological distress. Discussion: A considerable proportion of nurses and midwives experienced distress during the COVID-19 pandemic; however, the proportion and severity varied by country. Australian nurses and midwives experienced higher levels of distress than their Danish colleagues. Conclusion: Nurses and midwives working in countries with relatively low numbers of COVID-19 cases and deaths are also likely to experience psychological distress. Nurses and midwives would benefit from targeted country-specific support and wellbeing initiatives.

Enhancing active patient participation in nursing handover: A mixed methods study.

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: To explore: i) the frequency and nature of patient participation in nursing handover and ii) patients' and nurses' perceived strategies to enhance patient involvement in nursing handover. BACKGROUND: Patient participation in nursing handover is important for patient-centred care, shared decision-making, patient safety and a positive healthcare experience DESIGN: A multi-site prospective study using a mixed methods design. METHODS: Between September and December 2019, nursing handovers were observed on ten randomly selected wards, followed by semi-structured interviews with patients (n = 33), and nurses (n = 20) from the observed handovers. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics for structured observations and thematic analysis of interviews, and triangulated to develop a greater understanding of patient participation in nursing handover. This study is reported using the Good Reporting of Mixed Methods Study guidelines. RESULTS: The median patient age was 77 years and 47% (n = 55) patients were female. Of the 117 handovers, 76.9% (n = 90) were conducted in the patient's presence. Patients were active participants in 33.3% (n = 30) and passive participants in 46.7% (n = 42) of handovers; in 20% of handovers (n = 18), the patient had no input at all. Active participation was more likely in women (vs. men), surgical patients (vs. medical patients) and when nurses displayed engagement behaviours (eye contact, opportunity to ask questions, explanations). Three major themes were identified from the interviews: 'Being Involved', 'Layers of Influence' and 'Information Exchange'. CONCLUSIONS: The main finding was that patient participation in handover was low and strongly influenced by a complex interplay of factors including patient and nurse preferences and perceptions. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: Handover is an essential tool in the provision of safe patient care. Patients were able to actively participate in nursing handover when they understood the purpose and timing of handover and had rapport with nurses.

Associations of person-related, environment-related and communication-related factors on medication errors in public and private hospitals: a retrospective clinical audit.

BACKGROUND: Efforts to ensure safe and optimal medication management are crucial in reducing the prevalence of medication errors. The aim of this study was to determine the associations of person-related, environment-related and communication-related factors on the severity of medication errors occurring in two health services. METHODS: A retrospective clinical audit of medication errors was undertaken over an 18-month period at two Australian health services comprising 16 hospitals. Descriptive statistical analysis, and univariate and multivariable regression analysis were undertaken. RESULTS: There were 11,540 medication errors reported to the online facility of both health services. Medication errors caused by doctors (Odds Ratio (OR) 0.690, 95% CI 0.618-0.771), or by pharmacists (OR 0.327, 95% CI 0.267-0.401), or by patients or families (OR 0.641, 95% CI 0.472-0.870) compared to those caused by nurses or midwives were significantly associated with reduced odds of possibly or probably harmful medication errors. The presence of double-checking of medication orders compared to single-checking (OR 0.905, 95% CI 0.826-0.991) was significantly associated with reduced odds of possibly or probably harmful medication errors. The presence of electronic systems for prescribing (OR 0.580, 95% CI 0.480-0.705) and dispensing (OR 0.350, 95% CI 0.199-0.618) were significantly associated with reduced odds of possibly or probably harmful medication errors compared to the absence of these systems. Conversely, insufficient counselling of patients (OR 3.511, 95% CI 2.512-4.908), movement across transitions of care (OR 1.461, 95% CI 1.190-1.793), presence of interruptions (OR 1.432, 95% CI 1.012-2.027), presence of covering personnel (OR 1.490, 95% 1.113-1.995), misread or unread orders (OR 2.411, 95% CI 2.162-2.690), informal bedside conversations (OR 1.221, 95% CI 1.085-1.373), and problems with clinical handovers (OR 1.559, 95% CI 1.136-2.139) were associated with increased odds of medication errors causing possible or probable harm. Patients or families were involved in the detection of 1100 (9.5%) medication errors. CONCLUSIONS: Patients and families need to be engaged in discussions about medications, and health professionals need to provide teachable opportunities during bedside conversations, admission and discharge consultations, and medication administration activities. Patient counselling needs to be more targeted in effort to reduce medication errors associated with possible or probable harm.

