The advantages of UK Biobank's open-access strategy for health research.

Ready access to health research studies is becoming more important as researchers, and their funders, seek to maximize the opportunities for scientific innovation and health improvements. Large-scale population-based prospective studies are particularly useful for multidisciplinary research into the causes, treatment and prevention of many different diseases. UK Biobank has been established as an open-access resource for public health research, with the intention of making the data as widely available as possible in an equitable and transparent manner. Access to UK Biobank's unique breadth of phenotypic and genetic data has attracted researchers worldwide from across academia and industry. As a consequence, it has enabled scientists to perform world-leading collaborative research. Moreover, open access to an already deeply characterized cohort has encouraged both public and private sector investment in further enhancements to make UK Biobank an unparalleled resource for public health research and an exemplar for the development of open-access approaches for other studies.

Shared genetic aetiology between cognitive functions and physical and mental health in UK Biobank (N=112 151) and 24 GWAS consortia.

Causes of the well-documented association between low levels of cognitive functioning and many adverse neuropsychiatric outcomes, poorer physical health and earlier death remain unknown. We used linkage disequilibrium regression and polygenic profile scoring to test for shared genetic aetiology between cognitive functions and neuropsychiatric disorders and physical health. Using information provided by many published genome-wide association study consortia, we created polygenic profile scores for 24 vascular-metabolic, neuropsychiatric, physiological-anthropometric and cognitive traits in the participants of UK Biobank, a very large population-based sample (N=112 151). Pleiotropy between cognitive and health traits was quantified by deriving genetic correlations using summary genome-wide association study statistics and to the method of linkage disequilibrium score regression. Substantial and significant genetic correlations were observed between cognitive test scores in the UK Biobank sample and many of the mental and physical health-related traits and disorders assessed here. In addition, highly significant associations were observed between the cognitive test scores in the UK Biobank sample and many polygenic profile scores, including coronary artery disease, stroke, Alzheimer's disease, schizophrenia, autism, major depressive disorder, body mass index, intracranial volume, infant head circumference and childhood cognitive ability. Where disease diagnosis was available for UK Biobank participants, we were able to show that these results were not confounded by those who had the relevant disease. These findings indicate that a substantial level of pleiotropy exists between cognitive abilities and many human mental and physical health disorders and traits and that it can be used to predict phenotypic variance across samples.

Genetic associations with brain microbleeds: Systematic review and meta-analyses.

OBJECTIVE: We performed a systematic review and meta-analyses to assess the evidence for genetic associations with brain microbleeds (BMBs). METHODS: We sought all published studies of the association between any genetic polymorphism and BMBs studied in a total of >100 people. We critically appraised studies, and calculated pooled odds ratios (ORs) using the generic inverse variance fixed effects method. We used I² and χ² statistics to assess heterogeneity, and fail-safe N estimates to assess the robustness of our results. RESULTS: Only the APOE ε2/3/4 polymorphism had been studied in >100 people (10 studies, 7,351 participants). Compared with people with the ε3/ε3 genotype, carriers of the ε4 allele (ε4+) were statistically significantly more likely to have BMBs in any location (ε4+ vs ε3/ε3: pooled OR 1.22, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.05-1.41, p = 0.01). For strictly lobar BMBs, this association appeared slightly stronger (ε4+ vs ε3/ε3: pooled OR 1.35, 95% CI 1.10-1.66, p = 0.005). The association of ε4+ genotypes with strictly lobar BMBs was reasonably robust to potential publication and reporting biases. CONCLUSIONS: Given the known associations of APOE alleles with lobar intracerebral hemorrhage and cerebral amyloid angiopathy, these findings support the concept that strictly lobar BMBs may be an imaging biomarker of cerebral amyloid angiopathy.

Cerebral small vessel endothelial structural changes predate hypertension in stroke-prone spontaneously hypertensive rats: a blinded, controlled immunohistochemical study of 5- to 21-week-old rats.

