Pulmonary Embolism (PE) Prevalence in Mexican-Mestizo Patients With Severe SARS-COV-2 (COVID-19) Pneumonia At A Tertiary-Level Hospital: A Review.

Since the report of the first case of COVID-19 in Wuhan, China, on December 31, 2019, several associated thrombotic complications have been reported, mainly venous thromboembolic events, and myocardial infarctions, in addition to peripheral arterial thrombosis and cerebral vascular events, which have been attributed to a hypercoagulable state. We aimed to know the prevalence and prognostic biomarkers in patients with pulmonary thromboembolism (PE) and SARS Cov-2 pneumonia. Hospitalized patients with SARS Cov-2 pneumonia who have had clinical, biomarker, and imaging data (chest angiography) of pulmonary thromboembolism were included. Descriptive statistics and prevalence rates were calculated. For the analysis between the groups, the paired Student's t and the Wilcoxon test were performed. CT angiography was performed on 26 patients at our institution, with a diagnosis of severe pneumonia secondary to SARS-CoV2. 9 of the patients (34.6%) had a venous thromboembolic disease. Type 2 DM was the most frequent comorbidity up to 55.5% of the total; it was followed by obesity and overweight in 55.5%, and in third place, by systemic arterial hypertension in 33.3% of the cases, 1 (11.1%) patient had chronic kidney disease and 1 (11.1%) patient with a history of cancer, only 1 patient met criteria and was treated with thrombolysis. 6 (66.6%) of the patients had segmental PE, 3 (33.3%) patients had subsegmental PE, and 4 (44.4%) patients presented pulmonary infarction.

Minimización de costos de sedación usando anestesia inhalada. Análisis en la UTI durante la pandemia por COVID-19 / Minimization of sedation costs using inhaled anesthesia. Analysis in the ICU during the COVID-19 pandemic / Minimização dos custos de sedação usando anestesia inalatória. Análise na UTI durante a pandemia de COVID-19

Resumen: Introducción: los sedantes de uso no convencional y aquéllos fuera de recomendación como los anestésicos inhalados se usaron ante la escasez de medicamentos durante la pandemia por SARS-CoV-2. Objetivos: comparar el costo y resultados obtenidos con el uso de anestésicos inhalados versus sedantes intravenosos en COVID-19. Material y métodos: estudio retrospectivo en una unidad de terapia intensiva (UTI) de un hospital público de referencia. Se hizo un cálculo de costos de sedación de los dos primeros días de estancia en la UTI. Las dosis de fármacos fueron tomadas del expediente clínico y los costos de adquisición directamente de CompraNet. Se comparan medias de costos por medicamento y por grupo. Resultados: de 151 pacientes, 81 recibieron sedación intravenosa y 70 anestesia inhalada con o sin sedantes intravenosos. No hubo diferencia en mortalidad, días de ventilación mecánica, estancia en la UTI y estancia hospitalaria entre grupos. Se observó una reducción significativa de costos derivados del menor uso de midazolam, propofol y dexmedetomidina (p < 0.0001) cuando se usó anestesia inhalada y una diferencia entre medias de costos totales de sedación de $4,108.42 M.N. por día por paciente. Conclusiones: la anestesia inhalada durante la pandemia por COVID-19 permitió una reducción de costos comparada con sedación intravenosa en los primeros dos días de estancia en la UTI.

Abstract: Introduction: non-conventional sedatives and those off-label, such as inhaled anesthetics, were used due to the shortage of medicines during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. Objectives: to compare the cost and results obtained with the use of inhaled anesthetics versus intravenous sedatives in COVID-19. Material and methods: retrospective study in a public reference hospital ICU. A calculation of sedation costs was made of the first two days of ICU stay. Drug doses were taken from the clinical records and acquisition costs directly from CompraNet. Mean costs per medication and per group are compared. Results: of 151 patients, 81 received intravenous sedation and 70 received inhaled anesthesia with or without intravenous sedatives. There was no difference in mortality, days of mechanical ventilation, ICU stay, and hospital stay between groups. A significant reduction in costs derived from the less use of midazolam, propofol and dexmedetomidine (p < 0.0001), and a difference between means of total sedation costs of $4,108.42 Mexican pesos per patient per day was observed with inhaled anesthesia. Conclusions: inhaled anesthesia during the COVID-19 pandemic compared to intravenous sedation allowed a cost reduction in the first two days of ICU stay.