Modifications to medical emergency team activation criteria and implications for patient safety: A point prevalence study.

BACKGROUND: Medical emergency team (MET) activation criteria are sometimes modified to minimise unnecessary MET calls in patients who have chronic physiological derangements, have limitation of medical treatment orders in place, or have recently received treatment for clinical deterioration. However, the safety implications of modifying MET activation criteria are poorly understood. OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to examine the safety of modifying MET activation criteria. Specifically, we aimed to examine the frequency and nature of modifications to MET activation criteria and compare characteristics and outcomes of patients with and without modifications to MET activation criteria. METHODS: This was a point prevalence study using a retrospective medical record audit. Patients admitted to 14 wards on November 7, 2018, at two acute-care hospitals of one health service in Melbourne, Australia, were included (N = 430). Data were analysed using descriptive and inferential statistics. The main outcome measures included frequency and nature of modifications to MET activation criteria on a specified date, MET calls, intensive care unit admission, in-hospital cardiac arrest, and in-hospital death. RESULTS: Amongst 430 inpatients, there were 30 modifications to MET activation criteria in 26 (6.0%) patients. All modifications were intended to trigger METs at more extreme levels of physiological derangement. Most modifications pertained to tachypnoea (26.7%; n = 8/30) and bradycardia (23.3%; n = 7/30). Patients with modifications were more likely to have documented physiological deterioration that fulfilled MET (47.8%, n = 11; p < 0.001) or pre-MET (87.0%, n = 20; p < 0.001) criteria in the preceding 24-h period than patients without modifications. Of patients with modifications, none were admitted to an intensive care unit, had a cardiac arrest, or died in the hospital. There were no differences in hospital length of stay or discharge destination between patients with and without modifications. CONCLUSIONS: In this point prevalence study, modifications to MET activation criteria were infrequent and not associated with negative patient safety outcomes.

Impact of emergency department length of stay on anxiety and comfort in older people.

INTRODUCTION: Older people are frequent emergency department (ED) users, a vulnerable population and often have long stays in the ED. The aim of this study was to determine whether ED length of stay (LOS) had an impact on older people's (aged ≥65 years) anxiety, comfort and adverse events. METHODS: This prospective observational study was conducted in Melbourne, Australia. Patients (n = 301) from three EDs were classified by ED LOS: ≤4-hours (n = 89), 4-8 h (n = 136) and >8-hours (n = 76). Current state and trait anxiety and comfort were measured in ED. Adverse event data were collected from medical records. LOS groups were compared using Chi-Square and Kruskal-Wallis test. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in Trait Anxiety Scores. Patients with ED LOS ≤ 4-hours had lower median State Anxiety Scores (p = 0.003), were less likely to require ward admission (p < 0.001), and more likely to require short stay unit admission (p < 0.001). There were no significant differences between groups in comfort or adverse events during ED care or hospitalisation (for admitted patients). CONCLUSION: The impact of ED LOS on the anxiety of older ED users appears limited. There was no association identified between ED LOS and comfort during ED care or adverse events during ED care or hospitalisation.

Physical health assessment and cardiometabolic monitoring practices across three adult mental health inpatient units - a retrospective cohort study.