AIMS: The spontaneously hypertensive stroke-prone rat (SHRSP) is a potential animal model of human lacunar stroke, but there is little information on SHRSP small vessel pathology, especially in young rats. We investigated the structural changes that occur in cortical and subcortical vessels and adjacent tissue in SHRSP before, during and after the onset of hypertension. METHODS: We examined brains from SHRSP and Wistar Kyoto rats (WKY) at 5, 16 and 21 weeks of age. Structural changes in small arterioles and adjacent tissue were studied using antibodies to investigate different components of the neurovascular unit. We quantified staining in three standard regions, at two coronal levels. RESULTS: Immunostaining for claudin-5, a marker of endothelial tight junctions, was reduced in SHRSP at all ages compared to age-matched WKY controls. Smooth muscle actin, glial fibrillary acidic protein and ionized calcium-binding adaptor molecule 1 were increased in SHRSP vs. WKY by 16 weeks. Additionally, 21-week-old WKY and SHRSP rats fed a high-salt diet showed differences in claudin-5, glial fibrillary acidic protein and matrix metalloproteinase 9 staining compared to those fed a normal diet. CONCLUSION: Endothelial tight junction alterations of SHRSP rats from the earliest ages point towards increased susceptibility to blood-brain barrier dysfunction and stroke, which is exacerbated by salt loading. Salt loading may also damage the neurovascular unit in WKY controls.

The Causative Classification of Stroke system: an international reliability and optimization study.

BACKGROUND: Valid and reliable ischemic stroke subtype determination is crucial for well-powered multicenter studies. The Causative Classification of Stroke System (CCS, available at http://ccs.mgh.harvard.edu) is a computerized, evidence-based algorithm that provides both causative and phenotypic stroke subtypes in a rule-based manner. We determined whether CCS demonstrates high interrater reliability in order to be useful for international multicenter studies. METHODS: Twenty members of the International Stroke Genetics Consortium from 13 centers in 8 countries, who were not involved in the design and development of the CCS, independently assessed the same 50 consecutive patients with acute ischemic stroke through reviews of abstracted case summaries. Agreement among ratings was measured by kappa statistic. RESULTS: The κ value for causative classification was 0.80 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.78-0.81) for the 5-subtype, 0.79 (95% CI 0.77-0.80) for the 8-subtype, and 0.70 (95% CI 0.69-0.71) for the 16-subtype CCS. Correction of a software-related factor that generated ambiguity improved agreement: κ = 0.81 (95% CI 0.79-0.82) for the 5-subtype, 0.79 (95% CI 0.77-0.80) for the 8-subtype, and 0.79 (95% CI 0.78-0.80) for the 16-subtype CCS. The κ value for phenotypic classification was 0.79 (95% CI 0.77-0.82) for supra-aortic large artery atherosclerosis, 0.95 (95% CI 0.93-0.98) for cardioembolism, 0.88 (95% CI 0.85-0.91) for small artery occlusion, and 0.79 (0.76-0.82) for other uncommon causes. CONCLUSIONS: CCS allows classification of stroke subtypes by multiple investigators with high reliability, supporting its potential for improving stroke classification in multicenter studies and ensuring accurate means of communication among different researchers, institutions, and eras.

Assessing the impact of the requirement for explicit consent in a hospital-based stroke study.

BACKGROUND: Increasing regulation of medical research, in particular the requirement for explicit consent, may reduce the quantity and quality of clinical epidemiological research. AIM: To assess the potential biases arising from the need for explicit consent in our hospital-based stroke research register. DESIGN: Comparison of patients enrolled into our stroke research register with those included in a concurrent clinical stroke audit that targeted the same population but did not require explicit consent. METHODS: We obtained the numbers of consenters, refusers and those from whom consent was not sought for various logistical reasons. We compared characteristics of participants (those eventually included in the research register) vs. non-participants. RESULTS: Of 1228 patients included in the stroke audit during an 18-month period, 1075 (88%) were also included in the research register, with higher participation among outpatients than inpatients. Only 1% of eligible patients refused involvement in any aspect of the research register. By far the largest number of non-participants was those from whom we could not seek consent for practical reasons. Comparison of baseline characteristics showed important differences between participants and non-participants that could affect outcome. CONCLUSION: Very few patients refused inclusion in our research register, but the need for explicit consent reduced participation and introduced bias. An opt-out system avoiding the need for explicit patient consent for minimally intrusive clinical epidemiological studies would minimize bias and reduce the considerable time and costs associated with the consent process.

