Mannitol versus furosemide in patients with thoracic malignancies who received cisplatin-based chemotherapy using short hydration: A randomized phase II trial.

BACKGROUND: Mannitol is exclusively recommended in the National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines for diuresis in cisplatin (CDDP)-based chemotherapy. The utility of furosemide, a widely used and convenient diuretic, thus requires clarification. METHODS: This is a prospective, single-centered, open-label, noninferiority phase II study. Patients with thoracic malignancies who planned to receive CDDP-based chemotherapy were randomly assigned to receive either mannitol (arm A) or furosemide (arm B). The primary end point was set as the proportion of patients who experienced any grade of "creatinine (Cr) increased" based on the upper limit of the normal range (ULN) during the first cycle as assessed by Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version 4.0. Secondary end points were Cr increased based on the baseline value during the first cycle, Cr increased after the completion of CDDP, and the proportion of patients with phlebitis. RESULTS: Between April 2018 and March 2022, 115 patients were enrolled and 106 were analyzed. Any grade of Cr increased based on the ULN during the first cycle was 17.3% (arm A) and 24.1% (arm B), respectively (p = 0.34). Therefore, the primary end point was not met. After completion of chemotherapy, any grade of Cr increased was observed in 23.1% (arm A) and 31.5% (arm B), respectively. However, the actual serum Cr level and Cr clearance during the courses were not different between the arms. Phlebitis occurred more frequently in arm A (28.8%) than arm B (16.7%). CONCLUSIONS: Mannitol should remain the standard diuresis in CDDP-based chemotherapy assessed by conventional CTCAE grading, but furosemide can be room for consideration when assessed by actual serum Cr level and Cr clearance.

A Phase II Study of High-Flow Nasal Cannula for Relieving Dyspnea in Advanced Cancer Patients.

CONTEXT: The efficacy and tolerability of high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) for relieving dyspnea in advanced cancer patients with limited prognosis requires elucidation. OBJECTIVES: The primary aim of this trial was to assess the efficacy and tolerability of HFNC regarding dyspnea including severe as well as moderate for longer durations in patients under palliative care. METHODS: In this prospective study, hospitalized patients with advanced cancer who had dyspnea at rest (numeric rating scale, NRS≥3) and hypoxemia were enrolled. They were treated with HFNC for five days in the respiratory unit. Primary endpoint was mean change of modified Borg scale at 24 hours. Key secondary endpoints consisted of mean changes in modified Borg scale during the study period and feasibility (Trial Identifier, UMIN000035738). RESULTS: Between February 2019 and February 2022, 25 patients were enrolled and 21 were analyzed. Twenty patients used inspired oxygen and the mean fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) was 0.34 (range, 0.21-1.0). At baseline, mean NRS (dyspnea) was 5.9 (range, 3-10). Median survival time was 19 days (range, 3-657). The mean change of modified Borg scale was 1.4 (80% confidence interval [CI]: 0.8-1.9) at 24 hours, 12 patients (57%) showed 1.0 points improvement of modified Borg scale. Within two hours, 15 patients showed 1.0 points improvement of modified Borg scale and such early responders were likely to maintain dyspnea improvement for 24 hours. Nineteen patients could continue HFNC for 24 hours and 11 patients completed five days of HFNC. CONCLUSION: To our knowledge, this trial is the first prospective study to assess the five-day efficacy and tolerability of HFNC for dyspnea in patients under palliative care. Although this did not reach the prespecified endpoint, about half of the patients showed 1.0 point improvement, a minimally clinically important difference (MCID) in the chronic lung disease. HFNC can be a palliative treatment option in advanced cancer patients with dyspnea.

Adjacent angle size correlates with diagnostic sensitivity of endobronchial ultrasonography with a guide sheath.

