Long-term treatment with the dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor saxagliptin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and renal impairment: a randomised controlled 52-week efficacy and safety study.

OBJECTIVE: Therapeutic options are limited for diabetes patients with renal disease. This report presents 52-week results from a study assessing the dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor saxagliptin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and renal impairment. DESIGN: Double-blind study in patients stratified by baseline renal impairment (moderate, severe or end-stage renal disease [ESRD] on haemodialysis) randomised to saxagliptin 2.5 mg once daily or placebo added to other antidiabetic drugs in use at baseline, including insulin. PATIENTS: A total of 170 adults with glycated haemoglobin (HbA(1c) ) 7-11% and creatinine clearance < 50 ml/min or ESRD were randomised and treated. MEASUREMENTS: Absolute changes in HbA(1c) and fasting plasma glucose (FPG) from baseline to week 52 were evaluated using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) with last observation carried forward. Repeated-measures analyses were also performed. RESULTS: Adjusted mean decrease in HbA(1c) was greater with saxagliptin than placebo (difference, -0.73%, p < 0.001 [ANCOVA]). Reductions in adjusted mean HbA(1c) were numerically greater with saxagliptin than placebo in patients with renal impairment rated as moderate (-0.94% vs. 0.19% respectively) or severe (-0.81% vs. -0.49%), but similar to placebo for those with ESRD (-1.13% vs. -0.99%). Reductions in adjusted mean FPG were numerically greater with saxagliptin in patients with moderate or severe renal impairment. Saxagliptin was generally well tolerated; similar proportions of patients in the saxagliptin and placebo groups reported hypoglycaemic events (28% and 29% respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Saxagliptin 2.5 mg once daily offers sustained efficacy and good tolerability for patients with T2DM and renal impairment.

Saxagliptin improves glycaemic control and is well tolerated in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and renal impairment.

AIM: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of saxagliptin vs. placebo in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and renal impairment. METHODS: In this multicentre, randomized, parallel-group, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, patients with glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) 7-11% and creatinine clearance <50 ml/min were stratified by baseline renal impairment (moderate, severe or end-stage on haemodialysis), and randomized (1 : 1) to saxagliptin 2.5 mg once daily or placebo for 12 weeks. Oral antihyperglycaemic drugs and insulin therapy present at enrolment were continued throughout the study. The absolute change in HbA1c from baseline to week 12 (primary efficacy end-point) was analysed using an analysis of covariance model with last observation carried forward methodology. RESULTS: A total of 170 patients were randomized and treated. The adjusted mean decrease from baseline to week 12 in HbA1c was statistically significantly greater in the saxagliptin group than in the placebo group; the difference between treatments was -0.42% (95% confidence interval: -0.71 to -0.12%, p = 0.007). Adjusted mean HbA1c decreases from baseline to week 12 were numerically greater with saxagliptin than with placebo in the subgroups of patients with moderate (-0.64 vs. -0.05%) and severe (-0.95 vs. -0.50%) renal impairment. HbA1c reductions were similar between saxagliptin and placebo in the subgroup with end-stage renal disease on haemodialysis (-0.84 vs. -0.87%). Saxagliptin was generally well tolerated; incidences of adverse events and hypoglycaemic events were similar to placebo. CONCLUSIONS: Saxagliptin 2.5 mg once daily is a well-tolerated treatment option for patients with inadequately controlled T2DM and renal impairment.

Clinical trial: healing of NSAID-associated gastric ulcers in patients continuing NSAID therapy - a randomized study comparing ranitidine with esomeprazole.