VITATOPS, the VITAmins TO prevent stroke trial: rationale and design of a randomised trial of B-vitamin therapy in patients with recent transient ischaemic attack or stroke (NCT00097669) (ISRCTN74743444).

BACKGROUND: Epidemiological studies suggest that raised plasma concentrations of total homocysteine (tHcy) may be a common, causal and treatable risk factor for atherothromboembolic ischaemic stroke, dementia and depression. Although tHcy can be lowered effectively with small doses of folic acid, vitamin B(12) and vitamin B(6), it is not known whether lowering tHcy, by means of B vitamin therapy, can prevent stroke and other major atherothromboembolic vascular events. AIM: To determine whether the addition of B-vitamin supplements (folic acid 2 mg, B(6) 25 mg, B(12) 500 microg) to best medical and surgical management will reduce the combined incidence of stroke, myocardial infarction (MI) and vascular death in patients with recent stroke or transient ischaemic attack (TIA) of the brain or eye. DESIGN: A prospective, international, multicentre, randomised, double blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial. SETTING: One hundred and four medical centres in 20 countries on five continents. SUBJECTS: Eight thousand (6600 recruited as of 5 January, 2006) patients with recent (<7 months) stroke (ischaemic or haemorrhagic) or TIA (brain or eye). RANDOMISATION: Randomisation and data collection are performed by means of a central telephone service or secure internet site. INTERVENTION: One tablet daily of either placebo or B vitamins (folic acid 2 mg, B(6) 25 mg, B(12) 500 mug). PRIMARY OUTCOME: The composite of stroke, MI or death from any vascular cause, whichever occurs first. Outcome and serious adverse events are adjudicated blinded to treatment allocation. SECONDARY OUTCOMES: TIA, unstable angina, revascularisation procedures, dementia, depression. STATISTICAL POWER: With 8000 patients followed up for a median of 2 years and an annual incidence of the primary outcome of 8% among patients assigned placebo, the study will have at least 80% power to detect a relative reduction of 15% in the incidence of the primary outcome among patients assigned B vitamins (to 6.8%/year), applying a two-tailed level of significance of 5%. CONCLUSION: VITATOPS aims to recruit and follow-up 8000 patients between 1998 and 2008, and provide a reliable estimate of the safety and effectiveness of folic acid, vitamin B(12), and vitamin B(6) supplementation in reducing recurrent serious vascular events among a wide range of patients with TIA and stroke throughout the world.

Effects of apolipoprotein E genotype on outcome after ischaemic stroke, intracerebral haemorrhage and subarachnoid haemorrhage.

BACKGROUND: Rodent models of acute ischaemic stroke and head injury suggest that apolipoprotein E (APOE) genotype influences neuronal repair, regeneration and survival after brain injury. Possession of an APOE epsilon4 allele is associated with poor outcome after head injury in clinical studies. APOE might therefore influence outcome after acute stroke in humans. OBJECTIVE AND METHODS: To comprehensively search, identify, assess and carry out meta-analyses of studies reporting on the association between APOE and the combined outcome of death or dependency, or death alone, several months after ischaemic stroke, intracerebral haemorrhage (ICH) or subarachnoid haemorrhage (SAH). RESULTS: Main analyses included data from nine studies on 2262 patients (1453 with ischaemic stroke, 199 with ICH and 610 with SAH). Overall, epsilon4+ genotypes were not significantly associated with risk of death or dependency several months after stroke. However, there was significant heterogeneity between studies, and between the three pathological types of stroke. Epsilon4+ genotypes were associated with increased death or dependency after SAH (relative risk (RR) 1.40, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.06 to 1.84), with a trend towards a similar association with ICH (RR 1.38, 95% CI 0.99 to 1.92), but not with ischaemic stroke (RR 0.98, 95% CI 0.85 to 1.12). Results were similar for death alone. CONCLUSIONS: APOE may differentially affect outcome after the three main pathological types of stroke. Further, large studies are needed to confirm or refute these findings, and to assess the possibility of an interaction between the effects of APOE and age.

