Off-label use of an automated insulin delivery system in pregnant women with type 1 diabetes.

Using commercially available automated insulin delivery (AID) systems for treating type 1 diabetes during pregnancy remains controversial. This retrospective study assessed six pregnant women with type 1 diabetes who underwent AID therapy. Our observations revealed that AID treatment, in most cases, did not achieve the desired glycemic targets for pregnancy.

Salivary Cortisol Determination in ACTH Stimulation Test to Diagnose Adrenal Insufficiency in Patients with Liver Cirrhosis.

PURPOSE: The prevalence of adrenal insufficiency (AI) in patients with decompensated liver cirrhosis is unknown. Because these patients have lower levels of cortisol-binding carrier proteins, their total serum cortisol (TSC) correlates poorly with free serum cortisol (FC). Salivary cortisol (SaC) correlates better with FC. We aimed to establish SaC thresholds for AI for the 250 µg intravenous ACTH test and to estimate the prevalence of AI in noncritically ill cirrhotic patients. METHODS: We included 39 patients with decompensated cirrhosis, 39 patients with known AI, and 45 healthy volunteers. After subjects fasted ≥8 hours, serum and saliva samples were collected for determinations of TSC and SaC at baseline 0'(T0) and at 30-minute intervals after intravenous administration of 250 µg ACTH [30'(T30), 60'(T60), and 90'(T90)]. RESULTS: Based on the findings in healthy subjects and patients with known AI, we defined AI in cirrhotic patients as SaC-T0< 0.08 µg/dL (2.2 nmol/L), SaC-T60 < 1.43 µg/dl (39.5 nmol/L), or ΔSaC<1 µg/dl (27.6 nmol/L). We compared AI determination in cirrhotic patients with the ACTH test using these SaC thresholds versus established TSC thresholds (TSC-T0< 9 µg/dl [248 nmol/L], TSC-T60 < 18 µg/dl [497 nmol/L], or ΔTSC<9 µg/dl [248 nmol/L]). SaC correlated well with TSC. The prevalence of AI in cirrhotic patients was higher when determined by TSC (48.7%) than by SaC (30.8%); however, this difference did not reach statistical significance. AI was associated with sex, cirrhosis etiology, and Child-Pugh classification. CONCLUSIONS: Measuring SaC was more accurate than TSC in the ACTH stimulation test. Measuring TSC overestimated the prevalence of AI in noncritically ill cirrhotic patients.

Decision Support in Diabetes Care: The Challenge of Supporting Patients in Their Daily Living Using a Mobile Glucose Predictor.

BACKGROUND: In type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM), patients play an active role in their own care and need to have the knowledge to adapt decisions to their daily living conditions. Artificial intelligence applications can help people with type 1 diabetes in decision making and allow them to react at time scales shorter than the scheduled face-to-face visits. This work presents a decision support system (DSS), based on glucose prediction, to assist patients in a mobile environment. METHODS: The system's impact on therapeutic corrective actions has been evaluated in a randomized crossover pilot study focused on interprandial periods. Twelve people with type 1 diabetes treated with insulin pump participated in two phases: In the experimental phase (EP) patients used the DSS to modify initial corrective decisions in presence of hypoglycemia or hyperglycemia events. In the control phase (CP) patients were asked to follow decisions without knowing the glucose prediction. A telemedicine platform allowed participants to register monitoring data and decisions and allowed endocrinologists to supervise data at the hospital. The study period was defined as a postprediction (PP) time window. RESULTS: After knowing the glucose prediction, participants modified the initial decision in 20% of the situations. No statistically significant differences were found in the PP Kovatchev's risk index change (-1.23 ± 11.85 in EP vs -0.56 ± 6.06 in CP). Participants had a positive opinion about the DSS with an average score higher than 7 in a usability questionnaire. CONCLUSION: The DSS had a relevant impact in the participants' decision making while dealing with T1DM and showed a high confidence of patients in the use of glucose prediction.

Human Subcutaneous Tissue Response to Glucose Sensors: Macrophages Accumulation Impact on Sensor Accuracy.

