ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: This study aims to establish a screening method for canine distemper virus (CDV) microneutralizing activity suitable for microvolume samples. METHODS: This method is based on the Indirect immunofluorescence assay (IFA) established on Vero-slam cells. First, by comparing the sensitivities of CDV neutralizing monoclonal antibody (1C42H11) and NP protein monoclonal antibody (CDV-NP) in IFA experiments, CDV-NP was selected as the primary antibody. Then, by detecting the infection rates of multi-concentrations of CDV neutralized with water, the minimum CDV concentration with an infection rate greater than 90% was defined as the minimum stable infection concentration, which was used as the neutralizing solution for this method. Finally, the CDV-positive neutralizing serum (neutralizing titer 1:708) was diluted into multiple dilution groups as test samples, and then neutralized in equal volumes with the neutralizing solution to detect the neutralizing activity detection rates of each dilution group and the lowest detection limit of this method. RESULTS: The results showed that the neutralizing activity of serum with a CDV neutralizing titer of 1:708 diluted 212 times was the lowest limit of detection, and the detection rate of microneutralizing activity was 63.54 ± 4.774%. CONCLUSION: This study established an economical, stable, and easy-to-operate CDV microneutralizing activity high-throughput screening method, laying a methodological foundation for the development of native CDV neutralizing antibodies based on single B cells.
Subject(s)
Distemper Virus, Canine , Distemper , Animals , Dogs , Antibodies, Neutralizing , Antibodies, MonoclonalABSTRACT
The aim of this study was to establish a multiplex PCR (mPCR) method that can simultaneously detect canine parvovirus (CPV-2), canine coronavirus (CCoV) and canine adenovirus (CAV), thereby eliminating the need to detect these pathogens individually. Based on conserved regions in the genomes of these three viruses, the VP2 gene of CPV-2, the endoribonuclease nsp15 gene of CCoV, and the 52K gene of CAV were selected for primer design. The specificity of the mPCR results showed no amplification of canine distemper virus (CDV), canine parainfluenza virus (CPIV), or pseudorabies virus (PRV), indicating that the method had good specificity. A sensitivity test showed that the detection limit of the mPCR method was 1 × 104 viral copies. A total of 63 rectal swabs from dogs with diarrheal symptoms were evaluated using mPCR and routine PCR. The ratio of positive samples to total samples for CPV-2, CCoV, and CAV was 55.6% (35/63) for mPCR and 55.6% (35/63) for routine PCR. Thirty-five positive samples were detected by both methods, for a coincidence ratio of 100%. This mPCR method can simultaneously detect CCoV (CCoV-II), CAV (CAV-1, CAV-2) and CPV-2 (CPV-2a, CPV-2b, CPV-2c), which are associated with viral enteritis, thereby providing an efficient, inexpensive, specific, and accurate new tool for clinical diagnosis and laboratory epidemiological investigations.
Subject(s)
Adenoviruses, Canine/isolation & purification , Coronavirus, Canine/isolation & purification , Diarrhea/veterinary , Dog Diseases/virology , Parvovirus, Canine/isolation & purification , Adenoviruses, Canine/classification , Adenoviruses, Canine/genetics , Adenoviruses, Canine/physiology , Animals , Coronavirus, Canine/classification , Coronavirus, Canine/genetics , Coronavirus, Canine/physiology , Diarrhea/diagnosis , Diarrhea/virology , Dog Diseases/diagnosis , Dogs , Parvovirus, Canine/classification , Parvovirus, Canine/genetics , Parvovirus, Canine/physiology , Sensitivity and SpecificityABSTRACT
Chickens are susceptible to the highly pathogenic H5N1 strain of avian influenza virus (HPAIV), whereas ducks are not. Here, we used high-throughput sequencing to analyse the microRNA expression in the spleen, thymus and bursa of Fabricius of H5N1-HPAIV-infected and non-infected chickens and ducks. We annotated the genomic positions of duck microRNAs and we compared the microRNA repertoires of chickens and ducks. Our results showed that the microRNA expression patterns in the homologous immune organs of specific-pathogen-free (SPF) chickens and ducks diverge substantially. Moreover, there was larger divergence between the microRNA expression patterns in immune organs of HPAIV-infected chickens than HPAIV-infected ducks. Together, our results might help to elucidate the roles of microRNAs in the divergent immunity of chickens and ducks against H5N1 HPAIV.