Is hypertension a more frequent risk factor for deep than for lobar supratentorial intracerebral haemorrhage?

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether evidence from observational studies supports the widely held belief that hypertension is more commonly a risk factor for deep than for lobar supratentorial intracerebral haemorrhage. METHODS: Studies comparing the frequency of hypertension as a risk factor for deep versus lobar supratentorial intracerebral haemorrhage, excluding haemorrhages with identified secondary causes, were identified and subjected to a meta-analysis. The effects of predefined methodological quality criteria on the results were assessed and other sources of bias were considered. RESULTS: The pooled result from all 28 included studies (about 4000 patients) found hypertension to be about twice as common in patients with deep as in those with lobar haemorrhage (odds ratio (OR) 2.10, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.82 to 2.42), but there was significant heterogeneity between studies. The pooled OR was less extreme for studies that used a pre-stroke definition of hypertension, were population based or included first-ever strokes only. In the three studies meeting all criteria (601 patients), deep haemorrhage was associated with a smaller, statistically significant excess of hypertension (OR 1.50, 95% CI 1.09 to 2.07). The OR for studies confined to younger patients seemed to be more extreme (12.32, 95% CI 6.13 to 24.77), but none of these studies fulfilled our methodological quality criteria. Additional, unquantified sources of bias included uncertainty about whether those doctors reporting brain scans were blind to hypertension status, uncertain reliability of the classification of haemorrhage location and variable rates of investigation for secondary causes. CONCLUSIONS: An excess of hypertension was found in patients with deep versus lobar intracerebral haemorrhages without an identified secondary cause, but this may be due to residual, unquantified methodological biases.

Clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of clopidogrel and modified-release dipyridamole in the secondary prevention of occlusive vascular events: a systematic review and economic evaluation.