BACKGROUND: Subcutaneous (s.c.) glucose sensors have become a key component in type 1 diabetes management. However, their usability is limited by the impact of foreign body response (FBR) on their duration, reliability, and accuracy. Our study gives the first description of human acute and subacute s.c. response to glucose sensors, showing the changes observed in the sensor surface, the inflammatory cells involved in the FBR and their relationship with sensor performance. METHODS: Twelve obese patients (seven type 2 diabetes) underwent two abdominal biopsies comprising the surrounding area where they had worn two glucose sensors: the first one inserted 7 days before and the second one 24 h before biopsy procedure. Samples were processed and studied to describe tissue changes by two independent pathologists (blind regarding sensor duration). Macrophages quantification was studied by immunohistochemistry methods in the area surrounding the sensor (CD68, CD163). Sensor surface changes were studied by scanning electron microscopy. Seven-day continuous glucose monitoring records were considered inaccurate when mean absolute relative difference was higher than 10%. RESULTS: Pathologists were able to correctly classify all the biopsies regarding sensor duration. Acute response (24 h) was characterized by the presence of neutrophils while macrophages were the main cell involved in subacute inflammation. The number of macrophages around the insertion hole was higher for less accurate sensors compared with those performing more accurately (32.6 ± 14 vs. 10.6 ± 1 cells/0.01 mm2; P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The accumulation of macrophages at the sensor-tissue interface is related with decrease in accuracy of the glucose measure.

ViDa1: The Development and Validation of a New Questionnaire for Measuring Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients with Type 1 Diabetes.

This study describes the development of a new questionnaire to measure health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in patients with type 1 diabetes (the ViDa1 questionnaire) and provides information on its psychometric properties. For its development, open interviews with patients took place and topics relevant to patients' HRQoL were identified and items were generated. Qualitative analysis of items, expert review, and refinement of the questionnaire followed. A pilot study (N = 150) was conducted to explore the underlying structure of the 40-item ViDa1 questionnaire. A Principal Component Analysis (PCA) was performed and six of the items that did not load on any of the factors were eliminated. The results supported a four-dimensional structure for ViDa1, the dimensions being Interference of diabetes in everyday life, Self-care, Well-being, and Worry about the disease. Subsequently, the PCA was repeated in a larger sample (N = 578) with the reduced 34-item version of the questionnaire, and a Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) was performed (N = 428). Overall fit indices obtained presented adequate values which supported the four-factor model initially proposed [([Formula: see text] 2601.93) (p < 0.001); Root Mean Square Error of Approximation = 0.060 (CI = 0.056 -0.064)]. As regards reliability, the four dimensions of the ViDa1 demonstrated good internal consistency, with Cronbach's alphas ranging between 0.71 and 0.86. Evidence of convergent-discriminant validity in the form of high correlations with another specific HRQoL questionnaire for diabetes and low correlations with other constructs such as self-efficacy, anxiety, and depression were presented. The ViDa1 also discriminated between different aspects of clinical interest such as type of insulin treatment, presence of chronic complications, and glycemic control, temporal stability, and sensitivity to change after an intervention. In conclusion, the ViDa1 questionnaire presents adequate psychometric properties and may represent a good alternative for the evaluation of HRQoL in type 1 diabetes.

Topiramate as a Cause of False Positive in the Overnight 1-mg Dexamethasone Suppression Test.

