ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: This research compared the reliability and association of tissue dielectric constant (TDC) measures of knee edema to circumferential measurements of knee girth recorded as part of a physical therapy examination. METHODS: Twenty adults having observable unilateral knee edema were enrolled. A single examiner measured edematous knee swelling with a TDC device and a tape measure across two visits. The presence of edema was recorded as a positive number in reporting side-to-side differences and a positive percentage in documenting change over time. Intra-rater reliability of the measures was assessed with an intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC). Percent change in edema was evaluated independently for both methods using a paired t-test, and the association between measures was assessed by a Pearson's statistic. RESULTS: Both measures were reliable (ICC ≥ 0.81), and both detected a significant percentage decrease (p < 0.05) in edema across visits. The TDC measure changed by 8.3%, an amount nearly four times larger compared to knee girth (2.4%). The subsequent follow-up comparison revealed an inverse relationship (p = 0.049; r = -0.44) between the two percent change measurements of edema. CONCLUSION: The two methods capture different physical attributes of edema. The TDC records the water content of the tissue, while the use of a tape measure records circumferential limb girth. The TDC measurement was reliable and more responsive in detecting a percentage decrease in knee edema in comparison to a circumferential measure of knee girth. The TDC method may have wider use in directly measuring edema in other tissue structures and regions of the body.
