Functional units of the human foot.

Functional units in the human foot provide a meaningful basis for subdivisions of the entire foot during gait analysis as well as justified simplifications of foot models. The present study aimed to identify such functional units during walking and slow running. An invasive method based upon reflective marker arrays mounted on intracortical pins was used to register motion of seven foot bones. Six healthy subjects were assessed during walking and four of them during slow running. Angle-angle diagrams of corresponding planar bone rotations were plotted against each other and used to establish functional units. Individual functional units were accepted when the joints rotated temporally in phase and either (i) in the same direction, (ii) in the opposite direction, or (iii) when one of the two joints showed no rotation. A functional unit was generalized if all available angle-angle diagrams showed a consistent pattern. A medial array from the navicular to the first metatarsal was found to perform as a functional unit with parts rotating in the same direction and larger rotations occurring proximally. A rigid functional unit comprised the navicular and cuboid. No other functional units were identified. It was concluded that the talus, navicular, and medial cuneiform should neither be regarded as one rigid unit nor as one segment during gait analysis. The first and fifth metatarsals should also be considered separately. It was further concluded that a marker setup for gait analysis should consist of the following four segments: calcaneus, navicular-cuboid, medial cuneiform-first metatarsal, fifth metatarsal.

A MR imaging procedure to measure tarsal bone rotations.

Magnetic resonance imaging offers unique insights into three-dimensional foot bone motion. Thereby, adequate devices enabling defined loading and positioning of the foot are needed to profit from this noninvasive procedure. Tarsal bone positions of three healthy subjects were repeatedly measured in a pronated and a supinated foot excursion under bodyweight with a newly developed MR imaging procedure. The quantification of the transferred motion from the loading and positioning device to the calcaneus and an estimation of the required degrees to distinguish between tarsal joint rotations were used to evaluate the applicability of the procedure to investigate tarsal joint motion. It was found that 45-70% (75-95%) of the externally applied 15 deg foot pronation (supination) were transferred to the calcaneus. Furthermore, the talonavicular joint showed the largest amount of rotation up to 20 deg eversion-inversion and abadduction, followed by the subtalar joint showing nearly half of that motion. Considerably less motion was found between the cuboid and calcaneus (about 2-6 deg) and the cuboid nearly did not rotate relative to the navicular (on average 1 deg). The estimated necessary differences between tarsal joint movements to identify individual kinematic behavior were in the order of 2 deg (4 deg related to the talonavicular joint). Since the results were in agreement with the literature, it is concluded that the applicability of the presented procedure to investigate tarsal bone mechanics is warranted. The possibility to evaluate 3D tarsal joint motion in combination with bone morphology (e.g., joint curvature) may provide new insights in the still uncertain relationship between foot function and foot morphology.

Reliability of tarsal bone segmentation and its contribution to MR kinematic analysis methods.

The purpose of this study was to determine the reliability of tarsal bone segmentation based on magnetic resonance (MR) imaging using commercially available software. All tarsal bones of five subjects were segmented five times each by two operators. Volumes and second moments of volume were calculated and used to determine the intra- as well as interoperator reproducibility. The results show that these morphological parameters had excellent interclass correlation coefficients (>0.997) indicating that the presented tarsal bone segmentation is a reliable procedure and that operators are in fact interchangeable. The consequences on differences in MR kinematic analysis methods of segmentation due to repetition were also determined. It became evident that one analysis method--fitting surface point clouds--was considerable less affected by repeated segmentation (cuboid: up to 0.2 degrees, other tarsal bones up to 0.1 degrees) compared to a method using principal axes (cuboid up to 6.7 degrees, other tarsal bones up to 0.8 degrees). Thus, the former method is recommended for investigations of tarsal bone kinematics by MR imaging.