Primary Infection Site as a Predictor of Sepsis Development in Emergency Department Patients.

BACKGROUND: Sepsis is a life-threatening condition but predicting its development and progression remains a challenge. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess the impact of infection site on sepsis development among emergency department (ED) patients. METHODS: Data were collected from a single-center ED between January 2016 and December 2019. Patient encounters with documented infections, as defined by the Systematized Nomenclature of Medicine-Clinical Terms for upper respiratory tract (URI), lower respiratory tract (LRI), urinary tract (UTI), or skin or soft-tissue infections were included. Primary outcome was the development of sepsis or septic shock, as defined by Sepsis-1/2 criteria. Secondary outcomes included hospital disposition and length of stay, blood and urine culture positivity, antibiotic administration, vasopressor use, in-hospital mortality, and 30-day mortality. Analysis of variance and various different logistic regression approaches were used for analysis with URI used as the reference variable. RESULTS: LRI was most associated with sepsis (relative risk ratio [RRR] 5.63; 95% CI 5.07-6.24) and septic shock (RRR 21.2; 95% CI 17.99-24.98) development, as well as hospital admission rates (odds ratio [OR] 8.23; 95% CI 7.41-9.14), intensive care unit admission (OR 4.27; 95% CI 3.84-4.74), in-hospital mortality (OR 6.93; 95% CI 5.60-8.57), and 30-day mortality (OR 7.34; 95% CI 5.86-9.19). UTIs were also associated with sepsis and septic shock development, but to a lesser degree than LRI. CONCLUSIONS: Primary infection sites including LRI and UTI were significantly associated with sepsis development, hospitalization, length of stay, and mortality among patients presenting with infections in the ED.

Training Students as Navigators for Patients Experiencing Homelessness.

Background and Objectives: Despite the significant effects of homelessness on health, medical and health professions students rarely receive formal education in caring for individuals experiencing homelessness. We describe the implementation and evaluation of a novel student-run Patient Navigator Program (PNP) and its prerequisite elective that trains students in patient navigation principles specific to homelessness in the local community. METHODS: We analyzed pre- and postsurvey matched responses from students immediately before and after course completion. The survey utilizes the externally-validated instruments Health Professional Attitudes Toward the Homeless Inventory (HPATHI) and the Student-Run Free Clinic Project (SRFCP) survey. We examined differences using paired t tests and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests. Students also completed separate end-of-curriculum evaluation forms assessing satisfaction with the course. RESULTS: After completing the elective, students (n=45) demonstrated improvement in self-assessed attitude towards individuals experiencing homelessness (P=.03), specifically an increase in reported social advocacy (P<.001); and an increase in self-perceived knowledge about (P<.001), efficacy in working with (P=.01), and skills in caring for (P<.001) underserved groups. The elective also received high student satisfaction ratings. CONCLUSIONS: Formal education in patient navigation and caring for individuals experiencing homelessness improves self-assessed preparedness of future health care providers in serving homeless and underserved populations.

ICD Knowledge and Attitudes at End of Life in a Diverse and Vulnerable Patient Population.

BACKGROUND: Studies thus far lacking diversity show many patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) have poor understanding of ICD functioning, preventing informed decision-making near end of life (EOL). OBJECTIVE: To describe knowledge, perceptions, and preferences regarding ICDs among patients nearing EOL in a diverse, safety-net hospital population. METHODS: A cross sectional phone survey of patients with ICDs nearing EOL from a safety-net hospital was performed. The survey assessed knowledge, perceptions, and preferences regarding their ICD. RESULTS: Nearly half (46%) of patients falsely believed turning off shocking function would stop the heart, 69% were unaware that disabling ICDs does not require surgery, and 88% said no doctor had ever discussed the option of deactivation of shocking therapy with them. CONCLUSION: Challenges in health care delivery in a safety-net hospital patient population may result in patients being poorly equipped to align ICD settings with goals of care when nearing EOL.