Resumo: Introdução: sedativos de uso não convencional e não recomendados, como anestésicos inalatórios, foram utilizados devido à escassez de medicamentos durante a pandemia de SARS-CoV-2. Objetivos: comparar o custo e os resultados obtidos com o uso de anestésicos inalatórios versus sedativos intravenosos na COVID-19. Material e métodos: estudo retrospectivo em uma UTI de um hospital público de referência. Foi feito um cálculo dos custos de sedação para os dois primeiros dias de internação na UTI. As doses dos medicamentos foram retiradas do prontuário clínico e os custos de aquisição diretamente do CompraNet. Os custos médios por medicamento e por grupo são comparados. Resultados: dos 151 pacientes, 81 receberam sedação intravenosa e 70 anestesia inalatória com ou sem sedativos intravenosos. Não houve diferença na mortalidade, dias em ventilação mecânica, permanência na UTI e internação entre os grupos. Uma redução significativa nos custos derivados do menor uso de midazolam, propofol e dexmedetomidina (p < 0.0001) foi observada quando a anestesia inalatória foi usada e uma diferença entre as médias dos custos totais de sedação de $4,108.42 M.N. por dia por paciente. Conclusões: a anestesia inalatória durante a pandemia de COVID-19 permitiu redução de custos em comparação com a sedação endovenosa nos primeiros dois dias de internação na UTI.

Convalescent Plasma to Treat COVID-19: A Two-Center, Randomized, Double-Blind Clinical Trial.

Background: The use of convalescent plasma (CP) has been considered for its immunological mechanisms that could benefit patients in moderate and severe stages of COVID-19. This study evaluated the safety and efficacy of the use of donor CP for COVID-19. Material and methods: A double-blind, randomized controlled clinical trial was conducted from May to October 2020. Thirty-nine participants with moderate (II) and severe (III) stages of COVID-19 confirmed by RT-PCR were included. The study randomization rate was set at 3:1. CPs were chosen for application with a neutralizing antibody titer of ≥1:32. Results: We observed a significantly lower 21-day post-transfusion mortality HR: 0.17 (95.0% CI [0.07−0.45, p < 0.001]) in the group receiving CP compared with the control group; protective units (PU) in the group receiving convalescent plasma after seven days were significantly higher (512 (32−16,384) vs. 96 (32−256), p = 0.01); the PAO2/FIO2 index showed a significant improvement in the group receiving CP (251.01 (109.4) vs. 109.2 (62.4), p < 0.001, in the control group). Conclusion: CP is safe and effective, as it decreased mortality in the CP group compared with the control group.

Changes in lactate dehydrogenase on admission throughout the COVID-19 pandemic and possible impacts on prognostic capability.

Introduction: The enzyme lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) is a good marker of general hyperinflammation correlated with mortality for COVID-19, and is therefore used in prognosis tools. In a current COVID-19 clinical randomized trial (CRT), the blood level of LDH was selected as an inclusion criterion. However, LDH decreased during the pandemic; hence, the impact of this decrease on the prognostic value of LDH for mortality was evaluated. Methods: Data on LDH levels in 843 patients were obtained and analyzed. Relative risk, standard error and receiver operating characteristic curves were calculated for two cutoff values. Results: Relative risk lost validity and the area under the curve narrowed by trimester during the pandemic. Conclusion: The progressive decrease in LDH impacted the capacity to predict mortality in COVID-19. More studies are needed to validate this finding and its implications.

Differential activation of innate and adaptive lymphocytes during latent or active infection with Mycobacterium tuberculosis.

