Targeted Metabolomic Profiling of Plasma Samples in Gastric Cancer by Liquid Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry.

INTRODUCTION: As the high mortality rate of gastric cancer (GC) is due to delayed diagnosis, early detection is vital for improved patient outcomes. Metabolic deregulation plays an important role in GC. Although various metabolite-level biomarkers for early detection have been assessed, there is still no unified early detection method. We conducted a plasma metabolome study to assess metabolites that may distinguish GC samples from non-GC samples. METHODS: Blood samples were collected from 72 GC patients and 29 control participants (non-GC group) at the Tokyo Medical University Hospital between March 2020 and November 2020. Hydrophilic metabolites were identified and quantified using liquid chromatography-time-of-flight mass spectrometry. Differences in metabolite concentrations between the GC and non-GC groups were evaluated using the Mann-Whitney test. The discrimination ability of each metabolite was evaluated by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. A radial basis function (RBF) kernel-based support vector machine (SVM) model was developed to assess the discrimination ability of multiple metabolites. The selection of variables used for the SVM utilized a step-wise regression method. RESULTS: Of the 96 quantified metabolites, 8 were significantly different between the GC and non-GC groups. Of these, N1-acetylspermine, succinate, and histidine were used in the RBF-SVM model to discriminate GC samples from non-GC samples. The area under the curve (AUC) of the RBF-SVM model was higher (0.915; 95% CI: 0.865-0.965, p < 0.0001), indicating good performance of the RBF-SVM model. The application of this RBF-SVM to the validation dataset resulted from the AUC of the RBF-SVM model was (0.885; 95% CI: 0.797-0.973, p < 0.0001), indicating the good performance of the RBF-SVM model. The sensitivity of the RBF-SVM model was better (69.0%) than those of the common tumor markers carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) (10.5%) and carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) (2.86%). The RBF-SVM showed a low correlation with CEA and CA19-9, indicating its independence. CONCLUSION: We analyzed plasma metabolomics, and a combination of the quantified metabolites showed high sensitivity for the detection of GC. The independence of the RBF-SVM from tumor markers suggested that their complementary use would be helpful for GC screening.

Treatment strategies for reducing early and late recurrence of colonic diverticular bleeding based on stigmata of recent hemorrhage: a large multicenter study.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Treatment strategies for colonic diverticular bleeding (CDB) based on stigmata of recent hemorrhage (SRH) remain unstandardized, and no large studies have evaluated their effectiveness. We sought to identify the best strategy among combinations of SRH identification and endoscopic treatment strategies. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 5823 CDB patients who underwent colonoscopy at 49 hospitals throughout Japan (CODE-BLUE J-Study). Three strategies were compared: find SRH (definitive CDB) and treat endoscopically, find SRH (definitive CDB) and treat conservatively, and without finding SRH (presumptive CDB) treat conservatively. In conducting pairwise comparisons of outcomes in these groups, we used propensity score-matching analysis to balance baseline characteristics between the groups being compared. RESULTS: Both early and late recurrent bleeding rates were significantly lower in patients with definitive CDB treated endoscopically than in those with presumptive CDB treated conservatively (<30 days, 19.6% vs 26.0% [P < .001]; <365 days, 33.7% vs 41.6% [P < .001], respectively). In patients with definitive CDB, the early recurrent bleeding rate was significantly lower in those treated endoscopically than in those treated conservatively (17.4% vs 26.7% [P = .038] for a single test of hypothesis; however, correction for multiple testing of data removed this significance). The late recurrent bleeding rate was also lower, but not significantly, in those treated endoscopically (32.0% vs 36.1%, P = .426). Definitive CDB treated endoscopically showed significantly lower early and late recurrent bleeding rates than when treated conservatively in cases of SRH with active bleeding, nonactive bleeding, and in the right-sided colon but not left-sided colon. CONCLUSIONS: Treating definitive CDB endoscopically was most effective in reducing recurrent bleeding over the short and long term, compared with not treating definitive CDB or presumptive CDB. Physicians should endeavor to find and treat SRH for suspected CDB.

Predictive factors of relapse after dose reduction of oral 5-aminosalicylic acid in patients with ulcerative colitis in the remission phase.

