Lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymph node biopsy in epidermoid carcinoma of the anal canal.

AIM: Although 15-25% of patients with anal cancer present with superficial inguinal lymph node metastases but the routine application of groin irradiation is controversial because of serious side effects. Inguinal sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) can be used to select patients appropriately for inguinal radiation. The study evaluates the efficiency and clinical impact of SLNB. METHODS: Forty patients with anal cancer underwent 1 ml Tc(99m)-Nanocolloid injection in four sites around the tumour. Patients with inguinal radio colloid enrichment were selected for sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB). Lymph node status was examined by haematoxylin and eosin (H&E) as well as immunohistochemistry-staining. All SLN-positive patients were scheduled for inguinal radiation; SLN-negative patients with T1 and early T2 tumours were not scheduled for inguinal radiation. RESULTS: SLN were detected in 36/40 patients. Three common patterns of lymphatic drainage were observed: mesenterial, iliacal and inguinal. Twenty patients with inguinal SLN underwent SLN-biopsy. 6/20 patients were SLN-positive. In 10/20 patients SLNB altered the therapy plan--four patients with T1-tumours and positive SLN had additional groin irradiation, whereas 6 patients with small T2-tumors and tumour-free inguinal SLN did not undergo inguinal irradiation. CONCLUSIONS: Inguinal sentinel node biopsy in anal cancer is efficient and could assist in the decision for inguinal radiation. The validity and safety of the proposed therapeutic algorithm has to be proven by a larger, prospective study.

Use of the optical access trocar for safe and rapid entry in various laparoscopic procedures.

BACKGROUND: The use of the Veress needle in laparoscopy to create the pneumoperitoneum has inherent risks; it may cause vascular and visceral injuries. The open technique is compromised by the leakage of carbon dioxide and can also be time consuming. One alternative is to enter the abdomen using an optical trocar under direct view. Our aim was to determine whether the optical access trocar can be used to effect a safe and rapid entry in various laparoscopic procedures. METHODS: Over a 4-year period, the Optiview trocar was used for initial entry in 650 laparoscopic procedures. The procedures included cholecystectomy (n = 282), transabdominal inguinal hernia repair (n = 76), radiofrequency ablation of liver tumors (n = 73), adrenalectomy (n = 54), appendectomy (n = 41), colorectal surgery (n = 39), and various other procedures (n = 85). The following parameters were analyzed: presence of previous abdominal operations, site and duration of entry, and complications. RESULTS: Of the 650 patients, 156 (24%) had had previous abdominal operations. In 25 cases, previous trocar sites were reused for optical access. The optical trocar was inserted at the umbilicus in 495 patients (76%), in the right upper quadrant in 77 (12%), in the left upper quadrant in 26 (4%), in the upper midline in eight (1%), in the right lower quadrant in six (0.9%), and in the left lower quadrant in three (0.5%). In 35 patients undergoing posterior adrenalectomy, optical trocars were used to enter Gerota's space. Mean (SD) entry times were 92 (45) sec at the umbilical site, 114 (30) sec at the back, and 77 (35) sec at the remaining sites. Complications (0.3%) included one injury to the bowel and one injury to the gallbladder; however, they were recognized and repaired immediately. CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge, this report comprises the largest series in which the optical access trocar was used for laparoscopic surgery. This device provides the basis for a safe and fast technique for initial trocar placement: it also has the potential to reduce costs. Thanks to our favorable experience, the optical trocar method has become the standard technique for abdominal access in our laparoscopic practice since 1995.

Intraoperative thermal regulation in patients undergoing laparoscopic vs open surgical procedures.

BACKGROUND: Although perioperative hypothermia is a well-known consequence of general anesthesia, it has been hypothesized that laparoscopic surgery exacerbates hypothermia to a greater extent than open surgery. The aim of this study was to demonstrate that laparoscopic surgery does not represent an increased risk for hypothermia. METHODS: A case-controlled retrospective study was conducted on 45 patients, 25 undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy and 20 undergoing parathyroid surgery under endotracheal general anesthesia. Data were collected regarding age, sex, weight, height, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) status, length of surgery, and anesthesia. In addition, we analyzed the type of intraoperative intravenous fluids, anesthetics and perioperative drugs, and temperature, blood pressure, and heart rate recordings during anesthesia. RESULTS: There was no significant difference between the two groups with respect to age, sex, body mass index (BMI), ASA status, type or amount of intravenous fluids infused, length of anesthesia or surgery, changes in mean blood pressure, or heart rate. Core body temperatures in both groups decreased significantly over time (p 0.05). There was no difference between the groups in terms of maximum drop in temperature (lowest temperature recorded vs baseline temperature) (1.1 +/- 0.7 vs 1.0 +/- 0.7 degrees C, p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that patients who undergo laparoscopic and open procedures of similar duration under endotracheal general anesthesia have similar profiles in terms of perioperative hypothermia.

