Results From a Pilot Study of an Automated Directly Observed Therapy Intervention Using Artificial Intelligence With Conditional Economic Incentives Among Young Adults With HIV.

BACKGROUND: Despite improvements in antiretroviral therapy (ART) availability, suboptimal adherence is common among youth with HIV (YWH) and can increase drug resistance and poor clinical outcomes. Our study examined an innovative mobile app-based intervention that used automated directly observed therapy (aDOT) using artificial intelligence, along with conditional economic incentives (CEIs) to improve ART adherence and enhance viral suppression among YWH. SETTING: We conducted a pilot study of the aDOT-CEI intervention, informed by the operant framework of Key Principles in Contingency Management Implementation, to improve ART adherence among YWH (18-29) in California and Florida who had an unsuppressed HIV viral load. METHODS: We recruited 28 virally unsuppressed YWH from AIDS Healthcare Foundation clinics, who used the aDOT platform for 3 months. Study outcomes included feasibility and acceptability, self-reported ART adherence, and HIV viral load. RESULTS: Participants reported high satisfaction with the app (91%), and 82% said that it helped them take their medication. Comfort with the security and privacy of the app was moderate (55%), and 59% indicated the incentives helped improve daily adherence. CONCLUSIONS: Acceptability and feasibility of the aDOT-CEI intervention were high with potential to improve viral suppression, although some a priori metrics were not met. Pilot results suggest refinements which may improve intervention outcomes, including increased incentive amounts, provision of additional information, and reassurance about app privacy and security. Additional research is recommended to test the efficacy of the aDOT-CEI intervention to improve viral suppression in a larger sample.

Youth Ending the HIV Epidemic (YEHE): Protocol for a pilot of an automated directly observed therapy intervention with conditional economic incentives among young adults with HIV.

BACKGROUND: Young adults have a disproportionately high rate of HIV infection, high rates of attrition at all stages of the HIV care continuum, and an elevated probability of disease progression and transmission. Tracking and monitoring objective measures of antiretroviral therapy (ART) adherence in real time is critical to bolster the accuracy of research data, support adherence, and improve clinical outcomes. However, adherence monitoring often relies on self-reported and retrospective data or requires additional effort from providers to understand individual adherence patterns. In this study, we will monitor medication-taking using a real-time objective measure of adherence that does not rely on self-report or healthcare providers for measurement. METHODS: The Youth Ending the HIV Epidemic (YEHE) study will pilot a novel automated directly observed therapy-conditional economic incentive (aDOT-CEI) intervention to improve ART adherence among youth with HIV (YWH) in California and Florida who have an unsuppressed HIV viral load. The aDOT app uses facial recognition to record adherence each day, and then economic incentives are given based on a participant's confirmed adherence. We will enroll participants in a 3-month pilot study to assess the feasibility and acceptability of the aDOT-CEI intervention using predefined metrics. During and after the trial, a subsample of the pilot participants and staff/providers from participating AIDS Healthcare Foundation (AHF) clinics will participate in individual in-depth interviews to explore intervention and implementation facilitators and barriers. DISCUSSION: YEHE will provide data on the use of an aDOT-CEI intervention to improve adherence among YWH who are not virologically suppressed. The YEHE study will document the feasibility and acceptability and will explore preliminary data to inform a trial to test the efficacy of aDOT-CEI. This intervention has the potential to effectively improve ART adherence and virologic suppression among a key population experiencing health disparities. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial registration number is NCT05789875.

iVY: protocol for a randomised clinical trial to test the effect of a technology-based intervention to improve virological suppression among young adults with HIV in the USA.

INTRODUCTION: Young adults with HIV (YWH) experience worse clinical outcomes than adults and have high rates of substance use (SU) and mental illness that impact their engagement in care and adherence to antiretroviral therapy (ART). The intervention for Virologic Suppression in Youth (iVY) aims to address treatment engagement/adherence, mental health (MH) and SU in a tailored manner using a differentiated care approach that is youth friendly. Findings will provide information about the impact of iVY on HIV virological suppression, MH and SU among YWH who are disproportionately impacted by HIV and at elevated risk for poor health outcomes. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The iVY study will test the effect of a technology-based intervention with differing levels of resource requirements (ie, financial and personnel time) in a randomised clinical trial with an adaptive treatment strategy among 200 YWH (18-29 years old). The primary outcome is HIV virological suppression measured via dried blood spot. This piloted and protocolised intervention combines: (1) brief weekly sessions with a counsellor via a video-chat platform (video-counselling) to discuss MH, SU, HIV care engagement/adherence and other barriers to care; and (2) a mobile health app to address barriers such as ART forgetfulness, and social isolation. iVY has the potential to address important, distinct and changing barriers to HIV care engagement (eg, MH, SU) to increase virological suppression among YWH at elevated risk for poor health outcomes. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study and its protocols have been approved by the University of California, San Francisco Institutional Review Board. Study staff will work with a Youth Advisory Panel to disseminate results to YWH, participants and the academic community. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05877729.