OBJECTIVES: Useful indices to determine whether to reduce the dose of 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA) in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) during remission remain unclear. We aimed to analyze the rate and risk factors of relapse after reducing the dose of oral 5-ASA used for maintenance therapy of UC. METHODS: UC patients whose 5-ASA dose was reduced in clinical remission (partial Mayo score of ≤ 1) at our institution from 2012 to 2017 were analyzed. Various clinical variables of patients who relapsed after reducing the dose of oral 5-ASA were compared with those of patients who maintained remission. Risk factors for relapse were assessed by univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses. Cumulative relapse-free survival rates were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: A total of 70 UC patients were included; 52 (74.3%) patients maintained remission and 18 (25.7%) patients relapsed during the follow-up period. Multivariate analysis indicated that a history of acute severe UC (ASUC) was an independent predictive factor for clinical relapse (p = 0.024, odds ratio: 21, 95% confidence interval: 1.50-293.2). Based on Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, the cumulative relapse-free survival rate within 52 weeks was 22.2% for patients with a history of ASUC, compared with 82.0% for those without. the log-rank test showed a significant difference in a history of ASUC (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Dose reduction of 5-ASA should be performed carefully in patients who have a history of ASUC.

Predictive Factors of Postendoscopic Submucosal Dissection Electrocoagulation Syndrome and the Utility of Computed Tomography Scan after Esophageal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Recently, postendoscopic submucosal dissection electrocoagulation syndrome (PEECS) has attracted attention. However, the criteria for computed tomography (CT) scanning following esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) are unclear. In this study, we aimed to identify the predictive factors of PEECS and the usefulness of CT scanning after esophageal ESD. METHODS: A total of 245 lesions in 223 patients who underwent esophageal ESD between February 2008 and October 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients with double cancers, those who experienced procedural accidents, such as aspiration pneumonitis or perforation, and those who were unable to undergo CT were excluded from the study. PEECS evaluation items included body temperature (≤37.7°C = 1 point, ≥37.8°C = 2 points), white blood cell count (<10,800/µL = 1 point, ≥10,800/µL = 2 points), and chest pain (numerical rating scale [NRS] ≤4 = 1 point, NRS ≥5 = 2 points). Scores of ≥5 points were categorized as the PEECS-positive group, and scores of ≤4 points were categorized as the PEECS-negative group. The degree of mediastinal emphysema on CT was stratified into 5 grades, in which grades 0 and 1 were considered as the "low-grade" group, and grades 2, 3, and 4 were considered as the "high-grade" group. We analyzed the prognostic factors of high-grade mediastinal emphysema, including the presence or absence of PEECS. RESULTS: The PEECS-positive group comprised 18 out of the 163 patients (11.0%), and mediastinal emphysema was stratified into grades 0 (94), 1 (51), 2 (12), 3 (5), and 4 (1 patient). Three independent risk factors for the onset of PEECS were identified, as follows: resected area ≥750 mm2 (OR 7.28, 95% CI 1.42-37.33, p = 0.017), treatment duration ≥75 min (OR 10.26, 95% CI 1.20-87.77, p = 0.034), and muscle layer exposure (OR 10.92, 95% CI 2.22-53.74, p = 0.003). Two independent predictive factors of high-grade mediastinal emphysema were identified, which were PEECS positivity (OR 4.31, 95% CI 1.29-14.41, p = 0.018), and muscle layer exposure (OR 4.08, 95% CI 1.18-14.06, p = 0.026). CONCLUSIONS: A large resected area, prolonged treatment duration, and muscle layer exposure are risk factors for the onset of PEECS. Mediastinal emphysema was observed in 43% of patients following ESD. When marked clinical symptoms of PEECS appear, high-grade mediastinal emphysema may be observed, and therefore CT should be performed in these cases.

Impact of gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection in elderly patients: The latest single center large cohort study with a review of the literature.

With the increase in the elderly population, we are witnessing an increase in the rate of patients with underlying diseases and those under treatment with antithrombotic drugs.In this study, we compared the treatment outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) and other parameters in the following 3 groups: super-elderly, elderly, and nonelderly.Compared with the other groups, the super-elderly group showed a significantly higher incidence of underlying diseases and the rate of antithrombotic treatment (P < .05). However, we observed no significant difference in the rate of curative resection or incidence of complications among the 3 groups. ESD is a relatively safe technique when performed on super-elderly patients. However, we have identified some cases in the super-elderly group, for which ESD was selected as a minimally invasive treatment for lesions that did not meet the inclusion criteria for open surgery as well as for which follow-up observations were selected rather than additional surgery for noncurative resections.Further investigations concerning ESD are required, focusing on aspects such as indications, additional surgery, and informed consent of the patient or family, particularly when ESD is performed for super-elderly patients.