Australians with lived experience of mental illness die on average 10 or more years earlier than the general population. Cardiometabolic disorders, including cardiovascular disease and diabetes mellitus, are common causes of premature death in this cohort. Little is known about cardiometabolic monitoring practices in mental health inpatient units. The aim of this study was to examine the characteristics of cardiometabolic monitoring and physical health assessments of adult mental health consumers within the first 72 hours of admission to an inpatient unit. We implemented a retrospective descriptive exploratory design by medical record audit. Data were collected using a pre-validated audit tool, adapted with recent literature and policy, from a randomly selected sample of consumers admitted to three acute mental health adult inpatient units of a large Australian metropolitan health service in 2016. Of 228 consumers, the mean age was 37.5 (range 18-64) years and 51.3% were women. Cardiometabolic risks were common, yet most consumers received incomplete cardiometabolic monitoring. While few consumers (15%) were diagnosed with cardiometabolic comorbidities, 67.5% were prescribed psychotropic medications with high cardiometabolic risk. Compliance with recommended cardiometabolic monitoring varied considerably between risk factors: for example, blood pressure was measured in 56.1% of consumers, whereas waist circumference was never recorded. There were no statistically significant associations between cardiometabolic monitoring completion and sex or cardiometabolic risk. These findings demonstrate the need for increased education and awareness of cardiometabolic risk and identify a critical gap between physical health assessment practices and recommendations for this cohort.

Clinical deterioration and hospital-acquired complications in adult patients with isolation precautions for infection control: A systematic review.

AIM: To review and synthesize literature examining clinical deterioration and hospital-acquired complications in adult patients with isolation precautions for infection control. BACKGROUND: Isolation precautions are a common infection prevention and control strategy which may have impact on safety and quality of care. DESIGN: The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines guided this systematic review, which was registered with PROSPERO [CRD42019131573]. DATA SOURCES: A search of Medline, Embase, and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature was conducted for studies published in English up to 5 April 2019. REVIEW METHODS: Risk of bias was determined using Critical Appraisal Skills Program tools. Quality appraisal was performed using the Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach. The primary outcomes of interest were clinical deterioration events and hospital-acquired complications. In-hospital death and hospital length of stay were secondary outcomes. Data were synthesized using a narrative approach. RESULTS: The search yielded 785 citations after removal of duplicates, of which, six studies were relevant. Certainty of evidence for outcomes of interest was low to very low. CONCLUSION: There is no strong evidence that adult medical and surgical ward patients in isolation precautions for infection control are more or less likely to experience clinical deterioration or hospital-acquired complications. IMPACT: What problem did the study address? Are patients in isolation precautions more likely to experience clinical deterioration or hospital-acquired complications than non-isolated patients? What were the main findings? There is no strong evidence that clinical deterioration and hospital-acquired complications are more likely to occur to patients in isolation precautions for infection control. This research is of relevance to acute care nurses.

Understanding the patient experience of early unplanned hospital readmission following acute care discharge: a qualitative descriptive study.

OBJECTIVES: To understand from a patient and carer perspective: (1) what features of the discharge process could be improved to avoid early unplanned hospital readmission (within 72 hours of acute care discharge) and (2) what elements of discharge planning could have enhanced the discharge experience. DESIGN: A qualitative descriptive design was used. Study data were collected using semi-structured interviews that were transcribed verbatim and analysed using inductive thematic analysis. Data related to participant characteristic were collected by medical record audit and summarised using descriptive statistics. SETTING: Three acute care hospitals from one health service in Australia. PARTICIPANTS: Patients who had an early unplanned hospital readmission and/or their carers, if present during the interviews and willing to participate, with patient permission. FINDINGS: Thirty interviews were conducted (23 patients only; 6 patient and carer dyads; 1 carer only). Five themes were constructed: 'experiences of care', 'hearing and being heard', 'what's wrong with me', 'not just about me' and 'all about going home'. There was considerable variability in patients' and carers' experiences of hospital care, discharge processes and early unplanned hospital readmission. Features of the discharge process that could be improved to potentially avoid early unplanned hospital readmission were better communication, optimal clinical care including ensuring readiness for discharge and shared decision-making regarding discharge timing and goals on returning home. The discharge experience could have been enhanced by improved communication between patients (and carers) and the healthcare team, not rushing the discharge process and a more coordinated approach to patient transport home from hospital. CONCLUSIONS: The study findings highlight the complexities of the discharge process and the importance of effective communication, shared decision-making and carer engagement in optimising hospital discharge and reducing early unplanned hospital readmissions.