BACKGROUND: The use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID) is associated with an increased risk of gastric ulcer (GU) development. METHODS: This multicentre, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group trial compared endoscopic healing rates at 4 and 8 weeks after treatment with oral esomeprazole 40 or 20 mg once daily, or ranitidine 150 mg twice daily, in patients with 1 baseline GU > or = 5 mm but no GUs or duodenal ulcers >25 mm in diameter who received continued cyclooxygenase-2-selective or non-selective NSAID therapies. The primary outcome was the percentage of patients in each treatment group who had no GUs at week 8. RESULTS: Four hundred and forty patients were randomized to treatment. At week 8, GU healing rates (95% CI) with esomeprazole 40 mg, esomeprazole 20 mg and ranitidine were 85.7 (79.8-91.7)%, 84.8 (78.8-90.8)% and 76.3 (69.2-83.3)%, respectively; between-group differences were not statistically significant. Week-4 GU healing rates were 70.7 (62.9-78.4)% and 72.5 (65.0-79.9)% with esomeprazole 40 and 20 mg, respectively, and were significantly higher (P < 0.01 for both doses) than those with ranitidine [55.4 (47.1-63.7)%]. CONCLUSION: In patients who require continued NSAID therapy, GU healing rates at 8 weeks numerically favoured esomeprazole but were not significantly different from ranitidine.

Endoscopic biopsy requirements for post-treatment diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori.

BACKGROUND: Data on sensitivities of biopsy tests for Helicobacter pylori diagnosis after modern eradication therapy are limited. We assessed diagnostic yield of endoscopic biopsy tests before and after therapy in 2 U.S. multicenter double-blind trials of 10-day proton pump inhibitor-based triple therapy versus dual antibiotic therapy. METHODS: Three hundred one patients with duodenal ulcer and H pylori infection had endoscopy at baseline and at 8 weeks. Four antral and 3 body biopsies were taken at both endoscopies: 1 antral biopsy for a rapid urease test (CLOtest), 2 antral and 2 body biopsies for histologic examination (Genta stain), and 1 antral and 1 body biopsy for culture. RESULTS: The 2 same-site biopsies (antral or body) for histologic examination were in agreement in 97% of cases before treatment and 100% after triple therapy. Histologic examination of antral biopsies without body biopsies missed H pylori infection in 2% of patients before treatment and 5% after triple therapy. Posttreatment sensitivities for triple therapy were significantly lower than pretreatment sensitivities for all tests (e. g., 18% decrease in sensitivity in antral histology, 22% decrease in antral culture); decreases in sensitivity were greater after triple therapy than after the less effective dual therapy. CLOtest plus histology had a post-treatment sensitivity of 96% in the triple therapy group. CONCLUSIONS: A single antral biopsy for histology provides excellent sensitivity for H pylori in untreated patients, but, after effective therapy, sensitivities of biopsy tests decrease. Use of more than one method of testing may increase diagnostic yield when assessing post-treatment H pylori status with endoscopy, whereas the addition of multiple biopsies for each type of test is of more limited value.

Esomeprazole-based Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy and the effect of antibiotic resistance: results of three US multicenter, double-blind trials.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the efficacy of once-daily esomeprazole plus antibiotics for eradication of Helicobacter pylori, to assess the effect of antibiotic resistance on eradication rate, and to define the rate of emergent resistance. METHODS: Three separate randomized trials were performed in H. pylori-positive patients with a duodenal ulcer or history of documented duodenal ulcer within 5 yrs: 1) esomeprazole (40 mg once daily), amoxicillin (1 g b.i.d.), and clarithromycin (500 mg b.i.d.; this combination will be referred to as EAC) versus esomeprazole (40 mg once daily) plus clarithromycin (500 mg twice daily; this combination will be referred to as EC); 2) EAC versus esomeprazole (40 mg once daily; E); and 3) EC versus E. Therapy was given for 10 days. Endoscopy and biopsies for CLOtest, histology, and culture with susceptibility testing were done at baseline and 4 wk after completion of therapy. RESULTS: Per-protocol and intent-to-treat eradication rates, respectively, were as follows. For EAC versus EC in study 1 (N = 448), 84 versus 55% and 77 versus 52% (p < 0.001); for EAC versus E in study 2 (N = 98), 85 versus 5% and 78 versus 4% (p < 0.001); for EC versus E in study 3 (N = 66), 50% versus 0 and 46% versus 0 (p < 0.05). The 15% of patients in the combined studies with baseline clarithromycin resistance had significantly lower rates of eradication than those with susceptible strains (EAC: 45 vs. 89%; EC: 13 vs. 61%). Emergent resistance was less common after treatment with EAC [2/6 (33%)] than with EC (23/27 [85%]). CONCLUSIONS: Ten-day triple therapy with once-daily esomeprazole plus twice-daily amoxicillin and clarithromycin achieves an eradication rate virtually identical to that of the twice-daily proton pump inhibitor-based triple therapies. Baseline clarithromycin resistance, present in 15% of patients, predicts a markedly decreased rate. Use of an amoxicillin-containing regimen may decrease emergence of clarithromycin resistance.

Twice-daily, 10-day triple therapy with omeprazole, amoxicillin, and clarithromycin for Helicobacter pylori eradication in duodenal ulcer disease: results of three multicenter, double-blind, United States trials.

OBJECTIVE: We assessed the safety and efficacy of 10-day twice-daily triple therapy for Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) in three double-blind, controlled trials in patients with duodenal ulcer disease. METHODS: H. pylori-infected patients with one or more duodenal ulcer(s) at endoscopy (studies 1, 2) or with a documented duodenal ulcer history and no duodenal ulcer or erosions at endoscopy (study 3) were randomly assigned to 10-day courses of omeprazole 20 mg b.i.d. plus amoxicillin 1 g b.i.d. plus clarithromycin 500 mg b.i.d. (OAC) or placebo plus amoxicillin 1 g b.i.d. plus clarithromycin 500 mg b.i.d. (AC). In studies 1 and 2, patients received an additional 18 days of omeprazole 20 mg q.d. (OAC group) or placebo (AC group). Endoscopy was repeated 4 wk after therapy in studies 1 and 2 and 4-6 wk after therapy in study 3. At baseline, H. pylori was diagnosed by CLOtest plus histology, or by culture. Eradication was defined as no positive biopsy test and two or more negative tests. Patients were defined as compliant if they took 75% or more of each study drug and missed < or = 3 consecutive days of the 10-day therapy. RESULTS: Intent-to-treat populations of the three studies combined were 241 patients for OAC and 266 for AC. Of all OAC patients combined, 2% stopped study medications due to adverse events, and 93% were compliant. Per-protocol cure rates were 78% to 90% (all studies combined, 84%) for OAC vs 33% to 45% (combined, 39%) for AC (p < 0.001, OAC vs AC); intent-to-treat eradication rates were 69% to 83% (combined, 75%) for OAC vs 32% to 37% (combined, 35%) for AC; (p < 0.001, OAC vs AC). CONCLUSION: Rigorously designed studies indicate that 10 days of twice-daily triple therapy with omeprazole, amoxicillin, and clarithromycin achieves per-protocol eradication rates of approximately 80% to 90% in the U.S.

Low rate of emergence of clarithromycin-resistant Helicobacter pylori with amoxycillin co-therapy.

BACKGROUND: Patients with persistent Helicobacter pylori infection following treatment with clarithromycin or omeprazole plus clarithromycin often develop clarithromycin resistance. AIM: To assess pre- and post-treatment antibiotic resistance in three double-blind trials of triple therapy with omeprazole, amoxycillin and clarithromycin. METHODS: Patients with H. pylori and duodenal ulcer (studies 1 and 2) or history of duodenal ulcer (study 3) were randomly assigned to 10 day courses of omeprazole 20 mg b.d., amoxycillin 1 g b.d. and clarithromycin 500 mg b.d. (OAC) or placebo, amoxycillin 1 g b.d. and clarithromycin 500 mg b.d. (AC). Endoscopy was performed at baseline and 4 weeks after completion of therapy in studies 1 and 2, and at 4-6 weeks after therapy in study 3. At baseline, H. pylori was diagnosed by CLO test with confirmation by histology, or by culture. Eradication was defined as no positive biopsy test and > or = 2 negative tests. Susceptibility testing was performed using the Etest. RESULTS: In the 91 patients with pre-treatment susceptible isolates who had persistent infection after AC, 10 developed resistance, eight had intermediate susceptibility and 73 continued to have clarithromycin-susceptible H. pylori isolates. In the 10 patients with pre-treatment susceptible isolates who had persistent infection after OAC, three developed clarithromycin resistance and seven still had susceptible isolates. CONCLUSIONS: Use of amoxycillin co-therapy results in a low rate of clarithromycin resistance developing in patients with persistent H. pylori infection following therapy with a clarithromycin-containing regimen.

Helicobacter pylori eradication as a surrogate marker for the reduction of duodenal ulcer recurrence.

OBJECTIVES: An abundance of data exists documenting the association of H. pylori eradication with the reduction in duodenal ulcer recurrence. AIM: To evaluate the validity of using H. pylori eradication as a surrogate marker for the reduction in duodenal ulcer recurrence using rigorously controlled studies. METHODS: Three controlled clinical trials were conducted in patients with uncomplicated, active duodenal ulcers. Patients were treated with various combinations of omeprazole and amoxycillin. Ulcer healing and H. pylori eradication were assessed. For patients whose duodenal ulcer healed, duodenal ulcer recurrence was determined over a 6-month period in patients with H. pylori eradication and those remaining positive for H. pylori at least 4 weeks after treatment. To support the data obtained from these clinical trials, a search of the medical literature was conducted to identify additional human clinical trials in which duodenal ulcer recurrence rates were measured and categorized by H. pylori status at least 1 month post-treatment. RESULTS: In 11 controlled trials, the overall 6-18-month duodenal ulcer recurrence rate was 54% among patients remaining positive for H. pylori at least 4 weeks after treatment compared to 6% among patients with H. pylori eradication following treatment. This finding was corroborated by the uncontrolled trials, in which the duodenal ulcer recurrence rate was 64% among patients found to be H. pylori-positive and 6% for patients found to be H. pylori-negative at least 4 weeks after treatment. A time course of duodenal ulcer recurrence rates using pooled data from both controlled and uncontrolled studies demonstrated that duodenal ulcer recurrence rates for H. pylori-negative patients persisted for up to 4 years following treatment. Duodenal ulcer recurrence rates for H. pylori-positive patients increased for the first year, then levelled off. A comparison of the duodenal ulcer recurrence rates for different treatment regimens revealed that eradication regimens based on omeprazole plus antibiotics and bismuth plus antibiotics exhibited similar duodenal ulcer recurrence rates for H. pylori-positive and -negative patients. CONCLUSION: Regardless of treatment regimens, H. pylori eradication produced a consistent and significant reduction in duodenal ulcer recurrence. Therefore H. pylori eradication, 4 weeks post-therapy, can be used as a surrogate marker for reduced duodenal ulcer recurrence in investigational clinical trials.

US double-blind, controlled trials of omeprazole and amoxycillin for treatment of Helicobacter pylori.

BACKGROUND: Widely variable Helicobacter pylori eradication rates have been reported with omeprazole/amoxycillin dual therapy. We present the first US double-blind, controlled trials of this dual therapy. METHODS: Three separate studies were performed: Studies 1 and 2 included patients with an active duodenal ulcer and Study 3 included patients with a documented history of duodenal ulcer. H. pylori eradication regimens in all studies were omeprazole plus amoxycillin vs. omeprazole vs. amoxycillin for 2 weeks. Doses in Study 1 were omeprazole 40 mg b.d. and amoxycillin 500 mg t.d.s., and in Studies 2 and 3 they were omeprazole 20 mg b.d. and amoxycillin 1 g t.d.s. Endoscopic biopsy tests were used for H. pylori diagnosis, and testing for H. pylori eradication was done at least 4 weeks after the completion of therapy. Amoxycillin sensitivities were performed in Study 2. RESULTS: Intention-to-treat (ITT) and per protocol (PP) analyses showed that eradication rates with omeprazole/amoxycillin [ITT: 39%, 40%, 46% (n = 72, 62, 48); PP: 50%, 46%, 54% (n = 54, 52, 37)] were significantly greater than monotherapy with either omeprazole (ITT: 0-4%); PP: 0-5%) or amoxycillin (ITT: 2-5%; PP: 0-11%). No patients taking the dual therapy discontinued therapy due to adverse events. Amoxycillin resistance was not seen at baseline (n = 76) or after amoxycillin therapy (n = 56). CONCLUSIONS: Omeprazole/amoxycillin dual therapy is well tolerated but the eradication rate which can be expected in the USA is at best about 50%.

