Use of letermovir for cytomegalovirus primary prophylaxis in lung transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND: Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is a driver of negative outcomes after lung transplant (LTX) and primary prophylaxis (PPX) with valganciclovir (VGC) is standard-of-care. VGC is associated with myelosuppression, prompting interest in letermovir (LTV). METHODS: Adults receiving LTX between April 1, 2015, and July 30, 2022, at our institution were evaluated. Patients were excluded if low CMV risk (D-/R-), survived <90 days post-LTX, or transferred care before PPX withdrawal. Primary outcomes were leukopenia (white blood cell count [WBC] ≤ 3.0 × 109/L), severe leukopenia (WBC ≤ 2.0 × 109/L), and neutropenia (absolute neutrophil count ≤ 1500 cells/µL) requiring granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (GCSF) on PPX. Secondary outcomes included breakthrough CMV infection and post-PPX CMV infection. RESULTS: 204 patients met inclusion criteria: 175 patients on VGC and 29 patients on LTV (after VGC conversion). Most patients received bilateral LTX (62.7%) with non-lymphocyte-depleting induction (96.6%) and moderate-risk serostatus (D+/R+, 48.5%). Patients transitioned from VGC to LTV after a mean of 178 days (SD 80.8 days) post-transplant. Patients on VGC experienced significantly more leukopenia (82.3% vs. 58.6%, p = 0.008), severe leukopenia (57.1% vs. 31.0%, p = 0.016), and neutropenia requiring GCSF (70.9% vs. 51.7%, p = 0.048). Breakthrough (5.7% vs. 3.4%, p = 0.955) and post-PPX (24.6% vs. 37.9%, p = 0.199) infections were similar. A subgroup analysis of patients with high-risk serostatus showed similar trends, though did not reach statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS: In this single-center study, the incidence of leukopenia and neutropenia requiring GCSF were reduced with LTV compared to VGC. Breakthrough and post-PPX infections were not significantly different. This evidence suggests that LTV has comparable efficacy with reduced myelosuppression compared to VGC in LTX recipients, and may be an appropriate alternative for PPX.

Outcomes in solid organ transplant recipients receiving organs from a donor with Fusarium solani species complex meningitis.

BACKGROUND: Five organs (heart, right lung, liver, right, and left kidneys) from a deceased patient were transplanted into five recipients in four US states; the deceased patient was identified as part of a healthcare-associated fungal meningitis outbreak among patients who underwent epidural anesthesia in Matamoros, Mexico. METHODS: After transplant surgeries occurred, Fusarium solani species complex, a fungal pathogen with a high case-mortality rate, was identified in cerebrospinal fluid from the organ donor by metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) and fungal-specific polymerase chain reaction and in plasma by mNGS. RESULTS: Four of five transplant recipients received recommended voriconazole prophylaxis; four were monitored weekly by serum (1-3)-ß-d-glucan testing. All five were monitored for signs of infection for at least 3 months following transplantation. The liver recipient had graft failure, which was attributed to an etiology unrelated to fungal infection. No fungal DNA was identified in sections of the explanted liver, suggesting that F. solani species complex did not contribute to graft failure. The remaining recipients experienced no signs or symptoms suggestive of fusariosis. CONCLUSION: Antifungal prophylaxis may be useful in preventing donor-derived infections in recipients of organs from donors that are found to have Fusarium meningitis.

Acute rejection and post lung transplant surveillance.

Purpose: The purpose of this review is to summarize the current evidence on the evaluation and treatment of acute rejection after lung transplantation. Results: Despite significant progress in the field of transplant immunology, acute rejection remains a frequent complication after transplantation. Almost 30% of lung transplant recipients experience at least one episode of acute cellular rejection (ACR) during the first year after transplant. Acute cellular rejection, lymphocytic bronchiolitis, and antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) are all risk factors for the subsequent development of chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD). Acute cellular rejection and lymphocytic bronchiolitis have well-defined histopathologic diagnostic criteria and grading. The diagnosis of antibody-mediated rejection after lung transplantation requires a multidisciplinary approach. Antibody-mediated rejection may cause acute allograft failure. Conclusions: Acute rejection is a risk factor for development of chronic rejection. Further investigations are required to better define risk factors, surveillance strategies, and optimal management strategies for acute allograft rejection.