Background: An association exists among the diagnostic yield of transbronchial biopsy using endobronchial ultrasonography with a guide sheath (EBUS-GS-TBB) and several factors, such as simple within or adjacent endobronchial ultrasonography (EBUS) findings. Here, we aimed to investigate whether more detailed EBUS findings affect the diagnostic yield of lung cancer in EBUS-GS-TBB. Methods: We conducted this retrospective single-center cohort study, enrolling consecutive patients with lung cancer who underwent EBUS-GS-TBB. The primary outcome was examination of predictive factors affecting the diagnostic yield of lung cancer using EBUS-GS-TBB. The secondary outcome was a subgroup analysis of within and adjacent lesions. The adjacent angle was defined as the angle formed by the midpoint of the probe and the two points where the edge of the probe and shadow of the tumor intersected. Results: Of the 179 lesions investigated, 140 (78.2%) were diagnosed using EBUS-GS-TBB. The diagnostic yields of within and adjacent lesions were 91.6% and 51.7%, respectively. In the multivariable analysis, within lesions had significantly higher diagnostic yields than did the adjacent lesions (P<0.001). The adjacent angle was larger in lesions diagnosed using EBUS-GS-TBB than in undiagnosed lesions (P=0.003). In adjacent lesions, the diagnostic yields were 75.0% and 36.1% for lesions ≥180° and <180°, respectively. Conclusions: In adjacent lesions, the diagnostic yields differed significantly depending on the adjacent angle. Even if EBUS findings are adjacent, the operator should identify the branch of the bronchus with a greater adjacent angle. Future studies should investigate improvements in diagnostic yields via additional procedures for lesions with small adjacent angles.

Prospective multicenter cohort study of durvalumab for patients with unresectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer and grade 1 radiation pneumonitis.

OBJECTIVE: Durvalumab was safe and effective in patients with unresectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) after concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) in a phase 3 trial (PACIFIC trial). Although a history of radiation pneumonitis (RP) has been reported to increase the risk of exacerbation of pneumonitis associated with programmed death-1 axis inhibitors, the detailed clinical results of durvalumab treatment in patients with baseline grade 1 RP were not reported in the PACIFIC trial. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of durvalumab therapy in these patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a multicenter prospective cohort study involving 35 patients. Patients were eligible if they met the following criteria: inoperable stage III NSCLC, administration of durvalumab within 42 days after CCRT using platinum-based chemotherapy, no disease progression after CCRT, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-1, and presence of grade 1 RP at baseline. We assessed the effectiveness and safety of durvalumab with a minimum 1-year follow-up period for all patients. RESULTS: Thirty-five patients were enrolled in our study from February 2019 to December 2019. The median progression-free survival was 11.4 months (95 % confidence interval, 7.1 months-not reached), and the median overall survival was not reached. Eleven (31 %) patients had grade ≥2 pneumonitis/RP, 10 (28 %) developed grade 2 pneumonitis/RP, and 1 (3 %) developed grade 5 pneumonitis/RP. Five (14 %) patients experienced treatment-related grade ≥3 adverse events. CONCLUSION: Durvalumab might be safe and effective in patients with stage III NSCLC with baseline grade 1 RP following chemoradiotherapy.

Impact of pre-existing interstitial lung abnormal shadow on lung injury development and severity in patients of non-small cell lung cancer treated with osimertinib.

BACKGROUND: First-generation epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) sometimes causes lung injury, thereby affecting survival. Although pre-existing interstitial lung abnormal shadow (pre-ILS) increases the risk of lung injury by EGFR-TKIs, its impact on osimertinib, a third-generation EGFR-TKI, remains unknown. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This retrospective cohort study consecutively enrolled patients of EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer treated with osimertinib. Computed tomography images were obtained and evaluated independently by three pulmonologists in a blinded manner. Factors associated with lung injury were assessed using a logistic regression model. Survival curves were calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using a log-rank test. RESULTS: Of the 195 patients, 40 had pre-ILS, and 21 (8 with and 13 without pre-ILS) developed lung injury during the observation period. Multivariate analysis revealed that pre-ILS was independently associated with lung injury (odds ratio, 3.1; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.1-8.2; p = 0.025). Severe (≥Grade 3) lung injury was observed in eight (4.1%) patients, of whom, two (5%) and six (3.9%) had and did not have pre-ILS (p = 0.67), respectively. Grade 5 lung injury was not observed, and survival curves were similar between the patients who developed lung injury and those who did not (median 11 vs. 12 months; hazard ratio, 1.2; 95% CI, 0.56-2.7; p = 0.60). CONCLUSIONS: Pre-ILS increased the risk of lung injury in patients of non-small cell lung cancer treated with osimertinib, while the severity of lung injury was not clearly affected by the presence of pre-ILS.

