Negative ECG-gated cardiac CT in patients with low-to-moderate risk chest pain in the emergency department: 1-year follow-up.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this article is to determine the frequency of adverse cardiac events during the year following a negative cardiac CT angiogram in a population of patients presenting to the emergency department with low-to-moderate risk chest pain. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Eighty-one consecutive patients who had standard of care evaluation for low-to-moderate risk chest pain in the emergency department were enrolled and consented to have a cardiac CT angiogram added to their workup and to have follow-up for 1 year. Eleven patients were excluded, six because their cardiac CT examinations were unsuccessful, four because of a positive cardiac CT angiogram result, and one was lost to follow-up. Seventy patients with negative cardiac CT angiographic results (< 50% stenosis) were included and were interviewed in detail at 3, 6, and 12 months about intervening cardiac events, diagnostic testing, and therapy. Electronic medical records were also reviewed at each time point. RESULTS: None of the 70 patients reported an adverse cardiac event over the 12-month follow-up period. At 1 year, the cause of chest pain was unknown in 49 patients, gastrointestinal in nine patients, anxiety in seven patients, musculoskeletal in three patients, and other in two patients. Three of four patients with 50% or greater stenosis on their cardiac CT had subsequent cardiac catheterization and stent placement. CONCLUSION: In patients with low-to-moderate risk chest pain evaluated in the emergency department, adverse cardiac events may be rare during the 12 months following a negative cardiac CT angiogram.

Low-risk patients with chest pain in the emergency department: negative 64-MDCT coronary angiography may reduce length of stay and hospital charges.

OBJECTIVE: The current standard-of-care workup of low-risk patients with chest pain in an emergency department takes 12-36 hours and is expensive. We hypothesized that negative 64-MDCT coronary angiography early in the workup of such patients may enable a shorter length of stay and reduce charges. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The standard-of-care evaluation consisted of serial cardiac enzyme tests, ECGs, and stress testing. After informed consent, we added cardiac CT early in the standard-of-care workup of 53 consecutive patients. Fifty patients had negative CT findings and were included in this series. The length of stay and charges were analyzed using actual patient data for all patients in the standard-of-care workup and for two earlier discharge scenarios based on negative cardiac CT results: First, CT plus serial enzyme tests and ECGs during an observation period followed by discharge if all were negative; and second, CT plus one set of enzyme tests and one ECG followed by discharge if all were negative. Comparisons were made using paired Student's t tests. RESULTS: For standard of care and the two CT-based earlier discharge analyses, the mean lengths of stay were 25.4, 14.3, and 5.0 hours; mean charges were $7,597, $6,153, and $4,251. Length of stay and charges were both significantly less (p < 0.001) for the two CT-based analyses. CONCLUSION: In low-risk patients with chest pain, discharge from the emergency department based on negative cardiac CT, enzyme tests, and ECG may significantly decrease both length of stay and hospital charges compared with the standard of care.

Whole-chest 64-MDCT of emergency department patients with nonspecific chest pain: Radiation dose and coronary artery image quality with prospective ECG triggering versus retrospective ECG gating.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare the patient radiation dose and coronary artery image quality of long-z-axis whole-chest 64-MDCT performed with retrospective ECG gating with those of CT performed with prospective ECG triggering in the evaluation of emergency department patients with nonspecific chest pain. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Consecutively registered emergency department patients with nonspecific low-to-moderate-risk chest pain underwent whole-chest CT with retrospective gating (n = 41) or prospective triggering (n = 31). Effective patient radiation doses were estimated and compared by use of unpaired Student's t tests. Two reviewers independently scored the quality of images of the coronary arteries, and the scores were compared by use of ordinal logistic regression. RESULTS: Age, heart rate, body mass index, and z-axis coverage were not statistically different between the two groups. For retrospective gating, the mean effective radiation dose was 31.8 +/- 5.1 mSv; for prospective triggering, the mean effective radiation dose was 9.2 +/- 2.2 mSv (prospective triggering 71% lower, p < 0.001). Two of 512 segments imaged with retrospective gating were nonevaluable (0.4%), and two of 394 segments imaged with prospective triggering were nonevaluable (0.5%). Prospectively triggered images were 2.2 (95% CI, 1.1-4.5) times as likely as retrospectively gated images to receive a high image quality score for each segment after adjustment for segment differences (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: For long-z-axis whole-chest 64-MDCT of emergency department patients with nonspecific chest pain, use of prospective ECG triggering may result in substantially lower patient radiation doses and better coronary artery image quality than is achieved with retrospective ECG gating.