ABSTRACT
A hiperplasia endotelial intravascular ou tumor de Masson é uma lesão vascular benigna que não possui patogênese bem definida. Acredita-se que a resposta à lesão dos vasos sanguíneos seja um dos principais motivos para o seu desenvolvimento. É uma lesão tipicamente indolor, única e de evolução lenta. O objetivo deste relato é descrever um caso de tumor de Masson em uma região não habitual, na matriz ungueal do hálux, e discutir suas principais características
Intravascular endothelial hyperplasia, or Masson's tumor, is a benign vascular lesion with no well-defined pathogenesis. The response to vascular damage is believed to be one of the main reasons for its development. It is a typically painless injury, solitary, with slow evolution. This report aims to describe a case of Masson's tumor in an unusual place, the hallux nail matrix, and discuss its main characteristics.
ABSTRACT
UNLABELLED: Bone tumours and tumour-like lesions are frequently encountered by radiologists. Although radiographs are the primary screening technique, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can help narrow the differential or make a specific diagnosis when a lesion is indeterminate or shows signs of aggressiveness. MRI can extend the diagnostic evaluation by demonstrating several tissue components. Even when a specific diagnosis cannot be made, the differential diagnosis can be narrowed. MRI is superior to the other imaging modalities in detecting bone marrow lesions and tumoral tissue (faint lytic/sclerotic bone lesions can be difficult to visualise using only radiographs). Contrast-enhanced MRI can reveal the most vascularised parts of the tumour and MRI guidance makes it possible to avoid biopsing necrotic areas. MRI is very helpful in local staging and surgical planning by assessing the degree of intramedullary extension and invasion of the adjacent physeal plates, joints, muscle compartments and neurovascular bundles. It can be used in assessing response to neoadjuvant therapy and further restaging. The post-therapeutic follow-up should also be done using MRI. Despite the high quality of MRI, there are a few pitfalls and limitations of which one should be aware. Applications of MRI in bone tumours will probably continue to grow as new sequences are further studied. TEACHING POINTS: ⢠When a lesion is indeterminate or shows signs of aggressiveness, MRI is indicated. ⢠When MRI does not lead to a diagnosis, biopsy is indicated. ⢠MRI is superior to the other imaging modalities in detecting bone marrow lesions. ⢠MRI is very helpful in local staging and surgical planning. ⢠MRI is used in assessing the response to neoadjuvant therapy, restaging and post-therapeutic follow-up.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The increase in overall rates of cesarean sections (CS) in Brazil causes concern and it appears that multiple factors are involved in this fact. In 2009, undergraduate students in the first and final years of medical school at the University of Santa Catarina answered questionnaires regarding their choice of mode of delivery. The aim of the study was to evaluate whether the education process affects decision-making regarding the way of childbirth preferred by medical students. METHODS: A cross-sectional, quantitative study was conducted based on data obtained from questionnaires applied to medical students. The questions addressed four different scenarios in childbirth, as follows: under an uneventful pregnancy; the mode of delivery for a pregnant woman under their care; the best choice as a healthcare manager and lastly, choosing the birth of their own child. For each circumstance, there was an open question to explain their choice. RESULTS: A total of 189 students answered the questionnaires. For any uneventful pregnancy and for a pregnant woman under their care, 8.46% of the students would opt for CS. As a healthcare manager, only 2.64% of the students would recommend CS. For these three scenarios, the answers of the students in the first year did not differ from those given by students in the sixth year. In the case of the student's own or a partner's pregnancy, 41.4% of those in the sixth year and 16.8% of those in the first year would choose a CS. A positive association was found between being a sixth year student and a personal preference for CS according to logistic regression (OR = 2.91; 95%CI: 1.03-8.30). Pain associated with vaginal delivery was usually the reason for choosing a CS. CONCLUSIONS: A higher number of sixth year students preferred a CS for their own pregnancy (or their partner's) compared to first year students. Pain associated with vaginal delivery was the most common reason given for haven chosen a CS. The students' preference for childbirth changed over time during their graduation in favor of cesarean sections. This finding deserves considerable attention when structuring medical education in Obstetrics.