Correction to: Oral propranolol in prevention of severe retinopathy of prematurity: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

An amendment to this paper has been published and can be accessed via a link at the top of the paper.

Oral propranolol in prevention of severe retinopathy of prematurity: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To systematically assess the efficacy of oral beta blockage treatment in primary (before established) and secondary (in threshold stages) prevention of severe retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) in premature infants born ≤32 weeks gestational age. STUDY DESIGN: Following the PRISMA guidelines, published literature was systematically assessed up to April 27, 2018. Trials and observational studies, in which beta blockage was used to prevent severe ROP (defined as stage ≥3, or requiring treatment) were included. Meta-analyses including random effects models were conducted to determine the overall effect of oral beta blockage on prevention of ROP. RESULTS: Six studies (five clinical trials and one observational study) including 461 infants met inclusion criteria using propranolol. The pooled relative risk (RR) of severe ROP in the primary and secondary prophylaxis groups were 0.65 (95% CI 0.43-0.98, NNT = 7) and 0.48 (95% CI 0.35-0.65, NNT = 6) in RCTs, respectively. The RR of severe ROP in one observational study was 0.21 (95% CI 0.08-0.55) with a NNT of 3. There were low heterogeneity and publication bias. Side effects occurred in 8.4% of participants on propranolol. CONCLUSIONS: Systematic assessment of studies showed that prophylactic oral propranolol appeared to be effective in preventing severe ROP in premature infants ≤32 weeks gestational age. Additional well powered, multinational, randomized control trials reporting on long-term outcomes are needed.

Age-dependent sting recurrence and outcome in immunotherapy-treated children with anaphylaxis to Hymenoptera venom.

BACKGROUND: Data on outcome of insect venom immunotherapy in children are rare. OBJECTIVE: We investigated the rate of sting recurrence and outcome of Hymenoptera venom anaphylaxis in children of different age groups treated with immunotherapy. METHODS: Data from children consecutively referred for anaphylaxis to Hymenoptera venom were collected using a standardized questionnaire. RESULTS: During mean follow-up of 7.7 years after commencement of immunotherapy, 45 of 83 children (56%) were re-stung 108 times by the insect they were allergic to. This corresponds to a rate of 0.23 stings per child and year of follow-up. The younger the subject, the higher was the prevalence of re-stings, with rates of 0.41 in children < 6 years, 0.21 at school age and 0.15 in adolescents (P = 0.001). In contrast, prevalence of systemic allergic reactions to field stings was significantly lower in pre-school (3.4%) and school-age children (4.3%) compared with adolescents (15.6%; P < 0.05). Overall, prevalence of systemic allergic reactions at re-sting was 15.6% in the honey bee venom and 5.9% in the Vespula venom allergic group (P = ns). Younger boys with anaphylaxis to honey bee venom predominated in our cohort (P = 0.019). CONCLUSION AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: A majority of children with anaphylaxis to Hymenoptera venom (56%) in our cohort were re-stung, equally by honey bees or Vespula species. Younger children were more likely to be re-stung, but less likely to have a systemic reaction. Venom immunotherapy induces long-term protection in most children: 84.4% of subjects with anaphylaxis to honey bee and 94.1% of those to Vespula venom were completely protected at re-stings.