ABSTRACT
CCR7 and CD45RA expression on CD4+ and CD8+ T-cells in blood (PB) of 16 patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) and 16 healthy controls and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) of 10 patients suffering from MS were analysed by flow cytometric measurements. T-cells were divided by their distinct homing potentials and effector-functions in three groups: naïve T-cells (CCR7+, CD45RA+), central memory T-cells (TCM) (CCR7+, CD45RA-) and effector memory T-cells (TEM) (CCR7-, CD45RA-). There was a significant increase of CD8+ TEM-cells in PB of MS patients compared to healthy controls, indicating systemic immune activation. Further we found a relative depletion of CD8+ TEM-cells in CSF of MS patients compared to matching blood samples, suggesting that these cells represent the effector arm of the immune response and infiltrate the brain tissue at the sites of inflammation.
Subject(s)
CD8 Antigens/blood , CD8-Positive T-Lymphocytes/cytology , Immunologic Memory , Multiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-Remitting/immunology , Adult , Case-Control Studies , Female , Flow Cytometry/methods , Humans , Lymphocyte Activation/physiology , Male , Middle Aged , Multiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-Remitting/blood , Multiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-Remitting/pathology , T-Lymphocyte SubsetsABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Evaluation of different parameters of contrast media enhancement for the differentiation between scar tissue and local recurrence of rectal cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We included 83 patients after operation and radiotherapy of rectal cancer. In total, 20 local recurrences were diagnosed. After administration of 75 ml Iopromide (370 mg/ml) and a delay of 65 s, the whole abdomen and pelvis were scanned in a collimation of 4 x 2.5 mm and 12.5 mm table feed per rotation. The suspected tissue was marked by the freehand ROI option in every slice and the minimum, average and maximum densities were calculated. A local recurrence was suspected if maximum density was higher than 90 HU after admission of contrast media. In addition we calculated the maximum difference of density as the difference between maximum and minimum density. RESULTS: The minimum and average densities showed no reliable differences for patients with or without local recurrence (minimum density 4 HU ( +/- 12 HU) vs. 13 HU ( +/- 21 HU), P = 0.23, average density 48 HU ( +/- 10 HU), vs. 48 HU ( +/- 17 HU)), P = 0.52. The patients suffering from local recurrence showed higher maximum densities and a higher maximum difference than the patients without recurrence (maximum density 111 HU ( +/- 13 HU) vs. 81 HU ( +/- 24 HU), P = 0.02, maximum difference 103 HU ( +/- 20 HU) vs. 76 HU ( +/- 31 HU), P = 0.06. These differences were not significant. We calculated a sensitivity of 0.6, a specificity of 0.83, a positive predictive value of 0.52 and an accuracy of 0.77. CONCLUSION: It is not possible to diagnose a recurrent rectal cancer by density values alone.
Subject(s)
Contrast Media , Iohexol/analogs & derivatives , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/diagnostic imaging , Rectal Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Tomography, Spiral Computed , Aged , Cicatrix/diagnostic imaging , Diagnosis, Differential , Humans , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/diagnosis , Neoplasm Staging , Predictive Value of Tests , Radiotherapy Dosage , Rectal Neoplasms/pathology , Rectal Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Rectal Neoplasms/surgery , Rectum/pathology , Sensitivity and Specificity , Tomography, Spiral Computed/methodsABSTRACT
To determine the diagnostic impact of daily bedside chest radiography in comparison with digital luminescence technique (DLR; storage phosphor radiography) and conventional film screen radiography, a prospective randomized study was completed in 210 mechanically ventilated patients with a total of 420 analysed radiographs. The patients were allocated to two groups: 150 patients underwent DLR, and 60 patients underwent conventional film screen radiography. Radiological analysis was performed consensually and therapeutic efficacy was assessed by the clinicians. There was no statistical significant difference between the frequency of abnormal findings seen on DLR and conventional film screen radiography. In total, 448 abnormal findings were present in 249 of 300 DLR and 97 of 120 conventional film screen radiographs. The most common findings were signs of overhydration (41%), pleural effusion (31%), partial collapse of the lung (11%) and pneumothorax (2%). One hundred and twenty-three of 448 (27%) of these abnormal findings were thought to have a considerable impact on patient management. The high rate of abnormal findings with significant impact on patient management suggests that the use of daily bedside chest radiography may be reasonable.