Availability of Extragenital Chlamydia and Gonorrhea Testing in 6 High-Incidence States.

BACKGROUND: Extragenital testing (rectal and oropharyngeal) of Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) and Neisseria gonorrhoeae (NG) increases the detection of CT/NG infections, compared with genital testing alone. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommends annual extragenital CT/NG screening for men who have sex with men, and additional screenings for women and transgender or gender-diverse individuals if certain sexual behaviors and exposures are reported. METHODS: Prospective computer-assisted telephonic interviews were conducted with 873 clinics between June 2022 and September 2022. The computer-assisted telephonic interview followed a semistructured questionnaire that included closed-ended questions on the availability and accessibility of CT/NG testing. RESULTS: Of the 873 clinics, CT/NG testing was offered in 751 clinics (86.0%), and extragenital testing was offered in only 432 clinics (57.5%). Most clinics (74.5%) with extragenital testing do not offer tests unless patients request them and/or report symptoms. Additional barriers to accessing information on available CT/NG testing include clinics not picking up the telephone, disconnecting the call, and unwillingness or inability to answer questions. CONCLUSIONS: Despite evidence-based recommendations from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the availability of extragenital CT/NG testing is moderate. Patients seeking extragenital testing may encounter barriers such as fulfilling specific criteria or being unable to access information on testing availability.

Laboratory validation and clinical performance of a saliva-based test for monkeypox virus.

Improved diagnostic tests and accessibility are essential for controlling the outbreak of monkeypox. We describe a saliva-based polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay for monkeypox virus, in vitro test performance, and clinical implementation of that assay in Los Angeles, San Francisco, and Palm Springs, CA. Finally, using prespecified search terms, we conducted a systematic rapid review of PubMed and Web of Science online databases of studies reporting the performance of oral pharyngeal or saliva-based tests for the monkeypox virus. The assay showed in silico inclusivity of 100% for 97 strains of monkeypox virus, with an analytic sensitivity of 250 copies/ml, and 100% agreement compared to known positive and negative specimens. Clinical testing identified 22 cases of monkeypox among 132 individuals (16.7%), of which 16 (72.7%) reported symptoms, 4 (18.2%) without a rash at the time of testing. Of an additional 18 patients with positive lesion tests, 16 (88.9%) had positive saliva tests. Our systematic review identified six studies; 100% of tests on oropharyngeal specimens from 23 patients agreed with the PCR test result of a lesion. Saliva-based PCR tests are potential tools for case identification, and further evaluation of the performance of such tests is warranted.

Digital directly observed therapy to monitor adherence to medications: a scoping review.

Background: Technology-based directly observed therapy (DOT) is more cost-effective and efficient compared with in-person monitoring visits for medication adherence. While some evidence shows these technologies are feasible and acceptable, there is limited evidence collating information across medical conditions or in the context of HIV prevention, care, and treatment.Objectives: We conducted a scoping review to understand the current evidence on the acceptability, feasibility, and efficacy of digital DOT to improve medication adherence and, specifically, to determine if digital DOT had been used to improve adherence for HIV prevention, care, and treatmentMethods: We searched the electronic databases PubMed, Embase, and the Web of Science in January 2021 for any published studies with terms related to digital technologies and DOT. We included peer-reviewed studies in any population, from any country, for any outcome, and excluded conference abstracts. We included three types of digital DOT interventions: synchronous DOT, asynchronous DOT, and automated DOT. We provide an assessment of the current evidence, gaps in literature, and opportunities for intervention development regarding the use digital DOT to improve antiretroviral therapy (ART) adherence, specifically in the field of HIV.Results: We identified 28 studies that examined digital DOT. All studies found digital DOT to be acceptable and feasible. Patients using digital DOT had higher rates of treatment completion, observed doses, and adherence compared with in-person DOT, although data were limited on adherence. Only one study examined HIV prevention, and none examined ART adherence for HIV treatment.Conclusions: Digital DOT is acceptable and feasible but has not been used to remotely monitor and support ART adherence for people living with HIV.

