Meta-analysis of the impact of postoperative infective complications on oncological outcomes in colorectal cancer surgery.

BACKGROUND: Cancer outcomes are complex, involving prevention, early detection and optimal multidisciplinary care. Postoperative infection and surgical site-infection (SSI) are not only uncomfortable for patients and costly, but may also be associated with poor oncological outcomes. A meta-analysis was undertaken to assess the oncological effects of SSI in patients with colorectal cancer. METHODS: An ethically approved PROSPERO-registered meta-analysis was conducted following PRISMA guidelines. PubMed and Scopus databases were searched for studies published between 2007 and 2017 reporting the effects of postoperative infective complications on oncological survival in colorectal cancer. Results were separated into those for SSI and those concerning anastomotic leakage. Articles with a Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies score of at least 18 were included. Hazard ratios (HRs) with 95 per cent confidence intervals were computed for risk factors using an observed to expected and variance fixed-effect model. RESULTS: Of 5027 articles were reviewed, 43 met the inclusion criteria, with a total of 154 981 patients. Infective complications had significant negative effects on overall survival (HR 1·37, 95 per cent c.i. 1·28 to 1·46) and cancer-specific survival (HR 2·58, 2·15 to 3·10). Anastomotic leakage occurred in 7·4 per cent and had a significant negative impact on disease-free survival (HR 1·14, 1·09 to 1·20), overall survival (HR 1·34, 1·28 to 1·39), cancer-specific survival (HR 1·43, 1·31 to 1·55), local recurrence (HR 1·18, 1·06 to 1·32) and overall recurrence (HR 1·46, 1·27 to 1·68). CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis identified a significant negative impact of postoperative infective complications on overall and cancer-specific survival in patients undergoing colorectal surgery.

ANTECEDENTES: Los resultados del cáncer son complejos, implican prevención, detección precoz y atención multidisciplinaria óptima. La infección postoperatoria y la infección del sitio quirúrgico (surgical site infection, SSI) no solo son inconvenientes para los pacientes y costosas, sino que también pueden estar asociadas con malos resultados oncológicos. Este estudio realizó un metaanálisis para evaluar los efectos oncológicos de la SSI en pacientes con cáncer colorrectal. MÉTODOS: Se realizó un metaanálisis registrado en PROSPERO, aprobado por el comité ético, siguiendo las pautas de PRISMA y utilizando las bases de datos PubMed y Scopus para estudios entre 2007-2017 que describían los efectos de las complicaciones infecciosas postoperatorias en la supervivencia oncológica en el cáncer colorrectal. Los resultados se separaron para el grupo de infección del sitio quirúrgico (SSI) y de fuga anastomótica. Se incluyeron los artículos con una puntuación ≥ 18 según el índice MINORS. Para los factores de riesgo se calcularon los cocientes de riesgos instantáneos (hazard ratios, HR) mediante un modelo de efectos aleatorios y el método de Mantel-Haenszel con los i.c. del 95% utilizando el programe RevMan5. RESULTADOS: Se revisaron 5.027 artículos de los cuales 43 cumplieron con los criterios de inclusión. En total fueron 154.981 pacientes en los cuales las complicaciones infecciosas tuvieron efectos negativos significativos en la supervivencia global (HR: 1,37 i.c. del 95%: 1,28-1,46) y la supervivencia específica relacionada con el cáncer (HR: 2,58 i.c. del 95%: 2,15-3,10). La fuga anastomótica ocurrió en un 7,4% de los casos e impactó negativa y significativamente en la supervivencia libre de enfermedad (HR: 1,14 i.c. del 95%: 1,09-1,20), en la supervivencia global (HR: 1,34 i.c. del 95%: 1,28-1,39), en la supervivencia específica relacionada con el cáncer (HR: 1,43 i.c. del 95% 1.31-1.55), en la recidiva local (HR: 1,18 i.c. del 95%: 1,06-1,32) y en la recidiva global (HR: 1,46 i.c. del 95%: 1,27-1,68). CONCLUSIÓN: Este metaanálisis identificó un impacto negativo significativo en la supervivencia global y en la supervivencia específica relacionada con el cáncer en pacientes con complicaciones postoperatorias infecciosas sometidos a cirugía colorrectal.

Proceedings of resources for optimal care of acute care and emergency surgery consensus summit Donegal Ireland.