OBJECTIVE: To describe that topiramate may cause a false positive in an overnight 1-mg dexamethasone suppression test (DST) for hypercortisolism screening. METHODS: We present a case in which topiramate induced dexamethasone metabolism, leading to a false positive on the DST. RESULTS: A 44-year-old female with an incidentally found adenoma in the right adrenal gland underwent a DST for hypercortisolism screening. The patient was taking topiramate prescribed by a psychiatrist for an affective disorder, and insufficient cortisol suppression (11.9 mcg/dL) was observed. Her free cortisol in 24-hour urine was normal, and insufficient suppression was established in a second determination (9.3 mcg/dL). Finally, her psychiatrist switched her treatment from topiramate to bupropion, and the measurements were repeated. When she was not taking topiramate, correct suppression with 1 mg of dexamethasone was obtained (1.7 mcg/dL), and her free cortisol in 24-hour urine was again normal, thereby excluding the presence of hypercortisolism. On reviewing the literature, topiramate was not found to have been previously described as a cause of a false positive on DST, but it was proposed as a cause of hypoadrenalism in a patient taking oral corticosteroid replacement due to its capacity to induce dexamethasone metabolism. CONCLUSION: Topiramate treatment may well be a cause of false positives in DSTs, and its presence should be taken into consideration when screening for hypercortisolism.

Artificial pancreas using a personalized rule-based controller achieves overnight normoglycemia in patients with type 1 diabetes.

OBJECTIVE: This study assessed the efficacy of a closed-loop (CL) system consisting of a predictive rule-based algorithm (pRBA) on achieving nocturnal and postprandial normoglycemia in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM). The algorithm is personalized for each patient's data using two different strategies to control nocturnal and postprandial periods. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We performed a randomized crossover clinical study in which 10 T1DM patients treated with continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) spent two nonconsecutive nights in the research facility: one with their usual CSII pattern (open-loop [OL]) and one controlled by the pRBA (CL). The CL period lasted from 10 p.m. to 10 a.m., including overnight control, and control of breakfast. Venous samples for blood glucose (BG) measurement were collected every 20 min. RESULTS: Time spent in normoglycemia (BG, 3.9-8.0 mmol/L) during the nocturnal period (12 a.m.-8 a.m.), expressed as median (interquartile range), increased from 66.6% (8.3-75%) with OL to 95.8% (73-100%) using the CL algorithm (P<0.05). Median time in hypoglycemia (BG, <3.9 mmol/L) was reduced from 4.2% (0-21%) in the OL night to 0.0% (0.0-0.0%) in the CL night (P<0.05). Nine hypoglycemic events (<3.9 mmol/L) were recorded with OL compared with one using CL. The postprandial glycemic excursion was not lower when the CL system was used in comparison with conventional preprandial bolus: time in target (3.9-10.0 mmol/L) 58.3% (29.1-87.5%) versus 50.0% (50-100%). CONCLUSIONS: A highly precise personalized pRBA obtains nocturnal normoglycemia, without significant hypoglycemia, in T1DM patients. There appears to be no clear benefit of CL over prandial bolus on the postprandial glycemia.

Serum levels of TWEAK and scavenger receptor CD163 in type 1 diabetes mellitus: relationship with cardiovascular risk factors. a case-control study.

OBJECTIVE: To test the usefulness of serum concentrations of tumor necrosis factor-like weak inducer of apoptosis (sTWEAK) and soluble scavenger receptor CD163 (sCD163) as markers of subtle inflammation in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) without clinical cardiovascular (CV) disease and to evaluate their relationship with arterial stiffness (AS). METHODS: Sixty-eight patients with T1DM and 68 age and sex-matched, healthy subjects were evaluated. Anthropometrical variables and CV risk factors were recorded. Serum concentrations of sTWEAK and sCD163 were measured. AS was assessed by aortic pulse wave velocity (aPWV). All statistical analyses were stratified by gender. RESULTS: T1DM patients showed lower serum concentrations of sTWEAK (Men: 1636.5 (1146.3-3754.8) pg/mL vs. 765.9 (650.4-1097.1) pg/mL; p<0.001. Women: 1401.0 (788.0-2422.2) pg/mL vs. 830.1 (562.6-1175.9) pg/mL; p = 0.011) compared with their respective controls. Additionally, T1DM men had higher serum concentrations of sCD163 (285.0 (247.7-357.1) ng/mL vs. 224.8 (193.3-296.5) ng/mL; p = 0.012) compared with their respective controls. sTWEAK correlated negatively with aPWV in men (r = -0.443; p<0.001). However, this association disappeared after adjusting for potential confounders. In men, the best multiple linear regression model showed that the independent predictors of sTWEAK were T1DM and WHR (R(2) = 0.640; p<0.001). In women, T1DM and SBP were the independent predictors for sTWEAK (R(2) = 0.231; p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: sTWEAK is decreased in T1DM patients compared with age and sex-matched healthy subjects after adjusting for classic CV risk factors, although sTWEAK levels may be partially influenced by some of them. Additionally, T1DM men have higher serum concentrations of sCD163. These results point out an association between the inflammatory system and CV risk in T1DM.