A critical analysis of intraoperative time utilization in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

BACKGROUND: Most of the expense of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is incurred while the patient is in the operation room; however, heretofore there has been no critical analysis of the time required to perform the various steps of the operation. An understanding of how operative time is used is the first step toward improving the efficiency of the procedure and decreasing costs while maintaining an acceptable standard of care. METHODS: Of 194 patients undergoing LC at a university hospital between 1994 and 1997, operational videotapes of 48 randomly chosen patients were reviewed. Three groups of patients were identified: those undergoing LC for chronic cholecystitis (n = 27), those undergoing LC for acute cholecystitis (n = 11), and those with common bile duct stones (CBDS), (n = 10) undergoing LC with transcystic common bile duct exploration. The procedure was divided into the following seven steps; trocar entry, laparoscopic ultrasound, dissection of the triangle of Calot, cholangiogram, dissection of the gallbladder, extraction of the gallbladder, and irrigation-aspiration with removal of ports. Time spent for camera cleaning, bleeding control, and insertion of the cholangiocatheter into the cystic duct was also calculated. The groups were compared in terms of time spent for each step using the Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests. RESULTS: The mean +/- SD operating time was 66.5 +/- 20.5 min. The acute group had the longest operating time, followed by the CBDS and chronic groups. Dissection of the gallbladder, insertion of the cholangiocatheter, and irrigation-aspiration were longer steps in the acute group than in the other groups (p < 0.05). Dissection of the triangle of Calot took longer in acute cholecystitis than in chronic cholecystitis (p < 0.05). CBDS cases took longer (p < 0.05) than chronic cases because stone extraction added an average of 17.5 min to the time required for the cholangiogram in chronic cholecystitis. Laparoscopic ultrasound took longer in the CBDS group than in the other groups (p < 0.05). The mean +/- SD time spent for the cholangiogram and laparoscopic ultrasound in chronic cholecystitis was 7.5 +/- 4.3 and 4.8 +/- 1.9 min, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This time analysis study demonstrates that acute cholecystitis requires a longer operating time because most of the individual steps in the procedure take longer. In patients with choledocholithiasis, stone extraction was responsible for longer operating times. This study should serve as a basis for future studies focusing on time utilization in laparoscopic surgery.

Laparoscopic ultrasonographic appearance of the common bile duct mucosa: a predictor of choledocholithiasis.

Previously we reported on the use of laparoscopic ultrasonography in detecting common bile duct stones during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The aim of this study is to describe the laparoscopic ultrasonographic appearance of the common bile duct mucosa in patients with choledocholithiasis. Medical records of 44 patients with an increased risk for common bile duct stones undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy between 1993 and 1998 were reviewed. In the operating room, the laparoscopic ultrasonographic appearance of the common bile duct mucosa was scored in real time as normal, mild changes (hyperechoic mucosa), or severe changes (hyperechoic with mucosal thickening). Of the 31 patients (70%) with stones or sludge in the biliary tree, 29 (94%) had either severe (58%) or mild (36%) hyperechoic and 2 (6%) had normal-appearing common bile duct mucosa on laparoscopic ultrasonography. Of the 13 patients (30%) with no documented stones or sludge, 11 (85%) had normal and 2 (15%) had mild hyperechoic common bile duct mucosa on laparoscopic ultrasonography. Both of these patients had laboratory values indicating recent passage of common bile duct stones. The association between common bile duct stones and the presence of hyperechoic common bile duct mucosa was statistically significant (P < .0001, Fisher's exact test). This is the first report of hyperechoic common bile duct mucosa demonstrated by laparoscopic ultrasonography as a predictor of common bile duct stones. This finding is evident in the majority of patients with common bile duct stones and also may be associated with recent passage of a stone into the duodenum.

Laparoscopic ultrasound vs triphasic computed tomography for detecting liver tumors.