OBJECTIVES: To examine the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of two alternative antiplatelet agents, clopidogrel and modified-release (MR)-dipyridamole, relative to prophylactic doses of aspirin for the secondary prevention of occlusive vascular events. DATA SOURCES: Electronic databases. REVIEW METHODS: A total of 2906 titles and abstracts were rigorously screened and 441 studies were assessed in detail. Two RCTs were identified. For the assessment of cost-effectiveness, eight reviews were identified. The results were presented in structured tables and as a narrative summary. No additional clinical effectiveness data were presented in either of two company submissions. All economic evaluations (including accompanying models) included in the company submissions were assessed. Following this analysis, if the existing models (company or published) were not sufficient, a de novo model or modified versions of the models were developed. RESULTS: In the CAPRIE trial the point estimate for the primary outcome, i.e. ischaemic stroke, myocardial infarction (MI) or vascular death, favoured clopidogrel over aspirin, but the boundaries of the confidence intervals raise the possibility that clopidogrel is not more beneficial than aspirin. In terms of the secondary outcomes reported, there was a non-significant trend in favour of clopidogrel over aspirin but the boundaries of the confidence intervals on the relative risks all crossed unity. There was no difference in the number of patients ever reporting any bleeding disorder in the clopidogrel group compared with the aspirin group. The incidences of rash and diarrhoea were statistically significantly higher in the clopidogrel group than the aspirin group. Patients in the aspirin group had a higher incidence of indigestion/nausea/vomiting than patients in the clopidogrel group. Haematological adverse events were rare in both the clopidogrel and aspirin groups. No cases of thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura were reported in either group. Treatment with MR-dipyridamole alone did not significantly reduce the risk of any of the primary outcomes reported in ESPS-2 compared with treatment with aspirin. ASA-MR-dipyridamole was significantly more effective than aspirin alone in patients with stroke or transient ischaemic attacks (TIAs) at reducing the outcome of stroke and marginally more effective at reducing stroke and/or death. Treatment with ASA-MR-dipyridamole did not statistically significantly reduce the risk of death compared to treatment with aspirin. The number of strokes was statistically significantly reduced in the ASA-MR-dipyridamole group compared with the MR-dipyridamole group. In terms of the other primary outcomes, stroke and/or death and death, the results favoured treatment with ASA-MR-dipyridamole but the findings were not statistically significant. There was no difference in the number of bleeding complications between the ASA-MR-dipyridamole and aspirin groups. The incidence of bleeding complications was significantly lower in the MR-dipyridamole treatment group. More patients in the MR-dipyridamole treatment groups experienced headaches compared to patients receiving treatment with aspirin alone. The York model assessed the cost-effectiveness of differing combinations of treatment strategies in four patient subgroups, under a number of different scenarios. The results of the model were sensitive to the assumptions made in the alternative scenarios, in particular the impact of therapy on non-vascular deaths. CONCLUSIONS: Clopidogrel was marginally more effective than aspirin at reducing the risk of ischaemic stroke, MI or vascular death in patients with atherosclerotic vascular disease, however, it did not statistically significantly reduce the risk of vascular death or death from any cause compared with aspirin. There was no statistically significant difference in the number of bleeding complications experienced in the clopidogrel and aspirin groups. MR-dipyridamole in combination with aspirin was superior to aspirin alone at reducing the risk of stroke and marginally more effective at reducing the risk of stroke and/or death. Compared with treatment with MR-dipyridamole alone, MR-dipyridamole in combination with aspirin significantly reduced the risk of stroke. Treatment with MR-dipyridamole in combination with aspirin did not statistically significantly reduce the risk of death compared with aspirin. Compared with treatment with MR-dipyridamole alone, bleeding complications were statistically significantly higher in patients treated with aspirin and MR-dipyridamole in combination with aspirin. Due to the assumptions that have to be made, no conclusions could be drawn about the relative effectiveness of MR-dipyridamole, alone or in combination with aspirin, and clopidogrel from the adjusted indirect comparison. The following would apply for a cost of up to GBP20,000-40,000 per additional quality-adjusted life-year. For the stroke and TIA subgroups, ASA-MR-dipyridamole would be the most cost-effective therapy given a 2-year treatment duration as long as all patients were not left disabled by their initial (qualifying) stroke. For a lifetime treatment duration, ASA-MR-dipyridamole would be considered more cost-effective than aspirin as long as treatment effects on non-vascular deaths are not considered and all patients were not left disabled by their initial stroke. In patients left disabled by their initial stroke, aspirin is the most cost-effective therapy. Clopidogrel and MR-dipyridamole alone would not be considered cost-effective under any scenario. For the MI and peripheral arterial disease subgroups, clopidogrel would be considered cost-effective for a treatment duration of 2 years. For a lifetime treatment duration, clopidogrel would be considered more cost-effective than aspirin as long as treatment effects on non-vascular deaths are not considered. It is suggested that the combination of clopidogrel and aspirin should be evaluated for the secondary prevention of occlusive vascular events. Also randomised, direct comparisons of clopidogrel and MR-dipyridamole in combination with aspirin are required to inform the treatment of patients with a history of stroke and TIA, plus trials that compare treatment with clopidogrel and MR-dipyridamole for the secondary prevention of vascular events in patients who demonstrate a genuine intolerance to aspirin.

Clopidogrel used in combination with aspirin compared with aspirin alone in the treatment of non-ST-segment-elevation acute coronary syndromes: a systematic review and economic evaluation.

