Long Term outcomes of percutaneous atrial fibrillation ablation in patients with continuous monitoring.

INTRODUCTION: There is limited data using continuous monitoring to assess outcomes of atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. This study assessed long-term outcomes of AF ablation in patients with implantable cardiac devices. METHODS: 207 patients (mean age 68.1 ± 9.5, 50.3% men) undergoing ablation for symptomatic AF were followed up for a mean period of 924.5 ± 636.7 days. Techniques included The Pulmonary Vein Ablation Catheter (PVAC) (59.4%), cryoablation (17.4%), point by point (14.0%) and The Novel Irrigated Multipolar Radiofrequency Ablation Catheter (nMARQ) (9.2%). RESULTS: 130 (62.8%) patients had paroxysmal AF (PAF) and 77 (37.2%) persistent AF. First ablation and repeat ablation reduced AF burden significantly (relative risk 0.91, [95% CI 0.89 to 0.94]; P <0.0001 and 0.90, [95% CI, 0.86-0.94]; P <0.0001). Median AF burden in PAF patients reduced from 1.05% (interquartile range [IQR], 0.1%-8.70%) to 0.10% ([IQR], 0%-2.28%) at one year and this was maintained out to four-years. Persistent AF burden reduced from 99.9% ([IQR], 51.53%-100%) to 0.30% ([IQR], 0%-77.25%) at one year increasing to 87.3% ([IQR], 4.25%-100%) after four years. If a second ablation was required, point-by-point ablation achieved greater reduction in AF burden (relative risk, 0.77 [95% CI, 0.65-0.91]; P <0.01). CONCLUSION: Ablation reduces AF burden both acutely and in the long-term. If a second ablation was required the point-by-point technique achieved greater reductions in AF burden than "single-shot" technologies. Persistent AF burden increased to near pre ablation levels by year 4 suggesting a different mechanism from PAF patients where this increase did not occur.

Lessons of the month 3: ST-elevation myocardial infarction and left ventricular thrombus formation: an arterial thrombotic complication of severe COVID-19 infection.

We describe a case of an 82-year-old man who developed an anterior ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and left ventricular thrombus while an inpatient following a diagnosis of severe COVID-19 infection (SARS-CoV-2). His D-dimer was significantly elevated at 12,525 ng/mL (normal range <243). He unfortunately died despite management with thrombolysis, warfarin and non-invasive ventilation. This case provides an example of a likely arterial thrombotic complication of severe COVID-19 infection. Clinicians should be aware of this possibility in such patients, with a severely prothrombotic state as a possible underlying aetiology. Further research is required to establish any causative link, pathophysiological mechanisms and whether modification to existing venous thromboembolism prophylaxis strategies may also reduce arterial thrombotic complications of severe COVID-19 infection.

An economic evaluation of an advanced video conferencing system for cardiac multidisciplinary team meetings.

INTRODUCTION: Current UK and international guidelines advocate the need for multidisciplinary team (MDT) discussion of selected patients undergoing either percutaneous or surgical cardiac procedures to decide the optimal treatment strategy. To date, it is unknown if using videoconference facilities is cost-effective. Therefore, we performed a cost analysis of using a high-speed internet video conferencing system compared with conventional face-to-face MDT meetings. METHODS: Costs of running a conventional MDT meeting vs a video conferencing MDT were modelled and compared over a 2-year period. Participants were also surveyed on the overall effectiveness of conducting remote MDTs. RESULTS: The set-up and maintenance cost of the video conferencing system over 2 years was £30 400. The staff costs of running the face-to-face MDT were £95 970 and the video conferencing MDT was £23 992.50. The total travel costs of the conventional face-to-face MDTs were £10 555.34. In total, the cost of the conventional face-to-face MDT was £106 525.34 and the video conferencing MDT was £54 392.50 representing a cost saving of 48.9%. Participants rated the effectiveness of conducing a remote MDT and the ease of technology use as very good. CONCLUSIONS: Video conferencing systems provide a highly cost-effective method of facilitating MDT meetings between cardiologists and cardiac surgeons at remote centres.