Histologic transformation of epidermal growth factor receptor-mutated lung cancer.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to determine the incidence and clinical course of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutated lung cancer with histologic transformation (HT). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a multicentre, retrospective, cohort study of patients with advanced EGFR-mutated lung cancer who received EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) between 2012 and 2019. The primary outcome was the incidence of HT. The secondary outcome was treatment efficacy in patients with HT. RESULTS: In total, 6356 patients were enrolled. In 2624 patients, the histological type was proven by rebiopsy after acquiring resistance to EGFR-TKIs. Among them, 74 patients had HT (incidence rate: 2.8% [95% confidence interval: 2.3%-3.5%]). The median progression-free survival after EGFR-TKIs and first-line therapy after confirming HT was 10.4 and 4.4 months, respectively, which was not significantly different between patients with transformation to high-grade neuroendocrine carcinoma and those with transformation to another subtype of non-small cell lung cancer. Overall survival after confirming HT was 12.2 months. Twenty-seven patients received immune checkpoint inhibitors: 6 and 21 received immune checkpoint inhibitors before and after confirming HT, respectively. No patients achieved 1-year progression-free survival. The median progression-free survival after immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy after confirming HT was 1.6 months. CONCLUSION: HT occurred in approximately 3% of EGFR-mutated patients who developed resistance to EGFR-TKIs. Cytotoxic agents are likely to be effective in patients with HT. However, the therapeutic effectiveness of immune checkpoint inhibitors was limited in these patients. Given the rarity of HT and absence of prospective trials, our findings are important to inform the treatment of these patients.

Pre-treatment serum protein levels predict survival of non-small cell lung cancer patients without durable clinical benefit by PD-1/L1 inhibitors.

While PD-1/L1 inhibitors are characterized by durable tumor control, they also prolong survival without prolongation of progression-free survival (PFS) in part of patients. However, little is known about the factors and mechanisms involved in this. Between December 2015 and September 2018, 106 patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer treated with ICI monotherapy were enrolled in a prospective-observational study. Sixty-nine of whom progressed or died within 6 months after ICI initiation were defined as patients without durable clinical benefit (NDBs). Clinical factors and 39 serum proteins before ICI initiation and at the time of progressive disease (PD) were explored for an association with overall survival (OS) and OS after PD (OS-PD). As a result, median PFS, OS, and OS-PD were 44 days [95% confidence interval (CI): 39-56), 211 days (95% CI: 158-425), and 193 days (95% CI: 118-349), respectively. By multivariate analysis for OS, CRP (> 1.44 mg/dl) [HR 2.59 (95% CI:1.33-5.04), P = 0.005] and follistatin (> 685 pg/ml) [HR 2.29 (95% CI:1.12-4.69), P = 0.023] before ICI initiation were significantly predictive. Notably, no serum protein at the time of PD was predictive for OS-PD. There were also no serum predictive factors of OS in the 33 patients with durable clinical benefit. In conclusion, serum levels of CRP and follistatin before ICI initiation, not at the time of PD, are predictive for OS in NDBs, suggesting long-term survivor in NDBs are predetermined by the immune status before ICI initiation.

Durvalumab for patients with unresectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer and grade 1 radiation pneumonitis following concurrent chemoradiotherapy: a multicenter prospective cohort study.