Most individuals infected with Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) have latent tuberculosis (TB), which can be diagnosed with tests (such as the QuantiFERON-TB Gold test [QFT]) that detect the production of IFN-γ by memory T cells in response to the Mtb-specific antigens 6 kDa early secretory antigenic target EsxA (Rv3875) (ESAT-6), 10 kDa culture filtrate antigen EsxB (Rv3874) (CFP-10), and Mtb antigen of 7.7 kDa (Rv2654c) (TB7.7). However, the immunological mechanisms that determine if an individual will develop latent or active TB remain incompletely understood. Here we compared the response of innate and adaptive peripheral blood lymphocytes from healthy individuals without Mtb infection (QFT negative) and from individuals with latent (QFT positive) or active TB infection, to determine the characteristics of these cells that correlate with each condition. In active TB patients, the levels of IFN-γ that were produced in response to Mtb-specific antigens had high positive correlations with IL-1ß, TNF-α, MCP-1, IL-6, IL-12p70, and IL-23, while the proinflammatory cytokines had high positive correlations between themselves and with IL-12p70 and IL-23. These correlations were not observed in QFT-negative or QFT-positive healthy volunteers. Activation with Mtb-soluble extract (a mixture of Mtb antigens and pathogen-associated molecular patterns [PAMPs]) increased the percentage of IFN-γ-/IL-17-producing NK cells and of IL-17-producing innate lymphoid cell 3 (ILC3) in the peripheral blood of active TB patients, but not of QFT-negative or QFT-positive healthy volunteers. Thus, active TB patients have both adaptive and innate lymphocyte subsets that produce characteristic cytokine profiles in response to Mtb-specific antigens or PAMPs. These profiles are not observed in uninfected individuals or in individuals with latent TB, suggesting that they are a response to active TB infection.

Exploring Adjustment and Parent-Infant Relations in Mothers of Premature Infants: Thematic Analysis Using a Multisensory Approach.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to explore mothers' experiences of having an infant born prematurely (28-32 weeks gestation). In particular, the study aimed to explore the developing parent-infant relationship 12-30 months since birth and the developing parental identity during hospitalization and discharge. METHODS: Twelve mothers, aged between 22 and 43, participated in the semi-structured interviews. The mean age of infants was 19 months. Interviews comprised open-ended questions and visual stimuli consisting of photographs brought by participants, word selection, and card sorting techniques. Data were analyzed using Braun and Clarke's thematic analysis (Braun & Clarke, 2013). RESULTS: Three themes arose from a clustering of 10 subthemes: (a) Emotional Impact, (b) Searching for Parent Identity, and (c) Moving Beyond Adversity. Participants expressed experiencing heightened emotional distress during the time of their infants' birth and hospitalization and initially not feeling like parents. Their parental identity strengthened as they became more involved in the care of their infant and began to accept the situation. Participants described parenting their premature infants differently compared with parents of full-term infants, and described adjusting to this difference over time. CONCLUSIONS: The findings highlight the emotional experience and adjustment of mothers of premature infants, from hospital and postdischarge. The need for psycho-educational interventions postdischarge and parent-partnered models during hospitalization is discussed. In addition, the study demonstrates the use of integrating visual stimuli in qualitative data collection procedures, to elicit further meaning and interaction from participants with the interview process.

The Age-AST-D Dimer (AAD) Regression Model Predicts Severe COVID-19 Disease.