[Low reporting of clinical characteristics of patients with diabetes mellitus included in the main clinical trials on hypertension]. / Escasa caracterización clínica de los pacientes con diabetes mellitus incluidos en los principales ensayos clínicos sobre hipertensión arterial.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Subjects with diabetes mellitus (DM) are at high risk of cardiovascular events. However, their cardiovascular risk varies according to several clinical characteristics like age, sex, ethnicity, type and duration of the DM, quality of glycemic control, type of hypoglycemic treatment, or the presence of nephropathy or previous cardiovascular events. It is not known if these characteristics have been sufficiently reported in clinical trials on hypertension including subjects with DM. MATERIAL AND METHOD: We analyzed randomized controlled clinical trials about treatment of hypertension published before May 2003 with the following characteristics: a) inclusion of subjects with DM and b) a primary end-point including at least one of the following events: myocardial infarction, cerebrovascular disease or total mortality. In these trials we evaluated the above-mentioned clinical characteristics concerning cardiovascular risk. RESULTS: Sixteen trials were eventually analyzed. These trials were classified into: a) trials designed only for subjects with DM (RENAAL, UKPDS 38, UKPDS 39, IDNT); b) trials with a subgroup analysis for subjects with DM (SHEP, Syst-Eur, MICRO-HOPE, HOT, STOP-2, LIFE), and c) trials without a subgroup analysis for subjects with DM (CAPP, NORDIL, INSIGHT, ALLHAT, SANBPSG, CONVINCE). All these trials included a total of 33984 subjects with DM, most of them > or = 55 years old. The percentage of women evaluated ranged from 33.5 to 71.9% although in 2 trials no data were found regarding this percentage (12.5%). There was no information on ethnicity in 10 trials (62.5%), on the type of DM in 7 (43.8%), on the duration of the disease in 13 (81.3%), on the degree of glycemic control in 10 (62.5%), on the type of hypoglycemic treatment in 11 (68.8%), on the presence or absence of nephropathy in 11 (68.8%) and on the presence or absence of previous cardiovascular events in 3 (18.8%). Trials without subgroup analysis for subjects with DM had a lower reporting of the clinical characteristics of the subjects evaluated than the rest of the trials. CONCLUSIONS: The reporting of relevant clinical characteristics of cardiovascular risk in subjects with DM in the main clinical trials on hypertension is low, diminishing their external validity. To optimize the therapeutic recommendations in the treatment of hypertension in DM these deficiencies should be overcome.

Escasa caracterización clínica de los pacientes con diabetes mellitus incluidos en los principales ensayos clínicos sobre hipertensión arterial / Low reporting of clinical characteristics of patients with diabetes mellitus included in the main clinical trials on hypertension

