OC-01 (Varenicline Solution) Nasal Spray Demonstrates Consistency of Effect Regardless of Age, Race, Ethnicity, and Artificial Tear Use.

Purpose: To evaluate OC-01 [varenicline solution nasal spray (VNS)] tear production and symptom outcomes in patients with dry eye disease by age, gender, race, ethnicity, and artificial tear use status. Patients and Methods: Adults ≥22 years of age diagnosed with dry eye disease, with Ocular Surface Disease Index score ≥23, corneal fluorescein staining score ≥2 in ≥1 region or ≥4 for all regions, and baseline Schirmer Test Score (STS) ≤10 mm, with no restrictions on eye dryness score (EDS). Efficacy was assessed using integrated data from ONSET-1 and ONSET-2 [vehicle control (VC), n=294; OC-01 VNS 0.03 mg, n=308]. Subgroups included age (≤55, 56-65, >65 years), gender (male, female), race (White, Black or African American), ethnicity (Hispanic or Latino, Not Hispanic or Latino), and artificial tear use (yes, no). Analysis of covariance models, with the covariates treatment, study site, and baseline severity measures, were used to calculate treatment-VC differences. Consistency of effect among subgroups was evaluated by conducting interaction tests. Results: Consistency of treatment effect across subgroups was observed for all endpoints, with P value for all treatment-subgroup interaction terms >0.05. For % of patients with ≥10mm improvement in STS and least squares (LS) mean change from baseline in STS and EDS, there was improvement in tear production across demographic group categories. Artificial tear use did not change STS or EDS outcomes with OC-01 VNS. Conclusion: OC-01 VNS improved tear production and patient-reported symptom outcomes across a broad range of patients by age, gender, race, and ethnicity, and regardless of artificial tear use status at baseline. OC-01 VNS demonstrated a consistent benefit across an extensive range of patients with dry eye disease.

Efficacy and Safety of Single-dose OC-02 (Simpinicline Solution) Nasal Spray on Signs and Symptoms of Dry Eye Disease: The PEARL Phase II Randomized Trial.

PURPOSE: Dry eye disease is a multifactorial disorder that affects the ocular surface, with symptoms including ocular irritation, impaired vision, and pain. Nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (nAChR) agonists are novel treatments for dry eye disease; this study investigates the nAChR agonist OC-02 (simpinicline solution) as an aqueous nasal spray. METHODS: PEARL (Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy of OC-02 Nasal Spray on Signs and Symptoms of Dry Eye Disease) was a Phase II study that evaluated the efficacy and safety of OC-02 (simpinicline solution) nasal spray (OC-02 SNS) in adult patients with dry eye disease. Patients ≥22 years of age were eligible if they had an Ocular Surface Disease Index score ≥23, corneal fluorescein staining score ≥2 in >1 region or ≥4 for all regions, or Schirmer test score (STS) ≤10 mm; there were no restrictions on eye dryness score (EDS). Patients (N = 165) were randomly assigned 1:1:1:1 to vehicle (control; n = 42) or OC-02 SNS (0.11 mg, 0.55 mg, or 1.1 mg; n = 41 per group) and received a single dose of study drug (100 µL using a nasal spray atomizer) at visit 1 and visit 2 (15-19 days after visit 1). Primary efficacy outcomes were change in the STS from baseline to immediately after treatment administration (visit 1) and change in the EDS from before to 5 minutes after treatment during controlled adverse environment exposure (visit 2). FINDINGS: Baseline demographic and ocular clinical characteristics were similar across all groups. Single-dose OC-02 SNS improved the signs and symptoms of dry eye disease. For the STS, statistically significant and dose-dependent improvements were found from before to after treatment with OC-02 SNS versus vehicle (least-squares mean change from baseline: vehicle, 3.0 mm; 0.11 mg OC-02 SNS, 9.0 mm; 0.55 mg, 17.5 mm; and 1.1 mg, 19.6 mm). For EDS, statistically significant and dose-dependent improvements were found from before to 5 minutes after treatment with higher doses of OC-02 SNS versus vehicle (least-squares mean change from baseline: vehicle, -6.5; 0.11 mg OC-02 SNS, -9.4; 0.55 mg, -17.4; and 1.1 mg, -20.7). OC-02 SNS was well tolerated: only 2 ocular adverse events were reported (eye pruritis and keratitis), and the most common nonocular events were cough and throat irritation. IMPLICATIONS: Single-dose OC-02 SNS over a range of doses immediately and significantly increased tear production and improved eye dryness. Together with previous studies of OC-01 (varenicline solution) nasal spray, our findings suggest that agonist stimulation of nAChRs in the nasal cavity is a valid and effective mechanism to elicit natural tear production in patients with dry eye disease. CLINICALTRIALS: gov identifier: NCT03452397.

Efficacy and Safety of OC-01 (Varenicline Solution) Nasal Spray on Signs and Symptoms of Dry Eye Disease: The ONSET-2 Phase 3 Randomized Trial.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of OC-01 (varenicline solution) nasal spray for treatment of patients with dry eye disease. DESIGN: Randomized, multicenter, double-masked, vehicle-controlled, phase 3 study. PARTICIPANTS: Adults 22 years of age or older with a diagnosis of dry eye disease, artificial tear use, Ocular Surface Disease Index score of 23 or more, and Schirmer test score (STS) of 10 mm or less. Eligibility was not restricted by eye dryness score (EDS). METHODS: Patients (N = 758) were randomized in a 1:1:1 ratio to twice-daily treatment with 50-µl intranasal spray in each nostril of OC-01 0.03 mg (n = 260), OC-01 0.06 mg (n = 246), or vehicle (control; n = 252) for 4 weeks (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT04036292). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary efficacy end point was the percentage of patients achieving a 10-mm improvement or more in STS at week 4. Secondary end points included change from baseline to week 4 in STS and EDS in a controlled adverse environment (CAE) chamber and in the clinic. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were assessed. RESULTS: A statistically significantly greater percentage of patients achieved the primary end point in both OC-01 treatment groups compared with the vehicle group (OC-01 0.03 mg, 47.3%; OC-01 0.06 mg, 49.2%; vehicle, 27.8%; P < 0.0001 for both doses). Change from baseline in STS at week 4 was statistically significantly greater for patients receiving OC-01 than vehicle (P < 0.0001 for both doses). Eye dryness score assessed at week 4 improved with OC-01 treatment compared with vehicle, although the difference was not significant for EDS measured in the CAE chamber and showed (nominal) significance in the clinic. Overall, 86.5% of patients (654/756) reported at least 1 TEAE during the treatment period; most were mild, nonocular (sneezing, cough, throat irritation, and instillation site irritation) and were reported by fewer patients in the vehicle group than in the OC-01 treatment groups (OC-01 0.03 mg, 97.3%; OC-01 0.06 mg, 99.2%; vehicle, 57%). CONCLUSIONS: OC-01 nasal spray was well tolerated and showed a clinically meaningful effect on signs and symptoms of dry eye disease.