AIM: Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) ranges from mild clinical phenotypes to life-threatening conditions like severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS). It has been suggested that early liver injury in these patients could be a risk factor for poor outcome. We aimed to identify early biochemical predictive factors related to severe disease development with intensive care requirements in patients with COVID-19. METHODS: Data from COVID-19 patients were collected at admission time to our hospital. Differential biochemical factors were identified between seriously ill patients requiring intensive care unit (ICU) admission (ICU patients) versus stable patients without the need for ICU admission (non-ICU patients). Multiple linear regression was applied, then a predictive model of severity called Age-AST-D dimer (AAD) was constructed (n = 166) and validated (n = 170). RESULTS: Derivation cohort: from 166 patients included, there were 27 (16.3%) ICU patients that showed higher levels of liver injury markers (P < 0.01) compared with non-ICU patients: alanine aminotrasnferase (ALT) 225.4 ± 341.2 vs. 41.3 ± 41.1, aspartate aminotransferase (AST) 325.3 ± 382.4 vs. 52.8 ± 47.1, lactic dehydrogenase (LDH) 764.6 ± 401.9 vs. 461.0 ± 185.6, D-dimer (DD) 7765 ± 9109 vs. 1871 ± 4146, and age 58.6 ± 12.7 vs. 49.1 ± 12.8. With these finding, a model called Age-AST-DD (AAD), with a cut-point of <2.75 (sensitivity = 0.797 and specificity = 0.391, c - statistic = 0.74; 95%IC: 0.62-0.86, P < 0.001), to predict the risk of need admission to ICU (OR = 5.8; 95% CI: 2.2-15.4, P = 0.001), was constructed. Validation cohort: in 170 different patients, the AAD model < 2.75 (c - statistic = 0.80 (95% CI: 0.70-0.91, P < 0.001) adequately predicted the risk (OR = 8.8, 95% CI: 3.4-22.6, P < 0.001) to be admitted in the ICU (27 patients, 15.95%). CONCLUSIONS: The elevation of AST (a possible marker of early liver injury) along with DD and age efficiently predict early (at admission time) probability of ICU admission during the clinical course of COVID-19. The AAD model can improve the comprehensive management of COVID-19 patients, and it could be useful as a triage tool to early classify patients with a high risk of developing a severe clinical course of the disease.

Instrumental piezoeléctrico comparado con sierra convencional en cirugía ortognática / Piezoelectric bone surgery compared to conventional saw in orthognathic surgery

RESUMEN: Introducción: La utilización de instrumental piezoeléctrico en cirugía ortognática ha ido en aumento con el fin de minimizar el riesgo de daño a tejidos blandos en comparación al uso de sierra convencional. Sin embargo, aún existe incertidumbre respecto a las complicaciones asociadas a cada instrumental. Métodos: Realizamos una búsqueda en Epistemonikos, la mayor base de datos de revisiones sistemáticas en salud, la cual es mantenida mediante el cribado de múltiples fuentes de información, incluyendo MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane, entre otras. Extrajimos los datos desde las revisiones identificadas, analizamos los datos de los estudios primarios, realizamos un meta análisis y preparamos una tabla de resumen de los resultados utilizando el método GRADE. Resultados y conclusiones: Identificamos cuatro revisiones sistemáticas que en conjunto incluyeron 10 estudios primarios, de los cuales, cuatro corresponden a ensayos aleatorizados. Concluimos que el uso de instrumental piezoeléctrico en comparación con la sierra convencional podría disminuir el riesgo de daño nervioso grave y disminuir el sangrado grave (>500 mL), pero la certeza de la evidencia es baja. Por otra parte, el uso de instrumental piezoeléctrico podría presentar poca o nula diferencia en el dolor postoperatorio, pero la certeza de la evidencia es baja. Finalmente no es posible establecer con claridad si el uso de instrumental piezoeléctrico disminuye la pérdida de sangre intraoperatoria (variable continua), la inflamación postoperatoria o el tiempo operatorio, ya que la certeza de la evidencia existente ha sido evaluada como muy baja.

ABSTRACT: Introduction: The use of piezoelectric bone surgery in orthognathic surgery has been increasing to minimize the risk of soft tissue damage compared to conventional saws. However, there is still uncertainty regarding the complications associated with each instrument. Methods: We searched in Epistemonikos, the largest database of systematic reviews in health, which is maintained by screening multiple information sources, including MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane, among others. We extracted data from the systematic reviews, reanalyzed primary studies' data, conducted a meta-analysis and generated a summary of findings table using the GRADE approach. Results and conclusions: We identified four systematic reviews that included 10 primary studies, four of which corresponded to randomized trials. We conclude that the use of piezoelectric instrumentation compared to the conventional saw may reduce the risk of severe nerve damage and decrease severe bleeding (>500 mL), but the certainty of the evidence is low. On the other hand, the use of piezoelectric bone surgery may make little or no difference in postoperative pain, but the certainty of the evidence is low. Finally, we are uncertain whether piezoelectric bone surgery reduces intraoperative blood loss (continuous variable), postoperative inflammation, and operative time, as the certainty of the evidence has been assessed as very low.

