Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
BMJ Open ; 6(9): e008810, 2016 09 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27601484

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Laparoscopic surgery combined with enhanced recovery programmes has become the gold standard in the elective management of colorectal disease. However, there is no consensus with regard to the optimal perioperative analgesic regime in this cohort of patients, with a number of options available, including thoracic epidural spinal analgesia, patient-controlled analgesia, subcutaneous and/or intraperitoneal local anaesthetics, local anaesthetic wound infiltration catheters and transversus abdominis plane blocks. This study aims to explore any differences in analgesic strategies employed across the North East of England and to assess whether any variation in practice has an impact on clinical outcomes. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: All North East Colorectal units will be recruited for participation by the Northern Surgical Trainees Research Association (NoSTRA). Data will be collected over a consecutive 2-month period. Outcome measures will include postoperative pain score, postoperative opioid analgesic use and side effects, length of stay, 30-day complication rates, 30-day reoperative rates and 30-day readmission rates. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval for this study has been granted by the National Research Ethics Service. The protocol will be disseminated through NoSTRA. Individual unit data will be presented at local meetings. Overall collective data will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at relevant surgical meetings.


Subject(s)
Anesthesia, Conduction/methods , Laparoscopy/adverse effects , Pain Management/methods , Perioperative Care/methods , Reoperation/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Analgesics, Opioid/therapeutic use , Colon/surgery , Elective Surgical Procedures/adverse effects , England , Female , Humans , Laparoscopy/methods , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data , Male , Middle Aged , Pain Measurement , Pain, Postoperative/etiology , Patient Readmission/statistics & numerical data , Prospective Studies , Rectum/surgery , Research Design , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
2.
BMJ Case Rep ; 20152015 Mar 27.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25819824

ABSTRACT

A 76-year-old man was admitted with bleeding per-urostomy following a collapse at home. Three weeks prior to the admission, he had undergone a radical cystoprostatectomy and formation of ileal-conduit for an extensive bladder carcinoma. A CT angiogram revealed a possible small source of bleeding within the ileal-conduit itself, which settled with conservative management. However, prior to discharge he developed profuse fresh bleeding from the urostomy, which could not be controlled. The patient underwent an emergency endoscopy of the conduit and laparotomy, which revealed a fistula between the right external iliac artery and the proximal end of the ileal-conduit. The right iliac artery was ligated and an emergency left-to-right femoral-femoral crossover bypass was performed. The right ureter was stented and rediverted through the ileal-conduit and the left ureter was stented at a later date. He unfortunately had a stormy postoperative recovery with further episodes of per-urostomy bleeding and no identified source.


Subject(s)
Cystectomy/adverse effects , Fistula/etiology , Hemorrhage/etiology , Iliac Artery , Prostatectomy/adverse effects , Urinary Diversion , Aged , Carcinoma, Transitional Cell/surgery , Diagnosis, Differential , Fistula/surgery , Humans , Iliac Artery/surgery , Male , Prostatic Hyperplasia/surgery , Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/surgery
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...