A double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, cross-over study assessing the use of XEN-D0103 in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation and implanted pacemakers allowing continuous beat-to-beat monitoring of drug efficacy.

PURPOSE: The ultrarapid delayed rectifier current (IKur) carried by Kv1.5 channels, which are solely expressed in the atrium, is a potential target for safer treatment of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF). XEN-D0103 is a nanomolar ion channel blocker that selectively inhibits potassium ion flux through the Kv1.5 ion channel. The efficacy of XEN-D0103 in reducing AF burden was assessed in patients with DDDRp permanent pacemakers (PPMs) and PAF. METHODS: A double-blind, placebo-controlled, cross-over study was performed in patients with PAF and DDDRp PPMs with advanced atrial and ventricular Holters allowing beat-to-beat arrhythmia follow-up. All anti-arrhythmic drugs were withdrawn before randomised treatment. After baseline assessment, patients were randomly assigned to two treatment periods of placebo then XEN-D0103 50 mg bd, or XEN-D0103 50 mg bd then placebo. RESULTS: Fifty-four patients were screened and 21 patients were eligible and included in the randomised trial. All 21 patients completed both treatment periods. The primary endpoint was change in AF burden assessed by PPM. There was no significant difference in AF burden on treatment with XEN-D0103 versus placebo. There was a reduction in the mean frequency of AF episodes (relative reduction 0.72, 95% CI 0.66 to 0.77; p < 0.0001). XEN-D0103 was safe and well tolerated, and there were no serious adverse events. XEN-D0103 did not have any apparent effect on heart rate compared to placebo. CONCLUSIONS: XEN-D0103 did not reduce AF burden in patients with PAF and dual chamber pacemakers providing beat-to-beat monitoring. XEN-D0103 was well tolerated and did not have any apparent effect on heart rate. Although single-ion channel blockade with XEN-D0103 did not affect AF in this study, there might be a potential for this agent to be used in combination with other atrially specific drugs in the treatment of AF. EUDRACT TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: 2013-004456-38.

Results of the first investigator-initiated randomized clinical trial of nMARQTM, PVACTM, and thoracoscopic ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.

Aims: To investigate the effect of minimally invasive thoracoscopic surgical ablation and nMARQ irrigated multi-electrode phased radiofrequency (RF) ablation to treat paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) compared with PVAC multi-electrode phased RF ablation, with beat-to-beat device-derived Holter monitoring throughout the study duration. Methods and results: An investigator-initiated prospective trial of patients with paroxysmal AF randomized (1:1:1) to initial surgical, nMARQ or PVAC ablation. All patients had continuous beat-to-beat monitoring with an ILR or pacemaker to evaluate and document AF recurrence. There was a strong trend (P = 0.050) toward difference in AF outcome, with surgical AF ablation more efficacious than catheter ablation. At one year, the proportion of patients with less than 1% AF burden after one procedure and off all antiarrhythmic drugs was 63, 56, and 90% for PVAC, nMARQ and surgical ablations respectively. There were significantly more repeat ablations in the catheter ablation groups (P = 0.008): 25% PVAC, 27% nMARQ, 0% surgery. However, 7 of 20 (35%) of patients undergoing surgical ablation suffered a procedural complication, including two sternotomies for bleeding and one death. This was higher than for catheter ablation (P < 0.001). Surgical ablation took longer to perform (P < 0.001) and had a longer hospital admission (P < 0.001) than catheter ablation. Conclusion: Surgical AF ablation required significantly fewer repeat procedures than catheter ablation, and there was a clear trend towards improved arrhythmia outcome. However, it was associated with a significantly higher rate of procedural complications. Surgical ablation for paroxysmal AF is promising, however more prospective outcome data is required. Clinical Trial Registration: NCT01504451, http://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT01504451.

Hyperacute And Chronic Changes In Cerebral Magnetic Resonance Images After Pvac, nmarq And Epicardial Thoracoscopic Surgical Ablation For Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation.