Multisite Implementation and Evaluation of 12-Month Standard Dialectical Behavior Therapy in a Public Community Setting.

Dialectical behavior therapy (DBT) is an effective intervention for treating adults with emotional and behavioral dysregulation. The National DBT Project, Ireland was established in 2013 to coordinate the implementation of DBT across public community mental health settings at a national level. This study describes the implementation and evaluation of DBT across multiple independent sites in adult mental health services (AMHS). The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research was used to guide this national implementation where barriers and facilitators to DBT implementation were considered. Nine AMHS teams completed DBT training and delivered the standard 12-month program. One hundred and ninety-six adults with borderline personality disorder participated in the program, and outcome measures were recorded at four time points. Significant reductions on outcome measures, including frequency of self-harm and suicidal ideation, were observed. This study highlights that DBT can be successfully implemented in community mental health settings as part of a coordinated implementation.

Innovations in Practice: Dialectical behaviour therapy for adolescents: multisite implementation and evaluation of a 16-week programme in a public community mental health setting.

BACKGROUND: Dialectical behaviour therapy for adolescents (DBT-A) is an intervention with a growing evidence base for treating adolescents with emotional and behavioural dysregulation. This study describes the implementation and effectiveness of 16-week DBT-A across multiple sites in publicly funded child/adolescent mental health services (CAMHS) in Ireland. METHOD: The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research was used to guide this national implementation. Fifty-four clinicians from seven CAMHS teams completed DBT training and delivered the 16-week DBT-A programme. Eighty-four adolescents with emotional and behavioural dysregulation participated in the intervention and outcome measures were administered at preintervention, postintervention and 16-week follow-up. RESULTS: Significant reductions on all outcome measures were observed for DBT-A participants including presence and frequency of self-harm, suicidal ideation and depression. Reductions in the number of acute inpatient admissions, bed days and emergency department visits were also reported. CONCLUSIONS: DBT-A can be successfully implemented in CAMHS settings and yield positive outcomes for adolescents with emotional and behavioural dysregulation.

Correction to: Dialectical behaviour therapy for treating adults and adolescents with emotional and behavioural dysregulation: study protocol of a coordinated implementation in a publicly funded health service.

Upon publication of the original article (1) it was highlighted by the authors that there was just one error in the manuscript in the 'Sample size' subsection of the Methods/Design.

Dialectical behaviour therapy for treating adults and adolescents with emotional and behavioural dysregulation: study protocol of a coordinated implementation in a publicly funded health service.

BACKGROUND: In the Republic of Ireland, borderline personality disorder (BPD) is a feature of approximately 11-20% of clinical presentations to outpatient clinics within mental health services. These estimates are similar to other countries including the UK and USA. Dialectical behaviour therapy (DBT) is an intervention with a growing body of evidence that demonstrates its efficacy in treating individuals diagnosed with BPD. While a number of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) have demonstrated the efficacy of DBT, there is limited research which evaluates the effectiveness of this model when applied to real world settings. Funding was secured to co-ordinate DBT training in public community-based mental health services across Ireland. As no other study has evaluated a co-ordinated national implementation of DBT, the current study proposes to investigate the effectiveness of DBT in both adult and child/adolescent community mental health services across Ireland, evaluate the coordinated implementation of DBT at a national level, and complete a comprehensive economic evaluation comparing DBT versus treatment-as-usual. METHODS/ DESIGN: This study takes the form of a quasi-experimental design. Individuals attending community mental health services who meet criteria for participation in the DBT programme will be allocated to the intervention group. Individuals who live in areas in Ireland where DBT is not yet available, and individuals who choose not to participate in the intervention, will be invited to participate in a treatment-as-usual comparison group. Self-report clinical measures and health service use questionnaires for DBT participants (and parent/guardians as appropriate) will be administered at pre-, mid- and post-intervention, as well as follow-up for participants who complete the intervention. Survey and interview data for DBT therapists will be gathered at three time points: prior to DBT training, 6 months after teams begin delivery of the intervention, and 2 years following training completion. DISCUSSION: It is anticipated that the results of this study will provide evidence for the effectiveness of DBT for patients, and report on recommendations regarding best practice guidelines for implementation of DBT and its economic merit in a publicly funded service. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT03180541 ; Registered June 7th 2017 'retrospectively registered'.