OBJECTIVES: To review systematically the clinical effectiveness and the cost-effectiveness of clopidogrel used in combination with standard therapy including aspirin, compared with standard therapy alone for the treatment of non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes (ACS). DATA SOURCES: Electronic databases. Manufacturers' submissions. REVIEW METHODS: Studies were selected using rigorous criteria. The quality of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) was assessed according to criteria based on NHS CRD Report No. 4, and the quality of systematic reviews was assessed according to the guidelines for the Database of Reviews of Effect (DARE) criteria. The quality of economic evaluations was assessed according to a specifically tailored checklist. The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of clopidogrel in combination with standard therapy compared with standard therapy alone were synthesised through a narrative review with full tabulation of the results of the included studies. In the economic evaluations, a cost-effectiveness model was constructed using the best available evidence to determine cost-effectiveness in a UK setting. RESULTS: One RCT (the CURE trial) was a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of high quality and showed that clopidogrel in addition to aspirin was significantly more effective than placebo plus aspirin in patients with non-ST-segment elevation ACS for the composite outcome of death from cardiovascular causes, non-fatal myocardial infarction or stroke over the 9-month treatment period. However, clopidogrel was associated with a significantly higher number of episodes of both major and minor bleeding. The results from the five systematic reviews that assessed the adverse events associated with long-term aspirin use showed that aspirin was associated with a significantly higher incidence of haemorrhagic stroke, extracranial haemorrhage and gastrointestinal haemorrhage compared with placebo. Of the cost-effectiveness evidence reviewed, only the manufacturer's submission was considered relevant from the perspective of the NHS. The review of this evidence highlighted potential limitations within the submission in its use of data and in the model structure used. These limitations led to the development of a new model with the aim of providing a more reliable estimate of the cost-effectiveness from the perspective of the UK NHS. This model indicated that clopidogrel appears cost-effective compared with standard care alone in patients with non-ST-elevation ACS as long as the NHS is willing to pay GBP6078 per quality of life year (QALY). The results were most sensitive to the inclusion of additional strategies that assessed alternative treatment durations with clopidogrel. Although treatment with clopidogrel for 12 months remained cost-effective for the overall cohort, provisional findings indicate that the shorter treatment durations may be more cost-effective in patients at low risk. CONCLUSIONS: The results of the CURE trial indicate that clopidogrel in combination with aspirin was significantly more effective than placebo combined with aspirin in a wide range of patients with ACS. This benefit was largely related to a reduction in Q-wave myocardial infarction. There was no statistically significant benefit in relation to mortality. The trial data suggested that a substantial part of the benefit derived from clopidogrel is achieved by 3 months, with a further small benefit over the remaining 9 months of chronic treatment. The results from the base-case model suggest that treatment with clopidogrel as an adjunct to standard therapy (including aspirin) for 12 months, compared with standard therapy alone, is cost-effective in non-ST elevation ACS patients as long as the health service is willing to pay GBP6078 per additional QALY. However, although treatment with clopidogrel for 12 months remained cost-effective for the overall cohort, provisional findings indicate that the shorter treatment durations may be more cost-effective in patients at low risk. To estimate the exact length of time that clopidogrel in addition to standard therapy should be prescribed for patients with non-ST-segment ACS would require a prospective trial that randomised patients to various durations of therapy. This would accurately assess whether a 'rebound' phenomenon occurs in patients if clopidogrel were stopped after 3 months of treatment.

Posture and fluids for preventing post-dural puncture headache.

BACKGROUND: Potentially disabling postural headache occurs after dural puncture in 1-70% of patients. It has been suggested that such headaches may be less common if patients routinely have a period of bed rest or receive supplementary fluids after the procedure. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effects on post dural puncture headache of a period of bed rest versus early mobilisation, of different positions during a period of bed rest, and of administering supplementary fluids after the procedure. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register (Cochrane Library, Issue 4, 2000), MEDLINE (January 1994-December 1998), and EMBASE (January 1980-December 1998). We also searched the reference lists of articles identified electronically, and contacted trial authors for information about other potentially relevant studies. Date of the most recent search: December 2000. SELECTION CRITERIA: We sought randomised, unconfounded trials, among all types of patients, that compared the effects on post-dural puncture headache of: bed rest versus early mobilisation; head-down tilt versus horizontal or prone versus supine positions during bed rest; or the administration of supplementary fluids versus control. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: One reviewer extracted data from the reports of all trials considered eligible for inclusion. The authors of included studies were invited to check the information extracted and provide any details that were unavailable in the published reports. Intention-to-treat analyses were performed. MAIN RESULTS: Eleven trials among 1723 patients compared either bed rest with immediate mobilisation or a longer versus a shorter period of bed rest. There was a non-significant relative increase in the odds of the primary outcome of postural headache among patients allocated more rather than less bed rest (196/639 [31%] bed rest versus 169/615 [27%] early mobilisation; odds ratio [OR] 1.21; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.94 to 1.55). Analyses confined to the methodologically most rigorous trials gave similar results. Only two trials among 126 patients compared different positions during bed rest. No statistically significant differences were found, but small numbers made the comparisons imprecise. One trial among 100 patients assessed fluid supplementation. Again, the numbers of patients and outcome events were small, and indicated the possibility of both reduced and increased postural headache with additional fluids. REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: There is no good evidence from randomised trials to suggest that routine bed rest after dural puncture is beneficial. The role of fluid supplementation in the prevention of post-dural puncture headache remains uncertain.

