Multidisciplinary team approach on tracheoesophageal fistula in a patient with home ventilator.

A 68-year-old man was transferred to our tertiary hospital. Ten years ago, he received radiation therapy for tonsil cancer, and while there was no evidence of recurrence, he suffered from recurrent aspiration. We treated his aspiration pneumonia in the intensive care unit. Prior to his discharge, he received percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy (PDT) before he was transferred to a nursing hospital. Nine months later, he was readmitted owing to tracheoesophageal fistula (TEF). However, he was considered unsuitable for conservative intervention after a multidisciplinary team discussion. Esophageal stent insertion was impossible due to the high level of TEF in the esophagus. Additionally, the size of the TEF could not be covered by an endosponge and endoluminal vacuum therapy, and there was no tracheal stent that could cover his large trachea. The preceding percutaneous enteral gastrostomy (PEG) procedure was required for the primary closure operation of the esophagus; however, family's consent could not be obtained. After 1month, the patient and his family changed their minds and agreed to the procedure and we attempted to perform PEG procedure. However, we could not proceed with PEG owing to stenosis in the inlet of the esophagus. Then, the patient deteriorated clinically and died due to pneumonia with septic shock.

Intraoperative methods for wrapping anastomoses after airway reconstruction: a case series.

Background: Anastomosis management is the main challenge of airway resection and reconstruction, and postoperative anastomotic complications, including ischemia, stenosis, dehiscence, and separation may lead to severe outcomes and a poor prognosis. The anastomotic buttress is vital in airway reconstruction, but the selection of surgical buttress and reinforcement remains controversial. We aimed to demonstrate and evaluate the buttress options of anastomosis, including their preoperative characteristics, the intraoperative process, and the incidence of postoperative complications to help address the controversy regarding anastomosis management. Methods: This retrospective study was conducted at a single institution. Patients who underwent airway reconstruction with anastomotic wrapping from Jan. 2019 to Sep. 2021 were enrolled in this study and preoperative characteristics and operational features were collected. All patients were carefully followed up by telephone and outpatient. Their postoperative complications and postoperative status after 6 months were recorded. The surgical procedures and clinical characteristics of the buttress options of anastomosis were assessed. Results: A total of 62 patients undergoing either cervical tracheal, thoracic tracheal, carinal, or secondary carinal and main bronchus resection and reconstruction were evaluated. The anastomotic buttress used included mediastinal pleural flap (24/62, 38.7%), anterior cervical muscle (14/62, 22.6%), sternocleidomastoid (2/62, 3.2%), thymus flap (12/62, 19.4%), intercostal muscle flap (2/62, 3.2%), biological patch (2/62, 3.2%), prepericardial fat (1/62, 1.6%), thyroid gland (1/62, 1.6%), pectoralis major flap (2/62, 3.2%), and omental flap (2/62, 3.2%). All procedures produced satisfactory results without short-term anastomotic complications. A follow-up for 6 months was conducted and all patients were alive postoperatively. Tracheomalacia stenosis postoperatively occurred in 3 patients and they were subsequently treated with an endotracheal stent. One patient had tumor recurrence 3 months after surgery and received adjuvant chemotherapy. Conclusions: Various anastomotic wrapping materials are used in airway reconstruction. Different utilizations of buttress are selected according to the anatomic characteristics and the reconstruction method used. This study indicated that appropriate surgical buttresses for wrapping anastomoses are legitimate alternatives to reduce the risk of anastomotic complications.

The procedure and effectiveness of release maneuvers in tracheobronchial resection and reconstruction.

Background: Surgical resection and reconstruction are effective and radical treatments for tracheal tumors. Tension-free, well-perfused anastomosis plays a crucial role in postoperative prognosis. The use of various release maneuvers may be required to minimize anastomotic tension. However, the detailed procedures and effectiveness of them are seldomly reported. In the current study, we demonstrated the procedures and advantages of various release maneuvers during tracheal resection and reconstruction. Methods: All patients who underwent tracheobronchial resection and reconstruction between January 2019 to December 2021 were included in the study. The patients underwent tracheal release maneuvers, including laryngeal suprahyoid, pericardial, hilar, and inferior pulmonary ligament releasing. The patients' clinical features, surgical procedures, complications and postoperative outcomes were also described. Results: A total of 67 patients received release maneuvers during tracheobronchial surgery. Males accounted for a greater proportion (46/67, 65.7%) of the cohort. The mean age was 44.4 years. Most lesions were located in the thoracic and cervical trachea (21/67 and 17/67, respectively), and 18 cases of carinal (9/67) and bronchial (9/67) lesions were also included. Inferior pulmonary ligament releasing was applied to most noncervical lesion patients (39/67). Two cases of thyroid carcinoma with tracheal invasion received laryngeal suprahyoid release maneuvers. Adenoid cystic carcinoma (26.9%) and squamous cell carcinoma (14.9%) were the most commonly seen malignancies. Postoperative bronchoscopy showed no anastomotic abnormalities, including ischemic change, necrosis, or dehiscence. The median postoperative hospital stay was 7 days, ranging from 4 to 38 days. In the current study, a patient with postoperative aspiration had the longest hospital stay. In addition, 3 cases of anastomotic stenosis and laryngeal edema were observed. No other maneuver-related complications or particular discomforts were reported during the 6-month follow-up. Conclusions: Anastomosis is the key to successful tracheobronchial resection and reconstruction. Release maneuvers are recommended to facilitate tension-free anastomosis. In addition to simple neck flexion and paratracheal dissection, laryngeal, hilar, and pericardial releasing allow longer trachea to be resected and preservation of well-vascularized anastomosis. The release maneuvers showed acceptable effect and reliable safety without significant morbidity or mortality.