Standard 12 month dialectical behaviour therapy for adults with borderline personality disorder in a public community mental health setting.

BACKGROUND: Dialectical behaviour therapy (DBT) is noted to be an intervention with a growing body of evidence that demonstrates its efficacy in treating individuals diagnosed with borderline personality disorder (BPD). Evidence for the effectiveness of DBT in publicly funded community mental health settings is lacking however. No study to our knowledge has been published on the effectiveness of a 12 month standard DBT programme without adaptations for individuals with BPD in a publicly funded community mental health setting and no study has included data across multiple time-points. The main objective of the current study was to determine if completion of a 12 month DBT programme is associated with improved outcomes in terms of borderline symptoms, anxiety, hopelessness, suicidal ideation, depression and quality of life. A secondary objective includes assessing client progress across multiple time-points throughout the treatment. METHODS: Fifty-four adult participants with BPD completed the standard DBT programme across four sites in community mental health settings in the Republic of Ireland. Data was collected by the DBT therapists working with participants and took place at 8 week intervals across the 12 month programme. To explore the effects of the intervention for participants, linear mixed-effects models were used to estimate change utilising data available from all time-points. RESULTS: At the end of the 12 month programme, significant reductions in borderline symptoms, anxiety, hopelessness, suicidal ideation and depression were observed. Increases in overall quality of life were also noted. In particular, gains were made during the first 6 months of the programme. There was a tendency for scores to slightly regress after the six-month mark which marks the start of the second delivery of the group skills cycles. CONCLUSIONS: The current study provides evidence for the effectiveness of standard DBT in publicly funded community mental health settings. As participants were assessed at the end of every module, it was possible to observe trends in symptom reduction during each stage of the intervention. Despite real-world limitations of applying DBT in community settings, the results of this study are comparable with more tightly controlled studies. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT03166579; Registered May 24th 2017 'retrospectively registered'.

Family Connections versus optimised treatment-as-usual for family members of individuals with borderline personality disorder: non-randomised controlled study.

BACKGROUND: Borderline personality disorder (BPD) is challenging for family members who are often required to fulfil multiple roles such as those of advocate, caregiver, coach and guardian. To date, two uncontrolled studies by the treatment developers suggest that Family Connections (FC) is an effective programme to support, educate and teach skills to family members of individuals with BPD. However, such studies have been limited by lack of comparison to other treatment approaches. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of FC with an optimised treatment-as-usual (OTAU) programme for family members of individuals with BPD. A secondary aim was to introduce a long term follow-up to investigate if positive gains from the intervention would be maintained following programme completion. METHODS: This study was a non-randomised controlled study, with assessment of outcomes at baseline (pre-intervention) and end of programme (post-intervention) for both FC and OTAU groups, and at follow-up (3 months post-intervention; 12 or 19 months post-intervention) for the FC group. Eighty family members participated in the FC (n = 51) and the OTAU (n = 29) programmes. Outcome measures included burden, grief, depression and mastery. Linear mixed-effects models were used to assess baseline differences in the outcome measures by gender, age group and type of relationship to the individual with BPD. Linear mixed-effects models were also used to estimate the treatment effect (FC versus OTAU) utilising all available data from baseline and end of programme. RESULTS: The FC group showed changes indicating significant improvement with respect to all four outcome measures (p < 0.001). The OTAU group showed changes in the same direction as the intervention group but none of the changes were statistically significant. The intervention effect was statistically significant for total burden (including both subscales; p = .02 for subjective burden and p = .048 for objective burden) and grief (p = 0.013). Improvements were maintained at follow-up for FC participants. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of the current study indicate that FC results in statistically significant improvements on key measures while OTAU does not yield comparable changes. Lack of significant change on all measures for OTAU suggests that a three session psycho-education programme is of limited benefit. Further research is warranted on programme components and long-term supports for family members.

