Treatment outcomes with hypofractionated high-dose radiation therapy for prostate cancer.

AIM: To report the treatment results of a retrospective cohort of prostate cancer patients treated with Hypo-RT with a high equivalent biological effective dose (BED). BACKGROUND: Hypofractionated radiotherapy (Hypo-RT) has gained popularity and interest in the treatment of prostate cancer. However, there are few experiences with adequate follow-up reporting treatment results using high equivalent dose with Hypo-RT. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We assigned 149 men with low-, intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer to receive Hypo-RT with a total dose of 69 Gy/23 fractions. Late gastrointestinal (GI) and genitourinary (GU) toxicity were prospectively evaluated according to modified RTOG criteria. Biochemical no evidence of disease (bNED) was defined as the nadir prostate-specific antigen level plus 2 ng/mL. RESULTS: The median follow-up was 53 months. For the entire cohort, the 5-year bNED rate was 94.6%, and for low-, intermediate- and high-risk patients the 5-year bNED was 100%, 96.4%, and 86% (p = 0.007), respectively. The 5-year overall survival rate was 92%. Only 1 patient died from the disease at 48 months after treatment, giving a 5-year cancer-specific survival of 98%. The worst grade ≥2 rate GI and GU toxicity was 13.4% and 14%, respectively. No grade >3 toxicity was observed. The presence of grade ≥2 GI and GU toxicity at the last follow-up was only 1.3% and 3%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Hypo-RT (69 Gy/23 fractions) with a high equivalent BED produces excellent rates of biochemical control for low, intermediate and high-risk prostate cancer. The long term GU and GI toxicity rates were considered low and acceptable.

Whole brain radiotherapy and stereotactic radiosurgery for patients with recursive partitioning analysis I and lesions <5 cm(3): A matched pair analysis.

OBJECTIVE: The intention of this study is to compare whole brain radiotherapy and stereotactic radiosurgery (WBRT + SRS) with WBRT in patients with 1-4 brain metastases to find a subgroup of patients that have a great benefit with aggressive treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between December 2002 and December 2013, 60 patients with 1-4 brain metastases were treated by WBRT + SRS. In this period, 60 patients treated with WBRT were matched with patients treated with WBRT + SRS. RESULTS: The median survival for the entire cohort was 8.3 months. In the univariate analysis, WBRT + SRS (0.031), the presence of extracranial disease (P = 0.02), Karnofsky performance score <70 (P = 0.0001), and age >65 (P = 0.001) years were significant factors for survival. In the entire cohort, the median survival for recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) classes I, II, and III was 11, 7, and 3 months, respectively (P = 0.0001). In a stratified analysis, only RPA class I achieved statistical significance for 1-year survival between the groups (WBRT + SRS = 51% and WBRT = 23%, P = 0.03). Cox regression analysis revealed WBRT + SRS, age >65 years, and extracranial disease as independent prognostic factors. In the univariate analysis, lesion volume ≤5 cm 3 (P = 0.002) and WBRT + SRS (P = 0.003) were the significant factors associated with better brain control. CONCLUSION: WBRT plus SRS was an independent prognostic factor for survival. However, the combined treatment appears to be justified only in patients with RPA I and lesion volume ≤5 cm 3, independently of the number of lesions.

Acute toxicity profile in prostate cancer with conventional and hypofractionated treatment.

PURPOSE: To compare the acute toxicities in radical treatment of prostate cancer between conventional schedule (C-ARM) with 78 Gy/39 fractions and hypofractionation conformal treatment (H-ARM) with 69 Gy/23 fractions. METHODS AND MATERIAL: This prospective double arm study consisted of 217 patients with prostate cancer, 112 in H-ARM and 105 in C-ARM arm. C-ARM received conventional six- field conformal radiotherapy with 78 Gy in 39 fractions while H-ARM received hypofractionation with 69 Gy in 23 fractions. Weekly assessment of acute reactions was done during treatment and with one, and 3 months using RTOG scale. Univariated analysis was performed to evaluate differences between the incidences of acute reaction in the treatment arms. Variables with p value less than 0.1 were included in the multivariated logistic regression. RESULTS: There was no difference between H-ARM versus C-ARM for severity and incidence in genitourinary (GU) and gastrointestinal (GI) acute toxicity. During the treatment comparing H-ARM with C-ARM no differences was observed for GI toxicity (grade 0-3; H-ARM=45.5%, 34%, 18.7% and 1.8% versus C-ARM=47.6%, 35.2%, 17.2% and 0). For acute GU toxicity no difference was detected between H-ARM (grade 0-3; 22.3%, 54.5%, 18.7% and 4.5%) and C-ARM (grade 0-3; 25.8%, 53.3%, 17.1% and 3.8%).At the 3- months follow-up, persistent Grade> =2 acute GU and GI toxicity were 2.5% and 1.8% in H-ARM versus 5.7% and 3% in C-ARM (p>0.05). In univariated and multivariated analyses, there was not any dosimetric predictor for GI and GU toxicity. CONCLUSIONS: Our data demonstrate that hypofractionated radiotherapy achieving high biological effective dose using conformal radiotherapy is feasible for prostate cancer, being well tolerated with minimal severe acute toxicity.