Patient-controlled epidural analgesia versus conventional epidural analgesia after total hip replacement - a randomized trial.

AIMS: Patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) is usually considered a better option for pain management compared to conventional analgesia. The beneficial effect of PCA has been assessed in a number of studies; however, the results are inconsistent. The goal of this study was to compare of patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) to conventional epidural analgesia after total hip replacement (THR). METHODS: This prospective study was performed at the Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine at a tertiary university hospital. After THR, patients were admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) and randomized to one of two groups (PCEA and non-PCEA). Postoperative pain in the PCEA group was treated using a standardized protocol, while the analgesia in the non-PCEA group was based on physician prescription according to the patient's clinical condition. The total consumption of analgesics, patients' satisfaction, pain intensity, and analgesia-related complications were recorded for 24 h after surgery. RESULTS: The final sample consisted of 111 patients (PCEA group, n=55 and non-PCEA group, n=56). The PCEA group had significantly lower total consumption of analgesic mixtures (0.9±0.3 and 1.3±0.4 mL/kg per day, P<0.001).There was greater patient satisfaction (P<0.001) in the PCEA group. The mean pain intensity over 24 hours postoperatively was similar for both groups (P=0.14). There was no significant difference in rate of analgesia-related complications between the groups (hypotension, P=0.14; bradypnea, P=0.11). CONCLUSION: Compared to conventional epidural analgesia based on physician prescription, PCEA led to less total analgesic consumption and greater patient satisfaction after THR.

Comparison of Mechanical Thrombectomy with Contact Aspiration, Stent Retriever, and Combined Procedures in Patients with Large-Vessel Occlusion in Acute Ischemic Stroke.

BACKGROUND We investigated the properties and effects of 5 mechanical thrombectomy procedures in patients with acute ischemic stroke. The relationships between the type of procedure, the time required, the success of recanalization, and the clinical outcome were analyzed. MATERIAL AND METHODS This prospective comparative analysis included 500 patients with acute ischemic stroke and large-vessel occlusion. We compared contact aspiration thrombectomy (ADAPT, n=100), stent retriever first line (SRFL, n=196), the Solumbra technique (n=64), mechanical thrombectomy plus stent implantation (n=81), and a combined procedure (n=59). RESULTS ADAPT provided shorter procedure (P<0.001) and recanalization times (P<0.001) than the other techniques. Better clinical outcome was achieved for ischemia in the anterior circulation than ischemia in the posterior fossa (P<0.001). Compared to the other techniques, patients treated with ADAPT procedure had increased odds of achieving better mTICI scores (P=0.002) and clinical outcome (NIHSS) after 7 days (P=0.003); patients treated with SRFL had increased odds of achieving better long-term clinical status (3M-mRS=0-2; P=0.040). Patients with SRFL and intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) had increased odds of better clinical status (3M-mRS=0-2; P=0.031) and decreased odds of death (P=0.005) compared to patients with SRFL without IVT. The other treatment approaches had no additional effect of IVT. Patients with SRFL with a mothership transfer had increased odds of achieving favorable clinical outcome (3M-mRS) compared to SRFL with the drip-and-ship transfer paradigm (P=0.015). CONCLUSIONS Our results showed that ADAPT and SRFL provided significantly better outcomes compared to the other examined techniques. A mothership transfer and IVT administration contributed to the success of the SRFL approach.

Successful kidney transplant from methanol-intoxicated donors.

The well-described disparity between the need for and the supply of organs suitable for transplant is growing. Because of this disparity, mortality of patients listed for transplant is increasing. Donors who die of intoxication (including victims of methanol poisoning) represent less than 1% of suitable donors and might be used to increase the supply of organs. They are often not accepted as donors by transplant specialists, because of concerns about patients' outcomes with these grafts. Three cases of fatal methanol intoxication that resulted in transplants of 6 kidneys are evaluated.