Threshold testing of cardiac rhythm devices is essential to monitoring the proper functioning of such devices (1). However, the currently method of applying multiple ECG leads to the patient is burdensome and time consuming (2). We are presenting a completely new way to perform cardiac rhythm device threshold testing using pulse oximetry. Twenty patients, with varying cardiac rhythm devices and pacing modes, were enrolled and had their atrial and ventricular thresholds tested. A comparison was made between simultaneous threshold determinations via the standard EGM based method and the new pulse oximetry based method. 75% of the ventricular threshold tested and 58% of the atrial thresholds tested were the same with the two testing methods. The remainder of the tests (25% of ventricular threshold and 42% of the atrial threshold tests) varied by +0.25 V. This study shows that pulse oximetry based testing is an accurate, reliable, and easy way to perform cardiac rhythm device threshold testing and may complement traditional methods to perform such tests in the future.

The benefit of a remotely monitored implantable loop recorder as a first line investigation in unexplained syncope: the EaSyAS II trial.

AIMS: This prospective randomized controlled study evaluated the first-line use of a novel remotely monitored implantable loop recorder (ILR) in the initial investigation of unexplained syncope, and compared this to conventional therapy and a dedicated Syncope Clinic (SC). METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 246 patients (mean age 70.3 years) were randomly allocated to conventional management, SC alone, ILR alone, or SC + ILR. Median follow-up was 20 months (IQR 15-25 months). Time to electrocardiogram (ECG) diagnosis was significantly shorter with ILR alone vs. conventional [hazard ratio (HR) 35.5, P = 0.0004] and with SC vs. conventional (HR 25.6, P = 0.002). Seventy-four per cent of first syncopal events documented in the SC groups occurred during provocative tilt testing. Twenty-two per cent of patients who received an ILR were found to have a bradycardia indication for permanent pacing, compared with 3% of patients who did not. Overall, more investigative tests were undertaken in the conventional group than in any other. Only patients who received an ILR had a significant increase in time to second syncope (P = 0.02), suggesting successful diagnosis and management of treatable causes of syncope. CONCLUSIONS: Implantable loop recorder monitoring achieved a more rapid diagnosis in unexplained syncope than usual care. Conventional management of syncope failed to achieve an ECG diagnosis despite a large number of investigative tests. Syncope Clinic and provocative tilt testing delivered a rapid ECG diagnosis, but did not prevent recurrent syncope. Implantable loop recorders offered rapid diagnosis, increased the likelihood of syncope being reported, demonstrated a high rate of intermittent bradycardia requiring pacing, and reduced recurrent syncope.

Are implantable cardiac monitors the 'gold standard' for atrial fibrillation detection? A prospective randomized trial comparing atrial fibrillation monitoring using implantable cardiac monitors and DDDRP permanent pacemakers in post atrial fibrillation ablation patients.

AIMS: Implantable devices are widely accepted, but not proven, to be the most reliable monitoring method to assess atrial fibrillation (AF) therapies. We compared REVEAL(®)XT implantable cardiac monitors (ICMs) and permanent pacemakers (PPMs). METHODS AND RESULTS: Fifty patients with paroxysmal AF were randomized to ICM or PPM implant 6 weeks prior to pulmonary vein isolation. Permanent pacemakers were programmed to monitoring only (ODO). Device downloads were performed at 0, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months. All patients underwent 7-day external loop recorder. Device ECGs and EGMs were compared for AF burden. A total of 20 744 and 11 238 arrhythmia episodes were identified in the ICM and PPM groups, respectively. Correct identification of AF was significantly better in the PPM group (97 vs. 55% P < 0.001). In the ICM group, 26% of ECGs were un-interpretable. Sensitivity and specificity for each episode of AF was significantly better in the PPM group (100 vs. 79% and 98 vs. 66%, respectively, P < 0.001). The positive predictive value for the detection of any AF was significantly better in the PPM than the ICM (100 vs. 58%, P = 0.03). The negative predictive value for the absence of all AF was not significantly different between the PPM and ICM (100% vs. 92%, P = 0.76). CONCLUSION: Permanent pacemakers Holters are the most accurate method of evaluating arrhythmia burden and the therapeutic efficacy of novel AF therapies. ICM has a high degree of artefact, which reduces its specifity and sensitivity. Despite the deficiencies of ICM monitoring the negative predictive value of the ICM is satisfactory if zero AF burden is the aim of therapy.