BACKGROUND: Opportunities to improve emergency surgery outcomes exist through guided better practice and reduced variability. Few attempts have been made to define optimal care in emergency surgery, and few clinically derived key performance indicators (KPIs) have been published. A summit was therefore convened to look at resources for optimal care of emergency surgery. The aim of the Donegal Summit was to set a platform in place to develop guidelines and KPIs in emergency surgery. METHODS: The project had multidisciplinary global involvement in producing consensus statements regarding emergency surgery care in key areas, and to assess feasibility of producing KPIs that could be used to monitor process and outcome of care in the future. RESULTS: Forty-four key opinion leaders in emergency surgery, across 7 disciplines from 17 countries, composed evidence-based position papers on 14 key areas of emergency surgery and 112 KPIs in 20 acute conditions or emergency systems. CONCLUSIONS: The summit was successful in achieving position papers and KPIs in emergency surgery. While position papers were limited by non-graded evidence and non-validated KPIs, the process set a foundation for the future advancement of emergency surgery.

Intra-Abdominal Hypertension and Abdominal Compartment Syndrome after Abdominal Wall Reconstruction: Quaternary Syndromes?

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Reconstruction with reconstitution of the container function of the abdominal compartment is increasingly being performed in patients with massive ventral hernia previously deemed inoperable. This situation places patients at great risk of severe intra-abdominal hypertension and abdominal compartment syndrome if organ failure ensues. Intra-abdominal hypertension and especially abdominal compartment syndrome may be devastating systemic complications with systematic and progressive organ failure and death. We thus reviewed the pathophysiology and reported clinical experiences with abnormalities of intra-abdominal pressure in the context of abdominal wall reconstruction. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Bibliographic databases (1950-2015), websites, textbooks, and the bibliographies of previously recovered articles for reports or data relating to intra-abdominal pressure, intra-abdominal hypertension, and the abdominal compartment syndrome in relation to ventral, incisional, or abdominal hernia repair or abdominal wall reconstruction. RESULTS: Surgeons should thus consider and carefully measure intra-abdominal pressure and its resultant effects on respiratory parameters and function during abdominal wall reconstruction. The intra-abdominal pressure post-operatively will be a result of the new intra-peritoneal volume and the abdominal wall compliance. Strategies surgeons may utilize to ameliorate intra-abdominal pressure rise after abdominal wall reconstruction including temporizing paralysis of the musculature either temporarily or semi-permanently, pre-operative progressive pneumoperitoneum, permanently removing visceral contents, or surgically releasing the musculature to increase the abdominal container volume. In patients without complicating shock and inflammation, and in whom the abdominal wall anatomy has been so functionally adapted to maximize compliance, intra-abdominal hypertension may be transient and tolerable. CONCLUSIONS: Intra-abdominal hypertension/abdominal compartment syndrome in the specific setting of abdominal wall reconstruction without other complication may be considered as a quaternary situation considering the classification nomenclature of the Abdominal Compartment Society. Greater awareness of intra-abdominal pressure in abdominal wall reconstruction is required and ongoing study of these concerns is required.

Erratum to: 2016 WSES guidelines on acute calculous cholecystitis.

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1186/s13017-016-0082-5.].

2016 WSES guidelines on acute calculous cholecystitis.

Acute calculus cholecystitis is a very common disease with several area of uncertainty. The World Society of Emergency Surgery developed extensive guidelines in order to cover grey areas. The diagnostic criteria, the antimicrobial therapy, the evaluation of associated common bile duct stones, the identification of "high risk" patients, the surgical timing, the type of surgery, and the alternatives to surgery are discussed. Moreover the algorithm is proposed: as soon as diagnosis is made and after the evaluation of choledocholitiasis risk, laparoscopic cholecystectomy should be offered to all patients exception of those with high risk of morbidity or mortality. These Guidelines must be considered as an adjunctive tool for decision but they are not substitute of the clinical judgement for the individual patient.

Association of mannose-binding lectin levels and invasive fungal disease in hematologic malignancy patients receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy or allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

Several studies have suggested an association of mannose-binding lectin (MBL) deficiency with infections. In this study, we investigated the association between MBL deficiency and invasive fungal disease (IFD) in hematologic malignancy patients receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy or hematopoietic stem cell transplant. MBL levels were quantified at the start of treatment in 152 patients who were followed for 6 months and scored as developing IFD or not. Forty-five patients (29.6%) developed IFD, of which 21 (46.7% of IFD cases and 13.8% of patients) were proven or probable IFD. Fifty-nine (38.8%) had MBL levels <1000 ng/mL. The rates of all IFD in patients with MBL levels below and above 1000 ng/mL were 33.9% and 26.9%, respectively (P=0.356). The rates of proven or probable IFD in patients with MBL levels below and above 1000 ng/mL were 11.9% and 15.1%, respectively (P=0.579). MBL levels <1000 ng/mL were not predictors of death (P=0.233). As expected, IFD was associated with death (P<0.0001). Our findings indicate that MBL levels <1000 ng/mL were not associated with an increased risk of developing IFD or overall survival.

A systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis on intra-abdominal hypertension in critically ill patients: the wake-up project. World initiative on Abdominal Hypertension Epidemiology, a Unifying Project (WAKE-Up!).

Intra-abdominal hypertension (IAH), defined as a pathologically increase in intraabdominal pressure, is commonly found in critically ill patients. While IAH has been associated with several abdominal as well as extra-abdominal conditions, few studies have examined the occurrence of IAH in relation to mortality. The aim of this paper was to evaluate the prognostic role of IAH and its risk factors at admission in critically ill patients across a wide range of settings and countries. An individual patient meta-analysis of all available data and a systematic review of published (in full or as abstract) medical databases and studies between 1996 and June 2012 were performed. The search was limited to "clinical trials" and "randomized controlled trials", "adults", using the terms "intra-abdominal pressure", "intraabdominal hypertension" combined with any of the terms "outcome" and "mortality". All together data on 2707 patients, representing 21 centers from 11 countries was obtained. Data on 1038 patients were not analysed because of the following exclusion criteria: no IAP value on admission (N.=712), absence of information on ICU outcome (N.=195), age <18 or >95 years (N.=131). Data from 1669 individual patients (19 centers from 9 countries) were analyzed in the meta-analysis. Presence of IAH was defined as a sustained increase in IAP equal to or above 12 mmHg. At admission the mean overall IAP was 9.9±5.0 mmHg, with 463 patients (27.7%) presenting IAH with a mean IAP of 16.3±3.4 mmHg. The only independent predictors for IAH were SOFA score and fluid balance on the day of admission. Five hundred thirteen patients (30.8%) died in intensive care. The independent predictors for intensive care mortality were IAH, SAPS II score, SOFA score and admission category. This systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis shows that IAH is frequently present in critically ill patients and it is an independent predictor for mortality.

A Systematic Review And Individual Patient Data Meta-Analysis On Intraabdominal Hypertension In Critically Ill Patients: The Wake-Up Project World Initiative on Abdominal Hypertension Epidemiology, a Unifying Project (WAKE-Up!).

Background: Intraabdominal hypertension (IAH), defined as a pathologically increase in intraabdominal pressure, is commonly found in critically ill patients. While IAH has been associated with several abdominal as well as extra-abdominal conditions, few studies have examined the occurrence of IAH in relation to mortality. Objective: To evaluate the prognostic role of IAH and its risk factors at admission in critically ill patients across a wide range of settings and countries. Data sources: An individual patient meta-analysis of all available data and a systematic review of published (in full or as abstract) medical databases and studies between 1996 and June 2012 were performed. The search was limited to "clinical trials" and "randomized controlled trials", "adults", using the terms "intraabdominal pressure", "intraabdominal hypertension" combined with any of the terms "outcome" and "mortality". All together data on 2707 patients, representing 21 centers from 11 countries was obtained. Data on 1038 patients were not analysed because of the following exclusion criteria: no IAP value on admission (n=712), absence of information on ICU outcome (n=195), age <18 or > 95 years (n=131). Results: Data from 1669 individual patients (19 centers from 9 countries) were analyzed in the meta-analysis. Presence of IAH was defined as a sustained increase in IAP equal to or above 12 mmHg. At admission the mean overall IAP was 9.9±5.0 mmHg, with 463 patients (27.7%) presenting IAH with a mean IAP of 16.3±3.4 mmHg. The only independent predictors for IAH were SOFA score and fluid balance on the day of admission. Five hundred thirteen patients (30.8%) died in intensive care. The independent predictors for intensive care mortality were IAH, SAPS II score, SOFA score and admission category. Conclusions: This systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis shows that IAH is frequently present in critically ill patients and it is an independent predictor for mortality.