Fundamento y objetivo: Los pacientes con diabetes mellitus (DM) presentan un elevado pero heterogéneo riesgo cardiovascular. Entre los factores que pueden modificarlo se encuentran la edad, el sexo, la etnia, el tipo y la duración de la enfermedad, el grado de control glucémico, tipo de tratamiento hipoglucemiante y la presencia de nefropatía o de acontecimientos cardiovasculares previos. No se conoce hasta qué punto estas características están descritas en los principales ensayos clínicos sobre tratamiento de la hipertensión que incluyen pacientes con DM. Material y método: Se analizaron los ensayos clínicos aleatorizados y con grupo control, publicados hasta mayo de 2003, sobre el tratamiento de la hipertensión que incluían a pacientes con DM y tenían, dentro de su criterio principal de valoración, cualquiera de los siguientes acontecimientos cardiovasculares: infarto agudo de miocardio, accidente cerebrovascular o mortalidad total. En esos ensayos se valoró la información de los pacientes con DM en relación con las variables referidas en el apartado anterior. Resultados: Se analizó un total de 16 estudios que se clasificaron en 3 grupos: a) ensayos exclusivamente para pacientes con DM (RENAAL, UKPDS 38, UKPDS 39, IDNT); b) ensayos con análisis de subgrupo para pacientes con DM (SHEP, Syst-Eur, MICRO-HOPE, HOT, STOP-2, LIFE), y c) ensayos sin análisis de subgrupo para pacientes con DM (CAPP, NORDIL, INSIGHT, ALLHAT, SANBPSG, CONVINCE). En todos estos estudios se incluyó a un total de 33.984 pacientes con DM, la mayoría de 55 o más años y con un porcentaje de mujeres entre el 33,5 y el 71,9%, aunque en dos estudios no constó este porcentaje (12,5%). No se precisó el origen étnico de los participantes en 10 ensayos (62,5%), el tipo de DM en 7 (43,8%), el tiempo de evolución de la DM en 13 (81,3%), el grado de control glucémico en 10 (62,5%), el tipo de tratamiento en 11 (68,8%), la presencia o ausencia de nefropatía en 11 (68,8%) y no se precisó el porcentaje de acontecimientos cardiovasculares previos en 3 (18,8%). En general, los ensayos que no presentaron un análisis de subgrupos para pacientes con DM presentaron una peor definición de las características clínicas de los pacientes que el resto. Conclusiones: La caracterización clínica de los pacientes con DM incluidos en los principales ensayos clínicos sobre hipertensión es deficiente, lo que limita su validez externa. Esa caracterización debería tenerse en cuenta si se pretende mejorar las recomendaciones terapéuticas de la hipertensión en la DM

Background and objective: Subjects with diabetes mellitus (DM) are at high risk of cardiovascular events. However, their cardiovascular risk varies according to several clinical characteristics like age, sex, ethnicity, type and duration of the DM, quality of glycemic control, type of hypoglycemic treatment, or the presence of nephropathy or previous cardiovascular events. It is not known if these characteristics have been sufficiently reported in clinical trials on hypertension including subjects with DM. Material and method: We analyzed randomized controlled clinical trials about treatment of hypertension published before May 2003 with the following characteristics: a) inclusion of subjects with DM and b) a primary end-point including at least one of the following events: myocardial infarction, cerebrovascular disease or total mortality. In these trials we evaluated the above-mentioned clinical characteristics concerning cardiovascular risk. Results: Sixteen trials were eventually analyzed. These trials were classified into: a) trials designed only for subjects with DM (RENAAL, UKPDS 38, UKPDS 39, IDNT); b) trials with a subgroup analysis for subjects with DM (SHEP, Syst-Eur, MICRO-HOPE, HOT, STOP-2, LIFE), and c) trials without a subgroup analysis for subjects with DM (CAPP, NORDIL, INSIGHT, ALLHAT, SANBPSG, CONVINCE). All these trials included a total of 33984 subjects with DM, most of them >= 55 years old. The percentage of women evaluated ranged from 33.5 to 71.9% although in 2 trials no data were found regarding this percentage (12.5%). There was no information on ethnicity in 10 trials (62.5%), on the type of DM in 7 (43.8%), on the duration of the disease in 13 (81.3%), on the degree of glycemic control in 10 (62.5%), on the type of hypoglycemic treatment in 11 (68.8%), on the presence or absence of nephropathy in 11 (68.8%) and on the presence or absence of previous cardiovascular events in 3 (18.8%). Trials without subgroup analysis for subjects with DM had a lower reporting of the clinical characteristics of the subjects evaluated than the rest of the trials. Conclusions: The reporting of relevant clinical characteristics of cardiovascular risk in subjects with DM in the main clinical trials on hypertension is low, diminishing their external validity. To optimize the therapeutic recommendations in the treatment of hypertension in DM these deficiencies should be overcome