Vital sign abnormalities as predictors of clinical deterioration in subacute care patients: A prospective case-time-control study.

BACKGROUND: Emergency interhospital transfers from inpatient subacute care to acute care occur in 8% to 17.4% of admitted patients and are associated with high rates of acute care readmission and in-hospital mortality. Serious adverse events in subacute care (rapid response team or cardiac arrest team calls) and increased nursing surveillance are the strongest known predictors of emergency interhospital transfer from subacute to acute care hospitals. However, the epidemiology of clinical deterioration across sectors of care, and specifically in subacute care is not well understood. OBJECTIVES: To explore the trajectory of clinical deterioration in patients who did and did not have an emergency interhospital transfer from subacute to acute care; and develop an internally validated predictive model to identify the role of vital sign abnormalities in predicting these emergency interhospital transfers. DESIGN: This prospective, exploratory cohort study is a subanalysis of data derived from a larger case-time-control study. SETTING: Twenty-two wards of eight subacute care hospitals in five major health services in Victoria, Australia. All subacute care hospitals were geographically separate from their health services' acute care hospitals. PARTICIPANTS: All patients with an emergency transfer from inpatient rehabilitation or geriatric evaluation and management unit to an acute care hospital within the same health service were included. Patients receiving palliative care were excluded. METHODS: Study data were collected between 22 August 2015 and 30 October 2016 by medical record audit. The Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test and bivariate logistic regression analysis were used to compare cases with controls and to account for health service clustering effect. RESULTS: Data were collected on 603 transfers (557 patients) and 1160 controls. Adjusted for health service, ≥2 vital sign abnormalities in subacute care (adjusted odds ratio=8.81, 95% confidence intervals:6.36-12.19, p<0.001) and serious adverse events during the first acute care admission (adjusted odds ratio=1.28, 95% confidence intervals:1.08-1.99, p=0.015) were the clinical factors associated with increased risk of emergency interhospital transfer. An internally validated predictive model showed that vital sign abnormalities can fairly predict emergency interhospital transfers from subacute to acute care hospitals. CONCLUSION: Serious adverse events in acute care should be a key consideration in decisions about the location of subacute care delivery. During subacute care, 15.7% of cases had vital signs fulfilling organisational rapid response team activation criteria, yet missed rapid response team activations were common suggesting that further consideration of the criteria and strategies to optimise recognition and response to clinical deterioration in subacute care are needed.

Resuscitation status and characteristics and outcomes of patients transferred from subacute care to acute care hospitals: A multi-site prospective cohort study.

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: To examine the relationship between resuscitation status and (i) patient characteristics; (ii) transfer characteristics; and (iii) patient outcomes following an emergency inter-hospital transfer from a subacute to an acute care hospital. BACKGROUND: Patients who experience emergency inter-hospital transfers from subacute to acute care hospitals have high rates of acute care readmission (81%) and in-hospital mortality (15%). DESIGN: This prospective, exploratory cohort study was a subanalysis of data from a larger case-time-control study in five Health Services in Victoria, Australia. There were 603 transfers in 557 patients between August 2015 and October 2016. The study was conducted in accordance with the STrengthening the Reporting of OBservational studies in Epidemiology guidelines. METHODS: Data were extracted by medical record audit. Three resuscitation categories (full resuscitation; limitation of medical treatment (LOMT) orders; or not-for-cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) orders) were compared using chi-square or Kruskal-Wallis tests. Stratified multivariable proportional hazard Cox regression models were used to account for health service clustering effect. FINDINGS: Resuscitation status was 63.5% full resuscitation; 23.1% LOMT order; and 13.4% not-for-CPR. Compared to patients for full resuscitation, patients with not-for-CPR or LOMT orders were more likely to have rapid response team calls during acute care readmission or to die during hospitalisation. Patients who were not-for-CPR were less likely to be readmitted to acute care and more likely to return to subacute care. CONCLUSIONS: Two-thirds of patients in subacute care who experienced an emergency inter-hospital transfer were for full resuscitation. Although the proportion of patients with LOMT and not-for-CPR orders increased after transfer, there were deficiencies in the documentation of resuscitation status and planning for clinical deterioration for subacute care patients. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: As many subacute care patients experience clinical deterioration, patient preferences for care need to be discussed and documented early in the subacute care admission.

