Consensus recommendations from the strategic planning summit for pain and palliative care pharmacy practice.

Pain and symptoms related to palliative care (pain and palliative care [PPC]) are often undertreated. This is largely owing to the complexity in the provision of care and the potential discrepancy in education among the various health care professionals required to deliver care. Pharmacists are frequently involved in the care of PPC patients, although pharmacy education currently does not offer or require a strong curriculum commitment to this area of practice. The Strategic Planning Summit for the Advancement of Pain and Palliative Care Pharmacy was convened to address opportunities to improve the education of pharmacists and pharmacy students on PPC. Six working groups were charged with objectives to address barriers and opportunities in the areas of student and professional assessment, model curricula, postgraduate training, professional education, and credentialing. Consensus was reached among the working groups and presented to the Summit Advisory Board for adoption. These recommendations will provide guidance on improving the care provided to PPC patients by pharmacists through integrating education at all points along the professional education continuum.

Pharmacist-physician collaboration in pain management practice.

Pain is one of the most common reasons patients seek out healthcare and management typically requires complex medication regimens. Pharmacists have become increasingly more involved in pain management. Historically, pharmacists and physicians have often had adversarial relationships because of regulatory influence. However, as medication experts, pharmacists can play a key role in optimizing outcomes in the management of pain and can be critical to the success of the medication regimen. Numerous opportunities for collaboration exist for pharmacists and physicians in various settings. One example is the VIGIL process, an effective risk management strategy that requires collaboration between pharmacists and physicians. The success of pharmacist-physician collaboration will depend on numerous factors, including strong physician and administrative support. A clear strategy and stepwise approach to developing a pain management pharmacist-physician collaborative practice is the key to its success. Once the collaboration is formalized, a management strategy should also be defined and should include regular chart review and regular feedback from the physician. Through physician-pharmacist collaboration, pain management outcomes can be optimized and risk can be managed.

The efficacy and safety of pain management before and after implementation of hospital-wide pain management standards: is patient safety compromised by treatment based solely on numerical pain ratings?

UNLABELLED: Inadequate analgesia in hospitalized patients prompted the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations in 2001 to introduce standards that require pain assessment and treatment. In response, many institutions implemented treatment guided by patient reports of pain intensity indexed with a numerical scale. Patient safety associated with treatment of pain guided by a numerical pain treatment algorithm (NPTA) has not been examined. We reviewed patient satisfaction with pain control and opioid-related adverse drug reactions before and after implementation of our NPTA. Patient satisfaction with pain management, measured on a 1-5 scale, significantly improved from 4.13 to 4.38 (P < 0.001) after implementation of an NPTA. The incidence of opioid over sedation adverse drug reactions per 100,000 inpatient hospital days increased from 11.0 pre-NPTA to 24.5 post-NPTA (P < 0.001). Of these patients, 94% had a documented decrease in their level of consciousness preceding the event. Although there was an improvement in patient satisfaction, we experienced a more than two-fold increase in the incidence of opioid over sedation adverse drug reactions in our hospital after the implementation of NPTA. Most adverse drug reactions were preceded by a documented decrease in the patient's level of consciousness, which emphasizes the importance of clinical assessment in managing pain. IMPLICATIONS: Although patient satisfaction with pain management has significantly improved since the adoption of pain management standards, adverse drug reactions have more than doubled. For the treatment of pain to be safe and effective, we must consider more than just a one-dimensional numerical assessment of pain.