Introduction/Background Durvalumab demonstrated a good efficacy and safety in patients with unresectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) after concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) in the PACIFIC trial. Although a history of radiation pneumonitis (RP) has been reported to increase the risk of pneumonitis associated with programmed death-1 inhibitors, the safety and efficacy of durvalumab in patients with baseline Grade 1 RP have not been assessed. Therefore, we carried out a multicenter prospective cohort study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of durvalumab in these patients. Patients and Methods This was a multicenter prospective cohort study of 35 patients with Grade 1 RP after CCRT and before durvalumab initiation. This study was a first prespecified analysis for the first 20 patients with the primary objective of assessing the short-term safety; it was assessed 3 months after durvalumab initiation. Results Twenty patients were enrolled in this study between March 1, 2019, and September 3, 2019. Three patients (15%) experienced drug-related Grade ≥3 adverse events, while three patients (15%) had Grade ≥2 pneumonitis/RP within 3 months after durvalumab initiation. Three months after durvalumab initiation, all the patients were alive and four patients (20%) experienced disease progression. Conclusion Durvalumab can be a feasible treatment option for patients with stage III NSCLC with baseline Grade 1 RP following CCRT.(Trial registration number: UMIN000036061. The registration period was between March 2019 and December 2019.).

Phase Ib Study of Osimertinib Plus Ramucirumab in Japanese Lung Cancer Patients With EGFR Mutation.

BACKGROUND/AIM: To explore the safety of osimertinib plus ramucirumab in patients with EGFR-mutated lung adenocarcinoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Six advanced lung adenocarcinoma patients with EGFR mutation were treated with osimertinib 80 mg/day plus ramucirumab 10 mg/kg, every two weeks. Defined dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was assessed within the first two treatment cycles. RESULTS: Of those enrolled, five patients had both EGFR exon 20 T790M mutation and sensitizing mutation. DLT was observed in one patient (grade 3 appetite loss). During the entire period, no other severe adverse event was observed. Five patients showed partial response and one disease progression. Median progression-free survival for patients with EGFR T790M was 9.2 months. In an exploratory analysis, changes of cell-free DNA at 2 weeks predicted radiological tumor responses. CONCLUSION: The safety results of osimertinib plus ramucirumab in Japanese lung adenocarcinoma patients with EGFR mutation will lead to further efficacy investigation.

CD24, not CD47, negatively impacts upon response to PD-1/L1 inhibitors in non-small-cell lung cancer with PD-L1 tumor proportion score < 50.

CD24, a heavily glycosylated glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored surface protein, inhibits phagocytosis as potently as CD47. The relationship between such anti-phagocytic factors and the immune response with immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) remains unexplored. We evaluated CD24 and CD47 tumor proportion scores (TPS) in 68 of the 106 patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer who participated in a prospective observational study of ICI treatment. We also explored the impact of CD24 TPS and CD47 TPS on ICI efficacy and serum cytokine changes. CD24 positivity (TPS ≥ 1) was negatively associated with progression-free survival (PFS) of ICI when PD-L1 TPS was < 50 (median PFS; 37 vs 127 d, P = .033), but there was no association when PD-L1 TPS was ≥ 50 (median PFS; 494 vs 144 d, P = .168). CD24 positivity was also related to significantly higher increase of CCL2 from baseline to 4-6 wk later, and such increase was notably observed only when PD-L1 TPS < 50 (P = .0004). CCL2 increase after ICI initiation was negatively predictive for survival after initiation of ICI (median survival time; not reached vs 233 d; P = .028). CD47 TPS high (≥60) significantly suppressed the increase in vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-A, D and PDGF-AB/BB after ICI initiation. There was no association, however, between CD47 tumor expression and the efficacy of ICI. In conclusion, CD24, not CD47, is a candidate negative predictive marker of ICI in advanced, non-small-cell lung cancer with PD-L1 TPS < 50. Tumor expression of both CD24 and CD47 was associated with changes in factors related to monocytes and angiogenesis after ICI initiation (UMIN000024414).