Synthesis and characterization of bis-triruthenium cluster derivatives of an all equatorial [60]fullerene tetramalonate.

The reaction of the tetrakis[di(ethoxycarbonyl)methano]-C60 (1) with Ru3(CO)12 afforded the first bis-parallel C60-metal cluster complex: parallel-[Ru3(CO)9]2{µ3-η(2),η(2),η(2)-C60[C(COOC2H5)2]4}. The two triruthenium groups are found in either a parallel or a tilted orientation relative to each other, as determined by NMR. Only the parallel form was characterized by X-ray crystallography.

Información para mujeres con cáncer de mama

Contiene: el cáncer de mama, el diagnóstico del cáncer de mama, el tratamiento del cáncer de mama, prevención y tratamiento del linfedema, aspectos psicológicos y sociales durante el diagnóstico y tratamiento del cáncer de mama.

Evolutionary vaccination dilemma in complex networks.

In this work we analyze the evolution of voluntary vaccination in networked populations by entangling the spreading dynamics of an influenza-like disease with an evolutionary framework taking place at the end of each influenza season so that individuals take or do not take the vaccine upon their previous experience. Our framework thus puts in competition two well-known dynamical properties of scale-free networks: the fast propagation of diseases and the promotion of cooperative behaviors. Our results show that when vaccine is perfect, scale-free networks enhance the vaccination behavior with respect to random graphs with homogeneous connectivity patterns. However, when imperfection appears we find a crossover effect so that the number of infected (vaccinated) individuals increases (decreases) with respect to homogeneous networks, thus showing the competition between the aforementioned properties of scale-free graphs.

[National consensus of diagnosis and treatment of non-small cell lung cancer]. / Consenso nacional de diagnóstico y tratamiento del cáncer de pulmón de células no pequeñas.

Mexican specialists in oncology, oncologic surgery, thoracic surgery, pneumology, pathology, molecular biology, anesthesiology, algology, psychology, nutrition, and rehabilitation (all of them experts in lung cancer treatment) in order to develop the National Consensus on Lung Cancer. The consensus has been developed as an answer to the need of updated Mexican guidelines for the optimal treatment of the disease, as well as to the requirements that such guidelines be established by multidisciplinary panel, depicting the current attention given to cancer lung cases in Mexico. Thus, this paper analyses the epidemiological review, screening, diagnosis, staging, pathology, translational medicine, and the suitable therapies for early, locally advanced, and metastatic disease in the first, second, and third lines of management, as well as rehabilitation and palliative measures.

Factores presentes en la deserción universitaria en la Facultad de Psicología de la Universidad De San Buenaventura, sede Bogotá en el periodo comprendido entre 1998-2009 / Factors related to the college dropout in the Faculty of Psychology at San Buenaventura University Bogotá in the period 1998-2009

El objetivo del presente estudio fue describir los factores socio demográficos y las categorías del modelo psicológico de Ethington, presentes en la deserción universitaria, evaluados por medio de una encuesta telefónica diseñada con base en estas categorías y validada por jueces. Los participantes tenían entre 16 y 32 años, solteros, de estratos 3 y 4. Los resultados descriptivos permiten concluir que existen diversas causas para que se presente la deserción en la Facultad de Psicología de la Universidad San Buenaventura, sede Bogotá. Dificultades tales como incompatibilidad del horario de estudio con el horario de trabajo, escasa información respecto al programa elegido al ingresar a la Universidad y dificultades de salud. Es importante destacar que la categoría que presentó el porcentaje más alto fue la de apoyo económico familiar con un 95%.

The purpose of this study was to describe the categories as well as the socio-demographic aspects of Ethington's psychological model, present in the university dropout. In order to do that, those aspects were assessed using a telephone survey validated by judges. Participants were between 16 and 32 years, single, from 3 and 4 social stratum. The results show that there are various reasons for dropout in the Faculty of Psychology at the University of San Buenaventura, such as: incompatibility between study and work schedules, unsuitable or insufficient information when going to University and finally, health difficulties.