Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18002140

ABSTRACT

Use of extended electrocardiography (ECG) for detection of sleep disordered breathing SDB when obstructive sleep apneas and Cheyne-Stokes breathing are simultaneously present is explored. A multi-tier algorithm is designed that uses quantitative changes in the morphology of the QRS complex of Lead 1 and V4 due of SDB events and combines those changes with variations in heart rate to detect each type of SDB. For this purpose, ECG signals are divided into 15 minute epochs. These epochs are then subjected to baseline wander removal and R peak detection. An envelope of R peaks is computed to derive R Wave Attenuation (RWA). Concurrently, the heart rate variability (HRV) is also computed. Various biomarkers derived from these trends are combined to develop an algorithm to classify Normal, OSA and CSR epochs. One hundred and five (105) data clips from 15 subjects were used to test the proposed algorithm. It produced detection rates of 93.75%, 100% and 83.3% for Normal, OSA and CSR epochs respectively in case of training set (66 clips). Detection rates of 75%, 85.71% and 70.5% for Normal, OSA and CSR epochs respectively were obtained in case of test set (39 clips).


Subject(s)
Artificial Intelligence , Cheyne-Stokes Respiration/diagnosis , Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted/methods , Electrocardiography/methods , Pattern Recognition, Automated/methods , Polysomnography/methods , Sleep Apnea, Obstructive/diagnosis , Algorithms , Cheyne-Stokes Respiration/complications , Female , Humans , Male , Reproducibility of Results , Sensitivity and Specificity , Sleep Apnea, Obstructive/complications
2.
Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc ; 2006: 3561-4, 2006.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17947037

ABSTRACT

High cost of diagnostic studies to detect sleep disordered breathing and lack of availability of certified sleep laboratories in all inhabited areas make investigation of alternative methods of detecting sleep disordered breathing attractive. This study aimed to explore the possibility of discerning obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) from Cheyne-Stokes respiration (CSR) using overnight electrocardiography (ECG). Polysomnographic and ECG signals were acquired from the 13 OSA and 7 CSR volunteer subjects. Two signals: R-Wave Attenuation (RWA) and Heart Rate Variability (HRV) series were derived from the ECG. Using frequency domain analysis, various frequency bands in the power spectrum of RWA and HRV signals were identified that showed sensitivity to OSA and CSR events. A three-stage algorithm was developed to detect and differentiate OSA events from CSR events using RWA and HRV analysis. To test the algorithm, the ECG data was divided into fifteen minute epochs for analysis. Seventy two epochs containing OSA and 72 with CSR events were selected. 48 OSA clips and 48 CSR clips were randomly selected to form the training set. The remaining 24 clips in each category formed the test set. This method produced an average sensitivity of 95.83% and specificity of 79.16% in the training set and sensitivity of 87.5% and a specificity of 75% in the test set.


Subject(s)
Cheyne-Stokes Respiration/physiopathology , Sleep Apnea, Obstructive/physiopathology , Adult , Aged , Cheyne-Stokes Respiration/classification , Diagnosis, Differential , Electrocardiography , Female , Heart Rate , Humans , Incidence , Male , Middle Aged , Polysomnography , Sleep Apnea, Obstructive/classification , Sleep Apnea, Obstructive/epidemiology
3.
Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc ; 2005: 1216-9, 2005.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17282412

ABSTRACT

Spectral analysis was carried out on the R-Wave Attenuation (RWA) trend and Heart Rate Variability (HRV) series, derived from the polysomnographic Electrocardiogram (ECG) of the subjects with and without Cheyne Stokes Breathing. Nocturnal polysomnography was performed on 16 Normal subjects and 7 subjects with Cheyne Stokes Breathing (CSB) patients. The polysomnographic ECG data was divided into fifteen minute epochs for analysis. These epochs are processed to obtain the RWA. Hilbert Transform based algorithm [4] was used for QRS detection. Power spectrum of RWA and HRV are computed for each clip by using Welch's averaged periodogram method. HRV is sensitive to REM sleep as well and hence not specific to sleep apnea [12]. Hence the parameters derived from HRV alone cannot be used as diagnostic markers. Hence a combined detection scheme which uses parameters derived from RWA and HRV power spectrum is used in the proposed method to increase detection accuracy. This method produced a sensitivity of 84.75% and specificity of 87.03% in the training set and sensitivity of 85.78% and a specificity of 87.19% in the test set.

4.
Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc ; 2004: 3885-8, 2004.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17271145

ABSTRACT

Time domain analysis was carried out on the R-wave attenuation (RWA) envelope of the subjects with and without obstructive sleep apnea. The RWA envelope is derived from the morphology of the electrocardiogram (ECG) obtained during polysomnography data collection of the subjects. Nocturnal polysomnography was performed on 16 normal subjects and 14 obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) patients. The ECG from the polysomnography data was divided into fifteen minute epochs for analysis. The QRS detection was carried out by an algorithm using Hilbert transform. Standard deviation of each of the fifteen one minute epochs in fifteen minute epoch of the RWA envelope was calculated. Standard deviation of these fifteen parameters was observed to have considerably good sensitivity and specificity to sleep apnea. For the clips selected from normal subjects, the parameter produced a sensitivity of 78.57% and specificity of 70.33% for the training set and sensitivity of 87.5% and specificity of 80.95 for the testing set. For the clips selected from OSA subjects, the parameter produced a sensitivity of 72.46% and specificity of 73.53% for the training set and sensitivity of 82.86% and specificity of 66.67% for the testing set.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL