Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Rheumatology (Oxford) ; 50(10): 1894-900, 2011 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21750001

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: It is suggested that serious levels of fatigue are present in nearly half of patients with OA. However, it is unclear which dimensions of fatigue are involved, if fatigue is related to pain and physical function, and if fatigue is influenced by therapy. The aims of this study were to measure levels of different dimensions of fatigue before and after evidenced-based conservative treatment and to investigate the association between fatigue and pain and physical function in patients with knee or hip OA. METHODS: In this observational cohort study, levels of different dimensions of fatigue were measured in knee and/or hip OA patients before and after 12 weeks of conservative treatment. Cross-sectional and longitudinal relations between (change in) fatigue dimensions and (change in) pain or physical function were studied using association models, controlling for predefined possible confounders. RESULTS: A total of 231 patients was included, with 47% experiencing severe fatigue. A small decrease in levels of fatigue was seen after standardized treatment. The level of fatigue severity was cross-sectionally and longitudinally associated with physical function, whereas the level of physical fatigue was cross-sectionally and longitudinally associated with pain and physical function. No confounders were identified. CONCLUSIONS: Important levels of fatigue are common in knee and hip OA patients. After evidence-based tailored conservative treatment targeted to improve pain and physical function, a small decrease in fatigue levels was found. Reduction in levels of different fatigue dimensions were related to the change in physical function and pain.


Subject(s)
Fatigue/etiology , Osteoarthritis, Hip/complications , Osteoarthritis, Knee/complications , Pain/etiology , Acetaminophen/therapeutic use , Activities of Daily Living , Analgesics, Non-Narcotic/therapeutic use , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/therapeutic use , Cohort Studies , Disability Evaluation , Drug Therapy, Combination , Exercise Therapy , Fatigue/physiopathology , Fatigue/therapy , Female , Health Status , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Osteoarthritis, Hip/physiopathology , Osteoarthritis, Hip/therapy , Osteoarthritis, Knee/physiopathology , Osteoarthritis, Knee/therapy , Pain/physiopathology , Pain Measurement , Quality of Life , Severity of Illness Index
2.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord ; 11: 142, 2010 Jul 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20594308

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Non-pharmacological treatment (NPT) is a useful treatment option in the management of hip or knee osteoarthritis. To our knowledge however, no studies have investigated the effect of NPT in patients with generalized osteoarthritis (GOA). The primary aim of this study is to compare the effectiveness of two currently existing health care programs with different intensity and mode of delivery on daily functioning in patients with GOA. The secondary objective is to compare the cost-effectiveness of both interventions. METHODS/DESIGN: In this randomized, single blind, clinical trial with active controls, we aim to include 170 patients with GOA. The experimental intervention consist of six self-management group sessions provided by a multi-disciplinary team (occupational therapist, physiotherapist, dietician and specialized nurse). The active control group consists of two group sessions and four sessions by telephone, provided by a specialized nurse and physiotherapist. Both therapies last six weeks. Main study outcome is daily functioning during the first year after the treatment, assessed on the Health Assessment Questionnaire. Secondary outcomes are health related quality of life, specific complaints, fatigue, and costs. Illness cognitions, global perceived effect and self-efficacy, will also be assessed for a responder analysis. Outcome assessments are performed directly after the intervention, after 26 weeks and after 52 weeks. DISCUSSION: This article describes the design of a randomized, single blind, clinical trial with a one year follow up to compare the costs and effectiveness of two non-pharmacological interventions with different modes of delivery for patients with GOA. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Dutch Trial Register NTR2137.


Subject(s)
Osteoarthritis/therapy , Outcome Assessment, Health Care/methods , Physical Therapy Modalities , Activities of Daily Living , Adult , Clinical Protocols , Combined Modality Therapy/economics , Combined Modality Therapy/methods , Female , Humans , Male , Nurses/economics , Osteoarthritis/economics , Osteoarthritis/psychology , Patient Care Team , Patient Satisfaction , Physical Therapy Modalities/economics , Quality of Life , Self Care/economics , Self Care/methods , Self-Assessment , Surveys and Questionnaires
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...