The development of AF over time in patients with permanent pacemakers: objective assessment with pacemaker diagnostics demonstrates distinct patterns of AF.

AIMS: To describe the long-term patterns of atrial fibrillation (AF) in patients with permanent pacemakers. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 2092 pacemaker Holter downloads were analysed in 323 patients with dual chamber permanent pacemakers, describing a cumulative 1031 patient-years of beat-to-beat monitoring. Four subtypes of AF were applied: (i) non-progressive low-burden PAF (NPLB-PAF, n = 120): such patients never have >1% AF burden throughout follow-up; (ii) chronic progressive PAF (CP-PAF, n = 55): AF burden increases but is never 100%; (iii) relapsing-remitting PAF (RR-PAF, n = 78): AF burden has reduced at least once by more than 2% and is never 100%; (iv) persistent AF (PersAF, n = 70): 100% AF burden for at least 28 days. Overall, mean AF burden rose 0.34% per year (P < 0.0001). After accounting for age, heart failure (HF) had a significant interaction with AF burden (P = 0.0022), but HATCH score and CVA/TIA did not. There were no differences in the frequency or duration of monitoring between the four AF subtypes. Atrial fibrillation episode frequency discriminated between subtypes (P = 0.0004). Eighteen of 70 (26%) patients with PersAF had pacemaker documented episodes of sinus rhythm (i.e. reversion to 'paroxysmal AF') after the onset of PersAF. CONCLUSION: In this cohort, the development of AF over time appears more complex than current definitions suggest. Atrial fibrillation can remain low burden without progression, remit-relapse, or progress as is described in currently accepted definitions. More frequent episodes of AF indicated a favourable subtype. Persistent AF is not inevitable, and can revert to paroxysmal AF. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT02016950, http://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT02016950.

The effect of C-reactive protein reduction with a highly specific antisense oligonucleotide on atrial fibrillation assessed using beat-to-beat pacemaker Holter follow-up.

PURPOSE: C-reactive protein (CRP) is known to be strongly associated with atrial fibrillation (AF). However, it is not clear if CRP is a causal factor for AF. ISIS-CRPRx is a novel antisense oligonucleotide that reduces CRP production by specifically inhibiting mRNA translation. The effect of ISIS-CRPRx on AF was evaluated. METHODS: A double-blind phase II trial of ISIS-CRPRx in patients with paroxysmal AF and DDDRP permanent pacemakers (PPMs) with advanced atrial and ventricular Holters allowing beat-to-beat arrhythmia follow-up. RESULTS: Twenty six patients were screened and seven patients dosed with ISIS-CRPRx. After 4 weeks of baseline assessment, patients were randomly assigned to two treatment periods of either placebo then ISIS-CRPRx or ISIS-CRPRx then placebo. All patients were followed up for 8 weeks after the active treatment period. There was a 63.7 % (95 % CI 38.4 to 78.6 %, p = 0.003) relative reduction in CRP on treatment with ISIS-CRPRx versus baseline. Sensitivity analyses demonstrated a consistent treatment effect. The primary end-point was change in AF burden assessed by PPM. There was no significant difference in AF burden on treatment with ISIS-CRPRx versus baseline (OR 1.6, 95 % CI -2.42 to 5.62, p = 0.37). ISIS CRPRx was safe and well tolerated and there were no serious adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with ISIS-CRPRx did not reduce AF burden in patients with paroxysmal AF and PPMs, despite a large relative reduction in CRP. In this population, highly specific CRP reduction had no clinically discernable effect upon paroxysmal AF. However, average levels of CRP at baseline were relatively low, so it remains possible that AF patients with higher levels of CRP may benefit from CRP-directed therapy.