BACKGROUND: Accurate staging of malignant tumors in the liver has major implications in defining prognosis and guiding both surgical and nonsurgical therapy. Intraoperative ultrasound in open surgery compares favorably with computed tomography (CT) in the detection of liver tumors; however, there is little experience with laparoscopic ultrasound (LUS). HYPOTHESIS: Laparoscopic ultrasound is more sensitive than triphasic CT for detecting primary and metastatic liver tumors. DESIGN: Prospective study. SETTING: University hospital. PATIENTS: Fifty-five patients with a total of 222 lesions, including primary and metastatic liver tumors, who underwent both CT examinations and LUS as a part of a tumor ablation procedure. INTERVENTIONS: Triphasic spiral CT scans of the liver were obtained within 1 week before surgery. Liver LUS was performed with a linear 7.5-MHz side-viewing laparoscopic transducer. RESULTS: The LUS detected all 201 tumors seen on preoperative CT and detected 21 additional tumors (9.5%) in 11 patients (20.0%). These tumors missed by CT ranged in size from 0.3 to 2.7 cm. Smaller tumors tended to be missed by CT scan (28.6% of the lesions <1 cm, 15.8% of those 1-2 cm, 4% of those 2-3 cm, and 0% of those >3 cm), as did those in segments III and IV. There was good correlation between the size of lesions imaged by the 2 modalities (Pearson r = 0.86; P<.001). CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic ultrasound offers increased sensitivity over CT for the detection of liver tumors, especially for smaller lesions. This study documents the ability of LUS in detecting liver tumors and argues for more widespread use in laparoscopic staging procedures.

Laparoscopic radiofrequency ablation of primary and metastatic liver tumors. Technical considerations.

BACKGROUND: Radiofrequency thermal ablation is a new technology for the local destruction of liver tumors. Since we first described laparoscopic radiofrequency ablation (LRFA) for the treatment of liver tumors, much has been learned about patient selection, laparoscopic ultrasound (LU) guided placement of the ablation catheter, monitoring of the ablation process, and patient follow-up. METHODS: Since January 1996 we have performed LRFA of 250 tumors in 67 patients including 85 adenocarcinomas, 107 neuroendocrine tumors, 34 sarcomas, 1 melanoma, and 11 hepatomas. We used LU to guide placement of the ablation catheter and to monitor the ablation process. Most of the patients had two trocars (camera and laparoscopic ultrasound) with the 15-gauge ablation catheter (RITA Medical Systems, Mountain View, CA, USA) placed percutaneously. RESULTS: The LRFA procedure was completed successfully in all patients, with 1 to 14 lesions per patient, ranging in size from 0.5 to 10 cm in diameter. The entire liver could be examined by LU via right subcostal ports. Criteria for successful ablation were 5-min ablation times at 100 degrees C with 1-min cool-down temperatures of 60 degrees to 70 degrees C. Outgassing of dissolved nitrogen, monitored by ultrasound, was useful in confirming the zone of ablation. Intralesional color-flow Doppler, seen before ablation, was eliminated after ablation. Placement of the grounding pad closer to the lesion on the back rather than the thigh resulted in more efficient energy delivery to the tumor. Lesions larger than 3 cm in diameter required overlapping ablations to achieve a 1-cm margin of normal liver. Most patients required overnight hospitalization, with no coagulopathy or electrolyte disturbances noted. CONCLUSIONS: The LRFA procedure is a novel, minimally invasive technique for treatment of liver tumors that have failed conventional therapy. This study documents the technical aspects of targeting lesions and performing reproducible zones of ablation. Familiarity with these techniques should lead to more widespread application.

Local recurrence after laparoscopic radiofrequency thermal ablation of hepatic tumors.