Incarceration and COVID-19: Recommendations to Curb COVID-19 Disease Transmission in Prison Facilities and Surrounding Communities.

Overcrowding can increase the risk of disease transmission, such as that of SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19), within United States prisons. The number of COVID-19 cases among prisoners is higher than that among the general public, and this disparity is further increased for prisoners of color. This report uses the example case of the COVID-19 pandemic to observe prison conditions and preventive efforts, address racial disparities for people of color, and guide structural improvements for sustaining inmate health during a pandemic in four select states: California, New York, Illinois, and Florida. To curb the further spread of COVID-19 among prisoners and their communities, safe public health practices must be implemented including providing personal protective equipment (PPE) and testing of staff and inmates, disseminating culturally and language appropriate information regarding the pandemic and preventive precautions, introducing social distancing measures, and ensuring adequate resources to safely reintegrate released prisoners into their communities.

Clinical Factors Associated With Accurate Presumptive Treatment of Neisseria gonorrhoeae Infections in Men Who Have Sex with Men and Transgender Women.

BACKGROUND: Neisseria gonorrhoeae (N. gonorrhoeae) infections have increased among men who have sex with men and are high among transgender women. Presumptive treatment guidelines may lead to inaccurate treatments and possible antibiotic resistance. Using patient data from AIDS Healthcare Foundation sexually transmitted infection (STI) testing clinics in California and Florida, we identified clinical factors associated with accurate presumptive N. gonorrhoeae treatment. METHODS: Multivariable logistic regression analyses were conducted using patient visit data from 2013 to 2017. A sample of 42 050 patient encounters were analyzed. The primary outcome variable included accurate versus inaccurate presumptive treatment. Risk ratios were generated for particular symptoms, high-risk sexual behavior, and history of N. gonorrhoeae. RESULTS: Twelve percent (5051/42 050) of patients received presumptive N. gonorrhoeae treatment, and 46% (2329/5051) of presumptively treated patients tested positive for N. gonorrhoeae infection. Patients presenting with discharge or patients presenting with dysuria were more likely to receive accurate presumptive treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Providers should continue to follow the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention guidelines and consider presumptive N. gonorrhoeae treatment based on specific symptoms. As the STI epidemic continues to rise in the United States, along with increased antibiotic resistance, it is imperative to accurately test, diagnose, and treat populations at risk for N. gonorrhoeae and other STIs.

Barriers to hepatitis C direct-acting antiviral therapy among HIV/hepatitis C virus-coinfected persons.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) have increased hepatitis C virus (HCV) treatment opportunities for vulnerable HIV/HCV coinfected persons. The aim of this study was to identify the frequency of and potential barriers to DAA prescription in HIV/HCV patients during the first few years of DAA availability in the United States. METHODS: The AIDS Healthcare Foundation electronic medical record system was queried to identify all HCV viremic HIV-infected patients in care at AIDS Healthcare Foundation Healthcare centers in January 2015-August 2017 and compare characteristics by receipt of a DAA prescription. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were conducted to examine factors associated with DAA prescription. RESULTS: Of 826 eligible patients, 355 (43%) were prescribed a DAA; among those not prescribed a DAA, 301 (64%) had well-controlled HIV (HIV RNA ≤ 200 copies per mL). In multivariate logistic regression analysis, patients with a history of substance use (odds ratio [OR], 0.51 [95% confidence interval 0.35-0.73]) or on select HIV antiretroviral regimens were less likely to be prescribed a DAA. Those who had well-controlled HIV (OR, 5.03 [3.06-8.27]), CD4 + T cell count >200 cells per mm3 (OR, 1.85 [1.04-3.30]), estimated glomerular filtration rate >60 mL/min/1.73 m2 (OR, 3.32 [1.08-10.15]), or established care prior to January 2015 (OR, 1.57 [1.08-2.29] were more likely to be prescribed a DAA. CONCLUSIONS: In addition to lack of HIV suppression, select antiretroviral regimens, substance use, and kidney disease appeared to limit DAA prescription in the early interferon-free DAA era. Many were not prescribed DAAs despite HIV suppression. Further research is needed to determine if the observed associations persist today.

Brief Report: Discrepancies Between Self-Reported Adherence and a Biomarker of Adherence in Real-World Settings.