Intra-abdominal hypertension and the abdominal compartment syndrome: updated consensus definitions and clinical practice guidelines from the World Society of the Abdominal Compartment Syndrome

PURPOSE: To update the World Society of the Abdominal Compartment Syndrome (WSACS) consensus definitions and management statements relating to intra-abdominal hypertension (IAH) and the abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS). METHODS: We conducted systematic or structured reviews to identify relevant studies relating to IAH or ACS. Updated consensus definitions and management statements were then derived using a modified Delphi method and the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) guidelines, respectively. Quality of evidence was graded from high (A) to very low (D) and management statements from strong RECOMMENDATIONS (desirable effects clearly outweigh potential undesirable ones) to weaker SUGGESTIONS (potential risks and benefits of the intervention are less clear). RESULTS: In addition to reviewing the consensus definitions proposed in 2006, the WSACS defined the open abdomen, lateralization of the abdominal musculature, polycompartment syndrome, and abdominal compliance, and proposed an open abdomen classification system. RECOMMENDATIONS included intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) measurement, avoidance of sustained IAH, protocolized IAP monitoring and management, decompressive laparotomy for overt ACS, and negative pressure wound therapy and efforts to achieve same-hospital-stay fascial closure among patients with an open abdomen. SUGGESTIONS included use of medical therapies and percutaneous catheter drainage for treatment of IAH/ACS, considering the association between body position and IAP, attempts to avoid a positive fluid balance after initial patient resuscitation, use of enhanced ratios of plasma to red blood cells and prophylactic open abdominal strategies, and avoidance of routine early biologic mesh use among patients with open abdominal wounds. NO RECOMMENDATIONS were possible regarding monitoring of abdominal perfusion pressure or the use of diuretics, renal replacement therapies, albumin, or acute component-parts separation. CONCLUSION: Although IAH and ACS are common and frequently associated with poor outcomes, the overall quality of evidence available to guide development of RECOMMENDATIONS was generally low. Appropriately designed intervention trials are urgently needed for patients with IAH and ACS.

Recommendations for research from the International Conference of Experts on Intra-abdominal Hypertension and Abdominal Compartment Syndrome.

OBJECTIVE: Intra-abdominal hypertension (IAH) and abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS) have been increasingly recognized in the critically ill over the past decade, and the number of published studies has exploded in recent years. Interpretation of the results and comparison of these studies is difficult, because of incomplete and inconsistent reporting of data and statistics. DESIGN: An international consensus group of multidisciplinary specialists convened at the third World Congress on Abdominal Compartment Syndrome to develop recommendations for research related to the diagnosis and management of IAH and ACS. METHODS: Prior to the conference the authors developed a blueprint for consensus definitions and treatment guidelines which were refined both during and after the conference. RESULTS: Three major types of studies were identified (measurement techniques, epidemiology, and interventions), each with different needs regarding methodology, reporting of data and statistical analysis. CONCLUSIONS: These recommendations are proposed to guide clinical research in the field of IAH and ACS.

Renal implications of increased intra-abdominal pressure: are the kidneys the canary for abdominal hypertension?

INTRODUCTION: Increased intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) or intra-abdominal hypertension (IAH) is a cause of organ dysfunction in critically ill patients and is independently associated with mortality. The kidneys seem to be especially vulnerable to IAH induced dysfunction and renal failure is one of the most consistently described organ dysfunctions associated with IAH. The aim of this paper is to review the historical background, awareness, definitions, pathophysiologic implications and treatment options for IAP induced renal failure. METHODS: This review will focus on the available literature on IAH-induced renal dysfunction. A Medline and PubMed search was performed in order to find an answer to the question "What is the impact of increased IAP on renal function in the critically ill?". The resulting references were included in the current review on the basis of relevance and scientific merit. RESULTS: Renal dysfunction in IAH is a multifactorial process. The mechanisms involved have not been clarified completely. However, decreased cardiac output, altered renal blood flow and hormonal changes have been implicated. Decompression seems to have a beneficial effect on renal dysfunction, although there are some conflicting data. This may be due to the fact that there is no consensus on indications for decompression, both in terms of IAP values and of timing. An overview of current literature is provided and some interesting leads for future research are suggested. CONCLUSION: IAH can cause renal dysfunction. Therefore, IAP measurements should be considered in our daily practice and preventive measures should be taken to avoid (deterioration of) renal failure in patients with IAH. Decompression may have a beneficial effect in patients with established IAH and renal failure.

Temporary abdominal closure.

The increasing recognition of abdominal compartment syndrome's adverse effect on patient outcome has been coupled with our expanding knowledge of techniques of temporary abdominal closure. Temporary abdominal closure can be used prophylactically to prevent abdominal compartment syndrome developing and more commonly in the treatment of patients with progressing or advanced abdominal compartment syndrome. The preferred technique involves a negative suction dressing protecting the fascial and skin edges, collecting intraperitoneal fluid and reducing contamination. Attempts of early closure will facilitate recovery.