Prospective, multicentre, single-arm phase II trial of pembrolizumab combined with carboplatin and pemetrexed in elderly patients with advanced, non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Triplet regimen of carboplatin or cisplatin with pemetrexed and pembrolizumab is a standard treatment for patients with advanced, chemo-naïve, non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer. However, subgroup analysis for patients aged ≥75 years indicated that elderly patients who received the triplet regimen may have had shorter survival times than if they had chemotherapy alone (HR of 2.09). Treatments in the elderly are not always as effective or safe as for non-elderly patients, so there remains concern over whether the triplet regimen can be widely used in the elderly. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a single-arm, prospective, multicentre phase II study. The primary endpoint is set as the overall response rate according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors V.1.1. Secondary endpoints are progression-free survival, disease control rate and safety. This trial will enrol 22 patients. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study was approved by the Wakayama Medical University Central Review Board on 2 December 2019 (approval number: W-32). Patients have been enrolled since February 2020. As the study will complete accrual in January 2022, results will be submitted for publication in peer-reviewed medical journals within 2023 and international scientific meetings. This study will provide significant information on whether the triplet regimens are clinically beneficial to elderly patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Japan Registry of Clinical Trials (jRCTs051190095).

Immune-Related Adverse Events by Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors Significantly Predict Durable Efficacy Even in Responders with Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Although predictive value of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) induced by immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have been suggested by several studies, their assessments were insufficient because patients were categorized only by the occurrence of irAEs. It has not been elucidated whether irAEs also play a significant role even in responders. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between December 2015 and September 2018, 106 patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer treated with ICIs were enrolled in our prospective biomarker study. Twenty-three of these were responders, defined as those with complete or partial response. We investigated the proportion of irAEs among overall and responders. For responders, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival of ICIs were compared between those with and without irAEs. As an exploratory analysis, we measured 41 proteins from peripheral blood before and after ICI treatment. RESULTS: The proportion of irAEs was significantly higher in responders than nonresponders (65.2% vs. 19.3%, p < .01). Among responders, clinical characteristics did not differ regardless of the occurrence of irAEs. However, there was a significant difference in PFS among responders (irAE group 19.1 months vs. non-irAE group 5.6 months; hazard ratio: 0.30 [95% confidence interval: 0.10-0.85]; p = .02). Of 41 protein analyses, fibroblast growth factor-2 at baseline and monocyte chemoattractant protein fold change showed significant differences between them (p < .04). CONCLUSION: Although this is a small sample-sized study, irAE might be a predictive factor of durable efficacy, even in patients who responded to ICIs. Investigation into the significance of irAEs in responders will contribute to the establishment of optimal administration of ICI. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Although the predictive value of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) induced by immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has been suggested by several studies, it has not been elucidated whether irAEs also play a significant role even in responders. This study showed that more than 60% of responders had irAEs. It demonstrated the strong correlation between irAEs and efficacy even in responders. Investigation into the significance of irAEs in responders will contribute to the establishment of optimal administration of ICI.

Osimertinib for patients with EGFR T790M mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer and a poor performance status.

BACKGROUND: Osimertinib is a third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) that is effective against EGFR T790M mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in patients who have good performance status (PS). However, the efficacy and safety of osimertinib for patients with poor PS is unknown. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated the efficacy and safety of osimertinib in patients with EGFR T790M mutation-positive NSCLC who had Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group PS scores of 2-4 and who were administered 80 mg of osimertinib once daily between March 2016 and February 2017. RESULTS: Thirty patients (8 men and 22 women) with EGFR T790M mutation-positive NSCLC were evaluated; their median age was 66 years (range: 39-89 years). Twenty-four and six patients had PS scores of 2 and 3, respectively; none had a PS score of 4. All patients had previously been treated with first- or second-generation EGFR-TKIs. T790M was detected in the tumor samples of 23 patients, the blood samples of two patients, and both the tumor and blood samples of five patients. The overall response rate was 53% (95% confidence interval: 36-70%), and the PS score improvement rate was 63%. The median progression-free survival was 8.2 months (95% confidence interval: 4.3-13.2 months), while the median overall survival time was not reached. No patient required treatment cessation owing to adverse events, and no treatment-related deaths occurred. CONCLUSIONS: Osimertinib therapy demonstrates promising efficacy and acceptable safety in patients with EGFR T790M mutation-positive NSCLC who have poor PS.