Health literacy: a new piece of the puzzle in psoriasis care? A cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: Health literacy (HL) - the ability to seek, understand and utilize health information - is important for good health. Suboptimal HL has been associated with poorer health outcomes in other chronic conditions, although this has not previously been studied in patients with psoriasis. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the HL strengths and weaknesses of a cohort of patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis. Another aim was to examine possible associations between patients' quality of life, their demographic, clinical and self-management characteristics, and dimensions of HL. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted. Data were collected from a cohort of patients with psoriasis who had received climate helio therapy from 2011 to 2016 (n = 825). HL was assessed by the Health Literacy Questionnaire (HLQ). The association between HL domains, demographic, clinical and self-management variables were analysed using bivariate correlation and a four-step linear multiple regression model. RESULTS: The scores on all HLQ dimensions indicated lower health literacy than other populations. The linear regression models showed a significant association between HL, quality of life and self-management variables, with higher HL predicting higher quality of life, self-efficacy and psoriasis knowledge. Sex, educational attainment, age and disease severity had less influence on health literacy. CONCLUSIONS: Improving HL may be a useful strategy for reducing disparities in self-management skills for patients with psoriasis. Interventions that aim to reduce disease severity and increase psoriasis knowledge, self-efficacy and quality of life may positively increase HL.

The efficacy of rehabilitation for patients with rheumatoid arthritis: comparison between a 4-week rehabilitation programme in a warm and cold climate.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the long-term effect (week 16) of a 4-week rehabilitation programme for patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and to compare the effect of this intervention given in a Mediterranean or a Norwegian climate. METHODS: A randomized, controlled, parallel group design, where 124 RA patients applying for rehabilitation were randomized to a rehabilitation programme either in Norway or in a Mediterranean climate. The participants were examined clinically immediately before (week 0) and after (week 4) the rehabilitation period as well as in week 16 and answered a mailed questionnaire in week 28. The 28-Joint Disease Activity Score (DAS28), American College of Rheumatology (ACR) response and physical tests were used to measure clinical response. RESULTS: The baseline DAS28 value 4.45 (1.16) was reduced by -0.95 (1.05) in the Mediterranean climate and the baseline DAS28 value 4.18 (1.17) was reduced by -0.37 (0.92) in the Norwegian climate at week 16 (p = 0.003). An ACR20 improvement was achieved in 25% of the patients treated in the Mediterranean climate and in 15% of those treated in the Norwegian climate. Sustained improvement in all ACR core components at week 16 and in patient's assessment of health status at week 28 was found in the patients treated in the Mediterranean climate only. Tests of physical function, the 6-Minute Walk Test (6MWT) and the Timed Up and Go (TUG), showed comparable improvements in patients treated in both climates. CONCLUSIONS: RA patients showed immediate positive effects with regard to disease activity, physical function, and symptoms during a 4-week rehabilitation programme. The effects on disease activity and symptoms were larger and better maintained at least 3 months after rehabilitation in a warm rather than in a cold climate.

Treatment of patients with postpolio syndrome in a warm climate.

PURPOSE: Treatment in warm climate of various patient groups including patients with postpolio syndrome is controversial. METHOD: Eighty-eight patients with postpolio syndrome (61 women) were recruited, stratified according to sex, age (above/below 60 years old) and use/not use of electrical wheelchair, and randomized to three groups. Group 1 (n=30) underwent treatment in a rehabilitation centre in Tenerife for four weeks in November/December 1999. Group 2 (n=29) were treated in two similar centres in Norway for the same period of time, while Group 3 (n=29), the control group, followed their ordinary health care programme. All patients were tested at the start of study, and 3 and 6 months later, including physical tests and several questionnaire and qualitative interviews. Patients in Group 1 and 2 were also tested after the rehabilitation period. RESULTS: Group 1 and 2 improved significantly both in physical tests and subjective ratings. The positive effects in Group 1 tended to exceed the positive effects in Group 2, and the effects lasted longer. Six minutes walking distance in the two groups was 347 m and 316 m, respectively, before the treatment period, 429 m and 362 m immediately after, and 431 m and 356 m 3 months later. Subjective rating of pain (VAS-scale) was 42 and 43, respectively, before treatment, 17 and 31 immediately after, and 28 and 44 3-months later. In the control group, only minor changes were found. CONCLUSIONS: The study seems to document a positive effect of treatment of patients with postpolio syndrome in warm climate.

[Treatment of patients with postpolio syndrome in warm climate]. / Behandlingsreiser til Syden for pasienter med postpoliosyndrom.

BACKGROUND: Treatment in a warm climate of various patient groups, including patients with postpolio syndrome, is controversial. MATERIAL AND METHODS: 88 patients with postpolio syndrome (61 women) were recruited, stratified according to sex, age (<> 60 years old) and use/non-use of electrical wheelchair, and randomized to three groups. Group 1 (n = 30) underwent treatment in a rehabilitation centre in Tenerife for four weeks in November/December 1999. Group 2 (n = 29) was treated in two similar centres in Norway for the same period of time, while Group 3 (n = 29), the control group, followed their ordinary health care programme. All patients were tested at the start of the study and three and six months later with physical tests and several questionnaire and qualitative interviews. Patients in groups 1 and 2 were also tested after the rehabilitation period. RESULTS: Groups 1 and 2 improved significantly both in physical tests and subjective ratings. The positive effects in group 1 tended to exceed the positive effects in group 2, and the effects lasted longer. Six minutes walking distance in the two groups was 347 metres and 316 metres, respectively before the treatment period, 429 metres and 362 metres immediately after, and 431 metres and 356 metres three months later. Subjective rating of pain (VAS scale) was 42 and 43 respectively before treatment, 17 and 31 immediately after, and 28 and 44 three months later. In the control group, only minor changes were found. INTERPRETATION: The study seems to document a positive effect of treatment of patients with postpolio syndrome in a warm climate.