BACKGROUND: Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is only effective in preventing new HIV infections when taken consistently. In clinical practice, asking a patient about their adherence (self-report) is the predominant method of assessing adherence to PrEP. Although inexpensive and noninvasive, self-report is subject to social desirability and recall biases. Several clinical trials demonstrate a discrepancy between self-reported adherence and biomarker-based recent adherence. Less is known about the accuracy of self-report in real-world clinical settings. This brief report addresses this knowledge gap and describes the concordance between self-reported adherence and biomarker-based adherence in real-world clinical settings. METHODS: A liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry urine test for tenofovir was developed and used clinically to detect recent nonadherence (no dose in at least 48 hours) for each individual. Two clinics' standard operating procedures recommend utilization of the urine-based adherence test for patients who self-report that they are not struggling with adherence. Those who self-report struggling with adherence receive enhanced adherence support without the need for additional testing. The number of results indicating recent nonadherence from these 2 clinics were analyzed to assess the concordance between self-reported adherence and biomarker-based adherence. RESULTS: Across 2 clinics, 3987 tests were conducted from patients self-reporting as "adherent," and 564 [14.1%; 95% confidence interval (CI): 13.1% to 15.2%] demonstrated recent nonadherence with the liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry test. At clinic #1 in Florida, 3200 tests were conducted, and 465 (14.5%; 95% CI: 13.3% to 15.8%) demonstrated recent nonadherence. At clinic #2 in Texas, 787 tests were conducted, and 99 (12.6%; 95% CI: 10.4% to 14.9%) demonstrated recent nonadherence. CONCLUSIONS: Utilization of biomarker-based adherence monitoring at these 2 clinics resulted in 564 additional patients receiving enhanced adherence support who otherwise would not have been identified as nonadherent to their prescribed PrEP regimen. These findings suggest that objective adherence monitoring can be used clinically to enable providers to identify nonadherent patients and allocate support services accordingly.

Evaluation of the Performance of a Point-of-Care Test for Chlamydia and Gonorrhea.

Importance: Rates of chlamydial and gonococcal infection continue to increase in the United States, as do the associated costs of untreated infections. Improved diagnostic technologies that support testing and treating in 1 clinical visit are critical to advancing efforts to control the rates of chlamydial and gonococcal infection. Objective: To evaluate the clinical performance of a point-of-care (POC) molecular diagnostic assay for the detection of chlamydia and gonorrhea. Design, Setting, and Participants: A noninterventional, cross-sectional clinical study was conducted from September 18, 2018, through March 13, 2019, at sexually transmitted infection (STI), HIV, family planning, and obstetrics and gynecology clinics where STI screening is routine, using a convenience sample and comparing commercially available assays with a new 30-minute POC assay. Patients included were those eligible for STI screening or diagnostic testing who had not taken antibiotics effective against chlamydia or gonorrhea within the previous 28 days. Four vaginal swab samples were collected from women and a first-catch urine sample was obtained from men. Main Outcomes and Measures: A composite infection status was used to classify participants as infected if 2 or more comparator results were positive, as not infected if 2 or more comparator samples were negative, and as unevaluable if 1 result was invalid and the other 2 results did not agree with each other. Results: Swab samples from 1523 women (median age, 27 years [interquartile range, 17-37 years]), 817 (53.6%) of whom presented with symptoms, and 922 men (median age, 29 years [interquartile range, 17-41 years]), 308 (33.4%) of whom were symptomatic, were tested. For chlamydia, sensitivity of the new POC assay was 96.1% (95% CI, 91.2%-98.3%) for women and 92.5% (95% CI, 86.4%-96.0%) for men. For gonorrhea, sensitivity estimates were 100.0% (95% CI, 92.1%-100.0%) for women and 97.3% (95% CI, 90.7%-99.3%) for men. For chlamydia, specificity of the new POC assay was 99.1% (95% CI, 98.4%-99.5%) for women and 99.3% (95% CI, 98.4%-99.7%) for men. For gonorrhea, specificity estimates were 99.9% (95% CI, 99.5%-100%) for women and 100% (95% CI, 95.5%-100%) for men. Non-laboratory-trained personnel performed 94.8% of all tests (2318 of 2445) during the study. Conclusions and Relevance: This study suggests that self-obtained vaginal swab samples were associated with performance equivalent to laboratory-based molecular diagnostics, which can support use of this POC assay in many settings. The availability of an easy-to-use, rapid (30-minute) molecular test for accurate detection of chlamydia and gonorrhea has the power to facilitate testing and treatment in a single patient visit for these STIs.