The use of complementary and alternative medicine by women transitioning through menopause in Germany: results of a survey of women aged 45-60 years.

OBJECTIVES: To describe prevalence rates of complementary and alternative medicine therapies (CAM) for the relief of menopausal complaints among German women. Furthermore, to investigate the perceived effectiveness of these therapies. DESIGN: A self-administered questionnaire was sent to 9785 randomly selected women in Germany aged between 45 and 60 years. RESULTS: A total of 1893 (19.3%) questionnaires have been sent back. The mean age of all participants was 52.6±4.3 years. 81% (n=1517) of the responding women stated that they had experienced menopausal complaints at least once. Symptoms ranged from vasomotor symptoms, including hot flushes and night sweats, in 71.2% of cases, to bladder problems in 42.7%. The average symptom score (MRS II total score, range 1-44) among the respondents was 12.76±9.6. More than half (56%; n=1049/1872) of the responding women had used some form of therapy to alleviate their symptoms at least once. The majority of women undertaking a therapy (64.8%; n=679/1049) had used only CAM interventions (either one or more type of CAM), 14.2% (n=149) had used hormone replacement therapy (HRT) only, while 21.1% (n=221/1049) had tried both CAM and HRT. Popular CAM interventions by the respondents were an alteration of lifestyle (28.7%), St. John's wort (18.3%) and homoeopathy (14.9%). An alteration in lifestyle was rated as the most effective CAM treatment with 84.9% (n=457). Other treatments like hormone yoga (79.2%; n=42), homoeopathy (73.7%; n=205) and TCM (59.1%; n=94) were also perceived to be effective. Phytoestrogens were rated as the most ineffective (45.5%; n=50). CONCLUSION: CAM interventions to alleviate menopausal complaints are popular among German women, with 48.2% (n=900/1872) of respondents reporting having used CAM either alone or in combination with HRT. However, the users rated the effects of CAM differently, with some reporting CAM to be highly effective, while others indicate lower effectiveness. Nevertheless, women with a significantly higher symptom scoring tend to use both CAM and a conventional therapy (HRT).

Attitude of German women towards hormone therapy: results of a lay survey.

OBJECTIVE: Hormone therapy (HT) use has experienced a substantial change since publication of Women's Health Initiative (WHI) controlled trial. We aimed to investigate the attitude towards HT in German women aged 45-60 years. STUDY DESIGN: A questionnaire was sent to 9785 randomly selected women in Germany aged between 45 and 60 years. RESULTS: Response rate was 19.3% (n = 1,893). Of those, 81% experienced climacteric symptoms. Vasomotor symptoms were most frequently reported (71.2%; n = 1332). Of the respondents, 19.7% (n = 369) used HT. The most frequently mentioned benefits of HT were the improvement of climacteric complaints (71.2%; n = 1346), followed by the relief of osteoporosis (37.2%; n = 697) and the "anti-aging" effect (16.3%; n = 305). Breast cancer was stated as the main risk (64.9%; n = 1215), closely followed by weight gain (53.4%; n = 1000) and thromboembolism (48%; n = 898). About 44% of the women who has been advised by gynaecologists choose a HT, whereas this rate dropped down to 14.3% and 11.3% for women who have been advised by friends or media. CONCLUSION: German women were generally aware of the main risks and benefits of HT. "More informed" women appear to be more likely to use HT compared to "less informed" women. The media produces negative impression of HT.

Attitude of German gynecologists towards prescribing HRT before and after the WHI study.

OBJECTIVE: The publication of the Women's Health Initiative (WHI) randomized, controlled trial in 2002 resulted in a critical discussion on the risks and benefits of hormone replacement therapy (HRT). The present study aims to evaluate the attitude of German gynecologists regarding changes in the prescription of HRT over recent years. Method A questionnaire was sent to all 9589 German gynecologists in private practice in November 2010. RESULTS: The response rate was 2548 (26.6%). Whereas 82.2% of the responders stated that their advice for primary hormone therapy and alternative agents depended on the severity of symptoms, 9.1% of the responders would recommend HRT in the first place (male: 14.3%; female: 6.1%; p < 0.001). An age limit for hormone prescription was stated by 26.2%, with a mean age limit of 63 ± 5.3 years. An increasing number of patients and becoming more critical about HRT after the WHI was mentioned by 79.8%. Of the responding doctors, 43.9% found that their patients were badly informed by the media, 44.5% stated they were moderately or well (10.1%) informed, whereas only 1% considered their patients to be very well informed. HRT was prescribed for the relief of vasomotor symptoms by 97.4% of responders, making this the primary indication. This percentage decreased slightly to 92.6% between 2003 and 2008 (p < 0.001) and increased again to a similar level at the beginning of 2010 (96.7%, p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: German gynecologists generally have a positive attitude towards HRT, but find it important to focus on the evaluation of the risk-benefit ratio. The major barriers to prescription are multiple concerns of the patients resulting from non-objective media.