Real-World Perspectives From Surgeons and Oncologists on Resectability Definition and Multidisciplinary Team Discussion of Stage III NSCLC in People's Republic of China, Hong Kong, and Macau: A Physician Survey.

Introduction: Decision-making in diagnosis and management of stage III NSCLC remains complex owing to disease heterogeneity and diverse treatment options, and often warrants multidisciplinary team discussion. Specifically, the selection of patients for multimodality approaches involving surgical resection presents notable challenges owing to heterogeneity in guideline definitions and the subjective, case-specific nature of evaluating resectability on the basis of preoperative assessments. Methods: An internet- and paper-based survey was conducted in 2020 among lung cancer specialists in the People's Republic of China, Hong Kong, and Macau. This survey captured perspectives on stage III NSCLC on real-world diagnosis/staging practice, definition and evaluation of resectability using case scenarios, and preferred treatment paradigms. Results: A total of 60 completed responses were obtained (60.0% surgeons; 40.0% oncologists). The surgeons' and oncologists' responses differed most in the assessment of resectability in specific case scenarios despite overall agreement on top factors determining resectability (T stage, lymph node size, and lymph node location). Of the 17 scenarios, specialists agreed (≥80%) on four "resectable" and six "unresectable" scenarios; of the seven scenarios with less than 80% agreement, surgeons and oncologists had diverging responses for six scenarios. Multidisciplinary team discussions were available in most of the respondents' institutions but usually covered only selected (<50%) stage III cases. Conclusions: This survey used a comprehensive set of stage III NSCLC case scenarios to understand how working definitions of resectability may differ between surgeons and oncologists, and thus, identify types of cases to prioritize for multidisciplinary discussions to maximize limited resources. In parallel, the development of a multidisciplinary expert consensus on treatment approaches could complement local institutional expertise as a reference for decision-making.

A novel lung autotransplantation technique for treating central lung cancer: a case report.

Lung autotransplantation is an alternative technique in treating central non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) for patients who are not suitable to undergo pneumonectomy. We hereby report a novel lung autotransplantation technique for treating central lung cancer. Two cases of central NSCLC involving right main bronchus underwent right basal segment and right lower lobe autotransplantation after resection. The inferior pulmonary vein of graft was anastomosed to superior pulmonary venous stump in both cases to reduce the bronchial and pulmonary arterial gap created after extensive resection. One case had anastomosis of basal segment artery to the right upper lobe anterior segment artery stump while the other case had pulmonary artery angioplasty only without segmental arterial resection. Both procedures were performed in situ without graft perfusion. The airway reconstructions were completed using parachute principle via end-to-side anastomosis of graft bronchus and lateral wall of trachea instead of end-to-end anastomosis with main bronchial stump. Both patients received ICU care postoperatively for 4 days. Chest tubes were successfully removed within 7 days. They were discharged within 11 days postoperatively. No major complication, such as severe infection, anastomotic dehiscence, anastomotic stenosis, atelectasis, or pulmonary embolism was observed. There was no evidence of recurrence at 9-month follow-up.

Optimal Lymph Node Examination and Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Stage I Lung Cancer.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the optimal number of lymph nodes (LNs) examined and the role of adjuvant chemotherapy in stage I lung cancer. METHODS: The National Cancer Database was queried for surgically treated patients with pathologic stage I lung cancer between 2006 and 2014 (N = 65,438). The optimal LN numbers were determined in the multivariate Cox model and were further validated in the cohort with clinical stage I disease (N = 117,112) in terms of nodal upstaging and prognostic stratification. The role of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with suboptimal staging (number of LNs examined was less than than the optimum) was evaluated in each T stage. RESULTS: The number of LNs examined correlated with tumor size (p < 0.001). There were increasing survival benefits with each additional LN examined-up to eight, nine, 10, and 11 nodes for patients with T1a, T1b, T1c, and T2a, respectively. Validation from the cohort with clinically staged disease showed that the threshold of eight to 11 LNs was an independent predictor of nodal upstaging (OR = 1.706, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.608-1.779) and survival outcome (hazard ratio = 0.890, 95% CI: 0.865-0.916). After propensity matching, adjuvant chemotherapy was associated with improved survival in patients with stage T2a disease having suboptimal staging (hazard ratio = 0.841, 95% CI: 0.714-0.990), but not in patients with stage T1a to T1c disease. CONCLUSION: LN evaluation was important for accurate staging and adequate treatment, and examinations of an increasing number of nodes for progressively higher T components (i.e., eight, nine, 10, and 11 nodes for T1a, T1b, T1c, and T2a tumors, respectively) seemed crucial to predict upstaging and survival outcomes. Adjuvant chemotherapy might be beneficial to patients with stage T2a disease who have suboptimal nodal staging.