BACKGROUND: Since we first described laparoscopic radiofrequency ablation (LRFA) of liver tumors, several reports have documented technical and safety aspects of this procedure. Little is known, however, about the long-term follow-up of such patients. METHODS: From January 1996 to February 1999, we performed LRFA on 250 liver tumors in 66 patients. Triphasic spiral computed tomographic scanning was obtained preoperatively and at 1 week, and every 3 months postoperatively. Lesion diameter was measured in the x- and y-axes and the volume estimated; 181 lesions in 43 patients for whom computed tomographic scans available were included in the study. The tumor types were as follows: 64 metastatic adenocarcinomas, 79 neuroendocrine metastases, 27 other metastases, and 11 primary liver tumors. RESULTS: One week postoperatively, the ablated zone was larger than the original tumor in 178 of 181 lesions, which suggests ablation of the tumor and a margin of normal liver tissue. A progressive decline in lesion size was seen in 156 (88%) of 178 lesions, followed for at least 3 months (mean, 13.9 months; range, 4.9-37.8 months), which suggests resorption of the ablated tissue. Fourteen definite local treatment failures were apparent by increase in size and change in computed tomographic scan appearance, and eight lesions were scored as failures because of multifocal recurrence that encroached on ablated foci (22 total recurrences). Predictors of failure include lack of increased lesion size at 1 week (2 of 3 such lesions failed), adenocarcinoma or sarcoma (18 of 22 failures; P < .05), larger tumors (failures, M = 18 cm3 vs. successes, M = 7 cm3; P < .005) and vascular invasion on laparoscopic ultrasonography. By size criteria, 17 of 22 failures were apparent by 6 months. Energy delivered per gram of tissue was not significantly different (P = .45). CONCLUSIONS: LRFA has a 12% local failure rate, with larger adenocarcinomas and sarcomas at greatest risk. Failures occur early in follow-up, with most occurring by 6 months. LRFA seems to be a safe and effective treatment technique for patients with primary and metastatic liver malignancies.

Selective use of tube cholecystostomy with interval laparoscopic cholecystectomy in acute cholecystitis.

HYPOTHESIS: Tube cholecystostomy followed by interval laparoscopic cholecystectomy is a sale and efficacious treatment option in critically ill patients with acute cholecystitis. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study within a 4 1/2%-year period. SETTING: University hospital. PATIENTS: Of 324 patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy, 65 (20%) had acute cholecystitis; 15 of these 65 patients (mean age, 75 years) underwent tube cholecystostomy. INTERVENTION: Thirteen patients at high risk for general anesthesia because of underlying medical conditions underwent percutaneous tube cholecystostomy with local anesthesia. Laparoscopic tube cholecystostomy was performed on 2 patients during attempted laparoscopic cholecystectomy because of severe inflammation. Interval laparoscopic cholecystectomy was attempted after an average of 12 weeks. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Technical details and clinical outcome. RESULTS: Prompt clinical response was observed in 13 (87%) of the patients after tube cholecystostomy. Twelve patients (80%) underwent interval cholecystectomy. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy was attempted in 11 patients and was successful in 10 (91%), with 1 conversion to open cholecystectomy. One patient had interval open cholecystectomy during definitive operation for esophageal cancer and another had emergency open cholecystectomy due to tube dislodgment. Two patients (13%) had complications related to tube cholecystostomy and 2 patients died from sepsis before interval operation. One patient died from sepsis after combined esophagectomy and cholecystectomy. Postoperative minor complications developed in 2 patients. At a mean follow-up of 16.7 months (range, 0.5-53 months), all patients were free of biliary symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Tube cholecystostomy allowed for resolution of sepsis and delay of definitive surgery in selected patients. Interval laparoscopic cholecystectomy was safely performed once sepsis and acute infection had resolved in this patient group at high risk for general anesthesia and conversion to open cholecystectomy. Just as catheter drainage of acute infection with interval appendectomy is accepted in patients with periappendiceal abscess, tube cholecystostomy with interval laparoscopic cholecystectomy should have a role in the management of selected patients with acute cholecystitis.

Laparoscopic management of a posterior mediastinal tumor mimicking an adrenal neoplasm.

BACKGROUND: Rarely, a posterior mediastinal mass may mimic an adrenal tumor on preoperative computed tomography scan. The intraoperative discovery that a mass thought to be associated with the adrenal gland actually is above the diaphragm in the posteroinferior mediastinum poses a challenge for the laparoscopic surgeon. Conversion to a thoracotomy or to videothoracoscopy incurs additional morbidity and risk for the patient. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We describe a technique for the transdiaphragmatic removal of a benign mass from the posterior mediastinum. A posterior mediastinal tumor was detected during a laparoscopic procedure for a suspected right adrenal tumor. Frozen section proved benign, and the mass was resected laparoscopically via transdiaphragmatic access to the posterior mediastinum. RESULTS: No complications were noted during or after surgery. The patient was ready for discharge from the hospital on postoperative day 1. CONCLUSIONS: Transdiaphragmatic resection was done successfully instead of conversion to a thoracotomy or thoracoscopic procedure for a benign posterior mediastinal tumor found incidentally during laparoscopic surgery for a presumed adrenal lesion. This transdiaphragmatic approach can be applied to selected benign mediastinal masses.