Association between excessive premature atrial complexes and cryptogenic stroke: results of a case-control study.

OBJECTIVE: Recent anticoagulation trials in all-comer cryptogenic stroke patients have yielded equivocal results, reinvigorating the focus on identifying reproducible markers of an atrial myopathy. We investigated the role of excessive premature atrial complexes (PACs) in ischaemic stroke, including cryptogenic stroke and its association with vascular risk factors. METHODS AND RESULTS: A case-control study was conducted utilising a multicentre institutional stroke database to compare 461 patients with an ischaemic stroke or transient ischaemic attack (TIA) with a control group consisting of age matched patients without prior history of ischaemic stroke/TIA. All patients underwent 24-hour Holter monitoring during the study period and atrial fibrillation was excluded. An excessive PAC burden, defined as ≥200 PACs/24 hours, was present in 25.6% and 14.7% (p<0.01), of stroke/TIA and control patients, respectively. On multivariate regression, excessive PACs (OR 1.97; 95% CI 1.29 to 3.02; p<0.01), smoking (OR 1.58; 95% CI 1.06 to 2.36; p<0.05) and hypertension (OR 1.53; 95% CI 1.07 to 2.17; p<0.05) were independently associated with ischaemic stroke/TIA. Excessive PACs remained the strongest independent risk factor for the cryptogenic stroke subtype (OR 1.95; 95% CI 1.16 to 3.28; p<0.05). Vascular risk factors that promote atrial remodelling, increasing age (≥75 years, OR 3.64; 95% CI 2.08 to 6.36; p<0.01) and hypertension (OR 1.54; 95% CI 1.01 to 2.34; p<0.05) were independently associated with excessive PACs. CONCLUSIONS: Excessive PACs are independently associated with cryptogenic stroke and may be a reproducible marker of atrial myopathy. Prospective studies assessing their utility in guiding stroke prevention strategies may be warranted.

Timing of emergency interhospital transfers from subacute to acute care and patient outcomes: A prospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Australian and international data show that transfer from inpatient rehabilitation to acute care hospitals occurs in one in ten patients. Early unplanned transfers from subacute to acute care hospitals raises questions about the safety of patient transitions between health sectors. OBJECTIVES: To explore the characteristics of early and late emergency interhospital transfers from subacute to acute care. The investigators defined early transfers as occurring within 1 day and late transfers occurring after 1 day after subacute care admission. DESIGN: This prospective, exploratory cohort study is a subanalysis of data from a larger case-time-control study. SETTING: Twenty-two wards of eight subacute care hospitals in five major health services in Victoria, Australia. All subacute care hospitals were geographically separate from their health services' acute care hospitals. PARTICIPANTS: All patients with an emergency transfer from inpatient rehabilitation or geriatric evaluation and management wards to an acute care hospital within the same health service were included. Patients receiving palliative care were excluded. METHODS: Data were collected between 22 August 2015 and 30 October 2016 by record audit. To compare patient and admission characteristics between early and late transfers Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test (CMH) or logistic regression were used to account for health service clustering effect. RESULTS: There were 602 transfers: 54 early (48 patients) and 548 late transfers (505 patients). There was no difference in median age (79.5 vs 80, p = 0.680) or Charlson Comorbidity index (both groups = 3, p = 0.933). Early transfer patients had lower functional independence measure scores on subacute care admission (median 45 vs 66, p < 0.001). Prior to transfer, fewer early transfers had a limitation of medical treatment order in place during their subacute care admission (25.9% vs 48.7%, p < 0.001). The majority of both early and late transfers resulted in acute care hospital readmission (85.1% vs 77.7%, p = 0.204). For patients admitted to acute care, there was no difference in median acute care length of stay (6.5 vs 8 days, p = 0.367). Early transfer patients had fewer in-hospital deaths than late transfer patients (3.8% vs 16.1%, p = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: The high rates of acute care readmission in both groups suggest that transfer was warranted. Early transfer patients had lower in-patient mortality so emergency interhospital transfers, while resource intensive, appear to have a safety benefit. Early transfer patients were less likely than late transfer patients to have limitation of medical treatment orders, so the influence of resuscitation status and patient goals of care on transfer decisions warrants further investigation.