Congenital H-type tracheoesophageal fistula in adults.

Congenital tracheoesophageal fistulas (TEFs) in the adults are uncommonly reported but they are serious conditions that can cause severe morbidities and mortality. Three cases were identified in the last 16 years. The diagnosis was not easy but they were all successfully surgically repaired with good results. A detailed history and meticulous examination of the radiological studies will help diagnose this condition. Surgical repair should be performed once diagnosed.

Prognosis and staging of superficial endobronchial lung cancer: the impact of invasion depth, tumor diameter, and coexistent pneumonitis or atelectasis.

BACKGROUND: There are few reports discussing the surgical pathological characteristics of superficial endobronchial lung cancer (SELC) defined as cancer growth limited to the bronchial wall. Its prognosis and corresponding TNM staging have not been fully clarified. Little is known as to whether T status is impacted by the existence of associated atelectasis or pneumonia (which might be controversial, indicating either T1 or T2), and circumstantial invasion depth. METHODS: Between 1988 and 2007, 81 out of 8817 surgically treated patients met SELC criteria; there was no detectable invasion beyond the bronchial wall. A retrospective review was performed and follow-up information was collected. RESULTS: The overall five-year survival rate of 81 patients was 85.6%; for N0M0 (n = 67), N1M0 (n = 7) and N2M0 (n = 7) patients, they were 89.3%, 75.0% and 60.0%, respectively. Intraluminal tumor size measured from 0.4 to 3.0 cm; obstructive atelectasis or pneumonia was noted in 14 patients. The presence of tumor-associated obstructive atelectasis or pneumonia did not have a significant impact upon prognosis (P = 0.96), nor did the greatest diameter of the tumor (P = 0.70). Histology showed carcinoma in situ (level one) in 13 cases; invasion of the submucosal layer (level two) in 12, involvement of the muscular layer (level three) in 20, invasion into the space between the muscular layer and cartilage (level four) in 21, and bronchial cartilage infiltration in 15 (level five). In cases without lymphnode metastases, five-year survival was 100% for the first three levels and 84.0% and 61.3% for the level four and level five. CONCLUSIONS: Relative to TNM-based prognostic data, superficial endobronchial lung cancer exhibits increased five-year survival rates, and therefore should be placed at the forefront among tumors in the T1 class, regardless of tumor size or the presence of secondary obstructive atelectasis or pneumonia. Lymphnode metastasis is associated with a worse prognosis. Survival is negatively impacted by tumor infiltration depth into the bronchial wall.

A lethal complication of propofol.

High-dose propofol infusion for sedation of patients in the intensive care unit can result in rhabdomyolysis, acute renal failure, metabolic acidosis, hyperkalemia, ventricular arrhythmia, hyperthermia, and death. The death of a patient with such complications after lung biopsy is reported. Until a safer dosage range has been determined, propofol infusion at rates higher than 5 mg x kg(-1) x h(-1) should be discouraged for long-term sedation (> 48 h).

Special article: physiologic consequences of pneumonectomy. Consequences on the esophageal function. 1999.

Pneumonectomy is associated with gross anatomic and physiologic changes of the esophagus. So far, only a few studies have examined the influences of anatomic changes of the esophagus and the resulting physiologic consequences. When pneumonectomy is performed without pulmonary replacement, the esophagus is displaced to the side of pneumonectomy and posteriorly. Indentation of the esophagus by the trachea, bronchus, or aortic arch and dilatation at various levels are present. After pneumonectomy, the peak amplitude of esophageal peristaltic contractions is reduced. This feature is more pronounced in patients who are more than 60 years old and in patients who had their pneumonectomy performed more than 6 years ago. Injury of the vagal nerves, local ischemia, scarring of the esophagus and mediastinum after surgery, and disturbance of the autonomic nervous systems are the major reasons leading to esophageal dysmotility and delayed gastric emptying. Despite the severe morphologic and physiologic changes of the esophagus observed after pneumonectomy, few patients complain of gastrointestinal symptoms after pneumonectomy. Esophageal functional abnormalities may be present in patients with lung cancers before pneumonectomy because of a close anatomic relationship between the esophageal vagal nerve supply and the pulmonary hilum, making the vagal nerves susceptible to disturbances by the tumors or by involved hilar or mediastinal lymph nodes. After pneumonectomy, esophageal dysmotility is exaggerated. After recipient pneumonectomy for thoracic organ transplantation, esophageal dysmotility and delayed gastric emptying are common, but their relationship to gastroesophageal reflux, chronic aspiration, or subsequent development of bronchiectasis and obliterative bronchiolitis is controversial. To reduce the incidence of esophageal dysmotility after pneumonectomy, every effort should be made during surgery to prevent direct injury of the esophagus or the vagal nerves. A prospective study involving a larger patient population is needed to precisely define the problem and its management.