Preoperative difficulty assessment of interval laparoscopic cholecystectomy for gallstones.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is the gold standard treatment for benign gallbladder disease. However, few studies have reported the difficulty of interval cholecystectomy after cholecystitis because early cholecystectomy is recommended for acute cholecystitis. In this study, we evaluated the difficulties associated with interval cholecystectomy for cholecystitis with gallstones. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed patients with gallstones who underwent interval laparoscopic cholecystectomy for cholecystitis at our institution between January 2012 and December 2021. Patients were classified into laparoscopic total cholecystectomy and bailout procedure groups depending on whether they were converted to a bailout procedure, and their characteristics and outcomes were subsequently compared. Additionally, a logistic regression analysis of the preoperative factors contributing to bailout procedure conversion was performed. RESULTS: Of the 269 participants, 39 converted to bailout procedure, and bile duct injury occurred in one case (0.4%). In patient characteristics comparison, patients in the bailout procedure group were significantly older, had more impacted stones, had higher post-treatment choledocholithiasis, had severe cholecystitis, and had a higher rate of percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage. There were no differences in the bile duct injury or perioperative complications between the two groups. In logistic regression multivariate analysis of the factors contributing to the bailout procedure, post-treatment of choledocholithiasis (P < .001), impacted stone (P = .002), and age ≥71 (P = .007) were independent risk factors. CONCLUSION: Impacted stones and choledocholithiasis are risk factors for conversion to bailout procedure and high difficulty in interval cholecystectomy. For such patients, interval cholecystectomy should be performed cautiously.

Recurrent Primary Abdominal Wall Abscess: A Case Report and Review of the Literature.

Primary abdominal wall abscess is extremely rare and difficult to diagnose because abdominal wall abscesses usually occur secondary to malignant tumors or inflammatory diseases. We experienced a case of an 80-year-old man with an asynchronous primary abdominal wall abscess with recurrence. Both abscesses were successfully treated with surgical drainage. A patient without any history of cancer or trauma presented to our department with right upper abdominal pain. His laboratory data showed an abnormal high inflammatory response, and computed tomography revealed a 40 × 30 mm mass formed in the rectus abdominis muscle of the upper right abdomen. The mass had no continuity with the surgical scar after cholecystectomy or intra-abdominal organs. Citrobacter diversus was detected in the culture from the mass and any epithelial components were not detected by biopsy. For the diagnosis of primary abdominal wall abscess, the patient underwent surgical drainage because antibiotic treatment was ineffective. The abscess disappeared promptly after the drainage. Thirteen months after the first treatment, another primary abdominal wall abscess was noted in the lower right abdomen. The abscess also promptly disappeared with surgical drainage. Primary abdominal wall abscess is difficult to diagnose because of its rarity. Prompt diagnosis and drainage are important to prevent exacerbation.

Usefulness of Preoperative Predictors of Pathological Complicated Appendicitis.

INTRODUCTION: Complicated appendicitis (CA) is often indicated for emergency surgery; however, preoperative predictors of pathological CA (pCA) remain unclear. Furthermore, characteristics of CA that can be treated conservatively have not yet been established. METHODS: 305 consecutive patients diagnosed with acute appendicitis were reviewed. The patients were divided into two groups: an emergency surgery and a conservative treatment group. The emergency surgery group was pathologically classified as having uncomplicated appendicitis (pUA) and pCA, and the preoperative predictors of pCA were retrospectively assessed. Based on the preoperative pCA predictors, a predictive nomogram whether conservative treatment would be successful or not was created. The predictors were applied to the conservative treatment group, and the outcomes were investigated. RESULTS: In the multiple logistic regression analysis of the factors contributing to pCA, C-reactive protein ≥3.5 mg/dL, ascites, appendiceal wall defect, and periappendiceal fluid collection were independent risk factors. Over 90% of cases without any of the above four preoperative pCA predictors were pUA. The accuracy of the nomogram was 0.938. CONCLUSION: Our preoperative predictors and nomogram are useful to aid in distinguishing pCA and pUA and to predict whether or not conservative treatment will be successful. Some CA can be treated with conservative treatment.