Renal implications of increased intra-abdominal pressure: are the kidneys the canary for abdominal hypertension?

INTRODUCTION: Increased intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) or intra-abdominal hypertension (IAH) is a cause of organ dysfunction in critically ill patients and is independently associated with mortality. The kidneys seem to be especially vulnerable to IAH induced dysfunction and renal failure is one of the most consistently described organ dysfunctions associated with IAH. The aim of this paper is to review the historical background, awareness, definitions, pathophysiologic implications and treatment options for IAP induced renal failure. METHODS: This review will focus on the available literature on IAH-induced renal dysfunction. A Medline and PubMed search was performed in order to find an answer to the question "What is the impact of increased IAP on renal function in the critically ill?". The resulting references were included in the current review on the basis of relevance and scientific merit. RESULTS: Renal dysfunction in IAH is a multifactorial process. The mechanisms involved have not been clarified completely. However, decreased cardiac output, altered renal blood flow and hormonal changes have been implicated. Decompression seems to have a beneficial effect on renal dysfunction, although there are some conflicting data. This may be due to the fact that there is no consensus on indications for decompression, both in terms of IAP values and of timing. An overview of current literature is provided and some interesting leads for future research are suggested. CONCLUSION: IAH can cause renal dysfunction. Therefore, IAP measurements should be considered in our daily practice and preventive measures should be taken to avoid (deterioration of) renal failure in patients with IAH. Decompression may have a beneficial effect in patients with established IAH and renal failure.

Temporary abdominal closure.

The increasing recognition of abdominal compartment syndrome's adverse effect on patient outcome has been coupled with our expanding knowledge of techniques of temporary abdominal closure. Temporary abdominal closure can be used prophylactically to prevent abdominal compartment syndrome developing and more commonly in the treatment of patients with progressing or advanced abdominal compartment syndrome. The preferred technique involves a negative suction dressing protecting the fascial and skin edges, collecting intraperitoneal fluid and reducing contamination. Attempts of early closure will facilitate recovery.

Prospective study to evaluate the influence of FAST on trauma patient management.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have concentrated on the accuracy of Focused Assessment with Sonography in Trauma (FAST), but evaluation of whether FAST changes subsequent management has not been fully assessed. METHODS: This prospective study compared 419 trauma admissions in two groups, FAST and no-FAST, for demographics, time of resuscitation, and action after resuscitation. The 194 patients undergoing FAST had their management plan specified before, and confirmed after, FAST was performed to assess for change in management. To ensure scan consistency and to minimize bias, criteria were established to define an adequate FAST. RESULTS: FAST was performed in 194 patients (46%), assessing for free fluid. Management was changed in 59 cases (32.8%) after FAST. Laparotomy was prevented in 1 patient, computed tomography was prevented in 23 patients, and diagnostic peritoneal lavage was prevented in 15 patients. Computed tomography rates were reduced from 47% to 34% and diagnostic peritoneal lavage rates were reduced from 9% to 1%. CONCLUSIONS: FAST plays a key role in trauma, changing subsequent management in an appreciable number of patients.

Potential cervical spine injury and difficult airway management for emergency intubation of trauma adults in the emergency department--a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Emergency airway management for trauma adults is practised by physicians from a range of training backgrounds and with differing levels of experience. The indications for intubation and technique employed are factors that vary within EDs and between hospitals. OBJECTIVES: To provide practical evidence based guidance for airway management in trauma resuscitation: first for the trauma adult with potential cervical spine injury and second the management when a difficult airway is encountered at intubation. SEARCH STRATEGY AND METHODOLOGY: Full literature search for relevant articles in Medline (1966-2003), EMBASE (1980-2003), and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Relevant articles relating to adults and written in English language were appraised. English language abstracts of foreign articles were included. Studies were critically appraised on a standardised data collection sheet to assess validity and quality of evidence. The level of evidence was allocated using the methods of the Australian National Health and Medical Research Council.

Damage control surgery and the abdomen.

There is a complex interplay between primary injury, particularly major abdominal injury in the multi-system trauma patient, and secondary injury, which relate to patient physiology, decision making and surgical technique. Analysis of outcomes is further confounded by the variety of surgical techniques used. The challenge is to match the correct operation, for a critically injured patient, with the patient's physiology. Excellence in general surgery does not equate with excellence in trauma surgery, and a clear understanding of damage control is essential.