Characteristics and outcomes of emergency interhospital transfers from subacute to acute care for clinical deterioration.

OBJECTIVE: To describe characteristics and outcomes of emergency interhospital transfers from subacute to acute hospital care and develop an internally validated predictive model to identify features associated with high risk of emergency interhospital transfer. DESIGN: Prospective case-time-control study. SETTING: Acute and subacute healthcare facilities from five health services in Victoria, Australia. PARTICIPANTS: Cases were patients with an emergency interhospital transfer from subacute to acute hospital care. For every case, two inpatients from the same subacute care ward on the same day of emergency transfer were randomly selected as controls. Admission episode was the unit of measurement and data were collected prospectively. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Patient and admission characteristics, transfer characteristics and outcomes (cases), serious adverse events and mortality. RESULTS: Data were collected for 603 transfers in 557 patients and 1160 control patients. Cases were significantly more likely to be male, born in a non-English speaking country, have lower functional independence, more frequent vital sign assessments and experience a serious adverse event during first acute care or subacute care admissions. When adjusted for health service, cases had significantly higher inpatient mortality, were more likely to have unplanned intensive care unit admissions and rapid response team calls during their entire hospital admission. CONCLUSIONS: Patients who require an emergency interhospital transfer from subacute to acute hospital care have hospital admission rates and in-hospital mortality. Clinical instability during the first acute care admission (serious adverse events or increased surveillance) may prompt reassessment of patient suitability for movement to a separate subacute care hospital.

Refining nursing assessment and management with a new postanaesthetic care discharge tool to minimize surgical patient risk.

AIMS: To evaluate use of an evidence-based discharge tool, the Post-Anaesthetic Care Tool and its impact on nursing assessment, communication, and management of patients in the postanaesthetic care unit. BACKGROUND: Postanaesthetic care unit nurses manage patients immediately after surgery and make clinical decisions on discharge readiness. There is a lack of evidence-based guidance on assessing, documenting, and communicating the patient's postoperative experience. The Post-Anaesthetic Care Tool, which includes instructions for assessing discharge readiness and incorporates the ISOBAR acronym, was developed following a comprehensive systematic review and expert consultation. DESIGN AND METHODS: This quasiexperimental, multicentre, nonrandomized study was conducted in three postanaesthetic care units in Australia. Participants were nurses providing care to adults postgeneral anaesthesia. Episodes of care were observed before (N = 723) and after (N = 694) introduction of the evidence-based tool. Statistical methods (Chi-Square and Mann-Whitney U-Tests) were undertaken to analyse nursing assessment, communication, and management outcomes before and after implementation of the Post-Anaesthetic Care Tool. RESULTS: The Post-Anaesthetic Care Tool was associated with statistically significant improvements in the frequency of nursing assessment and responsiveness to complications including pain, nausea/vomiting and hypothermia. After the tool's introduction, nurses requested more medical reviews. This was associated with increased recognition of clinical deterioration and significant improvements in clarity of handover from the postanaesthetic care unit to the ward. CONCLUSIONS: The structured discharge tool, Post-Anaesthetic Care Tool, was associated with improved nursing management of patients in the postanaesthetic care unit and enabled early identification and response to clinical concerns.