Therapeutic strategy for acute appendicitis based on laparoscopic surgery.

PURPOSE: The treatment strategies for acute appendicitis differ depending on the facility, and various studies have investigated the usefulness of conservative treatment with antibiotics, laparoscopic surgery, and interval appendectomy (IA). However, although laparoscopic surgery is widely used, the clinical strategy for acute appendicitis, especially complicated cases, remains controversial. We assessed a laparoscopic surgery-based treatment strategy for all patients diagnosed with appendicitis, including those with complicated appendicitis (CA). METHODS: We retrospectively analysed patients with acute appendicitis treated in our institution between January 2013 and December 2021. Patients were classified into uncomplicated appendicitis (UA) and CA groups based on computed tomography (CT) findings on the first visit, and the treatment course was subsequently compared. RESULTS: Of 305 participants, 218 were diagnosed with UA and 87 with CA, with surgery performed in 159 cases. Laparoscopic surgery was attempted in 153 cases and had a completion rate of 94.8% (145/153). All open laparotomy transition cases (n = 8) were emergency CA surgery cases. No significant differences were found in the incidence of postoperative complications in successful emergency laparoscopic surgeries. In univariate and multivariate analyses for the conversion to open laparotomy in CA, only the number of days from onset to surgery ≥ 6 days was an independent risk factor (odds ratio: 11.80; P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic surgery is preferred in all appendicitis cases, including CA. Since laparoscopic surgery is difficult for CA when several days from the onset have passed, it is necessary that surgeons make an early decision on whether to operate.

Transmission Risk of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 before and after Symptom Onset of the Infector.

An outbreak of coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) occurred in Ueda City, Nagano prefecture, Japan, which has a population of 150,000. The residents were a population naïve to COVID-19, and many of them had only one chance of exposure, in which careful epidemiological investigation could reveal attack rates among close contact on the specific date of exposure. We identified 89 cases and 328 close contacts. Among the close contacts, 114 had only one chance of exposure to the 20 index cases. During the follow-up period, 17 close contacts tested positive for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), overall attack rate of 15%, after the exposure to 6 infectors. The median number of close contacts for the 6 infectors was 5.5 (range 2-14). Attack rates among these close contacts were 13% (1/8), 20% (2/5), 33% (2/6), 50% (1/2), 64% (4/9 and 5/5), and 100% (2/2), respectively. The transmission risk of SARS-CoV-2 appears to peak one day before symptom onset, and is at similar levels two days before (16%) and on the day (20%) of symptom onset. A multidisciplinary approach is needed to control the COVID-19 outbreak, in addition to investigation, which began after case identification.

Bleeding Meckel diverticulum associated with a vitellointestinal artery aneurysm found on preoperative angiography: report of a case.

An 18-year-old man was admitted to a local hospital with abdominal pain and bloody stool. Upper and lower gastrointestinal endoscopy failed to show any bleeding sites; however, an angiography of the superior mesenteric artery done on hospital day 4 showed an abnormal artery with an aneurysm, branching from the ileal artery. This artery was thought to be the vitellointestinal artery, a feeding artery of Meckel diverticulum. After embolization, he was transferred to our hospital, where we performed emergency laparotomy with partial resection of the ileum, including a bleeding Meckel diverticulum. Pathological examination revealed ectopic gastric mucosa and peptic ulceration, which we assumed was the origin of the bleeding. The patient had an uneventful postoperative course. Visceral artery aneurysms are rare but important vascular lesions because of their potential for fatal rupture. Although a minimally invasive procedure can be performed for a vitellointestinal artery aneurysm in patients with asymptomatic Meckel diverticulum, we treated our patient surgically because he presented with hemorrhagic shock and had been unresponsive to an H(2)-receptor antagonist.