[Treatment Refusal in Pediatric Oncology]. / Odmietnutie liecby v detskej onkológii.

BACKGROUND: Pediatric oncologists are often faced with situations in which parents or guardians refuse recommended treatment for curable childhood cancer. Deciding how to proceed in such situations is an ethical dilemma. The aim of this article is to consider optimal approaches when parents are strongly against oncological treatment, potentially compromising their childrens rights for health care and to the chance for cure. CASES: In this paper, we report two cases of treatment refusal from our department and the impact of such decisions on the children themselves. Case no. 1 describes a child with retinoblastoma whose parents refused standard treatment in order to seek alternative treatment abroad. Case no. 2 describes a patient with a primary lymphoma of bone who received treatment by a court order after parental refusal. CONCLUSION: When parents refuse a treatment for potentially curable cancer, the medical team often focuses on the certainty of death without treatment. In the background, there is a smaller but still significant risk that - even if the treatment is eventually accepted or compelled - the child will still die from treatment-related complications or refractory disease, possibly with considerable suffering. The reasons for refusing a treatment vary. The entire medical team is tasked with trying to respectfully understand the reasoning behind the parents unwillingness to accept the treatment, in order to address all possible misunderstandings and to propose solutions that could be acceptable for the parents. In some situations however, it is necessary to resolve the dilemma by legal means in order to protect the life of the child.Key words: oncology - ethics - decision making - treatment refusal - legal guardians The authors declare they have no potential conflicts of interest concerning drugs, products, or services used in the study. The Editorial Board declares that the manuscript met the ICMJE recommendation for biomedical papers.Submitted: 7. 8. 2017Accepted: 7. 9. 2017.

Improved outcome for children and adolescent with acute lymphoblastic leukemia in the first decade of the 21st century: A report from the Slovak Republic.

Our aim was to analyze event-free (EFS) and overall survival (OS) among children and adolescents with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) treated with International BFM Intercontinental trial (ALL IC 2002) therapy in the Slovak Republic. In total, 280 children and adolescent age 1 to 18 years were treated with ALL IC BFM 2002 based therapy from 2002 to 2012, which was divided into two periods. During 2002-2007, when patients were actively enrolled in the ALL IC-BFM 2002 trial, and during 2008-2012 when the trial was closed and patients were treated with the same therapy without randomization. Five-year EFS and OS rates were 79% (+/- 2.6%) and 86% (+/- 2.1%), respectively, similar to results obtained in the ALL-BFM 95 trial, which was the basis for ALL IC BFM 2002 therapy. The EFS (p<0.012) and OS (p<0.003) were significantly better than the prior Slovak experience in 1997-2001. Survival is improved in standard and intermediate risk groups, including those age 1 to 6 years, and older; with B-cell or T-cell immunophenotype, and is also excellent for those with good early response. The rate of death in induction, cumulative incidence of death in complete remission and of relapse decreased. However, outcome was suboptimal for patients in the high risk group. Current EFS and OS rates for children and adolescents with ALL in the Slovak Republic resembled those obtained in Western Europe as a result of clinical trial participation, and clinical experience acquired with intensive BFM type treatment.

Systemic malignancies presenting as primary osteolytic lesion.

The tumor formation may be the earliest manifestation preceeding other symptoms, signs and bone marrow evidence of systemic malignancy - leukemia/lymphoma. Here we present three cases of systemic malignancy in which bone lesions were the first manifested signs of the disease. All three cases were thought to be orthopedic cases and had been treated as so without genuing improvement. We would like to draw an attention to children who present with multifocal musculoskeletal pain and the importance of whole-body scaning. We describe interesting cases of diffuse large cell lymphoma and leukemia that initially presented as primary osteolytic bone lesion and discuss the differential diagnosis, literature review of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma arising in bone as the primary site (Tab. 1, Fig. 3, Ref. 18). Full Text (Free, PDF) www.bmj.sk.

Our experience with tumor lysis syndrome treatment.

Tumor lysis syndrome (TLS) is caused by rapid tumor cell turnover resulting in a release of intracellular contents into the circulation, and subsequent numerous metabolic derangements (hyperkalemia, hypocalcemia, hyperphosphatemia, hyperuricemia). More than 90% of cases have laboratory manifestations, and only about 10% have clinical manifestations. The main complications are acute renal failure, cardiac arrhythmia and metabolic acidosis. The management of TLS consists of preventive measures in high-risk patients prior to cancer treatment as well as prompt initiation of supportive care for patients who develop acute tumor lysis syndrome during treatment. The traditional management consists of intravenous hydratation, urinary alkalinization, diuretics and control of hyperuricemia, electrolyte disturbances and dialysis if needed. The use of a new hypouricemic agent (rasburicase) in patients with TLS minimized the need for renal dialysis as well as reduced the incidence of complications seen in hyperproduction of uric acid to minimum (Tab. 4, Ref. 8). Full Text (Free, PDF) www.bmj.sk.