Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys ; 45(2): 297-308, 1999 Sep 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10487549

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Treatment results for locally recurrent rectal cancers are poor. This is a result of the fact that surgery is hampered due to the severance of the anatomical planes during the primary procedure and that radiotherapy is limited by normal tissue tolerance, especially after previous irradiation. This paper describes the results of a combined treatment modality in this patient group. METHODS AND MATERIALS: From 1994 to 1998, 37 patients with locally recurrent rectal cancer, but without distant metastatic disease, received a combined treatment consisting of 50.4 Gy preoperative irradiation or, in case of previous radiotherapy, 30 Gy reirradiation or no irradiation, followed by radical surgery and intraoperative electron beam radiotherapy boost. RESULTS: Fifteen patients received a radical resection (R0), eight a microscopic irradical resection (R1), and 14 a macroscopic irradical resection (R2). The overall 3-year local control (LC), disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival rates were 60%, 32%, and 58% respectively. Radicality of resection (R0/R1 vs. R2) turned out to be the significant factor for improved survival (p < 0.05), DFS (p = 0.0008), and LC (p = 0.01). Preoperative (re-)irradiation is the other significant factor in survival (p = 0.005) and DFS (p = 0.001) and was almost significant for LC (p = 0.08). After external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) a significantly higher resection rate was obtained (R0/R1 vs. R2 p = 0.001). Symptomatic peripheral local recurrences have a significantly worse prognosis and higher rate of R2-resection (p = 0.0005). CONCLUSION: Centralization of locally recurrent rectal cancer patients enabled the development of an aggressive multimodality treatment, which in turn led to promising results. Distant failure is still a drawback.


Subject(s)
Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/radiotherapy , Rectal Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Combined Modality Therapy , Disease-Free Survival , Electrons/therapeutic use , Female , Humans , Intraoperative Period , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/mortality , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/pathology , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/surgery , Neoplasm, Residual , Postoperative Complications , Radiotherapy Dosage , Rectal Neoplasms/mortality , Rectal Neoplasms/pathology , Rectal Neoplasms/surgery , Reoperation , Survival Rate
2.
Br J Urol ; 81(1): 31-5, 1998 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9467473

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To determine the efficacy and costs of extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy (ESWL) compared with ureteroscopy (URS) in the treatment of mid- and lower ureteric calculi. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The records of patients treated primarily by ESWL and URS were analysed retrospectively. Treatment with ESWL included 63 patients (42 men and 21 women, mean age 52 years, range 23-78, 19 mid- and 44 lower ureteric calculi). All patients received 4000 shock waves at a mean energy setting of 18.1 kV. URS was used in 105 patients, with a 7.2 F miniscope or the 7.1 F flexible scope. Stones were fragmented with a pulsed-dye laser lithotripter at 504 nm and a power of up to 130 mJ (mean 53 mJ) using a 200 or 320 microns fibre. All ureteroscopies were performed with the patient under general (n = 17) or spinal (n = 87) anaesthesia in a mean treatment duration of 34 min. Stones were located in the mid-ureter in 24 patients and in the lower ureter in 80. The outcome was assessed by stone-free rates, re-treatment rates, time to become stone-free, complication and costs. RESULTS: ESWL for mid- and lower ureteric calculi resulted in a success rate of 90% and 81%, respectively, compared with 96% and 99% for URS. However, patients treated with URS were stone-free within 2 days, whereas patients in the ESWL group required up to 4 months. The best results for ESWL were achieved with stones of < 50 mm2. The costs of URS were higher than those for ESWL. CONCLUSIONS: ESWL provides a noninvasive, simple and safe option for the management of mid- and lower ureteric calculi, provided that the stones are < 50 mm2; larger stones are best treated by URS.


Subject(s)
Laser Therapy , Lithotripsy/methods , Ureteral Calculi/therapy , Ureteroscopy/methods , Adolescent , Aged , Costs and Cost Analysis , Female , Hospital Costs , Humans , Length of Stay , Lithotripsy/economics , Male , Middle Aged , Recurrence , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome , Ureteral Calculi/economics , Ureteroscopy/economics
3.
Surg Technol Int ; 7: 151-5, 1998.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12721976

ABSTRACT

In the past, many ultrasound phantoms, with tissue-mimicking material, have been created for routine testing and calibration ultrasound scanning systems, especially to decide the accuracy of transducers in a standardized medium. Following the introduction of the color doppler, several phantoms were developed for validating quantitative measurements such as blood flow. In addition to these applications, phantoms are available to enhance the learning process in echografical skills in general.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...