Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Sci Total Environ ; 879: 162881, 2023 Jun 25.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36933720

ABSTRACT

Agriculture can be a contributor of pollutants, including pesticides and excess sediment, to aquatic environments. However, side-inlet vegetated filter strips (VFSs), which are planted around the upstream side of culverts draining agricultural fields, may provide reductions in pesticide and sediment losses from agricultural fields, and have the additional benefit of removing less land from production than traditional VFS. In this study, reductions of runoff, the soluble pesticide acetochlor, and total suspended solids were estimated using a paired watershed field study and coupled PRZM/VFSMOD modeling for two treatment watersheds with source to buffer area ratios (SBAR) of 80:1 (SI-A) and 481:1 (SI-B). Based on the paired watershed ANCOVA analysis, runoff and acetochlor load reductions were significant following the implementation of a VFS at SIA but not SI-B, indicating the potential for side-inlet VFS to reduce runoff and acetochlor load from a watershed with an area ratio of 80:1 but not a higher ratio of 481:1. VFSMOD simulations were consistent with the results of the paired watershed monitoring study, where simulated reductions of runoff, acetochlor loads, and TSS loads were substantially lower for SI-B than SI-A. VFSMOD simulations of SI-B with the SBAR ratio observed at SI-A (80:1) also show that VFSMOD can be used to capture variability in effectiveness of VFS based on multiple factors including SBAR. While this study focused on the effectiveness of side-inlet VFSs at the field scale, broader adoption of properly sized side-inlet VFSs could improve surface water quality at the watershed or larger scales. Additionally, modeling at the watershed scale could aid in locating, sizing, and assessing the impacts of side-inlet VFSs at this larger scale.

2.
Integr Environ Assess Manag ; 18(3): 757-769, 2022 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34383375

ABSTRACT

Spray drift buffers are often required on herbicide labels to prevent potential drift effects to nontarget plants. Buffers are typically derived by determining the distance at which predicted exposure from spray drift equals the ecotoxicology threshold for sensitive plant species determined in greenhouse tests. Field studies performed under realistic conditions have demonstrated, however, that this approach is far more conservative than necessary. In 2016, the US Environmental Protection Agency estimated that isoxaflutole (IFT), a herbicide used to control grass and broadleaf weeds, could adversely affect downwind nontarget dicot plants at distances of ≥304 m from the edge of the treated field due to spray drift. This prediction implies that a buffer of at least 304 m is required to protect nontarget plants. To refine the predicted buffer distance for IFT, we conducted a field study in which sensitive nontarget plants (lettuce and navy bean, two to four leaf stage) were placed at various distances downwind from previously harvested soybean fields sprayed with Balance® Flexx Herbicide. The test plants were then transported to a greenhouse for grow out following the standard vegetative vigor test protocol. There were three trials. One had vegetation in the downwind deposition area (i.e., test plants placed in mowed grass; typical exposure scenario) and two had bare ground deposition areas (worst-case exposure scenario). For both plant species in bare ground deposition areas, effects on shoot height and weight were observed at 1.52 m but not at downwind distances of ≥9.14 m from the edge of the treated area. No effects were observed at any distance for plants placed in the vegetated deposition area. The field study demonstrated that a buffer of 9.14 m protects nontarget terrestrial plants exposed to IFT via spray drift even under worst-case conditions. Integr Environ Assess Manag 2022;18:757-769. © 2021 Bayer. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Society of Environmental Toxicology & Chemistry (SETAC).


Subject(s)
Herbicides , Ecotoxicology , Herbicides/analysis , Herbicides/toxicity , Isoxazoles , Plants
3.
J Environ Qual ; 47(1): 79-87, 2018 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29415099

ABSTRACT

The estimation of pesticide concentrations in surface water bodies is a critical component of the environmental risk assessment process required by regulatory agencies in North America, the European Union, and elsewhere. Pesticide transport to surface waters via deposition from off-field spray drift can be an important route of potential contamination. The spatial orientation of treated fields relative to receiving water bodies make prediction of off-target pesticide spray drift deposition and resulting aquatic estimated environmental concentrations (EECs) challenging at the watershed scale. The variability in wind conditions further complicates the simulation of the environmental processes leading to pesticide spray drift contributions to surface water. This study investigates the use of the Soil Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) for predicting concentrations of malathion (O,O-deimethyl thiophosphate of diethyl mercaptosuccinate) in a flowing water body when exposure is a result of off-target spray drift, and assesses the model's performance using a parameterization typical of a screening-level regulatory assessment. Six SWAT parameterizations, each including incrementally more site-specific data, are then evaluated to quantify changes in model performance. Results indicate that the SWAT model is an appropriate tool for simulating watershed scale concentrations of pesticides resulting from off-target spray drift deposition. The model predictions are significantly more accurate when the inputs and assumptions accurately reflect application practices and environmental conditions. Inclusion of detailed wind data had the most significant impact on improving model-predicted EECs in comparison to observed concentrations.


Subject(s)
Agriculture , Pesticides/analysis , Water Pollutants, Chemical/analysis , Models, Theoretical , Risk Assessment , Rivers , Wind
4.
Ecohealth ; 9(4): 455-70, 2012 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23212728

ABSTRACT

Changes in land use and climate are expected to alter the risk of malaria transmission in areas where rainfall limits vector abundance. We use a coupled hydrology-entomology model to investigate the effects of land use change on hydrological processes impacting mosquito abundance in a highland village of Ethiopia. Land use affects partitioning of rainfall into infiltration and runoff that reaches small-scale topographic depressions, which constitute the primary breeding habitat of Anopheles arabiensis mosquitoes. A physically based hydrology model isolates hydrological mechanisms by which land use impacts pool formation and persistence, and an agent-based entomology model evaluates the response of mosquito populations. This approach reproduced observed interannual variability in mosquito abundance between the 2009 and 2010 wet seasons. Several scenarios of land cover were then evaluated using the calibrated, field-validated model. Model results show variation in pool persistence and depth, as well as in mosquito abundance, due to land use changes alone. The model showed particular sensitivity to surface roughness, but also to root zone uptake. Scenarios in which land use was modified from agriculture to forest generally resulted in lowest mosquito abundance predictions; classification of the entire domain as rainforest produced a 34% decrease in abundance compared to 2010 results. This study also showed that in addition to vegetation type, spatial proximity of land use change to habitat locations has an impact on mosquito abundance. This modeling approach can be applied to assess impacts of climate and land use conditions that fall outside of the range of previously observed variability.


Subject(s)
Anopheles/growth & development , Climate , Insect Vectors/growth & development , Malaria/transmission , Water , Animals , Environment , Ethiopia , Humans , Models, Theoretical , Rain , Seasons , Soil
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...