Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal ; 24(1): e123-e129, 2019 Jan 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30573720

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to identify (1) the predilection site of postoperative infection after third molar extraction surgery, (2) risk factors associated with postoperative infection, and (3) the cause of the difference between delayed- and early-onset infections. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study included 1010 patients (396 male, 614 female) who had ≥1 third molars extracted (2407; 812 maxilla, 1595 mandible). The risk factors were classified as attributes, general health, anatomic, and operative. Outcome variables were delayed- and early-onset infections. RESULTS: Postoperative infection was completely absent in the maxilla, and all infections occurred in the mandible, with a probability of 1.94% (31/1595). Bivariate analysis for postoperative infection showed depth of inclusion and intraoperative hemostatic treatment to be significantly associated with the development of infections. Bivariate analysis for delayed- and early-onset infections showed simultaneous extraction of the left and right mandibular third molars to be prominent risk factors. CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative infection occurs mainly in the mandible, and that in the maxilla is very rare. The risk of postoperative infection in the mandible was found to be related to the depth of inclusion and intraoperative hemostatic treatment. Simultaneous extraction of the left and right mandibular third molars appear to increase the risk of delayed-onset postoperative infection.


Subject(s)
Bacterial Infections/epidemiology , Mandibular Diseases/epidemiology , Molar, Third/surgery , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Tooth Extraction , Adult , Female , Humans , Male , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors
2.
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg ; 47(12): 1581-1586, 2018 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30049607

ABSTRACT

The removal of titanium miniplates is a controversial topic in oral and maxillofacial surgery. This retrospective study examined the timing of and reasons for titanium plate removal after orthognathic surgery. The study included 240 orthognathic surgery patients (71 male, 169 female; age range 16-55 years, mean 25.0±8.8 years) who had maxillofacial osteosynthesis plates inserted or inserted and then removed at the Division of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Kagawa Prefectural Central Hospital, between April 2003 and March 2017. During the study period, a total of 717 miniplates were inserted in the 240 patients, and 71 of the patients (29.6%) had 236 plates (32.9%) removed. Ten patients (14.1%) had their plates removed within a year due to early complications. Although no patient had their plate removed due to complications at 1-5 years postoperative, a further 14 patients (19.7%) had their plates removed after more than 5 years of long-term follow-up due to plate-related complications. Complications requiring plate removal were evidently biphasic, occurring within 1 year after the operation and at ≥5 years after the operation. Therefore, after confirming postoperative bone healing, it is necessary to explain to patients the risks of plate removal and the importance of long-term follow-up.


Subject(s)
Bone Plates , Device Removal , Postoperative Complications/surgery , Adolescent , Adult , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Orthognathic Surgical Procedures , Retrospective Studies , Titanium
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...