Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino) ; 41(2): 215-9, 2000 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10901524

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Elevation of pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) has been considered to predict a bad outcome after orthotopic heart transplantation (HTx). A transpulmonary gradient (TG) > or =15 mmHg and PVR > or =5 wood (w) are correlated with a three-fold increase in 2-days as well as 30-days and 6-, 12-month mortality. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of 400 consecutive transplanted patients (pts) on hemodynamic data over a time period of 3.5 years. In 83 pts (23%) preoperative PVR was > or =5 w and TG >15 mmHg. Vasodilator studies were performed in this group of pts in order to evaluate pulmonary vasoreactivity or hemodynamic improvement. RESULTS: Hemodynamic follow-up post-transplantation showed a significant (p<0.001) decrease in mean TG to 8.8 mmHg within the first, 7.7 after the fifth year as well as decrease in PVR from 5.5 to 1.6, within the first and fifth year post-transplantation. Compared to the control group (n=286) (re-transplants n=6 and pediatric pts n=25 excluded) pts with TG <15 mmHg and/or PVR <5 w, transplanted within the same period, 30-day mortality and cumulative survival after 1 and 5 years do not show any significant difference with a mortality of 3%, 22% and 33% (p<0.05). Subgroup analysis for pts with endstage of ischemic versus dilatative cardiomyopathy has not shown any significant difference in mortality. CONCLUSIONS: In a retrospective analysis of 400 pts elevated PVR does not predict a bad outcome after orthotopic heart transplantation in early and late mortality.


Subject(s)
Heart Transplantation/physiology , Pulmonary Circulation/physiology , Vascular Resistance , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Cardiac Catheterization , Cardiac Output/drug effects , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Heart Diseases/surgery , Heart Transplantation/mortality , Humans , Hypertension, Pulmonary/mortality , Hypertension, Pulmonary/physiopathology , Hypertension, Pulmonary/prevention & control , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Male , Middle Aged , Pulmonary Circulation/drug effects , Pulmonary Wedge Pressure/drug effects , Retrospective Studies , Survival Rate , Tissue Donors , Treatment Outcome , Vascular Resistance/drug effects , Vasodilator Agents/therapeutic use
2.
Transplantation ; 66(9): 1163-7, 1998 Nov 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9825812

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The current shortage of donor organs, combined with an increasing demand for cardiac allografts, means that extended donor criteria are becoming more and more accepted. The use of cardiac allografts for transplantation from donors after acute poisoning is still under discussion; few data are currently available in the medical literature. We describe our experience with 19 orthotopic heart transplant recipients of organs from donors after acute intoxication with different agents. METHODS: Between March 1989 and December 1997, 883 orthotopic heart transplantations were performed at our transplant unit. Within this group, we accepted donor hearts after ethanol intoxication (n=1), benzodiazepine (n=1), alkylphosphate (E 605) in combination with beta-blocker intoxication (n=1), carbon monoxide poisoning (n=5), digitalis (n=1), digitalis/glibenclamide (n=1), chlormethiazole (n=1), propoxyphene (n=1), alkylphosphate (E 605) (n=1), insulin (n=2), neprobamate/ thiocyacide/flurazepam (n=1), paracetamol (n=1), carbamazepine (n=1), and cyanide (n=1) intoxication. At the time of organ explantation, hemodynamic data were available from all patients. RESULTS: Early mortality in this group was 11%; cumulative survival after 5 years was 74%. CONCLUSIONS: Based on our limited experience, cardiac allografts from donors exposed to different kinds of poisons can be transplanted in selected cases. If the donor organ is not hemodynamically compromised, showing regular filling pressures on low or mild inotropic support just before explantation, and if there are no electrocardiographic changes in combination with elevation of the transaminases, cardiac allograft transplantation seems to be a safe and life-saving procedure.


Subject(s)
Heart Transplantation/physiology , Heart Transplantation/statistics & numerical data , Hemodynamics , Poisoning/blood , Tissue Donors , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Survival Rate , Tissue and Organ Procurement , Transplantation, Homologous
3.
Transplantation ; 66(8): 1109-13, 1998 Oct 27.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9808501

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Heart transplantation (HT) has become a therapeutic option for patients suffering from endstage heart failure. The increasing demand for cardiac allografts has led to a shift toward extended donor criteria. In a retrospective analysis of 859 HT recipients, we report on the hemodynamic outcome of 19 HT patients who received cardiac allografts from donors > or =60 years of age. METHODS: From March 1989 to December 1997, we performed 883 orthotopic HT in 74 children and 809 adults at our transplant center. Within this period, 19 patients (17 women and 2 men) received cardiac allografts from donors > or =60 years of age. Recipient age ranged from 57 to 78 years (mean, 65+/-5 years). RESULTS: HT could be performed successfully in 19 cases. The early mortality rate was 16% (n=3). The late mortality rate was 37% (n=7). All long-term survivors are stable at New York Heart Association classification II (New York Heart Association Class II = resting hemodynamics: cardiac output normal; left ventricular end diastolic filling pressure elevated; clinically not compromised during mild to moderate workout). Although only 19 patients were retrospectively evaluated, there was a statistically significant (P<0.05) difference in survival among patients who received organs from male (11 vs. 8*) compared with female (8 vs. 2*) (*=death) donors. CONCLUSION: In our experience, it is possible to increase the cardiac donor pool by accepting allografts from donors, preferably female, > or =60 years of age in selected cases without a coronary angiogram, if hemodynamic parameters are in a normal range on mild-to-moderate inotropic support. We do not recommend cardiac allografts from donors > or =60 if there are signs of coronary insufficiency in the electrocardiogram, if left ventricle filling pressures are above normal on mild-to-moderate inotropic support and optimum hemodynamic management, or if there are signs of segmental dysfunction or mitral insufficiency >I in the echocardiogram.


Subject(s)
Heart Transplantation , Personnel Selection , Tissue Donors , Age Factors , Aged , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Heart/physiopathology , Heart Transplantation/mortality , Heart Transplantation/statistics & numerical data , Hemodynamics/physiology , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Sex Factors , Survival Analysis , Transplantation, Homologous , Treatment Outcome
4.
Int J Artif Organs ; 21(7): 414-6, 1998 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9745997

ABSTRACT

Frequently the only therapy for primary graft- and right heart failure, as well as low output syndrome from acute of chronic rejection, is implantation of a mechanical circulatory support system, until recompensation or retransplantation. At our institution, mechanical assist devices were implanted in 25 heart recipients for a cute rejection (n=9), primary graft failure (n=7), acute right heart failure (n=7), and chronic rejection with low output syndrome (n=2). Patients (pts) with primary graft failure (n=3) received an intraaortic balloon pump (IABP), one pt an IABP plus Abiomed-System for left ventricular support, one pt the Thoratec-System for biventricular support. Patients with right heart failure (RHF) received the Biomedicus centrifugal pump for right ventricular support. Nine pts suffered from acute rejection. Six pts received an IABP, one the Biomedicus as femoro-femoral bypass, one the Abiomed-System for biventricular support, two the Thoratec-System for biventricular support and two within this group switched from the Biomedicus pump to the Thoratec-System for biventricular support. Patients with chronic graft failure (n=2) received the Novacor-System (LVAD) for left ventricular support, one received a Tojobo-System and an oxygenator for biventricular support post coronary artery bypass surgery. Support time ranged from 0.5-h to 73 days. Five pts were weaned. Two (8%) of 25 pts were retransplanted, 18 (72%) died in spite of mechanical support from multiple organ failure. The use of a mechanical assist device after heart transplantation is encouraging only in the case of early right heart failure, as well as primary and chronic graft failure. In view of the poor results, the use of mechanical assist devices should not be recommended in the case of heart failure caused by acute rejection.


Subject(s)
Heart Transplantation , Heart-Assist Devices , Intra-Aortic Balloon Pumping , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Cardiac Output/physiology , Child , Child, Preschool , Coronary Artery Bypass , Female , Graft Rejection/therapy , Heart Failure/therapy , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...