Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Int J Mol Sci ; 23(13)2022 Jun 29.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35806212

ABSTRACT

(1) Background: Glioblastoma is the most frequent and lethal primary tumor of the central nervous system. Through many years, research has brought various advances in glioblastoma treatment. At this time, glioblastoma management is based on maximal safe surgical resection, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy with temozolomide. Recently, bevacizumab has been added to the treatment arsenal for the recurrent scenario. Nevertheless, patients with glioblastoma still have a poor prognosis. Therefore, many efforts are being made in different clinical research areas to find a new alternative to improve overall survival, free-progression survival, and life quality in glioblastoma patients. (2) Methods: Our objective is to recap the actual state-of-the-art in glioblastoma treatment, resume the actual research and future perspectives on immunotherapy, as well as the new synthetic molecules and natural compounds that represent potential future therapies at preclinical stages. (3) Conclusions: Despite the great efforts in therapeutic research, glioblastoma management has suffered minimal changes, and the prognosis remains poor. Combined therapeutic strategies and delivery methods, including immunotherapy, synthetic molecules, natural compounds, and glioblastoma stem cell inhibition, may potentiate the standard of care therapy and represent the next step in glioblastoma management research.


Subject(s)
Brain Neoplasms , Glioblastoma , Bevacizumab/therapeutic use , Brain Neoplasms/drug therapy , Brain Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Dacarbazine/therapeutic use , Glioblastoma/drug therapy , Humans , Temozolomide/therapeutic use
2.
World Neurosurg X ; 3: 100027, 2019 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31225520

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To determine the local control rate and complication rate in the treatment of grade I intracranial meningiomas. METHODS: A retrospective study was performed of patients with grade I meningioma who received radiosurgery with a dedicated linear accelerator from January 2002 to August 2012 with a minimum follow-up of 2 years. We performed descriptive statistics, logistic regression, and progression-free survival analysis through a Kaplan-Meier curve. RESULTS: Seventy-five patients with 78 grade I meningiomas received radiosurgery, 39 underwent surgery plus adjuvant radiosurgery, and 36 only radiosurgery. The follow-up median time was 68 months (range, 35-120 months). The tumor control rate was 93%, the 5-year progression-free survival was 92% (95% confidence interval, 77%-98%). Acute toxicity was 2.6%, and grade 1-2 late toxicity was 26.6%. Postradiosurgery edema was the main late morbidity. Age >55 years was the only significant factor for attaining a response >75%. The background of surgery before radiosurgery was the only significant prognostic factor for showing edema (odds ratio 5.78 [95% confidence interval, 2.14-15.64]). CONCLUSIONS: The local control rate attained in our series is similar to that reported in other series worldwide; the acute toxicity rate was low and late toxicity was moderate.

3.
Neurol Res ; 29(7): 712-6, 2007 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17659161

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To validate the radiosurgery-based arteriovenous malformation score (RBAS) as a predictor of outcome in patients with arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) treated with LINAC-based conformal radiosurgery. METHODS: We analysed 40 patients with a mean follow-up of 22 months. One patient (2.5%) pertained to Spetzler-Martin Grade I, 11 (27.5%) to Grade II, 19 (47.5%) to Grade III, eight (20%) to Grade IV and one (2.5%) to grade V. The mean RBAS was 2.0 (range: 0.76-5.56). The mean obliteration prediction index (OPI) and the Karlsson index (KI) were 0.74 (range: 0.2-2.86) and 109.48 (range: 3.0-350.7) respectively. Outcomes were analysed according to the OPI, KI and RBAS. RESULTS: We analysed different cutoff points in the RBAS and found a significant difference to predict the outcome in four scores: 1.2, 1.6, 1.7 and 1.8. In the group with RBAS < or = 1.8, 13 (68%) had an excellent outcome and six (33%) did not, while with RBAS>1.8, seven (32%) had an excellent outcome and 14 (67%) did not (p = 0.02). We did not find any correlation between Spetzler-Martin grading scale or OPI and outcome (p = 0.7 and p = 0.3 respectively). The KI predicted the excellent outcome in 8/9 patients (89%) with KI < or = 27 and in 12/31 patients (39%) with KI>27 (p = 0.08). CONCLUSION: The RBAS seems to be a good predictor of outcome in patients with AVMs treated with LINAC-based conformal radiosurgery as in patients treated with Gamma Knife. It remains only to find the best cutoff point based on a larger series and longer follow-up.


Subject(s)
Intracranial Arteriovenous Malformations/diagnosis , Intracranial Arteriovenous Malformations/surgery , Outcome Assessment, Health Care/methods , Radiosurgery/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Adult , Child , Disability Evaluation , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Intracranial Arteriovenous Malformations/physiopathology , Male , Middle Aged , Predictive Value of Tests , Radiation Dosage , Reproducibility of Results , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...