Epidural blood patching for preventing and treating post-dural puncture headache.

BACKGROUND: Dural puncture is a common procedure, but leakage of CSF from the resulting dural defect may cause postural headache after the procedure, and this can be disabling. Injecting an epidural blood patch around the site of the defect may stop this leakage, and so may have a role in preventing or treating post dural puncture headache. OBJECTIVES: To assess the possible benefits and harms of epidural blood patching in both the prevention and the treatment of post-dural puncture headache. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register (Cochrane Library, Issue 4, 2000), MEDLINE (January 1994 to December 1998), and EMBASE (January 1980 to December 1998). We also searched the reference lists of relevant articles identified electronically, and asked both the authors of all included trials and colleagues with an interest in this area to let us know of any other potentially relevant studies not already identified. Date of last search: December 2000. SELECTION CRITERIA: We sought all properly randomised, unconfounded trials that compared epidural blood patch versus no epidural blood patch in the prevention or treatment of post-dural puncture headache among all types of patients undergoing dural puncture for any reason. The primary outcome of effectiveness was postural headache. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: One reviewer extracted details of trial methodology and outcome data from the reports of all trials considered eligible for inclusion. We invited the authors of all such trials both to check the information extracted and to provide any details that were unavailable in the published reports. Intention-to-treat analyses were performed using the Peto O-E method. Information about adverse effects (post-dural puncture backache, epidural infection and lower limb paraesthesia) was also extracted. MAIN RESULTS: Three trials (77 patients) were eligible for inclusion. Methodological details were generally incomplete. Although the results of our analyses suggested that both prophylactic and therapeutic epidural blood patching may be of benefit, the very small numbers of patients and outcome events, as well as uncertainties about trial methodology, precluded reliable assessments of the potential benefits and harms of this intervention. REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: Further, adequately powered, randomised trials (including at least a few hundred patients) are required before reliable conclusions can be drawn about the role of epidural blood patching in the prevention and treatment of post-dural puncture headache.

Thienopyridines or aspirin to prevent stroke and other serious vascular events in patients at high risk of vascular disease? A systematic review of the evidence from randomized trials.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Aspirin is the most widely studied and prescribed antiplatelet drug for patients at high risk of vascular disease. We aimed to establish how the thienopyridines (ticlopidine and clopidogrel) compare with aspirin in terms of effectiveness and safety. METHODS: We did a systematic review of all unconfounded randomized trials comparing either ticlopidine or clopidogrel with aspirin for patients at high risk of vascular disease. The primary outcome was vascular events (stroke, myocardial infarction, or vascular death). Adverse outcomes were intracranial and extracranial hemorrhage, upper and lower gastrointestinal disturbances, neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and skin rash. RESULTS: In 4 trials among 22 656 patients (including 9840 presenting with a transient ischemic attack/ischemic stroke), the thienopyridines reduced the odds of a vascular event by 9% (odds ratio 0.91, 95% CI 0.84 to 0. 98; 2P=0.01), preventing 11 (95% CI 2 to 19) events per 1000 patients treated for approximately 2 years. The thienopyridines produced significantly less gastrointestinal hemorrhage and upper gastrointestinal upset (indigestion/nausea/vomiting) than did aspirin. Both thienopyridines increased the odds of skin rash and of diarrhea (ticlopidine by approximately 2-fold and clopidogrel by approximately one third). Only ticlopidine increased the odds of neutropenia. CONCLUSIONS: The thienopyridines appear modestly more effective than aspirin in preventing serious vascular events in high-risk patients. Clopidogrel appears to be safer than ticlopidine and as safe as aspirin, making it an appropriate, but more expensive, alternative antiplatelet drug for patients unable to tolerate aspirin. However, there is insufficient information to determine which particular types of patients would benefit most, and which least, from clopidogrel instead of aspirin.