Accuracy of CLOtest after Helicobacter pylori therapy.

BACKGROUND: The accuracy of rapid urease testing after Helicobacter pylori therapy has not been widely studied and might be diminished because of decreased numbers of organisms. We assessed CLOtest results after therapy in two randomized, double-blind trials. METHODS: A total of 233 patients (in two separate studies) with true-positive baseline CLOtests (by histology or culture) received 2 weeks of omeprazole/amoxicillin, omeprazole, or amoxicillin. In study 1, patients received an additional 2 weeks of omeprazole therapy (20 mg/day) or placebo; no additional therapy was given in study 2. Endoscopy was repeated 4 weeks after completion of therapy in both studies. A diagnosis of cure required at least two negative endoscopic biopsy tests (histology, culture, CLOtest) and no positive tests. RESULTS: After therapy, 178 patients (76%) remained positive for H. pylori by histology and/or culture for both studies combined. Post-therapy CLOtest sensitivity was 86% and specificity was 95%. Sensitivity was poorer in patients after dual therapy than after monotherapy in both study 1 (68% vs. 89%; p = 0.03) and study 2 (75% vs. 94%; p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: CLOtest sensitivity after therapy was lower than expected in our large group of patients with baseline true-positive CLOtests. In addition, sensitivity was lower after the use of more effective therapy (i.e., dual therapy as compared with monotherapy). Although most patients with unsuccessful treatment will be identified with the CLOtest alone, a negative result should not be taken as diagnostic of eradication.

Time of Helicobacter pylori eradication assessment following treatment.

BACKGROUND: The most appropriate time to assess accurately Helicobacter pylori eradication following treatment has been debated, with recommendations ranging from 1 to 3 months. The purpose of this study was to validate the assessment of H. pylori eradication 1 month following treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three randomized, double-blind, active-controlled clinical trials were conducted in patients with endoscopically verified, active duodenal ulcers and H. pylori infection. Patients were treated with various treatment regimens of omeprazole plus amoxicillin. Ulcer healing, H. pylori eradication, and ulcer relapse were examined. Patients underwent repeat endoscopy and biopsy at 1 and 6 months following treatment (or sooner if symptoms returned) to determine the recurrence of ulcers and H. pylori status. To determine the accuracy of measuring H. pylori eradication at 1 month posttreatment, we compared the H. pylori status at 1 month and 6 months following treatment. RESULTS: In a combination of treatment groups and studies, a total of 384 evaluable patients represented data at both time points and were included in the analysis. Of those eradicated at 1 month posttreatment, 94% (141 of 150) remained eradicated at 6 months posttreatment. The proportion of patients with H. pylori eradicated at 1 month posttreatment did not differ significantly from that at 6 months posttreatment for each study. The overall efficiency of the two tests (agreement between tests) was 93% (359 of 384). Agreement between the 1-month and 6-month posttreatment H. pylori assessment was apparent, regardless of the treatment used. CONCLUSION: H. pylori eradication measured 1 month following cessation of treatment accurately reflects successful treatment of the infection.

Comparison of single-dose ibuprofen lysine, acetylsalicylic acid, and placebo for moderate-to-severe postoperative dental pain.

In a single-dose, double-blind, parallel-group, single-site study, ibuprofen lysine 200 mg (IBL 200) was compared with acetylsalicylic acid 500 mg (ASA 500) and placebo in 183 patients with moderate-to-severe postoperative dental pain. The relative onset of analgesic response, duration and degree of analgesia, and safety were assessed over a 6-hour postdose period. Analgesic efficacy was assessed by patient self-rating of pain intensity, pain relief, time to meaningful pain relief, global evaluation, and requirement for additional analgesic medication; both IBL 200 and ASA 500 were significantly more effective than placebo. IBL 200 also had a significantly faster onset of action, greater peak and overall analgesic effect, and longer duration of analgesia than ASA 500. All treatments were generally well tolerated.