Thienopyridine derivatives (ticlopidine, clopidogrel) versus aspirin for preventing stroke and other serious vascular events in high vascular risk patients.

BACKGROUND: The most widely studied and prescribed antiplatelet agent for the prevention of stroke and other serious vascular events among high vascular risk patients is aspirin. Aspirin inhibits platelet activation by inhibiting platelet cyclooxygenase and thromboxane production, and reduces the odds of a serious vascular event by about a quarter. The thienopyridines (ticlopidine and clopidogrel) inhibit platelet activation by a different mechanism to aspirin (blocking the ADP receptor on platelets), and so may be more effective than aspirin. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this review was to determine the effectiveness and safety of thienopyridine derivatives (ticlopidine and clopidogrel) versus aspirin for the prevention of serious vascular events (stroke, myocardial infarction (MI) or vascular death) in patients at high risk of such events, and specifically in patients with a previous TIA or ischaemic stroke. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Stroke Group trials register (most recent search: March 1999) and the Antithrombotic Trialists' database, and also contacted Sanofi pharmaceutical company. SELECTION CRITERIA: All unconfounded, double blind, randomised trials directly comparing ticlopidine or clopidogrel with aspirin in high vascular risk patients. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two reviewers independently extracted data and assessed trial quality. Additional data were sought from the principal investigators of the largest trial. MAIN RESULTS: Four trials involving a total of 22,656 high vascular risk patients were included. The trials were of high quality and comparable. Aspirin was compared with ticlopidine in three trials (3471 patients) and with clopidogrel in one trial (19,185 patients). Allocation to a thienopyridine was associated with a modest, yet statistically significant, reduction in the odds of a serious vascular event (12. 0% vs 13.0%; OR: 0.91, 95% CI: 0.84 to 0.98; 2p = 0.01), corresponding to the avoidance of 11 (95% CI: 2 to 19) serious vascular events per 1000 patients treated for about two years. There was also a reduction in stroke (5.7% vs 6.4%; OR: 0.88, 95% CI: 0.79 to 0.98; 7 [95% CI: 1 to 13] strokes avoided per 1000 patients treated for two years). Compared with aspirin, thienopyridines produced a significant reduction in the odds of gastrointestinal haemorrhage and other upper gastrointestinal upset, but a significant increase in the odds of skin rash and of diarrhoea. However, the increased odds of skin rash and diarrhoea were greater for ticlopidine than for clopidogrel. Allocation to ticlopidine, but not clopidogrel, was associated with a significant increase in the odds of neutropenia (2.3% vs 0.8%; OR: 2.7, 95% CI: 1.5 to 4.8). In the subset of patients with TIA/ischaemic stroke, the results were similar to those for all patients combined. However, since these patients are at particularly high risk of stroke, allocation to a thienopyridine was associated with a larger absolute reduction in stroke (10.4% vs 12.0%; OR: 0.86, 95% CI: 0.75 to 0.97; 16 [95% CI: 3 to 28] strokes avoided per 1000 patients treated for two years). REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: The available randomised evidence shows that the thienopyridine derivatives are modestly but significantly more effective than aspirin in preventing serious vascular events in patients at high risk (and specifically in TIA/ischaemic stroke patients), but there is uncertainty about the size of the additional benefit. The thienopyridines are also associated with less gastrointestinal haemorrhage and other upper gastrointestinal upset than aspirin, but an excess of skin rash and diarrhoea. The risk of skin rash and diarrhoea is greater with ticlopidine than with clopidogrel. Ticlopidine, but not clopidogrel, is associated with an excess of neutropenia and of thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura.